Uploaded February 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This is 31-year-old Grace Tame. She’s a sexual assault survivor and an advocate for other victims. I’m not here to discuss that or take anything away from the work she’s done in that area.
In 2021, she was named Australian of the Year for helping to overturn a gag law preventing sexual assault survivors from speaking out. A year later, she refused to smile in a now-infamous photo with then-Prime Minister Scott Morrison. Regarding the encounter, she said: “The survival of abuse culture is dependent on submissive smiles and self-defeating surrenders. It is dependent on hypocrisy.”
She also has autism, with the ABC reporting that while it can be a risk factor for abuse, she finds the condition empowering. But again, that’s not what I’m here to talk about. According to her Instagram, TamePunk, she’s also a serious athlete; in one 60km ultramarathon, she was the first female to cross the line and came sixth overall.
On paper, she’s a high-achiever who has done a lot of heavy lifting. However, she has a history of using polite, official functions to make a scene—or a statement—depending on your point of view. In 2025, at an Australian of the Year morning tea at Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s residence, while she managed a smile, she did it while wearing a T-shirt that read, “F**k Murdoch,” referring to billionaire media mogul Rupert Murdoch.
Defending the choice, she said: “The T-shirt is clearly not just about Murdoch, it’s the obscene greed, inhumanity and disconnection that he symbolises, which are destroying our planet. For far too long this world and its resources have been undemocratically controlled by a small number of morbidly wealthy oligarchs. If we want to dismantle this corrupt system… resisting forces like Murdoch is a good starting point.”
Here she is hanging out with Garbage singer Shirley Manson late last year. If you remember, Manson made headlines in December 2025 for openly berating a lifelong fan at a concert in Melbourne. She called the man “middle-aged,” questioned his masculinity, and even encouraged the audience to “punch him in the f**king face”—all because he was holding a small beach ball.
As they say, you are the company you keep.
And as is quite fashionable nowadays, it probably comes as no surprise that Ms. Tame is also a pro-Palestinian activist.
At a protest of questionable legality earlier this week at Sydney Town Hall—following a failed Supreme Court bid to authorise the march—Ms. Tame was a keynote speaker. You can watch the speech in full on Instagram if you’re a glutton for punishment.
She referred to Australia as a “so-called democracy,” screaming into the microphone that the country “funds genocide” and “punishes peaceful protesters like us.” She didn’t hold back on international relations either, calling Israel a “right-wing fascist state” that has nothing left but “lies, bombs, and bloodlust,” to much applause and cheers from the fawning crowd. And in front of an Aboriginal flag, she described Australia as a “spineless colony of the United States.”
She finally led the crowd in a chant: “From Gadigal to Gaza, globalise the intifada!” For the uninitiated, ‘intifada’ is the Arabic word for uprising or rebellion. While her supporters call it “resistance,” to many others—including the NSW Government, which recently moved to ban the phrase—it is a direct call for violence.
Of course, Ms. Tame made the news as she probably hoped for. The ABC reported: “Call for Grace Tame to be stripped of Australian of the Year title over intifada chant.”
One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce agreed that she should have her title removed, saying, “Yes, 100 per cent… You have a responsibility, when given an honour by the Australian people, to basically conduct yourself in a way that inspires the harmonious nature of Australia. We do not inspire this sort of division, this hate.”
She was defiant, of course. She published the video on her social media under the headline: “FROM GADIGAL TO GAZA.” Naturally, she concluded her diatribe by declaring that Australia doesn’t actually belong to us. She wrote: “Thank you to the organisers, to everyone who attended, and to all the local elders who welcomed us and gave us permission to come together on these here stolen lands.”
Of course, you’re not allowed to comment on her posts, because you know, she doesn’t actually believe in your right to free speech—unless you’re following her script.
So there you go. So-called ‘Australian of the Year’ Grace Tame doesn’t particularly care for the country she represents, preferring to view the nation that honoured her as nothing more than a ‘spineless colony’ on stolen land. Apparently, being a ‘high-achiever’ is out, and being a professional agitator is in.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn
This is 31-year-old Grace Tame. She’s a sexual assault survivor and an advocate for other victims. I’m not here to discuss that or take anything away from the work she’s done in that area.
