The Neuroscience behind Moral Judgments @pbsbrainsontrial
The Neuroscience behind Moral Judgments  @pbsbrainsontrial
Uploaded September 2013 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
Alan met with Rebecca Saxe of MIT's McGovern Institute. Saxe has been researching how people make moral judgments of other's actions. Recognizing the Right Temporoparietal Junction (RTPJ) as active when weighing moral judgments, her research gives insight as to how jurors determine guilt or innocence in a trial.

This segment was taken from episode one, "Determining Guilt," from the broadcast, "Brains on Trial with Alan Alda."

To see the full episode, go here: brainsontrial.com/watch-videos/video/episode-1-determining-guilt

And for more video and other content, go here: brainsontrial.com
The Neuroscience behind Moral JudgmentsHow Memory Association affects fMRI Lie DetectionMITs McGovern Institute Brains on Trial PanelCocaine Addiction and the BrainCorrelating Brain Scans with BehaviorThe Problem of Racial Bias in Criminal JusticeCan a brain scan tell what you are seeing?How the Courts view Age when determining SentenceHow Neuroscience could improve Eye-Witness TestimonyHow does fMRI brain scanning work? Alan Alda and Dr. Nancy Kanwisher, MITEpisode one of the 2-part PBS series Brains on Trial with Alan AldaHow the Psychopathic Brain informs about Recidivism
Brains On Trial |

The Neuroscience behind Moral Judgments

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER