Uploaded September 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Indigenous DC superheroes, Pac-Man ghost statues, US-based Cambodian temple deities, and a mandatory queer love triangle. $25 adult entry, unless you’re Aboriginal and select “Mob Tix” for free. Is it just me, or has modern Australian art completely lost the plot?
I’m not an artist, but I don’t mind art. That said, Australia’s contemporary art scene has been completely overrun by modern-day wokeness.
Take, for example, the Museum of Contemporary Art located on Sydney Harbour. Their website, naturally, begins with a giant, unavoidable splash screen of an Aboriginal person seemingly washing their hands in white paint, accompanied by Aboriginal words written in English script—which, obviously, is useless to all but the most obsessed scholars.
Either way, after that, you finally arrive on the museum’s homepage.
Click through to tickets, and you’ll land on the Museum Admission page, where adult entry will set you back $25. If you’re a struggling pensioner or uni student, they’ll graciously knock five dollars off, provided you present official proof of concession or a valid ID. We can’t have the lower-middle class scamming the museum out of valuable income. But if you select “Mob Tix”—reserved strictly for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people—it’s completely free. Because, obviously, the museum assumes all Aboriginal people are dirt poor. What other explanation could there possibly be?
The main feature on their Events page is Tony Albert: Not a Souvenir. Look, I’m not here to mock the art, but the main image is literally two Aboriginal boys dressed in Batman and Superman costumes. How is that even art? Batman and Superman aren’t even Australian—am I missing something here?
But it’s not just race. Gender is, of course, front and centre in modern Australian art with an artwork by Nell titled Holding Both. The museum describes it as a sculpture that “honours the power and presence of women.”
And here’s the artist herself, crouching proudly beside her masterpiece—because nothing embodies the raw power and presence of women quite like a naked green bronze statue balancing two glowing Pac-Man ghosts on a stick. Sorry, I promise that will be the last time I mock any of the art.
But their flagship exhibition is Primavera: Young Australian Artists. This exhibition is apparently so vital to the national culture that even ABC News ran a dedicated, publicly-funded fluff piece on it.
It features quintessential Australian art, like this piece from Linda Sok titled Deities in Temples XXI. Because when people think of iconic Australian culture, ancient temple deities are obviously top of mind.
The ABC notes that Ms Sok actually lives in the United States and created this artwork to reconnect with her Cambodian heritage. Which makes total sense: an American-based artist exploring her Cambodian roots is, as I’m sure you’ll agree, classic Australian art.
They even feature a white male artist—I know, that doesn’t sound right, does it? The ABC writes: “Callum McGrath’s History Piece delves into a love story with a grisly ending.” Sounds intriguing!
Well... until you scroll down to the actual description: “Callum McGrath’s work examines a queer love triangle.” Of course it does. They add that “the Naarm/Melbourne based artist has often explored queer history in his work,” quoting him directly: “The homosexual element really comes out of a confession.”
Because heaven forbid the ABC highlight a story that doesn’t tick a mandatory activism box.
Despite how much fun I’m having here, I’ll hurry this along. The exhibition features artist Mark Maurangi Carrol, who was born in Dharawal Country, lives and works in Gadigal Country, and is a Māori Kūki Āirani artist from the Cook Islands.
So he’s a Cook Islander born and living in New South Wales, claiming three different nations before he even picks up a paintbrush. Because God forbid an artist just be from Sydney.
Also featured is an artist duo—a man and a woman, or at least I assume—named Stanton Cornish-Ward and Trent Crawford. Frankly, those both sound like private school boys’ names to me, but I couldn’t be bothered investigating any further.
Perhaps I was being a bit naive, but when I first looked into this exhibition, I foolishly thought they’d feature famous Aussie artist Barry “Bazza” Smith and his iconic piece, Self-Portrait of a Man Eating a Meat Pie with Dead Horse. Or maybe Kev “Davo” Davenport’s timeless masterpiece, Pass Me the Jugs, Love.
But no. Instead, we were treated to Aboriginal boys dressed as American superheroes, a powerful woman balancing Pac-Man ghosts on her shoulders, US residents painting Cambodian deities, and of course—because no Australian art exhibition is complete without one—a gay love triangle.