In 2021, she was named Australian of the Year for helping to overturn a gag law preventing sexual assault survivors from speaking out. A year later, she refused to smile in a now-infamous photo with then-Prime Minister Scott Morrison. Regarding the encounter, she said: “The survival of abuse culture is dependent on submissive smiles and self-defeating surrenders. It is dependent on hypocrisy.”
She also has autism, with the ABC reporting that while it can be a risk factor for abuse, she finds the condition empowering. But again, that’s not what I’m here to talk about. According to her Instagram, TamePunk, she’s also a serious athlete; in one 60km ultramarathon, she was the first female to cross the line and came sixth overall.
On paper, she’s a high-achiever who has done a lot of heavy lifting. However, she has a history of using polite, official functions to make a scene—or a statement—depending on your point of view. In 2025, at an Australian of the Year morning tea at Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s residence, while she managed a smile, she did it while wearing a T-shirt that read, “F**k Murdoch,” referring to billionaire media mogul Rupert Murdoch.
Defending the choice, she said: “The T-shirt is clearly not just about Murdoch, it’s the obscene greed, inhumanity and disconnection that he symbolises, which are destroying our planet. For far too long this world and its resources have been undemocratically controlled by a small number of morbidly wealthy oligarchs. If we want to dismantle this corrupt system… resisting forces like Murdoch is a good starting point.”
Here she is hanging out with Garbage singer Shirley Manson late last year. If you remember, Manson made headlines in December 2025 for openly berating a lifelong fan at a concert in Melbourne. She called the man “middle-aged,” questioned his masculinity, and even encouraged the audience to “punch him in the f**king face”—all because he was holding a small beach ball.
As they say, you are the company you keep.
And as is quite fashionable nowadays, it probably comes as no surprise that Ms. Tame is also a pro-Palestinian activist.
At a protest of questionable legality earlier this week at Sydney Town Hall—following a failed Supreme Court bid to authorise the march—Ms. Tame was a keynote speaker. You can watch the speech in full on Instagram if you’re a glutton for punishment.
She referred to Australia as a “so-called democracy,” screaming into the microphone that the country “funds genocide” and “punishes peaceful protesters like us.” She didn’t hold back on international relations either, calling Israel a “right-wing fascist state” that has nothing left but “lies, bombs, and bloodlust,” to much applause and cheers from the fawning crowd. And in front of an Aboriginal flag, she described Australia as a “spineless colony of the United States.”
She finally led the crowd in a chant: “From Gadigal to Gaza, globalise the intifada!” For the uninitiated, ‘intifada’ is the Arabic word for uprising or rebellion. While her supporters call it “resistance,” to many others—including the NSW Government, which recently moved to ban the phrase—it is a direct call for violence.
Of course, Ms. Tame made the news as she probably hoped for. The ABC reported: “Call for Grace Tame to be stripped of Australian of the Year title over intifada chant.”
One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce agreed that she should have her title removed, saying, “Yes, 100 per cent… You have a responsibility, when given an honour by the Australian people, to basically conduct yourself in a way that inspires the harmonious nature of Australia. We do not inspire this sort of division, this hate.”
She was defiant, of course. She published the video on her social media under the headline: “FROM GADIGAL TO GAZA.” Naturally, she concluded her diatribe by declaring that Australia doesn’t actually belong to us. She wrote: “Thank you to the organisers, to everyone who attended, and to all the local elders who welcomed us and gave us permission to come together on these here stolen lands.”
Of course, you’re not allowed to comment on her posts, because you know, she doesn’t actually believe in your right to free speech—unless you’re following her script.
So there you go. So-called ‘Australian of the Year’ Grace Tame doesn’t particularly care for the country she represents, preferring to view the nation that honoured her as nothing more than a ‘spineless colony’ on stolen land. Apparently, being a ‘high-achiever’ is out, and being a professional agitator is in.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn
![UniMelb: Did Aboriginals Actually Invent Highways?
Did you know that highways were actually invented by Australian Aboriginal people? It’s true! Well, kind of—at least according to some of our finest universities.
The University of Melbourne—consistently ranked among the finest in Australia and the world—publishes a steady stream of content on its YouTube page. You’ll find videos like:
• Celebrating the Hindu festival of Holi at UniMelb, which features the quote: “It’s purple. It’s mystery. Law is mystery.” I’ll tell you what’s a mystery: how someone actually gets a law degree saying things like that.
• Wominjeka 2026—essentially an Aboriginal Welcome to Country that is plastered on their buildings in both standard colours and, of course, the LGBT rainbow version.
• The Chinese Year of the Horse, with the quote: “It means moving forward and being brave.” At least that one makes sense. And…
• The Midsumma Pride March 2026, just to name a few.
As they say, “If it ain’t woke, don’t fix it.” Or is it: “If it ain’t woke, make sure it becomes woke and rub it in everyone’s faces—especially the students.”
But the one University of Melbourne video I’d like to look at today (and thank you to the viewer who sent this in) is titled: “Cultural and Indigenous Astronomy.”
They introduce the video by noting: “Cool things we’ve learnt from Indigenous astronomers.” They then pivot to what I hinted at earlier: “Our roads and cities come from star maps.” Yes, apparently our urban planning is actually an Aboriginal-inspired intergalactic grid. It definitely had nothing to do with surveyors, civil engineers, or, you know, British colonisation.
Back to the video: “Aboriginal people mapped out trade routes. These routes are called Songlines, which are encoded in song.” Yes, the roads you drive on actually double as a musical score, which is great news for anyone whose car radio is broken.
A quick Google search reveals that “Songlines, also known as Dreaming tracks or footprints of the ancestors, are intricate, oral-tradition paths spanning Australia that map the routes taken by Creator Beings during the Dreamtime.” Yes, when you drive along the M1, you’re not just stuck in gridlock; you’re following the pathways of the gods! Though, judging by the traffic at 5:00 PM, even the gods probably would’ve taken a backstreet.
But they’re not just roads. According to ABC News: “In Aboriginal culture, Songlines are like libraries—and they store knowledge.” They’re like some sort of ancient Wikipedia—only with more singing and less fact-checking. I’m not sure how this is ‘news,’ but trust our national broadcaster to treat a traditional oral history like it’s a breaking discovery from Silicon Valley.
The Indigenous website Deadly Story, which aims to help Aboriginal young people “connect to Country,” of course teaches them all about Songlines—providing realistic and highly practical scientific facts like: “Songlines act as a ‘Cultural Passport’,” and “Songlines contain information” such as which “types of food are safe to eat.”
Naturally, it also dives into grievance culture: “When the British invaded, the colonists [mercilessly] used Aboriginal Songlines for their horse-drawn vehicles,” and “One of the great tragedies of colonisation was the eradication and white-washing of the carefully curated use of Country by Aboriginal people. Songlines were diminished as mere ‘animal tracks’.”
I suppose the British should’ve just wandered aimlessly through the bush instead of using the most efficient routes available. Clearly, the greatest crime of the Empire wasn’t the mismanagement of a continent; it was the audacity to use an existing road.
And finally, the university’s video concludes that: “These Songlines eventually became roads and highways.” So there you go. That’s how Aboriginal people supposedly invented highways—or, if we want to be accurate, that’s how the colonising British Empire acquired existing footpaths and turned them into the dual-carriageway arterial roads that helped kick-start one of the world’s most successful modern economies.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn UniMelb: Did Aboriginals Actually Invent Highways?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/U5WBuZuM-Ys/mqdefault.jpg)








![The ABC’s Hilarious Defence of Anthony Albanese
We all know that politicians belong to one of the most trustworthy professions in Australia. I mean, how could you possibly lie when you’re constantly under the public spotlight? It doesn’t even seem humanly possible.
