Uploaded November 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Con moto: 0:00
II - Intermezzo. Allegretto grazioso: 12:51
III - Introduzione. Grave e molto calmo - Allegro maestoso: 17:54
Rubbra's Symphony No.4 was composed between 1940-2, written during the composer's army service, completed and orchestrated at a camp in North Wales. It was premiered on August 14 of 1942, performed at a promenade concert by the BBC Symphony Orchestra conducted by Rubbra himself. The score is dedicated to renowned conductor and composer Sir Henry Wood. The Symphony is the final entry of a tetralogy Rubbra wrote in quick succession between 1935-41. He described them as being "different facets of one thought", since each was a reaction to the last. The Symphony also reflects, to some degree, the war atmosphere of the times.
Paul Conway praised the piece with the following words: "Rubbra’s Fourth Symphony is an epic wartime work, as remarkable for its serene, other-worldly opening movement as the Brucknerian contrapuntal grandeur of its bipartite Finale". Rubbra's symphonies differ from the prevailing model of the symphony in that they are built on a principle of continuous, organic development from a single basic idea. By contrast, the traditional symphony is built on dramatic lines, with contrasting movements, each of which usually has contrasting themes as its main character. The symphony arose during a time which rebelled against counterpoint, while Rubbra's intention was to use the example of the great contrapuntal music of the English madrigalists for his model. Thus, Rubbra's symphonies form themselves according to the logic of their main idea, rather than fitting into the standard symphonic shape.
In 1941, Rubbra was called up for army service. After 18 months he was given an office post, again because of his knowledge of shorthand and typing. While he was there, he ran a small orchestra assisted by a double-bass player from the BBC orchestra. The War Office asked him to form a piano trio to play classical chamber music to the troops. Rubbra was happy to oblige, and the trio, with William Pleeth the cellist, Joshua Glazier violinist and himself on the piano took six months acquiring a repertoire of chamber music. "The Army Classical Music Group", was formed and later expanded to seven people. They travelled all over England and Scotland and then to Germany.
The first movement begins with an expressive and kind of ethereal main theme, presented through divided strings in octaves and a pulsing woodwind ostinato. This root material from which the entire movement is derived is based on a falling fifth and rising major third motif, as well as a dominant seventh chord in third inversion, respectively. The music unfolds and develops in a series of continuous flowing variations on the main material, with no contrasting themes. There is a sense of increasing urgency as the movement reaches a climactic moment on the last inversion of the dominant seventh on D, a tone below the initial harmony. A powerful climax is reached with a bold reinterpretation of the material, with descending sextuplets in the bass foreshadowing the descending Phrygian crotchets in the last movement. The con moto gradually winds down and ends with a noble coda.
The second movement is a brief intermezzo, described by Rubbra himself as "designed to give mental relief and refreshment between two movements full of tension". It opens with a rhythmic motive exposed by woodwinds over a pulsing pizzicato ostinato, almost like a slow and dignified dance. The material follows a similar dynamic as in the first movement but on a smaller scale. Rubbra works with two ideas: a rising and falling third and the main idea of the first movement rhythmically disguised. A gentle and modest coda closes the intermezzo.
The third movement is divided in two large sections. The first is slow and brooding, with yet another disguised version of the opening movement's main idea. A lyrical passage also uses the main accompanying figure to the first movement. After a pause, the second section then begins boldly, with yet another variant on our old friend, the falling fifth-rising third, this time on horns and strings. Rubbra works toward a climactic chorale, mostly through beautifully independent three-part counterpoint. But this is a chorale only in tone, since it too is composed of three independent strands. It's just that the rhythmic values have gotten larger. The work ends with a solemn E major coda, in which the symphony’s opening dominant seventh has been rooted on the tonic. The journey to light and triumph has been far from straightforward.
Picture: "Pillar and Moon" (1932-42) by British painter Paul Nash.