And best of all? You can enjoy the whole circus for free, provided you have the correct racial background.
Is it just me, or has modern Australian art completely lost the plot?
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn
Indigenous DC superheroes, Pac-Man ghost statues, US-based Cambodian temple deities, and a mandatory queer love triangle. $25 adult entry, unless you’re Aboriginal and select “Mob Tix” for free. Is it just me, or has modern Australian art completely lost the plot?
I’m not an artist, but I don’t mind art. That said, Australia’s contemporary art scene has been completely overrun by modern-day wokeness.
Take, for example, the Museum of Contemporary Art located on Sydney Harbour. Their website, naturally, begins with a giant, unavoidable splash screen of an Aboriginal person seemingly washing their hands in white paint, accompanied by Aboriginal words written in English script—which, obviously, is useless to all but the most obsessed scholars.
Either way, after that, you finally arrive on the museum’s homepage.
Click through to tickets, and you’ll land on the Museum Admission page, where adult entry will set you back $25. If you’re a struggling pensioner or uni student, they’ll graciously knock five dollars off, provided you present official proof of concession or a valid ID. We can’t have the lower-middle class scamming the museum out of valuable income. But if you select “Mob Tix”—reserved strictly for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people—it’s completely free. Because, obviously, the museum assumes all Aboriginal people are dirt poor. What other explanation could there possibly be?
The main feature on their Events page is Tony Albert: Not a Souvenir. Look, I’m not here to mock the art, but the main image is literally two Aboriginal boys dressed in Batman and Superman costumes. How is that even art? Batman and Superman aren’t even Australian—am I missing something here?
But it’s not just race. Gender is, of course, front and centre in modern Australian art with an artwork by Nell titled Holding Both. The museum describes it as a sculpture that “honours the power and presence of women.”
And here’s the artist herself, crouching proudly beside her masterpiece—because nothing embodies the raw power and presence of women quite like a naked green bronze statue balancing two glowing Pac-Man ghosts on a stick. Sorry, I promise that will be the last time I mock any of the art.
But their flagship exhibition is Primavera: Young Australian Artists. This exhibition is apparently so vital to the national culture that even ABC News ran a dedicated, publicly-funded fluff piece on it.
It features quintessential Australian art, like this piece from Linda Sok titled Deities in Temples XXI. Because when people think of iconic Australian culture, ancient temple deities are obviously top of mind.
The ABC notes that Ms Sok actually lives in the United States and created this artwork to reconnect with her Cambodian heritage. Which makes total sense: an American-based artist exploring her Cambodian roots is, as I’m sure you’ll agree, classic Australian art.
They even feature a white male artist—I know, that doesn’t sound right, does it? The ABC writes: “Callum McGrath’s History Piece delves into a love story with a grisly ending.” Sounds intriguing!
Well... until you scroll down to the actual description: “Callum McGrath’s work examines a queer love triangle.” Of course it does. They add that “the Naarm/Melbourne based artist has often explored queer history in his work,” quoting him directly: “The homosexual element really comes out of a confession.”
Because heaven forbid the ABC highlight a story that doesn’t tick a mandatory activism box.
Despite how much fun I’m having here, I’ll hurry this along. The exhibition features artist Mark Maurangi Carrol, who was born in Dharawal Country, lives and works in Gadigal Country, and is a Māori Kūki Āirani artist from the Cook Islands.
So he’s a Cook Islander born and living in New South Wales, claiming three different nations before he even picks up a paintbrush. Because God forbid an artist just be from Sydney.
Also featured is an artist duo—a man and a woman, or at least I assume—named Stanton Cornish-Ward and Trent Crawford. Frankly, those both sound like private school boys’ names to me, but I couldn’t be bothered investigating any further.
Perhaps I was being a bit naive, but when I first looked into this exhibition, I foolishly thought they’d feature famous Aussie artist Barry “Bazza” Smith and his iconic piece, Self-Portrait of a Man Eating a Meat Pie with Dead Horse. Or maybe Kev “Davo” Davenport’s timeless masterpiece, Pass Me the Jugs, Love.
