Neuroscience and the Right Against Self-Incrimination @pbsbrainsontrial
Neuroscience and the Right Against Self-Incrimination  @pbsbrainsontrial
Uploaded September 2013 | Updated September 2026, 17 hours ago
Alan discusses with Dr. Nita Farahany of Duke University how bringing fMRI brain scans into court, either by scanning witnesses or defendants, could challenge the right against self-incrimination and how constitutional law might have to change in ways to protect this right.

This segment was taken from episode one, "Determining Guilt," from the broadcast, "Brains on Trial with Alan Alda."

To see the full episode, go here: brainsontrial.com/watch-videos/video/episode-1-determining-guilt

And for more video and other content, go here: brainsontrial.com
Neuroscience and the Right Against Self-IncriminationDo humans truly have Free Will?Can Alan Alda get caught in a lie?Roundtable Discusses SentenceWhy fMRI Lie Detection isnt ready for courtEpisode two of the 2-part PBS series Brains on Trial with Alan AldaHow Retribution and Recidivism weigh into a Judges SentenceAlan Alda gets hypnotizedTruth and Lies - A Harvard University ExperimentThe Neuroscience behind Moral JudgmentsHow Memory Association affects fMRI Lie DetectionMITs McGovern Institute Brains on Trial Panel
Brains On Trial |

Neuroscience and the Right Against Self-Incrimination

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER