Uploaded March 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Did you know that highways were actually invented by Australian Aboriginal people? It’s true! Well, kind of—at least according to some of our finest universities.
The University of Melbourne—consistently ranked among the finest in Australia and the world—publishes a steady stream of content on its YouTube page. You’ll find videos like:
• Celebrating the Hindu festival of Holi at UniMelb, which features the quote: “It’s purple. It’s mystery. Law is mystery.” I’ll tell you what’s a mystery: how someone actually gets a law degree saying things like that.
• Wominjeka 2026—essentially an Aboriginal Welcome to Country that is plastered on their buildings in both standard colours and, of course, the LGBT rainbow version.
• The Chinese Year of the Horse, with the quote: “It means moving forward and being brave.” At least that one makes sense. And…
• The Midsumma Pride March 2026, just to name a few.
As they say, “If it ain’t woke, don’t fix it.” Or is it: “If it ain’t woke, make sure it becomes woke and rub it in everyone’s faces—especially the students.”
But the one University of Melbourne video I’d like to look at today (and thank you to the viewer who sent this in) is titled: “Cultural and Indigenous Astronomy.”
They introduce the video by noting: “Cool things we’ve learnt from Indigenous astronomers.” They then pivot to what I hinted at earlier: “Our roads and cities come from star maps.” Yes, apparently our urban planning is actually an Aboriginal-inspired intergalactic grid. It definitely had nothing to do with surveyors, civil engineers, or, you know, British colonisation.
Back to the video: “Aboriginal people mapped out trade routes. These routes are called Songlines, which are encoded in song.” Yes, the roads you drive on actually double as a musical score, which is great news for anyone whose car radio is broken.
A quick Google search reveals that “Songlines, also known as Dreaming tracks or footprints of the ancestors, are intricate, oral-tradition paths spanning Australia that map the routes taken by Creator Beings during the Dreamtime.” Yes, when you drive along the M1, you’re not just stuck in gridlock; you’re following the pathways of the gods! Though, judging by the traffic at 5:00 PM, even the gods probably would’ve taken a backstreet.
But they’re not just roads. According to ABC News: “In Aboriginal culture, Songlines are like libraries—and they store knowledge.” They’re like some sort of ancient Wikipedia—only with more singing and less fact-checking. I’m not sure how this is ‘news,’ but trust our national broadcaster to treat a traditional oral history like it’s a breaking discovery from Silicon Valley.
The Indigenous website Deadly Story, which aims to help Aboriginal young people “connect to Country,” of course teaches them all about Songlines—providing realistic and highly practical scientific facts like: “Songlines act as a ‘Cultural Passport’,” and “Songlines contain information” such as which “types of food are safe to eat.”
Naturally, it also dives into grievance culture: “When the British invaded, the colonists [mercilessly] used Aboriginal Songlines for their horse-drawn vehicles,” and “One of the great tragedies of colonisation was the eradication and white-washing of the carefully curated use of Country by Aboriginal people. Songlines were diminished as mere ‘animal tracks’.”
I suppose the British should’ve just wandered aimlessly through the bush instead of using the most efficient routes available. Clearly, the greatest crime of the Empire wasn’t the mismanagement of a continent; it was the audacity to use an existing road.
And finally, the university’s video concludes that: “These Songlines eventually became roads and highways.” So there you go. That’s how Aboriginal people supposedly invented highways—or, if we want to be accurate, that’s how the colonising British Empire acquired existing footpaths and turned them into the dual-carriageway arterial roads that helped kick-start one of the world’s most successful modern economies.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn
Did you know that highways were actually invented by Australian Aboriginal people? It’s true! Well, kind of—at least according to some of our finest universities.
The University of Melbourne—consistently ranked among the finest in Australia and the world—publishes a steady stream of content on its YouTube page. You’ll find videos like:
• Celebrating the Hindu festival of Holi at UniMelb, which features the quote: “It’s purple. It’s mystery. Law is mystery.” I’ll tell you what’s a mystery: how someone actually gets a law degree saying things like that.
• Wominjeka 2026—essentially an Aboriginal Welcome to Country that is plastered on their buildings in both standard colours and, of course, the LGBT rainbow version.
• The Chinese Year of the Horse, with the quote: “It means moving forward and being brave.” At least that one makes sense. And…
• The Midsumma Pride March 2026, just to name a few.
As they say, “If it ain’t woke, don’t fix it.” Or is it: “If it ain’t woke, make sure it becomes woke and rub it in everyone’s faces—especially the students.”
But the one University of Melbourne video I’d like to look at today (and thank you to the viewer who sent this in) is titled: “Cultural and Indigenous Astronomy.”
They introduce the video by noting: “Cool things we’ve learnt from Indigenous astronomers.” They then pivot to what I hinted at earlier: “Our roads and cities come from star maps.” Yes, apparently our urban planning is actually an Aboriginal-inspired intergalactic grid. It definitely had nothing to do with surveyors, civil engineers, or, you know, British colonisation.
Back to the video: “Aboriginal people mapped out trade routes. These routes are called Songlines, which are encoded in song.” Yes, the roads you drive on actually double as a musical score, which is great news for anyone whose car radio is broken.
A quick Google search reveals that “Songlines, also known as Dreaming tracks or footprints of the ancestors, are intricate, oral-tradition paths spanning Australia that map the routes taken by Creator Beings during the Dreamtime.” Yes, when you drive along the M1, you’re not just stuck in gridlock; you’re following the pathways of the gods! Though, judging by the traffic at 5:00 PM, even the gods probably would’ve taken a backstreet.
