Uploaded April 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Performed by Martine Joste and Sylvaine Billier.
I - Presto (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 184) - Doppio più lento (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 92) - Tempo I - Doppio più lento - Tempo I - Doppio più lento - Tempo I: 0:00
II - (𝅘𝅥 = 54) - Allargando molto - Tempo I: 0:53
III - (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 138): 4:10
IV - (𝅘𝅥. = 100): 6:32
V - Poco rubato (𝅘𝅥 = 52) - Rallentando - Tempo I - Rallentando - Tempo I - Rallentando molto - A tempo: 7:32
VI - (𝅘𝅥 = 104) - Meno animato (𝅘𝅥 = 𝅘𝅥.) - Poco più lento - Rallentando - Tempo I: 11:27
VII - (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 112) - Rallentando molto lento - Tempo I - Poco più lento - Ritenuto molto - Lento: 13:13
VIII - Molto pesante (𝅘𝅥 = 63) - Leggiero - Violentemente - Impetuoso e poco accelerando - Poco più animato - Molto impetuoso - Tempo I - Lento: 15:43
IX - (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 126) - Poco più lento - Più lento - Tempo I: 18:24
X - (𝅘𝅥 = 116): 21:35
XI - Maestoso (𝅘𝅥 = 44) - Cantabile - Poco più animato (𝅘𝅥 = 66) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 44) - Poco più animato - Tempo I cantabile: 22:55
XII - (𝅘𝅥 = 126) - Con violenza - Meno animato - Espressivo e rubato - Ancora più lento - Tempo I - Con molta violenza: 26:06
XIII - (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 88) - Poco più lento - Poco più animato - Ancora più animato - Tempo I: 27:44
XIV - (𝅘𝅥 = 69): 30:43
XV - (𝅘𝅥 = 96) - Lento - A tempo: 33:16
XVI - Andante (𝅘𝅥 = 52) - Più lento - Lento: 34:46
XVII - (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Più lento (𝅘𝅥 = 48) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 72): 38:47
XVIII - (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 56): 39:55
XIX - (𝅘𝅥 = 120): 41:54
XX - (𝅘𝅥 = 92): 43:29
XXI - (𝅘𝅥. = 52) - Più lento - Lento: 44:28
XXII - (𝅘𝅥 = 84) - Più lento: 47:05
XXIII - (𝅘𝅥. = 100): 48:06
XXIV - Andante (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 100) - Più lento - Poco più animato - A tempo (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 100) - Più lento - Lento: 49:10
Wyschnegradsky's 24 Préludes Op. 22 were composed in 1934, based on the 13-tone scale. The composer revised the set much later on between 1960-70, including quarter tones outside said scale and some preludes being thoroughly recomposed. A selection was performed in Paris on January 25 of 1937, performed by Ina Marika and Edward Staempfli. Excerpts were also performed in U.S.A., Germany, Switzerland, Austria and Russia. The premiere of the complete cycle took place in Tokyo on December 11 of 1986, performed by Henriette Puig-Roget and Kazuoki Fujii.
Wyschnegradsky invented diatonicized chromaticism, and the 24 Preludes are based on the "chromatic scale diatonicized to 13 tones". This scale is constructed of two connected heptachords, and each heptachord follows a ½ – ½ – ½ – ½ – ½ – ¼ step interval pattern. He uses a circle of major fourths with the 13-tone scale in the 24-TET, similar to the circle of fifths with the diatonic scale in the 12-TET. Each prelude uses a different 13-tone scale, and they move clockwise on the circle.
While Wyschnegradsky uses the 13-tone scale to exhibit tonality, it is interesting to note that the number of perfect fifths in the scale is scarce and instead there are more major fourths (a quarter-tone larger than a perfect fourth) and minor fifths (a quarter-tone smaller than the perfect fifth). As a result of this scarcity of perfect fifths, it is impossible to create any conventional harmonies (major or minor triads, seventh chords, etc.) using the 13-tone scale. The perfect fifth is the most consonant interval other than the unison and the octave and it contributes to acoustic consonance, so why did Wyschnegradsky craft a quarter tone scale that lacks this interval? The answer lies within the 13-tone scale’s structural similarities to the diatonic scale and the acoustic consonance of the major fourth and minor fifth.
