Uploaded August 2024 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Clip of Walksnail HDMI out to an IPS screen - youtube.com/watch?v=eNNo7Nl7z9c
The first test was using the stock Walksnail antennas on the receiver which are basically trash. I put Lumenier Double AXII 2's on the top and replaced the built in patches with iFlight Crystal HD patches I used to use for DJI.
I could actually go around a building in front of me after that but it still wasn't beating the O3. I was also able to barely go around the building behind me so with good antennas and a good receiving location I can see how the range can be pretty decent without LOS.
In my first test I mentioned the Avatar video not being as good as the O3 but now I can see it's at least equal or better. It's the crap skyzone goggles that give me the poor video. When using the HDMI out on the receiver into some decent IPS monitor the image looks crystal clear with good signal. It does get a little hard to see at below 7Mbps though. I would definitely put the GT on a better car especially since it can easily do HD to a screen and works good at night.
The O3 still holds up better to me as far as the overall image quality vs signal and I can go around more things with it. If I wanted more absolute range on the ground I'd go with the O3. If I wanted more absolute range in the AIR, and more features as well as an overall easier process to it all I'd go with the GT.
Clip of Walksnail HDMI out to an IPS screen - youtube.com/watch?v=eNNo7Nl7z9c
The first test was using the stock Walksnail antennas on the receiver which are basically trash. I put Lumenier Double AXII 2's on the top and replaced the built in patches with iFlight Crystal HD patches I used to use for DJI.
I could actually go around a building in front of me after that but it still wasn't beating the O3. I was also able to barely go around the building behind me so with good antennas and a good receiving location I can see how the range can be pretty decent without LOS.
In my first test I mentioned the Avatar video not being as good as the O3 but now I can see it's at least equal or better. It's the crap skyzone goggles that give me the poor video. When using the HDMI out on the receiver into some decent IPS monitor the image looks crystal clear with good signal. It does get a little hard to see at below 7Mbps though. I would definitely put the GT on a better car especially since it can easily do HD to a screen and works good at night.
The O3 still holds up better to me as far as the overall image quality vs signal and I can go around more things with it. If I wanted more absolute range on the ground I'd go with the O3. If I wanted more absolute range in the AIR, and more features as well as an overall easier process to it all I'd go with the GT.
