Uploaded July 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Cincinnati Wind Symphony conducted by Eugene Migliaro Corporon.
I - Moderately fast, with vigor (𝅗𝅥 = 88-92) - Molto agitato: 0:00
II - Andantino grazioso (𝅗𝅥 = 56) - Fast and gay (𝅘𝅥 = 112): 6:44
III - Fugue. Rather broad (𝅗𝅥 = 100) - Fast, energetic (𝅗𝅥 = 112) - Scherzando - Espressivo - Scherzando - Tempo primo - Poco più largamente: 12:21
Hindemith's Symphony in B-flat was composed in New Haven between February and March 1951, written for the U.S. Army Band then led by Lieutenant Colonel Hugh Curry, its commander between 1946-64. It was premiered in Washington D.C. on April 5 of that year, performed by said band conducted by the composer. The piece had a mixed reception, with some critics (like Paul Hume) praising it while others (like Richard Franko Goldman) dismissed it. It was in the following decades that the symphony became a staple in the repertoire of concert bands around the world.
Most concert bands at the time preferred to play arrangements, marches, and other popular music rather than original works for band. At the same time, most composers dismissed the possibilities of the concert band. As an example, only around a dozen of symphonies for concert band had been written up until Hindemith's work (the most notable of these being Berlioz's and Myaskovsky's). The length, breadth and content of Hindemith's symphony served to convince other first-rank composers, including Giannini, Persichetti, Creston and Hovahness, that the band is a legitimate medium for serious music.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a lively and rhythmic main theme exposed by cornets and trumpets over triplet woodwind rhythms, culminating in a short-lived climax. After a woodwind transition dominated by a five-note motive, an imposing, chorale-like second theme is introduced by the brass. There is a relentless sense of momentum and agitation that constantly pushes this music forward.The development section consists of a substantial fugato based on the motive, in which saxophones play a prominent role. A powerful climax opens the recapitulation of the material. A vigorous coda ends the movement.
The second movement is written in ternary form. It opens with a dialogue between saxophone and cornet, introducing a melodic main theme reminiscent of Kurt Weill. There are hints of Hindemith’s Weimar Republic roots in the melody, which sounds like the lamentation of a tired cabaret singer. After a brief pause, the central section opens with a dance-like second theme based on the five-note motive, in scurrying triple-time counterpoint and featuring tambourine accompaniment. After an impetuous climax, both sections are recapitulated as they are contrapuntally interlocked, a characteristic element of Hindemith's music. The music then suddenly stops without a formal coda.
The third movement (despite its title) is actually a double fugue in form. It begins with a short and solemn introduction, which introduces the main subject based on an abrupt four-note ascending figure. The second subject is slower and broader, built on a triplet rhythm. Both are contrapuntally combined, reaching its peak as the main theme from the first movement reappears on trumpet and cornet, another familiar Hindemithian device no less effective here for its familiarity. The concluding consonant chords, enlivened by busily piping woodwinds, stand in striking relief to the edgy harmonic language that characterizes this modest masterpiece.
Picture: Photographic detail of "Music and Harvest" (1950-1) from the sculptoric group "The Arts of Peace" by American sculptor James Earle Fraser.
Sources: tinyurl.com/ynwsh7hk, tinyurl.com/yozgu7qn and tinyurl.com/yujawvj3
To check the score: tinyurl.com/ylrajoml
Cincinnati Wind Symphony conducted by Eugene Migliaro Corporon.
I - Moderately fast, with vigor (𝅗𝅥 = 88-92) - Molto agitato: 0:00
II - Andantino grazioso (𝅗𝅥 = 56) - Fast and gay (𝅘𝅥 = 112): 6:44
III - Fugue. Rather broad (𝅗𝅥 = 100) - Fast, energetic (𝅗𝅥 = 112) - Scherzando - Espressivo - Scherzando - Tempo primo - Poco più largamente: 12:21
Hindemith's Symphony in B-flat was composed in New Haven between February and March 1951, written for the U.S. Army Band then led by Lieutenant Colonel Hugh Curry, its commander between 1946-64. It was premiered in Washington D.C. on April 5 of that year, performed by said band conducted by the composer. The piece had a mixed reception, with some critics (like Paul Hume) praising it while others (like Richard Franko Goldman) dismissed it. It was in the following decades that the symphony became a staple in the repertoire of concert bands around the world.
Most concert bands at the time preferred to play arrangements, marches, and other popular music rather than original works for band. At the same time, most composers dismissed the possibilities of the concert band. As an example, only around a dozen of symphonies for concert band had been written up until Hindemith's work (the most notable of these being Berlioz's and Myaskovsky's). The length, breadth and content of Hindemith's symphony served to convince other first-rank composers, including Giannini, Persichetti, Creston and Hovahness, that the band is a legitimate medium for serious music.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a lively and rhythmic main theme exposed by cornets and trumpets over triplet woodwind rhythms, culminating in a short-lived climax. After a woodwind transition dominated by a five-note motive, an imposing, chorale-like second theme is introduced by the brass. There is a relentless sense of momentum and agitation that constantly pushes this music forward.The development section consists of a substantial fugato based on the motive, in which saxophones play a prominent role. A powerful climax opens the recapitulation of the material. A vigorous coda ends the movement.
The second movement is written in ternary form. It opens with a dialogue between saxophone and cornet, introducing a melodic main theme reminiscent of Kurt Weill. There are hints of Hindemith’s Weimar Republic roots in the melody, which sounds like the lamentation of a tired cabaret singer. After a brief pause, the central section opens with a dance-like second theme based on the five-note motive, in scurrying triple-time counterpoint and featuring tambourine accompaniment. After an impetuous climax, both sections are recapitulated as they are contrapuntally interlocked, a characteristic element of Hindemith's music. The music then suddenly stops without a formal coda.
