Uploaded June 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Stuttgart Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Carl St Clair.
I - Allegro non troppo: 0:00
II - Adagio: 5:49
III - Scherzo. Vivace: 14:13
IV - Molto allegro: 17:48
Villa-Lobos's Symphony No.12 was begun in New York on 1957, where he often went for medical treatments during the last years of his life. It was completed on his seventieth birthday on March 5 of that year, written for the First Inter-American Music Festival in Washington D.C. It was premiered there on April 20 of 1958, performed by the National Symphony Orchestra conducted by Howard Mitchell. The European premiere occurred soon after in Brussels on 22 September 1958, played by the Grand Orchestre Symphonique de la Radiodiffusion Nationale Belge conducted by the composer.
The score is dedicated to Mindinha (Arminda Neves d'Almeida), the composer's companion for the last 23 years of his life. At the time of composition, contemporary music was in turmoil. It was the time of Stockhausen, Kagel, Messiaen and Boulez, who with their avant-garde sounds, including that of electronics, were turning the musical world upside down. Countering this turbulence were composers such as Martinu, Milhaud, Hartmann, Copland and many others, whose attempt was to recover the great symphonic tradition of the past. Villa-Lobos was an important addition to the latter group, and this is highly evident in his last symphony.
Indeed, the Twelfth brings together the symphonic craftsmanship of the great masters with explosive energy, harmonic richness and rhythmic vitality; a truly fitting climax and summation of his symphonic canon. The typical re-reading of Bach, Wagner and the French and Russian composers can here be extended to the Villa-Lobos who took Haydn’s concepts of propulsion and the unified gesture as a model for his string quartets. Symphony No. 12, along with No. 9, is the lightest and most compact of his symphonies. The orchestration, despite still including a considerable percussion section, dispenses with the piano and the vast wind sections of the others.
The first movement has a curious structure: the first theme, with its strong ascending impulse, which swells on the cellos and bassoons and is answered by the violins, reappears modified after the second thematic group, which is introduced in a more moderate fashion by the clarinet, followed by the oboe, bassoon and tuba. The concluding section is loosely based on elements of the second theme and some secondary material that had got lost along the way. In this way Villa-Lobos complies with the economy and possibilities for thematic development demanded of a symphonic allegro, at the same time as giving free rein to his imagination in the detail.
The Adagio is one of the most interesting of all the symphonies, and has an anxious and solemn quality. The theme announced by the bassoon is a collection of archetypes: a theme initially similar to Wagner’s Tristan, announced in the high-pitch section of Stravinsky’s Rite, without repeating notes, in the manner of a dodecaphonic series that never materializes. It is developed with different counterpoint modalities, passed on to the bass clarinet and the English horn. A short contrasting section is dominated by the brass section, and the sinuous melody is taken up again by the strings, in the midst of a rich counterpoint, which combines quartal, chromatic and pandiatonic elements.
The Scherzo is a piece of such orchestral brilliance that it could easily be used as an encore. The fourth interval dominates the theme, in the form of a call, and again, in a dazzling ascending impulse. A theme of parallel minor chords, announced by the horns and, later, by the tubas, adds a humorous touch. The central section, with its slightly oriental flavour, does not interrupt the breathless vitality of the movement as a whole.
The final movement tangentially follows the form of a rondo, with a military-style theme, which returns transformed at regular intervals, and alternates with another more impassioned one with a sequential structure. The bass line is extraordinarily active throughout the movement and creates a kind of link to the large amount of secondary material that appears before the triumphant finale. This exemplifies the difficulty that listeners have in finding their way through Villa-Lobos’s symphonies: his imagination is so consistently bold that what in the hands of other composers would be filler or linking material, ends up taking on an involuntarily leading role in his symphonies. In his final symphony, Villa-Lobos delights in a sea of themes and sounds, and flings them generously in the direction of the listeners, to quote his own words, in the form of "letters written to posterity without expecting a reply".
Picture: "Untitled" (1970) by the Brazilian painter José Antonio da Silva.
Source: tinyurl.com/2c6n7ato
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available.
Stuttgart Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Carl St Clair.
I - Allegro non troppo: 0:00
II - Adagio: 5:49
III - Scherzo. Vivace: 14:13
IV - Molto allegro: 17:48
Villa-Lobos's Symphony No.12 was begun in New York on 1957, where he often went for medical treatments during the last years of his life. It was completed on his seventieth birthday on March 5 of that year, written for the First Inter-American Music Festival in Washington D.C. It was premiered there on April 20 of 1958, performed by the National Symphony Orchestra conducted by Howard Mitchell. The European premiere occurred soon after in Brussels on 22 September 1958, played by the Grand Orchestre Symphonique de la Radiodiffusion Nationale Belge conducted by the composer.
The score is dedicated to Mindinha (Arminda Neves d'Almeida), the composer's companion for the last 23 years of his life. At the time of composition, contemporary music was in turmoil. It was the time of Stockhausen, Kagel, Messiaen and Boulez, who with their avant-garde sounds, including that of electronics, were turning the musical world upside down. Countering this turbulence were composers such as Martinu, Milhaud, Hartmann, Copland and many others, whose attempt was to recover the great symphonic tradition of the past. Villa-Lobos was an important addition to the latter group, and this is highly evident in his last symphony.
Indeed, the Twelfth brings together the symphonic craftsmanship of the great masters with explosive energy, harmonic richness and rhythmic vitality; a truly fitting climax and summation of his symphonic canon. The typical re-reading of Bach, Wagner and the French and Russian composers can here be extended to the Villa-Lobos who took Haydn’s concepts of propulsion and the unified gesture as a model for his string quartets. Symphony No. 12, along with No. 9, is the lightest and most compact of his symphonies. The orchestration, despite still including a considerable percussion section, dispenses with the piano and the vast wind sections of the others.
The first movement has a curious structure: the first theme, with its strong ascending impulse, which swells on the cellos and bassoons and is answered by the violins, reappears modified after the second thematic group, which is introduced in a more moderate fashion by the clarinet, followed by the oboe, bassoon and tuba. The concluding section is loosely based on elements of the second theme and some secondary material that had got lost along the way. In this way Villa-Lobos complies with the economy and possibilities for thematic development demanded of a symphonic allegro, at the same time as giving free rein to his imagination in the detail.
The Adagio is one of the most interesting of all the symphonies, and has an anxious and solemn quality. The theme announced by the bassoon is a collection of archetypes: a theme initially similar to Wagner’s Tristan, announced in the high-pitch section of Stravinsky’s Rite, without repeating notes, in the manner of a dodecaphonic series that never materializes. It is developed with different counterpoint modalities, passed on to the bass clarinet and the English horn. A short contrasting section is dominated by the brass section, and the sinuous melody is taken up again by the strings, in the midst of a rich counterpoint, which combines quartal, chromatic and pandiatonic elements.
The Scherzo is a piece of such orchestral brilliance that it could easily be used as an encore. The fourth interval dominates the theme, in the form of a call, and again, in a dazzling ascending impulse. A theme of parallel minor chords, announced by the horns and, later, by the tubas, adds a humorous touch. The central section, with its slightly oriental flavour, does not interrupt the breathless vitality of the movement as a whole.
The final movement tangentially follows the form of a rondo, with a military-style theme, which returns transformed at regular intervals, and alternates with another more impassioned one with a sequential structure. The bass line is extraordinarily active throughout the movement and creates a kind of link to the large amount of secondary material that appears before the triumphant finale. This exemplifies the difficulty that listeners have in finding their way through Villa-Lobos’s symphonies: his imagination is so consistently bold that what in the hands of other composers would be filler or linking material, ends up taking on an involuntarily leading role in his symphonies. In his final symphony, Villa-Lobos delights in a sea of themes and sounds, and flings them generously in the direction of the listeners, to quote his own words, in the form of "letters written to posterity without expecting a reply".
Picture: "Untitled" (1970) by the Brazilian painter José Antonio da Silva.
Source: tinyurl.com/2c6n7ato
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available.

![Symphony in E-flat major - Igor Stravinsky
Royal Scottish National Orchestra conducted by Sir Alexander Gibson.
I - Allegro moderato - Molto sostenuto - Poco meno mosso - Più mosso - Allegro molto - Tempo I: 0:00
II - Scherzo. Allegretto - Pochissimo meno mosso - Allegretto (Tempo I): 10:18
III - Largo: 16:04
IV - Finale. Allegro molto - Più tranquillo - L’istesso tempo - Un poco più tranquillo - L’istesso tempo - Presto - Molto pesante: 25:54
Stravinskys Symphony in E-flat major was composed between July 18 and September 24 of 1905, being his first major work under the close supervision of his teacher Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov. The second and third movements were performed in a private concert in St. Petersburg on March 27 of 1907, played by the St. Petersburg Court Orchestra conducted by Hugo Warlich, after which Stravinsky revised the orchestration. Its full public premiere took place on January 22 of 1908, with the same orchestra conducted by Felix Blumenfeld. A final revision of the orchestration took place in 1913, which was then performed in Montreux on April 2 of 1914, performed by the Orchestre du Kursaal conducted by Ernest Ansermet.
Unlike many other composers, Stravinsky did not dismiss the piece as a mere student exercise, as he conducted the symphony multiple times and even recorded it in 1960. The work shows the influence not only of Rimsky-Korsakov (to whom the work is dedicated), but also Tchaikovsky and Glazunov. Stravinsky later wrote about the work: I wrote this Symphony at a time when Glazunov reigned supreme. At that time I shared this admiration wholeheartedly. While the work is academic in nature, and clearly indebted to the grand Russian romantic tradition, an anticipation of Stravinskys own style can be clearly heard in the scherzo, which would be later used as an intermezzo in performances of the Ballets Russes.