The construction of the 13-tone scale is structurally similar to the diatonic scale, and the two heptachords of the 13-tone scale are analogous to the two tetrachords of the diatonic scale. In fact, the term "diatonicized chromaticism" comes from 13-tone scale’s relationship to the diatonic and chromatic scales. The acoustic consonance of the major fourth and minor fifth help fill the perfect fifth scarcity. The major fourth ratio is 11:8, the minor fifth is 16:11, and both ratios closely approximate the 11th harmonic of the overtone series. The representation of the 11th harmonic has been made possible through the 24-TET. Minor fifths can be used in the harmony instead of perfect fifth, as it retains acoustic consonance and functional identity of chord (major triad, minor triad).
Picture: "Soft Pressure" (1931) by Russian-French painter Wassily Kandinsky.
Sources: tinyurl.com/2dqla7dp, tinyurl.com/265ovyhv and tinyurl.com/26klz3lq
To check the score: tinyurl.com/24wyv69x
Performed by Martine Joste and Sylvaine Billier.
I - Presto (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 184) - Doppio più lento (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 92) - Tempo I - Doppio più lento - Tempo I - Doppio più lento - Tempo I: 0:00
II - (𝅘𝅥 = 54) - Allargando molto - Tempo I: 0:53
III - (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 138): 4:10
IV - (𝅘𝅥. = 100): 6:32
V - Poco rubato (𝅘𝅥 = 52) - Rallentando - Tempo I - Rallentando - Tempo I - Rallentando molto - A tempo: 7:32
VI - (𝅘𝅥 = 104) - Meno animato (𝅘𝅥 = 𝅘𝅥.) - Poco più lento - Rallentando - Tempo I: 11:27
VII - (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 112) - Rallentando molto lento - Tempo I - Poco più lento - Ritenuto molto - Lento: 13:13
VIII - Molto pesante (𝅘𝅥 = 63) - Leggiero - Violentemente - Impetuoso e poco accelerando - Poco più animato - Molto impetuoso - Tempo I - Lento: 15:43
IX - (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 126) - Poco più lento - Più lento - Tempo I: 18:24
X - (𝅘𝅥 = 116): 21:35
XI - Maestoso (𝅘𝅥 = 44) - Cantabile - Poco più animato (𝅘𝅥 = 66) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 44) - Poco più animato - Tempo I cantabile: 22:55
XII - (𝅘𝅥 = 126) - Con violenza - Meno animato - Espressivo e rubato - Ancora più lento - Tempo I - Con molta violenza: 26:06
XIII - (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 88) - Poco più lento - Poco più animato - Ancora più animato - Tempo I: 27:44
XIV - (𝅘𝅥 = 69): 30:43
XV - (𝅘𝅥 = 96) - Lento - A tempo: 33:16
XVI - Andante (𝅘𝅥 = 52) - Più lento - Lento: 34:46
XVII - (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Più lento (𝅘𝅥 = 48) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 72): 38:47
XVIII - (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 56): 39:55
XIX - (𝅘𝅥 = 120): 41:54
XX - (𝅘𝅥 = 92): 43:29
XXI - (𝅘𝅥. = 52) - Più lento - Lento: 44:28
XXII - (𝅘𝅥 = 84) - Più lento: 47:05
XXIII - (𝅘𝅥. = 100): 48:06
XXIV - Andante (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 100) - Più lento - Poco più animato - A tempo (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 100) - Più lento - Lento: 49:10
Wyschnegradsky's 24 Préludes Op. 22 were composed in 1934, based on the 13-tone scale. The composer revised the set much later on between 1960-70, including quarter tones outside said scale and some preludes being thoroughly recomposed. A selection was performed in Paris on January 25 of 1937, performed by Ina Marika and Edward Staempfli. Excerpts were also performed in U.S.A., Germany, Switzerland, Austria and Russia. The premiere of the complete cycle took place in Tokyo on December 11 of 1986, performed by Henriette Puig-Roget and Kazuoki Fujii.
Wyschnegradsky invented diatonicized chromaticism, and the 24 Preludes are based on the "chromatic scale diatonicized to 13 tones". This scale is constructed of two connected heptachords, and each heptachord follows a ½ – ½ – ½ – ½ – ½ – ¼ step interval pattern. He uses a circle of major fourths with the 13-tone scale in the 24-TET, similar to the circle of fifths with the diatonic scale in the 12-TET. Each prelude uses a different 13-tone scale, and they move clockwise on the circle.
While Wyschnegradsky uses the 13-tone scale to exhibit tonality, it is interesting to note that the number of perfect fifths in the scale is scarce and instead there are more major fourths (a quarter-tone larger than a perfect fourth) and minor fifths (a quarter-tone smaller than the perfect fifth). As a result of this scarcity of perfect fifths, it is impossible to create any conventional harmonies (major or minor triads, seventh chords, etc.) using the 13-tone scale. The perfect fifth is the most consonant interval other than the unison and the octave and it contributes to acoustic consonance, so why did Wyschnegradsky craft a quarter tone scale that lacks this interval? The answer lies within the 13-tone scale’s structural similarities to the diatonic scale and the acoustic consonance of the major fourth and minor fifth.
The construction of the 13-tone scale is structurally similar to the diatonic scale, and the two heptachords of the 13-tone scale are analogous to the two tetrachords of the diatonic scale. In fact, the term "diatonicized chromaticism" comes from 13-tone scale’s relationship to the diatonic and chromatic scales. The acoustic consonance of the major fourth and minor fifth help fill the perfect fifth scarcity. The major fourth ratio is 11:8, the minor fifth is 16:11, and both ratios closely approximate the 11th harmonic of the overtone series. The representation of the 11th harmonic has been made possible through the 24-TET. Minor fifths can be used in the harmony instead of perfect fifth, as it retains acoustic consonance and functional identity of chord (major triad, minor triad).
Picture: "Soft Pressure" (1931) by Russian-French painter Wassily Kandinsky.
Sources: tinyurl.com/2dqla7dp, tinyurl.com/265ovyhv and tinyurl.com/26klz3lq
To check the score: tinyurl.com/24wyv69x


![Sacri di Giove augei sacre Fenici Madrigal - Giovanni Gabrieli
English Cornett and Sackbut Ensemble & I Fagiolini Ensemble conducted by Robert Hollingworth.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Sacri di Giove augei sacre Fenici was published in Volume II of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form, it is scored for a single choir of twelve voices a cappella. The madrigal exemplifies the Venetian polychoral style adapted to the secular madrigal tradition. The text, in Italian, is a lofty encomium invoking sacred birds of Jove and sacred phoenixes as metaphors for illustrious heroes whose virtues and deeds are celebrated by nymphs, shepherds, and gods.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The madrigals allegorical imagery situates the work in the late Renaissance culture of courtly praise, where mythological references conveyed political or dynastic homage. The 12 parts of the chorus are often grouped antiphonally, creating dynamic exchanges and echo effects, while moments of full ensemble writing deliver sonorous climaxes. Gabriellis harmonic language blends the modal clarity of Renaissance counterpoint with expressive chromatic inflections, enhancing the text’s grandeur. Substantial word-painting is employed through the piece: rising figures depict al ciel poggiate (you rise to the heavens) or how sustained harmonies evoke the idea of eternal fame.
The madrigal begins by calling on sacred birds of Jove (poetic shorthand for eagles) and sacred phoenixes to bear witness to the virtues of the person being honoured. Gabrieli underscores this ceremonial tone with majestic, open‑fifths sonorities, giving the sense of a formal proclamation. The melodic lines rise prominently on words about divinity and loftiness, musically depicting ascent. Then the text moves to pastoral and mythological figures who sing of your immortal fame. The music shifts to a dynamic of exchanges between upper and lower voices, which could mirror the idea of different realms (earthly shepherds and divine beings) united in praise. Moments of syncopated imitation highlight verbs of action, giving rhythmic lift to the scene. As the poem turns toward ideas of everlasting renown (al ciel poggiate / to the heavens you ascend), Gabrieli crafts long, arching lines that climb stepwise, often holding the peak note before cascading down in rich, full-ensemble chords. The texture thickens, the harmonic rhythm slows, and dissonances resolve in broad cadences, all of which create a feeling of timeless suspension, fitting for the imagery of immortal glory.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: Perseus freeing Andromeda (c. 1575-80) by the Italian painter Paolo Veronese.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3 and Copilot GPT-5
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/26adbg2d Sacri di Giove augei sacre Fenici Madrigal - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wH00GSXelh4/mqdefault.jpg)


![Lieto godea sedendo Polychoral Madrigal - Giovanni Gabrieli
The King’s Consort conducted by Robert King.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Lieto godea sedendo was published in Volume II of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form it is scored for eight voices divided in two groups of four, set in this recording for two falsettists and a rich string accompaniment.
The madrigal became specially popular, as proves the fact that is was republished in 1588 by Friedrich Lindner, 1591 by Vittorio Baldini, and 1596 by Pierre Phalèse. Its music was reused as contrafacta in multiple compositions; Auxilium promisit Deus, Ein Kindlein fein, Fröhlich zu sein, Heilig ist Gott and Quam pulchra es amica mea. It was also the basis of the 1607 Magnificat supra Lieto godea by German composer Jan Le Febure, and was arranged both as a lute duet and also by Gabrieli’s pupil Heinrich Schütz as part of his Psalmen Davids (1619). In the midst of a traditionally damp Venetian spring its mildly erotic, lovesick tone must have brought on longings for the arrival of good weather.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The popular historical imagination has long nourished a fascination with the cori spezzati (split choir) traditions of Venices San Marco Cathedral. Well-known complexities of this churchs architecture provide numerous locations for the placement of musical ensembles: multiple choir lofts around the altar, elevated galleries, and even oversized, raised pulpits. Though more sober historical analysis has tempered earlier concepts of a nearly Berliozian disposition of performing forces in San Marco, several generations of Venetian musicians cultivated music that exploits the contrasts between antiphonal groups. The trend culminates in the splendid polychoral motets of Andrea and Giovanni Gabrieli.
The text paints a pastoral and amorous scene: the poet sits happily in April’s gentle breeze, surrounded by nature’s sighs of love, until Cupid strikes him with his mortal dart, bringing sudden emotional turmoil. Gabrieli mirrors this shift in mood through sharply contrasting musical textures. The choirs often sing in alternation (antiphonally), imitating each other’s motifs, which creates a lively call-and-response effect. This interplay not only enhances clarity of text but also exploits the Venetian polychoral tradition’s grandeur.
Midway, Gabrieli introduces a quicker triple-time section, injecting rhythmic vitality and dance-like energy before returning to the slower, more stately antiphonal exchanges. The madrigal’s structure thus reflects the emotional arc of the poetry: from serene contentment to the agitation of love’s wound, and finally to a return of the opening material, suggesting a cyclical inevitability. In sum, Lieto godea sedendo is both a showcase of Gabrieli’s mastery of spatial choral writing and a finely crafted marriage of text and music, emblematic of the Venetian madrigal’s expressive and architectural splendour.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: Young Woman (La Bella) (c. 1518-20) by the Italian painter Palma Vecchio.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3, https://tinyurl.com/2564kjuj, https://tinyurl.com/2833x4qr and Copilot GPT-5
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/226e9tlm Lieto godea sedendo Polychoral Madrigal - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnjIxfhsH_0/mqdefault.jpg)




![Ego dixi, Domine Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli
La Guilde des Mercenaires Ensemble conducted by Adrien Mabire.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Ego dixi, Domine was published in Volume I of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form, it is scored for seven voices a cappella (Two cantus, Altus, Quintus, Sextus, Tenor and Bassus). The text is taken from multiple sources, all of them sacred; Psalm 40:5, Psalm 89:13 and the Te Deum.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The work is mostly contrapuntal setting of the text (most often imitative in nature), with brief unison passages in between. Some light word-painting, very typical of late renaissance music, is employed by Gabrieli. Miserere mei, for instance, is often set with suspensions and dissonances resolving into consonance, a sonic metaphor for mercy granted. Sana animam meam, on the other hand, features smoother, stepwise motion, evoking healing and restoration. At key textual moments (especially invocations of the Lord’s name) are underlined by full, chordal writing. We find some rhythmic contrast between flowing semibreves for solemnity and quicker note values for urgency in the plea. Overall the piece shows Gabrieli’s ability to balance penitential gravity with luminous hope, a hallmark of late Renaissance Venetian music.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: Two Apostles by Italian painter Tintoretto.
Musical analysis written by myself alongside use of Copilot AI (GPT-5). Source: https://tinyurl.com/28vdnjlk
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2cmdsyvs Ego dixi, Domine Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xP7K5WIXxR0/mqdefault.jpg)