Uploaded March 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This is the British pound sterling, the world’s oldest currency in continuous use since its inception. These are the banknotes. As you can see, they feature the faces of famous British figures. For example, the £5 note has a portrait of former military officer and wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill; the £10 features celebrated English novelist Jane Austen; while the £50 showcases WWII codebreaker and the father of modern computing, Alan Turing.
Influential British people on British banknotes? Nothing to see here, right? Well, it turns out that in the name of diversity—or some other such nonsense—having pictures of people on money might upset some individuals. And as you know, in modern society, we’re not allowed to upset anyone. For example, Winston Churchill: although he saved Britain from Nazi Germany, he was a staunch defender of British imperialism. Not to mention he was a member of the Conservative Party—very upsetting.
So, the Bank of England, in its infinite wisdom, has decided to replace these “divisive” humans with British wildlife instead. Thank you to the viewer who sent this in. As the BBC reported recently: “Wildlife to replace historical figures on banknotes—and you get a say.” Well, not you, unless you’re British, but even then, you probably won’t get much of a say.
Just to be clear: they’re not erasing history, they’re just updating it—by deleting historical figures.
According to the BBC article, this “spells the end for the, sometimes controversial, choice of historical characters.” But never fear, “a panel of experts will draw up a wildlife shortlist to put before the public.” Ah, democracy at work. Don’t worry about the disappearance of these national icons; just shut up and choose an animal!
The official reason for the change has nothing to do with divisive historical figures, but rather, as the BBC put it: “Images of wildlife would be difficult to counterfeit, while also allowing for a celebration of nature across the country, the Bank said.”
Of course! See, counterfeiting Winston Churchill is too easy—apparently any toddler can scribble a recognisable cigar and a scowl—but try to draw a robin! They’re surprisingly impossible to draw. And the common frog? Once the Bank has an amphibian on the fiver, financial crime in the British Isles is basically solved.
According to more recent BBC reports, to everyone’s surprise, there’s been a bit of a backlash to the Bank’s sudden pivot to biology. Leader of the Opposition Kemi Badenoch said it was “a silly thing to do,” while Reform’s Nigel Farage called it “absolutely crackers.” And again, the Bank reiterates that this was primarily an anti-counterfeiting move, claiming Churchill and other historical characters “would eventually have to be replaced” anyway.
The anti-counterfeiting properties of the Eurasian beaver cannot be understated. Even the RSPCA has stepped into the debate, making the case for “pigeons, rats and gulls” to be represented on the currency. Oh yes, I can’t wait for the tenner to have a rat on it. Nothing says ‘Global Britain’ quite like a plague-carrying rodent.
For those lovers of the royal family, never fear; the BBC notes that “the monarch has appeared on Bank of England notes since 1960, and will continue to do so in the future.” So, King Charles will still be there, personally overseeing every overpriced pint and electricity bill.
Chief Cashier at the Bank of England, Victoria Cleland, loves her new idea. She said: “Nature is a great choice from a banknote authentication perspective and means we can showcase the UK’s rich and varied wildlife on the next series of banknotes.” See? It’s purely technical! Apparently, a badger has better “authentication perspective” than the man who won the Second World War.
I guess now it’s just a matter of time until Australia copies the UK—as we love to do—and starts erasing the likes of one of Australia’s greatest military commanders, John Monash, and replacing him with a bin chicken. ‘Waltzing Matilda’-creator Banjo Paterson will become a grumpy wombat, while Queen Elizabeth will be appropriately superseded by a screeching cockatoo.
I just can’t wait till they replace our heritage with a zoo, because as we’ve learnt today: they’re not erasing history, they’re just updating it—by deleting the very people who made it.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn
This is the British pound sterling, the world’s oldest currency in continuous use since its inception. These are the banknotes. As you can see, they feature the faces of famous British figures. For example, the £5 note has a portrait of former military officer and wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill; the £10 features celebrated English novelist Jane Austen; while the £50 showcases WWII codebreaker and the father of modern computing, Alan Turing.
Influential British people on British banknotes? Nothing to see here, right? Well, it turns out that in the name of diversity—or some other such nonsense—having pictures of people on money might upset some individuals. And as you know, in modern society, we’re not allowed to upset anyone. For example, Winston Churchill: although he saved Britain from Nazi Germany, he was a staunch defender of British imperialism. Not to mention he was a member of the Conservative Party—very upsetting.
So, the Bank of England, in its infinite wisdom, has decided to replace these “divisive” humans with British wildlife instead. Thank you to the viewer who sent this in. As the BBC reported recently: “Wildlife to replace historical figures on banknotes—and you get a say.” Well, not you, unless you’re British, but even then, you probably won’t get much of a say.
Just to be clear: they’re not erasing history, they’re just updating it—by deleting historical figures.
According to the BBC article, this “spells the end for the, sometimes controversial, choice of historical characters.” But never fear, “a panel of experts will draw up a wildlife shortlist to put before the public.” Ah, democracy at work. Don’t worry about the disappearance of these national icons; just shut up and choose an animal!
The official reason for the change has nothing to do with divisive historical figures, but rather, as the BBC put it: “Images of wildlife would be difficult to counterfeit, while also allowing for a celebration of nature across the country, the Bank said.”
Of course! See, counterfeiting Winston Churchill is too easy—apparently any toddler can scribble a recognisable cigar and a scowl—but try to draw a robin! They’re surprisingly impossible to draw. And the common frog? Once the Bank has an amphibian on the fiver, financial crime in the British Isles is basically solved.
