Uploaded March 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Aarhus Symphony Orchestra conducted by Owain Arwel Hughes.
I - Impressioni. Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 120-32) - Poco maestoso - Meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 120) - Tranquillo (𝅘𝅥 = 112) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 120-32) - Tranquillo (𝅘𝅥 = 112) - Tempo I - Meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 120) - Molto allegro (𝅗𝅥 = 80) - Meno mosso poco tranquillo - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 120-32) - Allegro molto (𝅗𝅥 = 80-100) - Maestoso (𝅘𝅥 = 132) - Allegro molto (𝅗𝅥 = 80) - Largamente - Feroce - Largamente - Feroce - Largamente - Feroce - Largamente - Feroce - Tempo I, sostenuto - Meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 112): 0:00
II - Lamentazione. Adagio, molto tranquillo (𝅘𝅥 = 56) - Un pochettino più mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 56) - Un pochettino più mosso - Liberamente (𝅘𝅥 = 66) - Poco meno e sostenuto - Più mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Tempo I - Pochettino più mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Poco allegretto (𝅘𝅥 = 100) - Subito meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 66) - Tranquillo - Tempo I: 11:37
III - Espressione. Allegro (𝅗𝅥. = 80): 22:05
Holmboe's Symphony No.2 was composed between 1938-9, winning a Scandinavian competition organized by the Royal Danish Orchestra (Det Kongelige Kapel) in Copenhagen. This win launched the composer's career in his natal Denmark, and after the war, throuhout Europe. It was premiered in Copenhagen on December 5 of 1939, performed by the Royal Danish Orchestra conducted by Egisto Tango. Initially left out, the conductor was the one that selected the piece and convinced the jury of its greatness. He never clarified why he considered this work so important.
Holmboe's second is the first of four symphonies (Nos. 2-5) which relate to World War 2. Dedicated to the composer's parents, this symphony originally carried the subtitle "Impressions of September." Near the end of his life, Holmboe explained that the music could be considered a "forewarning of war". He meant this in no specific descriptive way, merely as a general guide, a partial but clear recollection of a musical impetus and its environment. The symphony is also noteworthy for its orchestration, formal variety and motivic unity.
The first movement is rather free in form, not following a standard structure. It opens with a series of dramatic chords, which introduce a three-note motive within the interval of the second, this is the basic root most of the symphony is based on. From this simple motif several contrasting themes are born and exposed, some rhythmic and imperious and other gentle and melodic in nature. With marching rhythms and the opening gesture returns each time the music becomes more fierce and agitated, Holmboe creating an effective contrast of moods throughout the allegro. The development of the material is largely synthesizing in nature, with startling moments such as passages in irregular metre and one in which a solo trumpet is accompanied by string glissandi. A shortened kind of recapitulation leads to a vigorous climax, before a sombre and introspective coda ends the allegro.
The second movement is also rather free in form. It opens with a sombre theme on low strings that seems in direct continuation with the previous movement, also being largely based on the opening motive and the interval of the second. It contrapuntally unfolds on strings with great sobriety, before woodwinds are gradually introduced with decorative figures that add more colour. Although a few contrasts in the movement are as strong as those in the first movement, the emphasis in this adagio is on continuity. Brass appear in the central section with a stern fanfare. A dissonant and rarefied climax is reached in the poco allegretto, concluding with a sudden bang before the adagio ends with a meditative coda and a return to the opening obscureness in which we can hear the fundamental contour of the second.
The third movement eludes a traditional structure. It begins with a noisy and vigorously rhythmic theme, which again is based on the opening motive of the symphony. It soon becomes the subject of a flowing and melodic fugato, a rare procedure in Holmboe's music. Gradually more and more instruments are added as the musical texture thickens, contrasted by lighter passages. An agitated climax is reached in which the marching rhythms and irregular metre of the first movement briefly return in full force. A long crescendo begins with a flute and cello duet, with the music growing more and more resolute and wilful. The symphony thus ends with an affirmative and resounding conclusion on full orchestra.
Picture: "Simeon the Stylite" (1939) by Dutch painter Carel Willink.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/yllw5rdt and tinyurl.com/yl3btoq2
To check the score: tinyurl.com/yl3btoq2
Aarhus Symphony Orchestra conducted by Owain Arwel Hughes.
I - Impressioni. Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 120-32) - Poco maestoso - Meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 120) - Tranquillo (𝅘𝅥 = 112) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 120-32) - Tranquillo (𝅘𝅥 = 112) - Tempo I - Meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 120) - Molto allegro (𝅗𝅥 = 80) - Meno mosso poco tranquillo - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 120-32) - Allegro molto (𝅗𝅥 = 80-100) - Maestoso (𝅘𝅥 = 132) - Allegro molto (𝅗𝅥 = 80) - Largamente - Feroce - Largamente - Feroce - Largamente - Feroce - Largamente - Feroce - Tempo I, sostenuto - Meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 112): 0:00
II - Lamentazione. Adagio, molto tranquillo (𝅘𝅥 = 56) - Un pochettino più mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 56) - Un pochettino più mosso - Liberamente (𝅘𝅥 = 66) - Poco meno e sostenuto - Più mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Tempo I - Pochettino più mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Poco allegretto (𝅘𝅥 = 100) - Subito meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 66) - Tranquillo - Tempo I: 11:37
III - Espressione. Allegro (𝅗𝅥. = 80): 22:05
Holmboe's Symphony No.2 was composed between 1938-9, winning a Scandinavian competition organized by the Royal Danish Orchestra (Det Kongelige Kapel) in Copenhagen. This win launched the composer's career in his natal Denmark, and after the war, throuhout Europe. It was premiered in Copenhagen on December 5 of 1939, performed by the Royal Danish Orchestra conducted by Egisto Tango. Initially left out, the conductor was the one that selected the piece and convinced the jury of its greatness. He never clarified why he considered this work so important.
Holmboe's second is the first of four symphonies (Nos. 2-5) which relate to World War 2. Dedicated to the composer's parents, this symphony originally carried the subtitle "Impressions of September." Near the end of his life, Holmboe explained that the music could be considered a "forewarning of war". He meant this in no specific descriptive way, merely as a general guide, a partial but clear recollection of a musical impetus and its environment. The symphony is also noteworthy for its orchestration, formal variety and motivic unity.
The first movement is rather free in form, not following a standard structure. It opens with a series of dramatic chords, which introduce a three-note motive within the interval of the second, this is the basic root most of the symphony is based on. From this simple motif several contrasting themes are born and exposed, some rhythmic and imperious and other gentle and melodic in nature. With marching rhythms and the opening gesture returns each time the music becomes more fierce and agitated, Holmboe creating an effective contrast of moods throughout the allegro. The development of the material is largely synthesizing in nature, with startling moments such as passages in irregular metre and one in which a solo trumpet is accompanied by string glissandi. A shortened kind of recapitulation leads to a vigorous climax, before a sombre and introspective coda ends the allegro.
The second movement is also rather free in form. It opens with a sombre theme on low strings that seems in direct continuation with the previous movement, also being largely based on the opening motive and the interval of the second. It contrapuntally unfolds on strings with great sobriety, before woodwinds are gradually introduced with decorative figures that add more colour. Although a few contrasts in the movement are as strong as those in the first movement, the emphasis in this adagio is on continuity. Brass appear in the central section with a stern fanfare. A dissonant and rarefied climax is reached in the poco allegretto, concluding with a sudden bang before the adagio ends with a meditative coda and a return to the opening obscureness in which we can hear the fundamental contour of the second.
The third movement eludes a traditional structure. It begins with a noisy and vigorously rhythmic theme, which again is based on the opening motive of the symphony. It soon becomes the subject of a flowing and melodic fugato, a rare procedure in Holmboe's music. Gradually more and more instruments are added as the musical texture thickens, contrasted by lighter passages. An agitated climax is reached in which the marching rhythms and irregular metre of the first movement briefly return in full force. A long crescendo begins with a flute and cello duet, with the music growing more and more resolute and wilful. The symphony thus ends with an affirmative and resounding conclusion on full orchestra.
