Uploaded May 2025 | Updated September 2026, 3 days ago
I'm on PUBLIC PROPERTY. A Contractor (Ruth Eckerd Hall) has a contract to run 35 events a year. The property reverts back to the PEOPLE for the other 330 days. The problem is that REH is making a power play. They want the amphitheater for themselves and they want to keep the people out on non-event days. The amphitheater is a cool and rather quiet place to study and kick back. The city did not give REH rights to the property on non-event days. In fact, the intention was always for the amphitheater to revert back to the people on days when a show was going on. Moreover, the city ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF CLEARWATER spent $84M to build the amphitheater along with renovating Coachman Park (most of that money went into the Amphitheater).
So what makes Ruth Eckerd Hall think it can put up gates and block people when that was not part of their contract at the time? Also, REH seems to target who it wants to block - aka discrimination, which is a violation of the 14th Amendment.
It looks like there is a huge amount of embezzlement going on - that the money isn't staying within the venue to generate more events for the members of the community, but rather is being funnelled into pocket and not properly accounted for.
Today is June 15, 2025. On June 13, 2025 I had a hearing to dismiss. In a false arrest at the amphitheater on Oct. 20, 2025. I've taken a huge amount of uncalled for heat since then. I think I hit on sensitive issue for serveral departments and for multiple reasons.
Sgt. Newton handled himself and this situation kind of well. Listen to the part where he says the stage is 'inherently' part of the venue. It's a weird thing to say. It didn't really makes sense. Later that evening, a speaker that had been put up on the stage was still blaring. So, I was studying for a course I was taking.
REH, it appears in connect with the officers, put a speaker on a loop (approx 30 secs), blaring...on the stage. It seems exactly like it was put there to antaganize me and to provoke me into leaving or going onto the stage to turn it off. I didn't realize the motive until several hours later. At which point, I filmed it and addressed what I assumed the motive to be. Very shortly thereafter, the speaker was turned off. In such, it would appear Sgt. Newton had worked with REH in a bias manner against a citizen in hopes to try to get that citizen to do something they claimed was 'inherently'...something. The reality is that the stage is no more 'inherently' anything more or less than any other part fo the park.
The prosecutor forged documents changing the date of some records - amongst other things - the day before the Friday, June 13th hearing. When I brought it up to the judge, she jumped all over me about it. She's supposed to address these matters, not cover them up. She said she wasn't going to let it go before the jury, but it is the judge who could dismiss a case based on acts of fraud by the prosecution. These were extreme measures by the prosecution and whomever helped them. REH ws definitely part of it. I know this because the Ruth Eckerd Hall CEO signed a fraudulent document to give a false impression of the facts relating to contracts and their role. REH is a contractor. It is now attempting to call itself a lessee, which it is not. So, CEO Susan Crocker's document claiming that the agreement and amended agreement are 'lease' agreements, is a misrepresentation of the truth, which is meant to be believed and meant to harm me.
Further, Natalie Reise, the Asst State Attorney, in this case, didn't file the documents via the e-filing system OR had to manually exclude me from receiving the filing(s) electronically. My 'BEST ADDRESS' has been filed as my e-mail address...Yet, the prosecutor appears to be ttempting to block my access to the case.
Further, a couple or a few hearings ago, the judge referenced this channel, then she said that she hadn't been to it. But after Friday's hearing and now reviewing this particular video, it really seems like she's in communication with... I dunno...maybe the prosecution and law enforcement. Ugh...
I was in jail for one day and released. I ws told that the case was dropped, that I was lucky. The jailer told me this. I tried to get confirmation, once out of jail. I looked at the website. The prosecutor's name was crossed out. I looked at a multitude of other cases and the only cases that had the prosecutors name crossed out - from what I could tell - were closed cases.
I also called the State Attorney's Office and asked to speak with Natalie Reis, the ASA on the case. She was unavailable, but I spoke with a woman named Mia, who told me that they weren't going to prosecute me unless I sued them. BTW, that's not the standard for prosecuting someone. The prosecutor is supposed to be unbiased. Once they found out I was going to sue, they reopened the case, which is malice.
20241124 133351
I'm on PUBLIC PROPERTY. A Contractor (Ruth Eckerd Hall) has a contract to run 35 events a year. The property reverts back to the PEOPLE for the other 330 days. The problem is that REH is making a power play. They want the amphitheater for themselves and they want to keep the people out on non-event days. The amphitheater is a cool and rather quiet place to study and kick back. The city did not give REH rights to the property on non-event days. In fact, the intention was always for the amphitheater to revert back to the people on days when a show was going on. Moreover, the city ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF CLEARWATER spent $84M to build the amphitheater along with renovating Coachman Park (most of that money went into the Amphitheater).
So what makes Ruth Eckerd Hall think it can put up gates and block people when that was not part of their contract at the time? Also, REH seems to target who it wants to block - aka discrimination, which is a violation of the 14th Amendment.
It looks like there is a huge amount of embezzlement going on - that the money isn't staying within the venue to generate more events for the members of the community, but rather is being funnelled into pocket and not properly accounted for.
Today is June 15, 2025. On June 13, 2025 I had a hearing to dismiss. In a false arrest at the amphitheater on Oct. 20, 2025. I've taken a huge amount of uncalled for heat since then. I think I hit on sensitive issue for serveral departments and for multiple reasons.
Sgt. Newton handled himself and this situation kind of well. Listen to the part where he says the stage is 'inherently' part of the venue. It's a weird thing to say. It didn't really makes sense. Later that evening, a speaker that had been put up on the stage was still blaring. So, I was studying for a course I was taking.
REH, it appears in connect with the officers, put a speaker on a loop (approx 30 secs), blaring...on the stage. It seems exactly like it was put there to antaganize me and to provoke me into leaving or going onto the stage to turn it off. I didn't realize the motive until several hours later. At which point, I filmed it and addressed what I assumed the motive to be. Very shortly thereafter, the speaker was turned off. In such, it would appear Sgt. Newton had worked with REH in a bias manner against a citizen in hopes to try to get that citizen to do something they claimed was 'inherently'...something. The reality is that the stage is no more 'inherently' anything more or less than any other part fo the park.
The prosecutor forged documents changing the date of some records - amongst other things - the day before the Friday, June 13th hearing. When I brought it up to the judge, she jumped all over me about it. She's supposed to address these matters, not cover them up. She said she wasn't going to let it go before the jury, but it is the judge who could dismiss a case based on acts of fraud by the prosecution. These were extreme measures by the prosecution and whomever helped them. REH ws definitely part of it. I know this because the Ruth Eckerd Hall CEO signed a fraudulent document to give a false impression of the facts relating to contracts and their role. REH is a contractor. It is now attempting to call itself a lessee, which it is not. So, CEO Susan Crocker's document claiming that the agreement and amended agreement are 'lease' agreements, is a misrepresentation of the truth, which is meant to be believed and meant to harm me.
Further, Natalie Reise, the Asst State Attorney, in this case, didn't file the documents via the e-filing system OR had to manually exclude me from receiving the filing(s) electronically. My 'BEST ADDRESS' has been filed as my e-mail address...Yet, the prosecutor appears to be ttempting to block my access to the case.
Further, a couple or a few hearings ago, the judge referenced this channel, then she said that she hadn't been to it. But after Friday's hearing and now reviewing this particular video, it really seems like she's in communication with... I dunno...maybe the prosecution and law enforcement. Ugh...
I was in jail for one day and released. I ws told that the case was dropped, that I was lucky. The jailer told me this. I tried to get confirmation, once out of jail. I looked at the website. The prosecutor's name was crossed out. I looked at a multitude of other cases and the only cases that had the prosecutors name crossed out - from what I could tell - were closed cases.
I also called the State Attorney's Office and asked to speak with Natalie Reis, the ASA on the case. She was unavailable, but I spoke with a woman named Mia, who told me that they weren't going to prosecute me unless I sued them. BTW, that's not the standard for prosecuting someone. The prosecutor is supposed to be unbiased. Once they found out I was going to sue, they reopened the case, which is malice.
20241124 133351