The first movement is structured in sonata form, clearly influenced by Glazunov and Borodin. It begins with a brilliant and assertive main theme in E-flat major, presented by full orchestra and rising to a powerful climax. A transition leads to the more lyrical second theme in B-flat major introduced by the clarinet before passing onto strings. The ensuing development is dominated by the opening fragment of the main theme, boldly modulating to keys such as C minor, G minor and G-flat major. After a dramatic climax, the material is then brilliantly recapitulated in the home key of E-flat major. A slower transition leads to a syncopated coda, which ends the allegro with a final statement of the main theme.
The second movement is a scherzo in ternary form, influenced by Rimsky-Korsakov and Tchaikovsky. It opens with a rhythmic and vigorous main theme in B-flat major. The trio section features a more lyrical second theme in F major, presented by strings before woodwinds gradually join. It is based on the Russian folksong Tchitcher-Yatcher that Stravinsky would later reuse for his 1911 ballet Petrushka and his Three little songs of 1913. After a climax, both themes are contrapuntally combined in the key of E-flat major. The main theme is then recapitulated in the home key of B-flat major. A final repeat of the trio theme leads to a short and playful coda.
The third movement is also structured in ternary form, again showing the influence of Tchaikovsky, specially his Symphony No. 6 in B minor Pathétique. It begins with a lyrical and melancholic main theme in G-sharp minor, introduced by cellos and violas in pianissimo. It passes onto full strings, growing into two dramatic and expressive climaxes. The central section features a noble and melodic second theme in E major, introduced by the horn before passing onto strings and offering great contrast. The music then reaches the most intense climax yet, leading to the varied recapitulation of the main theme. The largo ends with a long, sparse and desolate coda that seems to anticipate the 1910 ballet The Firebird.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Colourful Life (1907) by the Russian-French painter Wassily Kandinsky.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2dqrhy9a, https://tinyurl.com/28w4fmyl and https://tinyurl.com/23cabkrk
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/29kk8cyy Symphony in E-flat major - Igor Stravinsky](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uFZFYhbipy8/mqdefault.jpg)








![Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo Polychoral Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli
Concerto Palatino conducted by Bruce Dickey.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo was published in Volume I of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form, it is scored for ten voices separated in two groups of five. The first with a cantus, septimus, altus, octavus and sextus. The second for a decimus, nonus, tenor and a bassus. The text is a selection of the Psalm 63, attributed to King David, set when he was in the wilderness of Judah, and its theme concerns being stranded in the wilderness away from ones family.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The popular historical imagination has long nourished a fascination with the cori spezzati (split choir) traditions of Venices San Marco Cathedral. Well-known complexities of this churchs architecture provide numerous locations for the placement of musical ensembles: multiple choir lofts around the altar, elevated galleries, and even oversized, raised pulpits. Though more sober historical analysis has tempered earlier concepts of a nearly Berliozian disposition of performing forces in San Marco, several generations of Venetian musicians cultivated music that exploits the contrasts between antiphonal groups. The trend culminates in the splendid polychoral motets of Andrea and Giovanni Gabrieli.
Although the score does not specify instrumentation, in practice it was common to reinforce or replace some voices with instruments such as cornettos, sackbuts or dulcians, in addition to the organ. This arrangement allowed for contrasting timbres and dynamics, alternating responsive passages between choirs and tutti sections that filled the space with a full and majestic sound. Structurally, the piece combines imitative sections with homophonic ones, always adapting the music to the meaning of the text. The opening invocation, Deus, Deus meus, is presented in a solemn and compact manner, while phrases such as Ad te de luce vigilo take on a more agile character, evoking the idea of vigilance and movement toward God. In Sitivit in te anima mea, the melodic lines ascend, symbolizing spiritual desire, and in Quam multipliciter tibi caro mea, the texture thickens to underline the intensity of devotion.
The harmonic language remains within a modal framework, with a predominance of modes such as Mixolydian and Dorian, and both authentic and plagal cadences articulate the sections. Gabrieli achieves a remarkable balance between textual clarity and sonorous richness, so that even in the densest passages, the words remain comprehensible. This motet is not only an example of Venetian sacred theatricality, but also a work that would influence later generations, such as Heinrich Schütz, who studied with Gabrieli and brought this style to Germanic lands.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: The three temptations of Christ in a 12th-century mosaic in St Marks Cathedral in Venice.
Source: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3 and Copilot GPT-5.
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2cg8oxkn Deus, Deus meus, ad te de luce vigilo Polychoral Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v_pObKZY0QM/mqdefault.jpg)