But they’re not just roads. According to ABC News: “In Aboriginal culture, Songlines are like libraries—and they store knowledge.” They’re like some sort of ancient Wikipedia—only with more singing and less fact-checking. I’m not sure how this is ‘news,’ but trust our national broadcaster to treat a traditional oral history like it’s a breaking discovery from Silicon Valley.
The Indigenous website Deadly Story, which aims to help Aboriginal young people “connect to Country,” of course teaches them all about Songlines—providing realistic and highly practical scientific facts like: “Songlines act as a ‘Cultural Passport’,” and “Songlines contain information” such as which “types of food are safe to eat.”
Naturally, it also dives into grievance culture: “When the British invaded, the colonists [mercilessly] used Aboriginal Songlines for their horse-drawn vehicles,” and “One of the great tragedies of colonisation was the eradication and white-washing of the carefully curated use of Country by Aboriginal people. Songlines were diminished as mere ‘animal tracks’.”
I suppose the British should’ve just wandered aimlessly through the bush instead of using the most efficient routes available. Clearly, the greatest crime of the Empire wasn’t the mismanagement of a continent; it was the audacity to use an existing road.
And finally, the university’s video concludes that: “These Songlines eventually became roads and highways.” So there you go. That’s how Aboriginal people supposedly invented highways—or, if we want to be accurate, that’s how the colonising British Empire acquired existing footpaths and turned them into the dual-carriageway arterial roads that helped kick-start one of the world’s most successful modern economies.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn








![The ABC’s Hilarious Defence of Anthony Albanese
We all know that politicians belong to one of the most trustworthy professions in Australia. I mean, how could you possibly lie when you’re constantly under the public spotlight? It doesn’t even seem humanly possible.
So, it comes as a bit of a surprise that One Nation has launched a campaign targeting Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called “Fire the Liar”—which, in just two weeks, has managed to rake in over $4.8 million. They claim the PM has lied about everything from immigration levels and ISIS brides to electricity prices and… falling off a stage.
Now, to be fair to Albo, he didn’t fall off the stage. He was simply sitting down and having a rest in an incredibly awkward, floor-dwelling position. Hey, don’t judge—it’s exhausting work being on the campaign trail.
Thankfully, The Guardian was on standby to publish an entire piece explaining the nuanced differences between “falling, stumbling, and stepping off,” just to ensure you plebeians didn’t get the wrong idea.
But leaving aside that hard-hitting piece of investigative journalism, One Nation’s campaign is well underway. The real question is: did the PM honestly lie? (Excuse the oxymoron). Well, you might be surprised to learn that the ABC says: technically, no, he didn’t.
Here’s the article in question: “‘Broken promise’ or not, Anthony Albanese’s tax decision has helped One Nation.” First of all, a quick shout-out and thank you to the viewer who sent this one in. Now, to be entirely fair, this piece was originally published on The Conversation by Michelle Grattan—but nonetheless, the ABC happily chose to run it on their own platform.
The tax changes Michelle Grattan is referring to are, of course, the ones regarding negative gearing and capital gains. Now, what exactly did Albanese say about this before the election? Well, to give you just one example, during a press conference on the campaign trail last year, a journalist asked him directly: “Can you rule out any changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax settings if re-elected?” To which he snapped: “Yes. How hard is it? For the 50th time.”
Now, you would think that flatly ruling it out fifty times in his own words—only to turn around and introduce those exact changes anyway—would be definitive proof that he lied, right?
Well, not according to this ABC article.
Naturally, the article kicks off by focusing on the ABC’s perennial favourite villain, Pauline Hanson, and her “Fire the Liar” campaign. They immediately pivot to casting doubt on the fundraising numbers, noting: “By evening, it claimed to have raised more than $1 million, rising fast. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese cast doubt on the numbers.”
Because, of course, if there’s anyone whose judgement we should trust on the absolute, unvarnished truth… it’s the guy who just flat-out broke a major election promise. Good to see he’s keeping an eye on everyone else’s integrity.
The article features plenty of creative terms to describe Albanese’s bending of the truth. For instance, it refers to the “budget’s broken promises” before pointedly asking: “Does breaking your word in politics matter?”
It goes on to say: “But by changing the tax arrangements in the budget, he was certainly breaking his word, breaching faith with voters. It doesn’t help that when tackled about this, the prime minister pushed back by endlessly repeating the phrase, ‘We changed our position’.”
Yes, you’ve probably heard that exact phrase about a hundred times by now. Because apparently, in modern political speak, “we changed our position” is the new elegant euphemism for “we completely lied to your face.”
Speaking of lying, does the article actually mention the “L” word? Yes, it does! Buried in the text, they drop this incredible piece of semantic acrobatics:
“We can’t assume Albanese ‘lied’ in the campaign. To lie is, in a dictionary definition, ‘to say […] something that is not true in order to deceive someone’. We don’t know (beyond reasonable doubt) whether, when Albanese before the election flatly ruled out changing negative gearing and capital gains tax, he was saying one thing and intending (if conditions suited) to do another.”
Ah, well, it’s all settled then! If we can’t prove in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt that he was actively plotting to deceive us at the exact moment he said it, then it wasn’t a lie.
Perhaps that kind of elite dictionary-defending flies down at the ABC, but I reckon if you asked most Aussies down at the local pub, they’d call absolute BS on that explanation.
So, what is it? “Fire the person who may have technically changed his position and broken his word”? Or is it “Fire the Liar”?
I’ll let you decide.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn The ABC’s Hilarious Defence of Anthony Albanese](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XtiOY-SNfuc/mqdefault.jpg)

