Uploaded October 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was recently filmed disembarking his plane wearing a Joy Division shirt—the pioneering post-punk English rock band.
Apparently, the band borrowed their name Joy Division from the sexual slavery wing of a Nazi concentration camp. Okay, young post-punkers using provocative names and imagery in their music? Hardly surprising.
But almost 50 years later, should the Australian Prime Minister be wearing their shirt? Well, personally I think the PM should be allowed to wear whatever shirt he wants to—it’s a free country after all. However, I can also understand that if you’re a politician who pursues woke ideals at every opportunity, then be prepared to be attacked if you break those ideals.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley commented in parliament: “At a time when Jewish Australians are facing a rise in antisemitism, when families are asking for reassurance and unity, the Prime Minister chose to parade an image derived from hatred and suffering.”
Okay, personally I think the PM is a lot of things, but he’s certainly not a Nazi. I mean, it’s hilarious to pretend that he is, but I think there are far bigger things to criticise him about than his choice of clothing. Still, I understand the political game. I’m sure if the Opposition Leader was seen waving to a crowd with a stiff-armed salute, some members of the government would happily jump on this without a moment’s thought and accuse Ms. Ley of supporting Adolf Hitler.
But I do think this whole saga does highlight something amusing about modern society: Are we too eager to search for Nazi references and feign outrage? I think we are.
For example, Sussan Ley also went through a punk phase. She intentionally put an extra ‘S’ in her first name, as reported by The Guardian: “Sussan Ley says name spelling change was due to ‘punk phase’ – not numerology.”
Okay, so she intentionally decided to have two S’s in her name. Two S’s? What does that remind us of? Oh yes, the German SS—the Schutzstaffel—a major paramilitary organisation under the leadership of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, responsible for mass surveillance, state terrorism, and running extermination camps. And Ms. Ley knowingly put those two S’s in her name? What was she thinking!
Or what about her very first car, which she happily published on her social media last year—a Volkswagen Beetle. Doesn’t she know that Volkswagen was founded in 1937 by the Nazi German government to create a “people’s car”—that’s literally what the name means?
Not to mention, that during the war, the Volkswagen factory heavily relied on forced and slave labour from concentration camps to maintain production. The entire concept originated with Adolf Hitler. What was she thinking, driving a Nazi-inspired car!
Of course, I’m being facetious.
The point is: it’s ridiculously easy to find links to Nazism and feign outrage.
The ABC is of course obsessed with Nazis: “‘Nazis aren’t welcome’ in Victoria,” “Nazi flags to be banned,” “The Nazi salute is grounded in hatred,” “Police sergeant suspended over Nazi salute,” “Victorian premier lashes neo-Nazi ‘cowards’,” “Melbourne man found guilty of performing Nazi salute,” and “PM condemns ‘horrific scenes’ of neo-Nazi gathering in Adelaide.”
Of course, they often conflate these extremists with anybody on the political Right: “Former soap star filmed doing Nazi salute at far-right event,” “How overseas Neo-Nazi groups are shaping Australia’s far-right,” “Man charged with performing Nazi salute at anti-immigration rally,” “Far-right protesters attack Aboriginal site,” and “Neo-Nazis march through Melbourne.”
But here’s a curious piece of recent news that complicates the narrative: “Thomas Sewell found not guilty of offensive behaviour by Victorian court.” A Victorian magistrate has found Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell not guilty of offensive behaviour after the 32-year-old led a white supremacist rally through Ballarat in 2023. The group was seen carrying a banner with the slogan: “Australia for the White Man, National Socialist Network.”
The Magistrate simply concluded: “Behaviour deemed unacceptably offensive by some, may not trouble others at all. The test is whether the impugned behaviour is so deeply and seriously insulting as to warrant the interference in the criminal law. Society is evolving in attitudes all the time. Fringe groups are arising all the time.”
Anyway, according to the ABC, the whole country has become overrun with Nazis. We’ve got the PM wearing a Joy Division shirt, we’ve got the Opposition Leader driving Volkswagens... what’s next? Foreign Minister Penny Wong sporting a toothbrush moustache?
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was recently filmed disembarking his plane wearing a Joy Division shirt—the pioneering post-punk English rock band.
Apparently, the band borrowed their name Joy Division from the sexual slavery wing of a Nazi concentration camp. Okay, young post-punkers using provocative names and imagery in their music? Hardly surprising.
But almost 50 years later, should the Australian Prime Minister be wearing their shirt? Well, personally I think the PM should be allowed to wear whatever shirt he wants to—it’s a free country after all. However, I can also understand that if you’re a politician who pursues woke ideals at every opportunity, then be prepared to be attacked if you break those ideals.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley commented in parliament: “At a time when Jewish Australians are facing a rise in antisemitism, when families are asking for reassurance and unity, the Prime Minister chose to parade an image derived from hatred and suffering.”
Okay, personally I think the PM is a lot of things, but he’s certainly not a Nazi. I mean, it’s hilarious to pretend that he is, but I think there are far bigger things to criticise him about than his choice of clothing. Still, I understand the political game. I’m sure if the Opposition Leader was seen waving to a crowd with a stiff-armed salute, some members of the government would happily jump on this without a moment’s thought and accuse Ms. Ley of supporting Adolf Hitler.
But I do think this whole saga does highlight something amusing about modern society: Are we too eager to search for Nazi references and feign outrage? I think we are.
For example, Sussan Ley also went through a punk phase. She intentionally put an extra ‘S’ in her first name, as reported by The Guardian: “Sussan Ley says name spelling change was due to ‘punk phase’ – not numerology.”
Okay, so she intentionally decided to have two S’s in her name. Two S’s? What does that remind us of? Oh yes, the German SS—the Schutzstaffel—a major paramilitary organisation under the leadership of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, responsible for mass surveillance, state terrorism, and running extermination camps. And Ms. Ley knowingly put those two S’s in her name? What was she thinking!
Or what about her very first car, which she happily published on her social media last year—a Volkswagen Beetle. Doesn’t she know that Volkswagen was founded in 1937 by the Nazi German government to create a “people’s car”—that’s literally what the name means?
Not to mention, that during the war, the Volkswagen factory heavily relied on forced and slave labour from concentration camps to maintain production. The entire concept originated with Adolf Hitler. What was she thinking, driving a Nazi-inspired car!
Of course, I’m being facetious.
The point is: it’s ridiculously easy to find links to Nazism and feign outrage.
The ABC is of course obsessed with Nazis: “‘Nazis aren’t welcome’ in Victoria,” “Nazi flags to be banned,” “The Nazi salute is grounded in hatred,” “Police sergeant suspended over Nazi salute,” “Victorian premier lashes neo-Nazi ‘cowards’,” “Melbourne man found guilty of performing Nazi salute,” and “PM condemns ‘horrific scenes’ of neo-Nazi gathering in Adelaide.”
Of course, they often conflate these extremists with anybody on the political Right: “Former soap star filmed doing Nazi salute at far-right event,” “How overseas Neo-Nazi groups are shaping Australia’s far-right,” “Man charged with performing Nazi salute at anti-immigration rally,” “Far-right protesters attack Aboriginal site,” and “Neo-Nazis march through Melbourne.”
But here’s a curious piece of recent news that complicates the narrative: “Thomas Sewell found not guilty of offensive behaviour by Victorian court.” A Victorian magistrate has found Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell not guilty of offensive behaviour after the 32-year-old led a white supremacist rally through Ballarat in 2023. The group was seen carrying a banner with the slogan: “Australia for the White Man, National Socialist Network.”
The Magistrate simply concluded: “Behaviour deemed unacceptably offensive by some, may not trouble others at all. The test is whether the impugned behaviour is so deeply and seriously insulting as to warrant the interference in the criminal law. Society is evolving in attitudes all the time. Fringe groups are arising all the time.”
Anyway, according to the ABC, the whole country has become overrun with Nazis. We’ve got the PM wearing a Joy Division shirt, we’ve got the Opposition Leader driving Volkswagens... what’s next? Foreign Minister Penny Wong sporting a toothbrush moustache?
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn









![Grace Tame, Anthony Albanese, and the One-Word Identity Crisis
Former Australian of the Year Grace Tame—honoured for her advocacy for survivors of sexual assault—is now a full-blown activist. Earlier this month, outside Sydney’s Town Hall, she led a crowd in a rather divisive chant at a rally against the visit of Israeli President Isaac Herzog.
She screamed: “From Gadigal to Gaza, globalise the intifada!”