Sources: tinyurl.com/2bdpskmw, tinyurl.com/25m9ve9t and tinyurl.com/2awchkj9
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Con moto: 0:00
II - Intermezzo. Allegretto grazioso: 12:51
III - Introduzione. Grave e molto calmo - Allegro maestoso: 17:54
Rubbra's Symphony No.4 was composed between 1940-2, written during the composer's army service, completed and orchestrated at a camp in North Wales. It was premiered on August 14 of 1942, performed at a promenade concert by the BBC Symphony Orchestra conducted by Rubbra himself. The score is dedicated to renowned conductor and composer Sir Henry Wood. The Symphony is the final entry of a tetralogy Rubbra wrote in quick succession between 1935-41. He described them as being "different facets of one thought", since each was a reaction to the last. The Symphony also reflects, to some degree, the war atmosphere of the times.
Paul Conway praised the piece with the following words: "Rubbra’s Fourth Symphony is an epic wartime work, as remarkable for its serene, other-worldly opening movement as the Brucknerian contrapuntal grandeur of its bipartite Finale". Rubbra's symphonies differ from the prevailing model of the symphony in that they are built on a principle of continuous, organic development from a single basic idea. By contrast, the traditional symphony is built on dramatic lines, with contrasting movements, each of which usually has contrasting themes as its main character. The symphony arose during a time which rebelled against counterpoint, while Rubbra's intention was to use the example of the great contrapuntal music of the English madrigalists for his model. Thus, Rubbra's symphonies form themselves according to the logic of their main idea, rather than fitting into the standard symphonic shape.
In 1941, Rubbra was called up for army service. After 18 months he was given an office post, again because of his knowledge of shorthand and typing. While he was there, he ran a small orchestra assisted by a double-bass player from the BBC orchestra. The War Office asked him to form a piano trio to play classical chamber music to the troops. Rubbra was happy to oblige, and the trio, with William Pleeth the cellist, Joshua Glazier violinist and himself on the piano took six months acquiring a repertoire of chamber music. "The Army Classical Music Group", was formed and later expanded to seven people. They travelled all over England and Scotland and then to Germany.
The first movement begins with an expressive and kind of ethereal main theme, presented through divided strings in octaves and a pulsing woodwind ostinato. This root material from which the entire movement is derived is based on a falling fifth and rising major third motif, as well as a dominant seventh chord in third inversion, respectively. The music unfolds and develops in a series of continuous flowing variations on the main material, with no contrasting themes. There is a sense of increasing urgency as the movement reaches a climactic moment on the last inversion of the dominant seventh on D, a tone below the initial harmony. A powerful climax is reached with a bold reinterpretation of the material, with descending sextuplets in the bass foreshadowing the descending Phrygian crotchets in the last movement. The con moto gradually winds down and ends with a noble coda.
The second movement is a brief intermezzo, described by Rubbra himself as "designed to give mental relief and refreshment between two movements full of tension". It opens with a rhythmic motive exposed by woodwinds over a pulsing pizzicato ostinato, almost like a slow and dignified dance. The material follows a similar dynamic as in the first movement but on a smaller scale. Rubbra works with two ideas: a rising and falling third and the main idea of the first movement rhythmically disguised. A gentle and modest coda closes the intermezzo.
The third movement is divided in two large sections. The first is slow and brooding, with yet another disguised version of the opening movement's main idea. A lyrical passage also uses the main accompanying figure to the first movement. After a pause, the second section then begins boldly, with yet another variant on our old friend, the falling fifth-rising third, this time on horns and strings. Rubbra works toward a climactic chorale, mostly through beautifully independent three-part counterpoint. But this is a chorale only in tone, since it too is composed of three independent strands. It's just that the rhythmic values have gotten larger. The work ends with a solemn E major coda, in which the symphony’s opening dominant seventh has been rooted on the tonic. The journey to light and triumph has been far from straightforward.
Picture: "Pillar and Moon" (1932-42) by British painter Paul Nash.
Sources: tinyurl.com/2bdpskmw, tinyurl.com/25m9ve9t and tinyurl.com/2awchkj9
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.
![Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo Polychoral Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli
Concerto Palatino conducted by Bruce Dickey.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo was published in Volume I of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form, it is scored for ten voices separated in two groups of five. The first with a cantus, septimus, altus, octavus and sextus. The second for a decimus, nonus, tenor and a bassus. The text is a selection of the Psalm 63, attributed to King David, set when he was in the wilderness of Judah, and its theme concerns being stranded in the wilderness away from ones family.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The popular historical imagination has long nourished a fascination with the cori spezzati (split choir) traditions of Venices San Marco Cathedral. Well-known complexities of this churchs architecture provide numerous locations for the placement of musical ensembles: multiple choir lofts around the altar, elevated galleries, and even oversized, raised pulpits. Though more sober historical analysis has tempered earlier concepts of a nearly Berliozian disposition of performing forces in San Marco, several generations of Venetian musicians cultivated music that exploits the contrasts between antiphonal groups. The trend culminates in the splendid polychoral motets of Andrea and Giovanni Gabrieli.
Although the score does not specify instrumentation, in practice it was common to reinforce or replace some voices with instruments such as cornettos, sackbuts or dulcians, in addition to the organ. This arrangement allowed for contrasting timbres and dynamics, alternating responsive passages between choirs and tutti sections that filled the space with a full and majestic sound. Structurally, the piece combines imitative sections with homophonic ones, always adapting the music to the meaning of the text. The opening invocation, Deus, Deus meus, is presented in a solemn and compact manner, while phrases such as Ad te de luce vigilo take on a more agile character, evoking the idea of vigilance and movement toward God. In Sitivit in te anima mea, the melodic lines ascend, symbolizing spiritual desire, and in Quam multipliciter tibi caro mea, the texture thickens to underline the intensity of devotion.
The harmonic language remains within a modal framework, with a predominance of modes such as Mixolydian and Dorian, and both authentic and plagal cadences articulate the sections. Gabrieli achieves a remarkable balance between textual clarity and sonorous richness, so that even in the densest passages, the words remain comprehensible. This motet is not only an example of Venetian sacred theatricality, but also a work that would influence later generations, such as Heinrich Schütz, who studied with Gabrieli and brought this style to Germanic lands.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: The three temptations of Christ in a 12th-century mosaic in St Marks Cathedral in Venice.
Source: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3 and Copilot GPT-5.
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2cg8oxkn Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo Polychoral Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v_pObKZY0QM/mqdefault.jpg)



![Sacri di Giove augei sacre Fenici Madrigal - Giovanni Gabrieli
English Cornett and Sackbut Ensemble & I Fagiolini Ensemble conducted by Robert Hollingworth.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Sacri di Giove augei sacre Fenici was published in Volume II of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form, it is scored for a single choir of twelve voices a cappella. The madrigal exemplifies the Venetian polychoral style adapted to the secular madrigal tradition. The text, in Italian, is a lofty encomium invoking sacred birds of Jove and sacred phoenixes as metaphors for illustrious heroes whose virtues and deeds are celebrated by nymphs, shepherds, and gods.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The madrigals allegorical imagery situates the work in the late Renaissance culture of courtly praise, where mythological references conveyed political or dynastic homage. The 12 parts of the chorus are often grouped antiphonally, creating dynamic exchanges and echo effects, while moments of full ensemble writing deliver sonorous climaxes. Gabriellis harmonic language blends the modal clarity of Renaissance counterpoint with expressive chromatic inflections, enhancing the text’s grandeur. Substantial word-painting is employed through the piece: rising figures depict al ciel poggiate (you rise to the heavens) or how sustained harmonies evoke the idea of eternal fame.