According to more recent BBC reports, to everyone’s surprise, there’s been a bit of a backlash to the Bank’s sudden pivot to biology. Leader of the Opposition Kemi Badenoch said it was “a silly thing to do,” while Reform’s Nigel Farage called it “absolutely crackers.” And again, the Bank reiterates that this was primarily an anti-counterfeiting move, claiming Churchill and other historical characters “would eventually have to be replaced” anyway.
The anti-counterfeiting properties of the Eurasian beaver cannot be understated. Even the RSPCA has stepped into the debate, making the case for “pigeons, rats and gulls” to be represented on the currency. Oh yes, I can’t wait for the tenner to have a rat on it. Nothing says ‘Global Britain’ quite like a plague-carrying rodent.
For those lovers of the royal family, never fear; the BBC notes that “the monarch has appeared on Bank of England notes since 1960, and will continue to do so in the future.” So, King Charles will still be there, personally overseeing every overpriced pint and electricity bill.
Chief Cashier at the Bank of England, Victoria Cleland, loves her new idea. She said: “Nature is a great choice from a banknote authentication perspective and means we can showcase the UK’s rich and varied wildlife on the next series of banknotes.” See? It’s purely technical! Apparently, a badger has better “authentication perspective” than the man who won the Second World War.
I guess now it’s just a matter of time until Australia copies the UK—as we love to do—and starts erasing the likes of one of Australia’s greatest military commanders, John Monash, and replacing him with a bin chicken. ‘Waltzing Matilda’-creator Banjo Paterson will become a grumpy wombat, while Queen Elizabeth will be appropriately superseded by a screeching cockatoo.
I just can’t wait till they replace our heritage with a zoo, because as we’ve learnt today: they’re not erasing history, they’re just updating it—by deleting the very people who made it.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn



![UniMelb: Did Aboriginals Actually Invent Highways?
Did you know that highways were actually invented by Australian Aboriginal people? It’s true! Well, kind of—at least according to some of our finest universities.
The University of Melbourne—consistently ranked among the finest in Australia and the world—publishes a steady stream of content on its YouTube page. You’ll find videos like:
• Celebrating the Hindu festival of Holi at UniMelb, which features the quote: “It’s purple. It’s mystery. Law is mystery.” I’ll tell you what’s a mystery: how someone actually gets a law degree saying things like that.
• Wominjeka 2026—essentially an Aboriginal Welcome to Country that is plastered on their buildings in both standard colours and, of course, the LGBT rainbow version.
• The Chinese Year of the Horse, with the quote: “It means moving forward and being brave.” At least that one makes sense. And…
• The Midsumma Pride March 2026, just to name a few.
As they say, “If it ain’t woke, don’t fix it.” Or is it: “If it ain’t woke, make sure it becomes woke and rub it in everyone’s faces—especially the students.”
But the one University of Melbourne video I’d like to look at today (and thank you to the viewer who sent this in) is titled: “Cultural and Indigenous Astronomy.”
They introduce the video by noting: “Cool things we’ve learnt from Indigenous astronomers.” They then pivot to what I hinted at earlier: “Our roads and cities come from star maps.” Yes, apparently our urban planning is actually an Aboriginal-inspired intergalactic grid. It definitely had nothing to do with surveyors, civil engineers, or, you know, British colonisation.
Back to the video: “Aboriginal people mapped out trade routes. These routes are called Songlines, which are encoded in song.” Yes, the roads you drive on actually double as a musical score, which is great news for anyone whose car radio is broken.
A quick Google search reveals that “Songlines, also known as Dreaming tracks or footprints of the ancestors, are intricate, oral-tradition paths spanning Australia that map the routes taken by Creator Beings during the Dreamtime.” Yes, when you drive along the M1, you’re not just stuck in gridlock; you’re following the pathways of the gods! Though, judging by the traffic at 5:00 PM, even the gods probably would’ve taken a backstreet.
But they’re not just roads. According to ABC News: “In Aboriginal culture, Songlines are like libraries—and they store knowledge.” They’re like some sort of ancient Wikipedia—only with more singing and less fact-checking. I’m not sure how this is ‘news,’ but trust our national broadcaster to treat a traditional oral history like it’s a breaking discovery from Silicon Valley.
The Indigenous website Deadly Story, which aims to help Aboriginal young people “connect to Country,” of course teaches them all about Songlines—providing realistic and highly practical scientific facts like: “Songlines act as a ‘Cultural Passport’,” and “Songlines contain information” such as which “types of food are safe to eat.”
Naturally, it also dives into grievance culture: “When the British invaded, the colonists [mercilessly] used Aboriginal Songlines for their horse-drawn vehicles,” and “One of the great tragedies of colonisation was the eradication and white-washing of the carefully curated use of Country by Aboriginal people. Songlines were diminished as mere ‘animal tracks’.”
I suppose the British should’ve just wandered aimlessly through the bush instead of using the most efficient routes available. Clearly, the greatest crime of the Empire wasn’t the mismanagement of a continent; it was the audacity to use an existing road.
And finally, the university’s video concludes that: “These Songlines eventually became roads and highways.” So there you go. That’s how Aboriginal people supposedly invented highways—or, if we want to be accurate, that’s how the colonising British Empire acquired existing footpaths and turned them into the dual-carriageway arterial roads that helped kick-start one of the world’s most successful modern economies.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn UniMelb: Did Aboriginals Actually Invent Highways?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/U5WBuZuM-Ys/mqdefault.jpg)