The third movement (despite its title) is actually a double fugue in form. It begins with a short and solemn introduction, which introduces the main subject based on an abrupt four-note ascending figure. The second subject is slower and broader, built on a triplet rhythm. Both are contrapuntally combined, reaching its peak as the main theme from the first movement reappears on trumpet and cornet, another familiar Hindemithian device no less effective here for its familiarity. The concluding consonant chords, enlivened by busily piping woodwinds, stand in striking relief to the edgy harmonic language that characterizes this modest masterpiece.
Picture: Photographic detail of "Music and Harvest" (1950-1) from the sculptoric group "The Arts of Peace" by American sculptor James Earle Fraser.
Sources: tinyurl.com/ynwsh7hk, tinyurl.com/yozgu7qn and tinyurl.com/yujawvj3
To check the score: tinyurl.com/ylrajoml





![Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo Polychoral Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli
Concerto Palatino conducted by Bruce Dickey.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo was published in Volume I of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form, it is scored for ten voices separated in two groups of five. The first with a cantus, septimus, altus, octavus and sextus. The second for a decimus, nonus, tenor and a bassus. The text is a selection of the Psalm 63, attributed to King David, set when he was in the wilderness of Judah, and its theme concerns being stranded in the wilderness away from ones family.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The popular historical imagination has long nourished a fascination with the cori spezzati (split choir) traditions of Venices San Marco Cathedral. Well-known complexities of this churchs architecture provide numerous locations for the placement of musical ensembles: multiple choir lofts around the altar, elevated galleries, and even oversized, raised pulpits. Though more sober historical analysis has tempered earlier concepts of a nearly Berliozian disposition of performing forces in San Marco, several generations of Venetian musicians cultivated music that exploits the contrasts between antiphonal groups. The trend culminates in the splendid polychoral motets of Andrea and Giovanni Gabrieli.
Although the score does not specify instrumentation, in practice it was common to reinforce or replace some voices with instruments such as cornettos, sackbuts or dulcians, in addition to the organ. This arrangement allowed for contrasting timbres and dynamics, alternating responsive passages between choirs and tutti sections that filled the space with a full and majestic sound. Structurally, the piece combines imitative sections with homophonic ones, always adapting the music to the meaning of the text. The opening invocation, Deus, Deus meus, is presented in a solemn and compact manner, while phrases such as Ad te de luce vigilo take on a more agile character, evoking the idea of vigilance and movement toward God. In Sitivit in te anima mea, the melodic lines ascend, symbolizing spiritual desire, and in Quam multipliciter tibi caro mea, the texture thickens to underline the intensity of devotion.
The harmonic language remains within a modal framework, with a predominance of modes such as Mixolydian and Dorian, and both authentic and plagal cadences articulate the sections. Gabrieli achieves a remarkable balance between textual clarity and sonorous richness, so that even in the densest passages, the words remain comprehensible. This motet is not only an example of Venetian sacred theatricality, but also a work that would influence later generations, such as Heinrich Schütz, who studied with Gabrieli and brought this style to Germanic lands.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: The three temptations of Christ in a 12th-century mosaic in St Marks Cathedral in Venice.
Source: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3 and Copilot GPT-5.
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2cg8oxkn Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo Polychoral Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v_pObKZY0QM/mqdefault.jpg)



![Sacri di Giove augei sacre Fenici Madrigal - Giovanni Gabrieli
English Cornett and Sackbut Ensemble & I Fagiolini Ensemble conducted by Robert Hollingworth.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Sacri di Giove augei sacre Fenici was published in Volume II of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form, it is scored for a single choir of twelve voices a cappella. The madrigal exemplifies the Venetian polychoral style adapted to the secular madrigal tradition. The text, in Italian, is a lofty encomium invoking sacred birds of Jove and sacred phoenixes as metaphors for illustrious heroes whose virtues and deeds are celebrated by nymphs, shepherds, and gods.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The madrigals allegorical imagery situates the work in the late Renaissance culture of courtly praise, where mythological references conveyed political or dynastic homage. The 12 parts of the chorus are often grouped antiphonally, creating dynamic exchanges and echo effects, while moments of full ensemble writing deliver sonorous climaxes. Gabriellis harmonic language blends the modal clarity of Renaissance counterpoint with expressive chromatic inflections, enhancing the text’s grandeur. Substantial word-painting is employed through the piece: rising figures depict al ciel poggiate (you rise to the heavens) or how sustained harmonies evoke the idea of eternal fame.
The madrigal begins by calling on sacred birds of Jove (poetic shorthand for eagles) and sacred phoenixes to bear witness to the virtues of the person being honoured. Gabrieli underscores this ceremonial tone with majestic, open‑fifths sonorities, giving the sense of a formal proclamation. The melodic lines rise prominently on words about divinity and loftiness, musically depicting ascent. Then the text moves to pastoral and mythological figures who sing of your immortal fame. The music shifts to a dynamic of exchanges between upper and lower voices, which could mirror the idea of different realms (earthly shepherds and divine beings) united in praise. Moments of syncopated imitation highlight verbs of action, giving rhythmic lift to the scene. As the poem turns toward ideas of everlasting renown (al ciel poggiate / to the heavens you ascend), Gabrieli crafts long, arching lines that climb stepwise, often holding the peak note before cascading down in rich, full-ensemble chords. The texture thickens, the harmonic rhythm slows, and dissonances resolve in broad cadences, all of which create a feeling of timeless suspension, fitting for the imagery of immortal glory.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: Perseus freeing Andromeda (c. 1575-80) by the Italian painter Paolo Veronese.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3 and Copilot GPT-5
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/26adbg2d Sacri di Giove augei sacre Fenici Madrigal - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wH00GSXelh4/mqdefault.jpg)