Picture: "Simeon the Stylite" (1939) by Dutch painter Carel Willink.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/yllw5rdt and tinyurl.com/yl3btoq2
To check the score: tinyurl.com/yl3btoq2





![Symphony in E-flat major - Igor Stravinsky
Royal Scottish National Orchestra conducted by Sir Alexander Gibson.
I - Allegro moderato - Molto sostenuto - Poco meno mosso - Più mosso - Allegro molto - Tempo I: 0:00
II - Scherzo. Allegretto - Pochissimo meno mosso - Allegretto (Tempo I): 10:18
III - Largo: 16:04
IV - Finale. Allegro molto - Più tranquillo - L’istesso tempo - Un poco più tranquillo - L’istesso tempo - Presto - Molto pesante: 25:54
Stravinskys Symphony in E-flat major was composed between July 18 and September 24 of 1905, being his first major work under the close supervision of his teacher Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov. The second and third movements were performed in a private concert in St. Petersburg on March 27 of 1907, played by the St. Petersburg Court Orchestra conducted by Hugo Warlich, after which Stravinsky revised the orchestration. Its full public premiere took place on January 22 of 1908, with the same orchestra conducted by Felix Blumenfeld. A final revision of the orchestration took place in 1913, which was then performed in Montreux on April 2 of 1914, performed by the Orchestre du Kursaal conducted by Ernest Ansermet.
Unlike many other composers, Stravinsky did not dismiss the piece as a mere student exercise, as he conducted the symphony multiple times and even recorded it in 1960. The work shows the influence not only of Rimsky-Korsakov (to whom the work is dedicated), but also Tchaikovsky and Glazunov. Stravinsky later wrote about the work: I wrote this Symphony at a time when Glazunov reigned supreme. At that time I shared this admiration wholeheartedly. While the work is academic in nature, and clearly indebted to the grand Russian romantic tradition, an anticipation of Stravinskys own style can be clearly heard in the scherzo, which would be later used as an intermezzo in performances of the Ballets Russes.
The first movement is structured in sonata form, clearly influenced by Glazunov and Borodin. It begins with a brilliant and assertive main theme in E-flat major, presented by full orchestra and rising to a powerful climax. A transition leads to the more lyrical second theme in B-flat major introduced by the clarinet before passing onto strings. The ensuing development is dominated by the opening fragment of the main theme, boldly modulating to keys such as C minor, G minor and G-flat major. After a dramatic climax, the material is then brilliantly recapitulated in the home key of E-flat major. A slower transition leads to a syncopated coda, which ends the allegro with a final statement of the main theme.
The second movement is a scherzo in ternary form, influenced by Rimsky-Korsakov and Tchaikovsky. It opens with a rhythmic and vigorous main theme in B-flat major. The trio section features a more lyrical second theme in F major, presented by strings before woodwinds gradually join. It is based on the Russian folksong Tchitcher-Yatcher that Stravinsky would later reuse for his 1911 ballet Petrushka and his Three little songs of 1913. After a climax, both themes are contrapuntally combined in the key of E-flat major. The main theme is then recapitulated in the home key of B-flat major. A final repeat of the trio theme leads to a short and playful coda.
The third movement is also structured in ternary form, again showing the influence of Tchaikovsky, specially his Symphony No. 6 in B minor Pathétique. It begins with a lyrical and melancholic main theme in G-sharp minor, introduced by cellos and violas in pianissimo. It passes onto full strings, growing into two dramatic and expressive climaxes. The central section features a noble and melodic second theme in E major, introduced by the horn before passing onto strings and offering great contrast. The music then reaches the most intense climax yet, leading to the varied recapitulation of the main theme. The largo ends with a long, sparse and desolate coda that seems to anticipate the 1910 ballet The Firebird.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Colourful Life (1907) by the Russian-French painter Wassily Kandinsky.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2dqrhy9a, https://tinyurl.com/28w4fmyl and https://tinyurl.com/23cabkrk
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/29kk8cyy Symphony in E-flat major - Igor Stravinsky](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uFZFYhbipy8/mqdefault.jpg)




