Uploaded May 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Melbourne Symphony Orchestra conducted by John Lanchbery.
I - Andante tranquillo - Un poco più animato - Allegro agitato (ma non troppo presto) - Tempo I - Andante: 0:00
II - Scherzo. Allegretto vivace: 13:00
III - Andante molto: 18:24
IV - Carnival. Allegro vivacissimo - Plus vite - Animato - Più presto: 26:39
Bizet's Rome Symphony had a long and complicated history. The piece was conceived in 1860, after Bizet's stay in Italy from winning the Prix de Rome, calling it at first "Rome, Venice, Florence and Naples". However, only the scherzo was finished by 1861, being premiered on January 11 of 1863 in the Concerts Pasdeloup. In 1866 the first version of the work was finished, dropping all extramusical elements, but Bizet was unsatisfied with it, rewriting it all again except the scherzo.
These three revised movements were premiered on February 28 of 1869 under the direction of Jules Pasdeloup. By then the piece was retitled as "Fantaisie symphonique: Souvenirs de Rome", with subtitles intended to evoke suggestions in the audience, with music that barely has any descriptive details. Bizet was still unsatisfied and kept revising the work. By 1871 he seems to have dropped work on his revisions, being focussed on other projects while it was performed as the Rome Symphony. After Bizet's death in 1875, the score was premiered that year in its final version. Its publication in 1880 as the "Troisième Suite de Concert", still sparks debate about the nature of the work; Is it a symphony? A suite? A symphonic fantasy?
The first movement is structured in an modified sonata form. It was originally subtitled as "Rome", then later "Une Chasse dans la forêt d’Ostie" (A Hunt in the Forest of Ostia). Both were removed later on. It begins with a solemn theme on four horns, later joined by woodwinds and strings. An accelerando leads us to the main allegro, in which and agitated and passionate main theme is presented on strings. It is contrasted by a lyric and romantic second theme. A stormy development ensues, with brief references by the horns of the opening theme, then taken by strings. After a brief transition, the introduction is fully repeated, ending the movement with a serene coda.
The second movement is a scherzo in ternary form, being originally subtitled "Florence" before it was removed. It opens with an animated and playful main theme on violins, which gradually passes to the rest of strings in contrapuntal imitation. Its initial figure persists through the whole movement. The central trio section contains a deeply lyrical second theme, almost like a wordless aria underpinned by the rhythmic figure. The scherzo then continues until a charming little coda ends the movement.
The third movement is written in ternary form. It was originally titled as "Venice", and then just as "Une Procession" (A Procession), both again being removed. It begins with a contemplative and lyrical main theme on strings, full of yearning and rising to a passionate climax. The clarinet, and then the rest of the wood, takes it in dialogue with the strings. The central section opens as a second melodic theme appears, hardly contrasting but more bright and uplifting. This whole passage, before the main theme is recapitulated by the horn supported by string arabesques. A serene coda ends the andante.
The fourth movement is structured in sonata form. It was originally titled as "Naples" and after "Carnaval à Rome" (Carnival in Rome), then shortened to "Carnival" when published. It opens with a lively and colourful main theme in form of a tarantella, presented on the oboe and unfolded with a superb orchestration. A more lyric and noble second theme is introduced by strings. Follows an intense and rich development section, characterized by its drastic changes of tempo and dynamics. The recapitulation begins with the return of the tarantella theme, followed by the second one. A triumphal climax leads us to an exciting coda that ends the work brilliantly.
Picture: "Modern Rome - Campo Vaccino" (1839) by the English painter J.M.W. Turner.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/2b4rtamy and tinyurl.com/2aelvgel
Score: tinyurl.com/26qorbll
Melbourne Symphony Orchestra conducted by John Lanchbery.
I - Andante tranquillo - Un poco più animato - Allegro agitato (ma non troppo presto) - Tempo I - Andante: 0:00
II - Scherzo. Allegretto vivace: 13:00
III - Andante molto: 18:24
IV - Carnival. Allegro vivacissimo - Plus vite - Animato - Più presto: 26:39
Bizet's Rome Symphony had a long and complicated history. The piece was conceived in 1860, after Bizet's stay in Italy from winning the Prix de Rome, calling it at first "Rome, Venice, Florence and Naples". However, only the scherzo was finished by 1861, being premiered on January 11 of 1863 in the Concerts Pasdeloup. In 1866 the first version of the work was finished, dropping all extramusical elements, but Bizet was unsatisfied with it, rewriting it all again except the scherzo.
These three revised movements were premiered on February 28 of 1869 under the direction of Jules Pasdeloup. By then the piece was retitled as "Fantaisie symphonique: Souvenirs de Rome", with subtitles intended to evoke suggestions in the audience, with music that barely has any descriptive details. Bizet was still unsatisfied and kept revising the work. By 1871 he seems to have dropped work on his revisions, being focussed on other projects while it was performed as the Rome Symphony. After Bizet's death in 1875, the score was premiered that year in its final version. Its publication in 1880 as the "Troisième Suite de Concert", still sparks debate about the nature of the work; Is it a symphony? A suite? A symphonic fantasy?
The first movement is structured in an modified sonata form. It was originally subtitled as "Rome", then later "Une Chasse dans la forêt d’Ostie" (A Hunt in the Forest of Ostia). Both were removed later on. It begins with a solemn theme on four horns, later joined by woodwinds and strings. An accelerando leads us to the main allegro, in which and agitated and passionate main theme is presented on strings. It is contrasted by a lyric and romantic second theme. A stormy development ensues, with brief references by the horns of the opening theme, then taken by strings. After a brief transition, the introduction is fully repeated, ending the movement with a serene coda.
The second movement is a scherzo in ternary form, being originally subtitled "Florence" before it was removed. It opens with an animated and playful main theme on violins, which gradually passes to the rest of strings in contrapuntal imitation. Its initial figure persists through the whole movement. The central trio section contains a deeply lyrical second theme, almost like a wordless aria underpinned by the rhythmic figure. The scherzo then continues until a charming little coda ends the movement.
The third movement is written in ternary form. It was originally titled as "Venice", and then just as "Une Procession" (A Procession), both again being removed. It begins with a contemplative and lyrical main theme on strings, full of yearning and rising to a passionate climax. The clarinet, and then the rest of the wood, takes it in dialogue with the strings. The central section opens as a second melodic theme appears, hardly contrasting but more bright and uplifting. This whole passage, before the main theme is recapitulated by the horn supported by string arabesques. A serene coda ends the andante.
The fourth movement is structured in sonata form. It was originally titled as "Naples" and after "Carnaval à Rome" (Carnival in Rome), then shortened to "Carnival" when published. It opens with a lively and colourful main theme in form of a tarantella, presented on the oboe and unfolded with a superb orchestration. A more lyric and noble second theme is introduced by strings. Follows an intense and rich development section, characterized by its drastic changes of tempo and dynamics. The recapitulation begins with the return of the tarantella theme, followed by the second one. A triumphal climax leads us to an exciting coda that ends the work brilliantly.
Picture: "Modern Rome - Campo Vaccino" (1839) by the English painter J.M.W. Turner.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/2b4rtamy and tinyurl.com/2aelvgel
Score: tinyurl.com/26qorbll
![Symphony in E-flat major - Igor Stravinsky
Royal Scottish National Orchestra conducted by Sir Alexander Gibson.
I - Allegro moderato - Molto sostenuto - Poco meno mosso - Più mosso - Allegro molto - Tempo I: 0:00
II - Scherzo. Allegretto - Pochissimo meno mosso - Allegretto (Tempo I): 10:18
III - Largo: 16:04
IV - Finale. Allegro molto - Più tranquillo - L’istesso tempo - Un poco più tranquillo - L’istesso tempo - Presto - Molto pesante: 25:54
Stravinskys Symphony in E-flat major was composed between July 18 and September 24 of 1905, being his first major work under the close supervision of his teacher Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov. The second and third movements were performed in a private concert in St. Petersburg on March 27 of 1907, played by the St. Petersburg Court Orchestra conducted by Hugo Warlich, after which Stravinsky revised the orchestration. Its full public premiere took place on January 22 of 1908, with the same orchestra conducted by Felix Blumenfeld. A final revision of the orchestration took place in 1913, which was then performed in Montreux on April 2 of 1914, performed by the Orchestre du Kursaal conducted by Ernest Ansermet.
Unlike many other composers, Stravinsky did not dismiss the piece as a mere student exercise, as he conducted the symphony multiple times and even recorded it in 1960. The work shows the influence not only of Rimsky-Korsakov (to whom the work is dedicated), but also Tchaikovsky and Glazunov. Stravinsky later wrote about the work: I wrote this Symphony at a time when Glazunov reigned supreme. At that time I shared this admiration wholeheartedly. While the work is academic in nature, and clearly indebted to the grand Russian romantic tradition, an anticipation of Stravinskys own style can be clearly heard in the scherzo, which would be later used as an intermezzo in performances of the Ballets Russes.
