How Retribution and Recidivism weigh into a Judges Sentence @pbsbrainsontrial
How Retribution and Recidivism weigh into a Judges Sentence  @pbsbrainsontrial
Uploaded September 2013 | Updated September 2026, 3 days ago
Dr. Nita Farahany discusses what the judge in our trial might be thinking as he determines Jimmy Moran's sentence. Farahany explains what different schools of thought could enter into Judge Rakoff's mind, considering retribution and recidivism.

This segment was taken from episode two "Deciding Punishment," from the broadcast, "Brains on Trial with Alan Alda."

To see the full episode, go here: brainsontrial.com/watch-videos/video/episode-2-deciding-punishment

And for more video and other content, go here: brainsontrial.com
How Retribution and Recidivism weigh into a Judges SentenceAlan Alda gets hypnotizedTruth and Lies - A Harvard University ExperimentThe Neuroscience behind Moral JudgmentsHow Memory Association affects fMRI Lie DetectionMITs McGovern Institute Brains on Trial PanelCocaine Addiction and the BrainCorrelating Brain Scans with BehaviorThe Problem of Racial Bias in Criminal JusticeCan a brain scan tell what you are seeing?How the Courts view Age when determining SentenceHow Neuroscience could improve Eye-Witness Testimony
Brains On Trial |

How Retribution and Recidivism weigh into a Judge's Sentence

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER