Uploaded March 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Aarhus Symphony Orchestra conducted by Owain Arwel Hughes.
I - Poco sostenuto (𝅘𝅥 = c. 72) - Allegro espansivo (𝅘𝅥 = c. 120): 0:00
II - Andante affettuoso (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = c. 92) - Più mosso (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = c. 120) - Tempo giusto (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = c. 80) - Allegro passionato (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = c. 120) - Andante tranquillo (𝅘𝅥 = c. 92): 9:18
III - Allegro con forza (𝅘𝅥 = c. 132) - Poco sostenuto - Tempo giusto (𝅘𝅥 = c. 132): 18:49
Holmboe's Symphony No.10 was composed between 1970-1, requested by Swedish conductor Sixten Ehrling, who was then conductor of the Detroit Symphony Orchestra. It was premiered on January 27 of 1972, performed by said orchestra and conductor. The score is dedicated to both. After minor revisions, the symphony was performed in Denmark on September 7 of that same year, played by the Danish National Radio Symphony Orchestra under Herbert Blomstedt. Structured in three movements, the work shows the composer's continued use of the Metamorphosis technique in a more concentrated form.
Holmboe's Metamorphosis is an original structural principle in which the material is continually being transformed from one state to another, gradually reaching a "total change", without losing its identity or its fundamental characteristics. The correspondence with nature's continuous transformation of matter is striking, and the material which Holmboe introduces into the process of change is most usually a musical "embryo", a thematic, motivic or rhythmical idea. Throughout a lifelong development he unwaveringly kept to a modal-diatonic basis (twelve tone music and serialism appealed little to him) but the principle has striking similarities with the constructive principles employed by Schoenberg and his pupils.
According to Helmer Nørgård: "With the 10th Symphony, the tonal fixation has become a compositional principle, and the chamber music and cluster sounds have disappeared. The 10th Symphony can be seen as a fulfilment of the new tendencies in the 9th Symphony." It is music that is at once concentrated and expansive, austere and expressive, intensely concentrated and wildly ecstatic. The symphony's score is preceded by the poem "Eidolons" by Walt Whitman, which embodies Holmboe's principle of metamorphosis:
"Ever the dim beginning,
Ever the growth, the rounding of the circle,
Ever the summit and the merge at last, (to surely start again)
Eidolons! Eidolons!
All space, all time,
(The stars, the terrible perturbations of the suns,
Swelling, collapsing, ending, serving their longer, shorter use)
Fill'd with eidolon sonly.
Ever the mutable,
Ever materials, changing, crumbling, re-cohering."
The first movement is rather free in form. It begins with a substantial introduction that presents the core elements of the ensuing allegro. After a cymbal clash, several motives are presented; low string pedal notes, a melancholic melodic idea on upper strings and suspended woodwind figures. These contribute to an austere and darkly coloured timbre. Low strings then unfold the melodic idea in a flowing counterpoint with upper strings. The allegro espansivo then subjects these elements to the metamorphosis technique, with a remarkable treatment of the build-up and release of tension. A brief central section offers an almost pastoral contrast between wood instruments. The transformations continue as tension gathers in a continuous crescendo, culminating in an imperious climax that serves as the coda.
The second movement is written in form of an arch. It opens with a severe and poignant theme on strings, with brass fanfares soon being added on top. Swirling strings the start the next section of the andante, a metamorphosic development of the previous material. Woodwinds engage in a lyrical counterpoint, before the music turns anxious and dissonant, a brief return to the previous status. A dramatic and sustained climax is reached on full orchestra, as the momentum develops inexorably into heavy rhythmic attacks. After a diminuendo, we hear a kind of recapitulation of the material, before the music serenely dissolves in the silence.
The third movement is also rather free in form. It begins with a short-lived calm introduction with an ostinato figure on woodwinds, quickly leading to the allegro con forza. This ostinato then becomes the subject of a concentred metamorphosic development, rising in a continuous crescendo before being cut off. A lyrical variation of the ostinato then unfolds in contrapuntal woodwinds, offering great contrast while the ostinato is audible throughout. It nobly rises acquiring a radiant colour, leading to a grandiose climax that seems to conciliate the different moods heard through the allegro. A slow, enigmatic coda then ends the symphony with a pedal note on low strings.
Picture: "The Embrace" (2022) by the Danish painter Eva Helene Pade.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/26lcdeju and tinyurl.com/24lf4dus
To check the score: tinyurl.com/25a4pgnx
Aarhus Symphony Orchestra conducted by Owain Arwel Hughes.
I - Poco sostenuto (𝅘𝅥 = c. 72) - Allegro espansivo (𝅘𝅥 = c. 120): 0:00
II - Andante affettuoso (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = c. 92) - Più mosso (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = c. 120) - Tempo giusto (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = c. 80) - Allegro passionato (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = c. 120) - Andante tranquillo (𝅘𝅥 = c. 92): 9:18
III - Allegro con forza (𝅘𝅥 = c. 132) - Poco sostenuto - Tempo giusto (𝅘𝅥 = c. 132): 18:49
Holmboe's Symphony No.10 was composed between 1970-1, requested by Swedish conductor Sixten Ehrling, who was then conductor of the Detroit Symphony Orchestra. It was premiered on January 27 of 1972, performed by said orchestra and conductor. The score is dedicated to both. After minor revisions, the symphony was performed in Denmark on September 7 of that same year, played by the Danish National Radio Symphony Orchestra under Herbert Blomstedt. Structured in three movements, the work shows the composer's continued use of the Metamorphosis technique in a more concentrated form.
Holmboe's Metamorphosis is an original structural principle in which the material is continually being transformed from one state to another, gradually reaching a "total change", without losing its identity or its fundamental characteristics. The correspondence with nature's continuous transformation of matter is striking, and the material which Holmboe introduces into the process of change is most usually a musical "embryo", a thematic, motivic or rhythmical idea. Throughout a lifelong development he unwaveringly kept to a modal-diatonic basis (twelve tone music and serialism appealed little to him) but the principle has striking similarities with the constructive principles employed by Schoenberg and his pupils.
According to Helmer Nørgård: "With the 10th Symphony, the tonal fixation has become a compositional principle, and the chamber music and cluster sounds have disappeared. The 10th Symphony can be seen as a fulfilment of the new tendencies in the 9th Symphony." It is music that is at once concentrated and expansive, austere and expressive, intensely concentrated and wildly ecstatic. The symphony's score is preceded by the poem "Eidolons" by Walt Whitman, which embodies Holmboe's principle of metamorphosis:
"Ever the dim beginning,
Ever the growth, the rounding of the circle,
Ever the summit and the merge at last, (to surely start again)
Eidolons! Eidolons!
All space, all time,
(The stars, the terrible perturbations of the suns,
Swelling, collapsing, ending, serving their longer, shorter use)
Fill'd with eidolon sonly.
Ever the mutable,
Ever materials, changing, crumbling, re-cohering."
The first movement is rather free in form. It begins with a substantial introduction that presents the core elements of the ensuing allegro. After a cymbal clash, several motives are presented; low string pedal notes, a melancholic melodic idea on upper strings and suspended woodwind figures. These contribute to an austere and darkly coloured timbre. Low strings then unfold the melodic idea in a flowing counterpoint with upper strings. The allegro espansivo then subjects these elements to the metamorphosis technique, with a remarkable treatment of the build-up and release of tension. A brief central section offers an almost pastoral contrast between wood instruments. The transformations continue as tension gathers in a continuous crescendo, culminating in an imperious climax that serves as the coda.
The second movement is written in form of an arch. It opens with a severe and poignant theme on strings, with brass fanfares soon being added on top. Swirling strings the start the next section of the andante, a metamorphosic development of the previous material. Woodwinds engage in a lyrical counterpoint, before the music turns anxious and dissonant, a brief return to the previous status. A dramatic and sustained climax is reached on full orchestra, as the momentum develops inexorably into heavy rhythmic attacks. After a diminuendo, we hear a kind of recapitulation of the material, before the music serenely dissolves in the silence.
The third movement is also rather free in form. It begins with a short-lived calm introduction with an ostinato figure on woodwinds, quickly leading to the allegro con forza. This ostinato then becomes the subject of a concentred metamorphosic development, rising in a continuous crescendo before being cut off. A lyrical variation of the ostinato then unfolds in contrapuntal woodwinds, offering great contrast while the ostinato is audible throughout. It nobly rises acquiring a radiant colour, leading to a grandiose climax that seems to conciliate the different moods heard through the allegro. A slow, enigmatic coda then ends the symphony with a pedal note on low strings.
Picture: "The Embrace" (2022) by the Danish painter Eva Helene Pade.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/26lcdeju and tinyurl.com/24lf4dus
To check the score: tinyurl.com/25a4pgnx

![Roaring Rotterdam for Orchestra - Joep Franssens
Netherlands Radio Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Gerd Albrecht.
I - Tempo I: Sostenuto, ma ritmico (♪ = 168) - Tempo II (♪ = 138) - (♪ = 168) - (♪ = 138) - Sempre come un corale (𝅘𝅥 = 84) - Appasionato maestoso (𝅘𝅥 = 69) - Tempo II (♪ = 138) 0:00
Franssenss Roaring Rotterdam was composed on 1997, being commissioned by the [Netherlands] Radio Philharmonic Orchestra (Radio Filharmonisch Orkest), with financial support from the Fonds voor de Scheppende Toonkunst, a Dutch foundation funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science in order promote the creation of new compositions in the field of classical music and jazz. It was premiered on November 17 of 1997, as the opener of a concert series titled Roaring Rotterdam, from which the title is derived. A version for 4 pianos was realized on 1997, being later revised on 2016.
After completing his musical studies with Louis Andriessen and Klaas de Vries, Franssens became inspired by Ligeti’s micropolyphony and the phase-shifting technique of Steve Reich. The relationship with Ligeti’s music becomes clear in works written in the eighties such as Echo’s and Phasing. The influence of Reich can already be heard in Between the Beats, an early piece for two pianos. During the nineties, Franssens’ sound became more open and more optimistic in tone. Because of the melodious, generous and emotional character of his music, he encountered growing resistance within the Dutch music scene. Contrarily he received growing acclaim by a wider audience. His first CD with Echo’s, Phasing and Sanctus was a hit.
The work with a series of ostinato figures introduced by the string basses of the orchestra, clearly inspired by the opening chorus of Bachs St. John Passion. The music gradually grows in a long crescendo, reaching two powerful and expressive climaxes. Other influences of the piece are Smetana’s The Moldau and the opening of Wagner’s Das Rheingold, the pop group Yes and more generally American minimalism. The meandering river of sound leads to a fortissimo chorale, coming to a halt on a lengthy bed of sound filled with octaves and fifths. The language seems at first glance clearly to belong to postmodernism, though in one way or another, the deeply serious tone of this piece is at odds with the anything goes attitude. What is more, it seems anything but fragmentary, given that all the discrete elements of the piece combine towards the end of the piece and culminate in an ineluctable granite-like chorale, a triumph of harmonic and rhythmic simplicity and unambiguousness.
Picture: Photograph of a lanscape in Rotterdam (2016) by David Broetz.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2brun3zn and https://tinyurl.com/26o828xn
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/29w5wtcg Roaring Rotterdam for Orchestra - Joep Franssens](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ssO3Ss-Kj7w/mqdefault.jpg)






![Symphony in E-flat major - Igor Stravinsky
Royal Scottish National Orchestra conducted by Sir Alexander Gibson.
I - Allegro moderato - Molto sostenuto - Poco meno mosso - Più mosso - Allegro molto - Tempo I: 0:00
II - Scherzo. Allegretto - Pochissimo meno mosso - Allegretto (Tempo I): 10:18
III - Largo: 16:04
IV - Finale. Allegro molto - Più tranquillo - L’istesso tempo - Un poco più tranquillo - L’istesso tempo - Presto - Molto pesante: 25:54
Stravinskys Symphony in E-flat major was composed between July 18 and September 24 of 1905, being his first major work under the close supervision of his teacher Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov. The second and third movements were performed in a private concert in St. Petersburg on March 27 of 1907, played by the St. Petersburg Court Orchestra conducted by Hugo Warlich, after which Stravinsky revised the orchestration. Its full public premiere took place on January 22 of 1908, with the same orchestra conducted by Felix Blumenfeld. A final revision of the orchestration took place in 1913, which was then performed in Montreux on April 2 of 1914, performed by the Orchestre du Kursaal conducted by Ernest Ansermet.
Unlike many other composers, Stravinsky did not dismiss the piece as a mere student exercise, as he conducted the symphony multiple times and even recorded it in 1960. The work shows the influence not only of Rimsky-Korsakov (to whom the work is dedicated), but also Tchaikovsky and Glazunov. Stravinsky later wrote about the work: I wrote this Symphony at a time when Glazunov reigned supreme. At that time I shared this admiration wholeheartedly. While the work is academic in nature, and clearly indebted to the grand Russian romantic tradition, an anticipation of Stravinskys own style can be clearly heard in the scherzo, which would be later used as an intermezzo in performances of the Ballets Russes.
The first movement is structured in sonata form, clearly influenced by Glazunov and Borodin. It begins with a brilliant and assertive main theme in E-flat major, presented by full orchestra and rising to a powerful climax. A transition leads to the more lyrical second theme in B-flat major introduced by the clarinet before passing onto strings. The ensuing development is dominated by the opening fragment of the main theme, boldly modulating to keys such as C minor, G minor and G-flat major. After a dramatic climax, the material is then brilliantly recapitulated in the home key of E-flat major. A slower transition leads to a syncopated coda, which ends the allegro with a final statement of the main theme.
The second movement is a scherzo in ternary form, influenced by Rimsky-Korsakov and Tchaikovsky. It opens with a rhythmic and vigorous main theme in B-flat major. The trio section features a more lyrical second theme in F major, presented by strings before woodwinds gradually join. It is based on the Russian folksong Tchitcher-Yatcher that Stravinsky would later reuse for his 1911 ballet Petrushka and his Three little songs of 1913. After a climax, both themes are contrapuntally combined in the key of E-flat major. The main theme is then recapitulated in the home key of B-flat major. A final repeat of the trio theme leads to a short and playful coda.
The third movement is also structured in ternary form, again showing the influence of Tchaikovsky, specially his Symphony No. 6 in B minor Pathétique. It begins with a lyrical and melancholic main theme in G-sharp minor, introduced by cellos and violas in pianissimo. It passes onto full strings, growing into two dramatic and expressive climaxes. The central section features a noble and melodic second theme in E major, introduced by the horn before passing onto strings and offering great contrast. The music then reaches the most intense climax yet, leading to the varied recapitulation of the main theme. The largo ends with a long, sparse and desolate coda that seems to anticipate the 1910 ballet The Firebird.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Colourful Life (1907) by the Russian-French painter Wassily Kandinsky.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2dqrhy9a, https://tinyurl.com/28w4fmyl and https://tinyurl.com/23cabkrk
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/29kk8cyy Symphony in E-flat major - Igor Stravinsky](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uFZFYhbipy8/mqdefault.jpg)