So, it comes as a bit of a surprise that One Nation has launched a campaign targeting Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called “Fire the Liar”—which, in just two weeks, has managed to rake in over $4.8 million. They claim the PM has lied about everything from immigration levels and ISIS brides to electricity prices and… falling off a stage.
Now, to be fair to Albo, he didn’t fall off the stage. He was simply sitting down and having a rest in an incredibly awkward, floor-dwelling position. Hey, don’t judge—it’s exhausting work being on the campaign trail.
Thankfully, The Guardian was on standby to publish an entire piece explaining the nuanced differences between “falling, stumbling, and stepping off,” just to ensure you plebeians didn’t get the wrong idea.
But leaving aside that hard-hitting piece of investigative journalism, One Nation’s campaign is well underway. The real question is: did the PM honestly lie? (Excuse the oxymoron). Well, you might be surprised to learn that the ABC says: technically, no, he didn’t.
Here’s the article in question: “‘Broken promise’ or not, Anthony Albanese’s tax decision has helped One Nation.” First of all, a quick shout-out and thank you to the viewer who sent this one in. Now, to be entirely fair, this piece was originally published on The Conversation by Michelle Grattan—but nonetheless, the ABC happily chose to run it on their own platform.
The tax changes Michelle Grattan is referring to are, of course, the ones regarding negative gearing and capital gains. Now, what exactly did Albanese say about this before the election? Well, to give you just one example, during a press conference on the campaign trail last year, a journalist asked him directly: “Can you rule out any changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax settings if re-elected?” To which he snapped: “Yes. How hard is it? For the 50th time.”
Now, you would think that flatly ruling it out fifty times in his own words—only to turn around and introduce those exact changes anyway—would be definitive proof that he lied, right?
Well, not according to this ABC article.
Naturally, the article kicks off by focusing on the ABC’s perennial favourite villain, Pauline Hanson, and her “Fire the Liar” campaign. They immediately pivot to casting doubt on the fundraising numbers, noting: “By evening, it claimed to have raised more than $1 million, rising fast. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese cast doubt on the numbers.”
Because, of course, if there’s anyone whose judgement we should trust on the absolute, unvarnished truth… it’s the guy who just flat-out broke a major election promise. Good to see he’s keeping an eye on everyone else’s integrity.
The article features plenty of creative terms to describe Albanese’s bending of the truth. For instance, it refers to the “budget’s broken promises” before pointedly asking: “Does breaking your word in politics matter?”
It goes on to say: “But by changing the tax arrangements in the budget, he was certainly breaking his word, breaching faith with voters. It doesn’t help that when tackled about this, the prime minister pushed back by endlessly repeating the phrase, ‘We changed our position’.”
Yes, you’ve probably heard that exact phrase about a hundred times by now. Because apparently, in modern political speak, “we changed our position” is the new elegant euphemism for “we completely lied to your face.”
Speaking of lying, does the article actually mention the “L” word? Yes, it does! Buried in the text, they drop this incredible piece of semantic acrobatics:
“We can’t assume Albanese ‘lied’ in the campaign. To lie is, in a dictionary definition, ‘to say […] something that is not true in order to deceive someone’. We don’t know (beyond reasonable doubt) whether, when Albanese before the election flatly ruled out changing negative gearing and capital gains tax, he was saying one thing and intending (if conditions suited) to do another.”
Ah, well, it’s all settled then! If we can’t prove in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt that he was actively plotting to deceive us at the exact moment he said it, then it wasn’t a lie.
Perhaps that kind of elite dictionary-defending flies down at the ABC, but I reckon if you asked most Aussies down at the local pub, they’d call absolute BS on that explanation.
So, what is it? “Fire the person who may have technically changed his position and broken his word”? Or is it “Fire the Liar”?
I’ll let you decide.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn The ABC’s Hilarious Defence of Anthony Albanese](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XtiOY-SNfuc/mqdefault.jpg)