The madrigal begins by calling on sacred birds of Jove (poetic shorthand for eagles) and sacred phoenixes to bear witness to the virtues of the person being honoured. Gabrieli underscores this ceremonial tone with majestic, open‑fifths sonorities, giving the sense of a formal proclamation. The melodic lines rise prominently on words about divinity and loftiness, musically depicting ascent. Then the text moves to pastoral and mythological figures who sing of your immortal fame. The music shifts to a dynamic of exchanges between upper and lower voices, which could mirror the idea of different realms (earthly shepherds and divine beings) united in praise. Moments of syncopated imitation highlight verbs of action, giving rhythmic lift to the scene. As the poem turns toward ideas of everlasting renown (al ciel poggiate / to the heavens you ascend), Gabrieli crafts long, arching lines that climb stepwise, often holding the peak note before cascading down in rich, full-ensemble chords. The texture thickens, the harmonic rhythm slows, and dissonances resolve in broad cadences, all of which create a feeling of timeless suspension, fitting for the imagery of immortal glory.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: Perseus freeing Andromeda (c. 1575-80) by the Italian painter Paolo Veronese.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3 and Copilot GPT-5
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/26adbg2d Sacri di Giove augei sacre Fenici Madrigal - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wH00GSXelh4/mqdefault.jpg)


![Lieto godea sedendo Polychoral Madrigal - Giovanni Gabrieli
The King’s Consort conducted by Robert King.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Lieto godea sedendo was published in Volume II of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form it is scored for eight voices divided in two groups of four, set in this recording for two falsettists and a rich string accompaniment.
The madrigal became specially popular, as proves the fact that is was republished in 1588 by Friedrich Lindner, 1591 by Vittorio Baldini, and 1596 by Pierre Phalèse. Its music was reused as contrafacta in multiple compositions; Auxilium promisit Deus, Ein Kindlein fein, Fröhlich zu sein, Heilig ist Gott and Quam pulchra es amica mea. It was also the basis of the 1607 Magnificat supra Lieto godea by German composer Jan Le Febure, and was arranged both as a lute duet and also by Gabrieli’s pupil Heinrich Schütz as part of his Psalmen Davids (1619). In the midst of a traditionally damp Venetian spring its mildly erotic, lovesick tone must have brought on longings for the arrival of good weather.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The popular historical imagination has long nourished a fascination with the cori spezzati (split choir) traditions of Venices San Marco Cathedral. Well-known complexities of this churchs architecture provide numerous locations for the placement of musical ensembles: multiple choir lofts around the altar, elevated galleries, and even oversized, raised pulpits. Though more sober historical analysis has tempered earlier concepts of a nearly Berliozian disposition of performing forces in San Marco, several generations of Venetian musicians cultivated music that exploits the contrasts between antiphonal groups. The trend culminates in the splendid polychoral motets of Andrea and Giovanni Gabrieli.
The text paints a pastoral and amorous scene: the poet sits happily in April’s gentle breeze, surrounded by nature’s sighs of love, until Cupid strikes him with his mortal dart, bringing sudden emotional turmoil. Gabrieli mirrors this shift in mood through sharply contrasting musical textures. The choirs often sing in alternation (antiphonally), imitating each other’s motifs, which creates a lively call-and-response effect. This interplay not only enhances clarity of text but also exploits the Venetian polychoral tradition’s grandeur.
Midway, Gabrieli introduces a quicker triple-time section, injecting rhythmic vitality and dance-like energy before returning to the slower, more stately antiphonal exchanges. The madrigal’s structure thus reflects the emotional arc of the poetry: from serene contentment to the agitation of love’s wound, and finally to a return of the opening material, suggesting a cyclical inevitability. In sum, Lieto godea sedendo is both a showcase of Gabrieli’s mastery of spatial choral writing and a finely crafted marriage of text and music, emblematic of the Venetian madrigal’s expressive and architectural splendour.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: Young Woman (La Bella) (c. 1518-20) by the Italian painter Palma Vecchio.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3, https://tinyurl.com/2564kjuj, https://tinyurl.com/2833x4qr and Copilot GPT-5
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/226e9tlm Lieto godea sedendo Polychoral Madrigal - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnjIxfhsH_0/mqdefault.jpg)