But no. Instead, we were treated to Aboriginal boys dressed as American superheroes, a powerful woman balancing Pac-Man ghosts on her shoulders, US residents painting Cambodian deities, and of course—because no Australian art exhibition is complete without one—a gay love triangle.
And best of all? You can enjoy the whole circus for free, provided you have the correct racial background.
Is it just me, or has modern Australian art completely lost the plot?
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn


![UniMelb: Did Aboriginals Actually Invent Highways?
Did you know that highways were actually invented by Australian Aboriginal people? It’s true! Well, kind of—at least according to some of our finest universities.
The University of Melbourne—consistently ranked among the finest in Australia and the world—publishes a steady stream of content on its YouTube page. You’ll find videos like:
• Celebrating the Hindu festival of Holi at UniMelb, which features the quote: “It’s purple. It’s mystery. Law is mystery.” I’ll tell you what’s a mystery: how someone actually gets a law degree saying things like that.
• Wominjeka 2026—essentially an Aboriginal Welcome to Country that is plastered on their buildings in both standard colours and, of course, the LGBT rainbow version.
• The Chinese Year of the Horse, with the quote: “It means moving forward and being brave.” At least that one makes sense. And…
• The Midsumma Pride March 2026, just to name a few.
As they say, “If it ain’t woke, don’t fix it.” Or is it: “If it ain’t woke, make sure it becomes woke and rub it in everyone’s faces—especially the students.”
But the one University of Melbourne video I’d like to look at today (and thank you to the viewer who sent this in) is titled: “Cultural and Indigenous Astronomy.”
They introduce the video by noting: “Cool things we’ve learnt from Indigenous astronomers.” They then pivot to what I hinted at earlier: “Our roads and cities come from star maps.” Yes, apparently our urban planning is actually an Aboriginal-inspired intergalactic grid. It definitely had nothing to do with surveyors, civil engineers, or, you know, British colonisation.
Back to the video: “Aboriginal people mapped out trade routes. These routes are called Songlines, which are encoded in song.” Yes, the roads you drive on actually double as a musical score, which is great news for anyone whose car radio is broken.
A quick Google search reveals that “Songlines, also known as Dreaming tracks or footprints of the ancestors, are intricate, oral-tradition paths spanning Australia that map the routes taken by Creator Beings during the Dreamtime.” Yes, when you drive along the M1, you’re not just stuck in gridlock; you’re following the pathways of the gods! Though, judging by the traffic at 5:00 PM, even the gods probably would’ve taken a backstreet.
But they’re not just roads. According to ABC News: “In Aboriginal culture, Songlines are like libraries—and they store knowledge.” They’re like some sort of ancient Wikipedia—only with more singing and less fact-checking. I’m not sure how this is ‘news,’ but trust our national broadcaster to treat a traditional oral history like it’s a breaking discovery from Silicon Valley.
The Indigenous website Deadly Story, which aims to help Aboriginal young people “connect to Country,” of course teaches them all about Songlines—providing realistic and highly practical scientific facts like: “Songlines act as a ‘Cultural Passport’,” and “Songlines contain information” such as which “types of food are safe to eat.”
Naturally, it also dives into grievance culture: “When the British invaded, the colonists [mercilessly] used Aboriginal Songlines for their horse-drawn vehicles,” and “One of the great tragedies of colonisation was the eradication and white-washing of the carefully curated use of Country by Aboriginal people. Songlines were diminished as mere ‘animal tracks’.”
I suppose the British should’ve just wandered aimlessly through the bush instead of using the most efficient routes available. Clearly, the greatest crime of the Empire wasn’t the mismanagement of a continent; it was the audacity to use an existing road.
And finally, the university’s video concludes that: “These Songlines eventually became roads and highways.” So there you go. That’s how Aboriginal people supposedly invented highways—or, if we want to be accurate, that’s how the colonising British Empire acquired existing footpaths and turned them into the dual-carriageway arterial roads that helped kick-start one of the world’s most successful modern economies.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn UniMelb: Did Aboriginals Actually Invent Highways?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/U5WBuZuM-Ys/mqdefault.jpg)