The first movement is structured in sonata form, clearly influenced by Glazunov and Borodin. It begins with a brilliant and assertive main theme in E-flat major, presented by full orchestra and rising to a powerful climax. A transition leads to the more lyrical second theme in B-flat major introduced by the clarinet before passing onto strings. The ensuing development is dominated by the opening fragment of the main theme, boldly modulating to keys such as C minor, G minor and G-flat major. After a dramatic climax, the material is then brilliantly recapitulated in the home key of E-flat major. A slower transition leads to a syncopated coda, which ends the allegro with a final statement of the main theme.
The second movement is a scherzo in ternary form, influenced by Rimsky-Korsakov and Tchaikovsky. It opens with a rhythmic and vigorous main theme in B-flat major. The trio section features a more lyrical second theme in F major, presented by strings before woodwinds gradually join. It is based on the Russian folksong Tchitcher-Yatcher that Stravinsky would later reuse for his 1911 ballet Petrushka and his Three little songs of 1913. After a climax, both themes are contrapuntally combined in the key of E-flat major. The main theme is then recapitulated in the home key of B-flat major. A final repeat of the trio theme leads to a short and playful coda.
The third movement is also structured in ternary form, again showing the influence of Tchaikovsky, specially his Symphony No. 6 in B minor Pathétique. It begins with a lyrical and melancholic main theme in G-sharp minor, introduced by cellos and violas in pianissimo. It passes onto full strings, growing into two dramatic and expressive climaxes. The central section features a noble and melodic second theme in E major, introduced by the horn before passing onto strings and offering great contrast. The music then reaches the most intense climax yet, leading to the varied recapitulation of the main theme. The largo ends with a long, sparse and desolate coda that seems to anticipate the 1910 ballet The Firebird.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Colourful Life (1907) by the Russian-French painter Wassily Kandinsky.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2dqrhy9a, https://tinyurl.com/28w4fmyl and https://tinyurl.com/23cabkrk
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/29kk8cyy Symphony in E-flat major - Igor Stravinsky](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uFZFYhbipy8/mqdefault.jpg)








![Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo Polychoral Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli
Concerto Palatino conducted by Bruce Dickey.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo was published in Volume I of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form, it is scored for ten voices separated in two groups of five. The first with a cantus, septimus, altus, octavus and sextus. The second for a decimus, nonus, tenor and a bassus. The text is a selection of the Psalm 63, attributed to King David, set when he was in the wilderness of Judah, and its theme concerns being stranded in the wilderness away from ones family.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The popular historical imagination has long nourished a fascination with the cori spezzati (split choir) traditions of Venices San Marco Cathedral. Well-known complexities of this churchs architecture provide numerous locations for the placement of musical ensembles: multiple choir lofts around the altar, elevated galleries, and even oversized, raised pulpits. Though more sober historical analysis has tempered earlier concepts of a nearly Berliozian disposition of performing forces in San Marco, several generations of Venetian musicians cultivated music that exploits the contrasts between antiphonal groups. The trend culminates in the splendid polychoral motets of Andrea and Giovanni Gabrieli.
Although the score does not specify instrumentation, in practice it was common to reinforce or replace some voices with instruments such as cornettos, sackbuts or dulcians, in addition to the organ. This arrangement allowed for contrasting timbres and dynamics, alternating responsive passages between choirs and tutti sections that filled the space with a full and majestic sound. Structurally, the piece combines imitative sections with homophonic ones, always adapting the music to the meaning of the text. The opening invocation, Deus, Deus meus, is presented in a solemn and compact manner, while phrases such as Ad te de luce vigilo take on a more agile character, evoking the idea of vigilance and movement toward God. In Sitivit in te anima mea, the melodic lines ascend, symbolizing spiritual desire, and in Quam multipliciter tibi caro mea, the texture thickens to underline the intensity of devotion.
The harmonic language remains within a modal framework, with a predominance of modes such as Mixolydian and Dorian, and both authentic and plagal cadences articulate the sections. Gabrieli achieves a remarkable balance between textual clarity and sonorous richness, so that even in the densest passages, the words remain comprehensible. This motet is not only an example of Venetian sacred theatricality, but also a work that would influence later generations, such as Heinrich Schütz, who studied with Gabrieli and brought this style to Germanic lands.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: The three temptations of Christ in a 12th-century mosaic in St Marks Cathedral in Venice.
Source: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3 and Copilot GPT-5.
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2cg8oxkn Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo Polychoral Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v_pObKZY0QM/mqdefault.jpg)