For context, “Gadigal” refers to the original inhabitants of the Sydney region. This little chant of hers tells us two things:
1. She doesn’t want to refer to Sydney using its legal name. It goes without saying that the city of Sydney only exists thanks to European colonisation, so to call the metropolitan entity by any other name doesn’t make any logical sense.
2. Globalising the intifada can only mean one thing: taking a word inextricably linked to suicide bombings and civilian casualties and suggesting it be turned into an international export.
To be fair to Ms Tame, she did defend herself on social media, saying that her words have been “disingenuously distorted” by the media: “I said a phrase that isn’t illegal, whilst addressing a peaceful protest.”
Well, tell that to the Jewish Australian community, many of whom lost friends and family in the First and Second Intifadas in Israel. She notes: “For the record, I’m staunchly anti-violence and anti-racism in every form.”
Well, you should probably avoid words synonymous with a decade of suicide bombings and bus attacks.
Although, she ignored the historical context by playing word games, explaining that ‘intifada’ just literally means ‘shaking off’ in Arabic. Oh okay, so what you meant was: “From Gadigal to Gaza, globalise the shaking off!”
Is she referring to a dance move, or is she trying to ‘shake off’ her own responsibility for leading a chant that calls for a globalised armed uprising?
Despite the way Grace Tame has acted, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is under fire. At the Future Victoria conference earlier this week, he took part in a word association game where he had to give a one-word response to a rapid-fire list of people and news topics.
For example, he referred to Pauline Hanson as “divisive,” former Prince Andrew as a “grub,” and One Nation voters as “frustrated.” When it came to Grace Tame, he said: “Difficult.”
It’s a pretty accurate description, I would suggest. After all, in a previous meeting with the Prime Minister, she wore a profanity-laden shirt.
Well, Ms Tame wasn’t too happy with the description. She reshared a post to her Instagram story, claiming: “‘Difficult’ is the misogynist’s code for a woman who won’t comply. History tends to call her ‘courageous’.”
The BBC later reported: “Australian PM apologises after calling child sex abuse survivor and advocate ‘difficult’.” According to the PM, he wasn’t calling her difficult; he was saying she’s had a “difficult life.”
He insisted: “If there was any misinterpretation, then I certainly apologise. She has had a difficult life and that was what I was referring to.”
But he still couldn’t ignore the fallout from her earlier chant. He pivoted: “Now there are other issues, such as the language that Grace Tame used, that I disagree with… That’s why it’s impossible to describe people in one word.”
Ms Tame, however, was not buying the walk-back. As The Guardian noted, she told the Prime Minister to “spare me the condescension, old man,” even accusing him of “quoting Scott [Morrison]” to dismiss her.
Anyway, do you buy Albo’s apology? Do you agree Grace Tame’s had a difficult life? Or is she just playing silly word games?
“The PM called me difficult. I called for a global intifada.”
Either way, whether it’s “shaking off” or “difficult,” one word is never quite enough to hide the reality of what’s actually being said.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn Grace Tame, Anthony Albanese, and the One-Word Identity Crisis](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/O1ZuM0PpEOc/mqdefault.jpg)
![Has Woke Bureaucracy Paralysed the Reef Authority?
This is the Great Barrier Reef—the world’s largest coral reef ecosystem, stretching over 2,300 km along Australia’s northeastern coast. You wouldn’t exactly think “racism” would be a word associated with managing a natural wonder.
Bzzt! Wrong. The ABC has plastered an article all over their website this morning exposing a buried, taxpayer-funded review into the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, under the blunt headline: “‘Systemic racism’ tip of the iceberg in buried reef authority review.”
It seems like if you look hard enough, you can find racism anywhere these days.
Here’s the actual article, focusing heavily on “Systemic Racism.” Now, you’d think with the ABC’s ongoing love affair with climate change, that would be their main focus when covering the Reef. But no—in modern woke Australia, racism is apparently the most catastrophic threat the natural world has ever faced.
Basically, an independent review was conducted into the taxpayer-funded Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, noting that it “cares for an area bigger than New Zealand and home to 70 traditional owner groups.” One massive ecosystem, split across dozens of tribal groups. Good luck getting seventy different committees to agree on anything, let alone marine management.
This taxpayer-funded review was commissioned back in 2022, but a decision was made to never finalise it, effectively burying the findings. The ABC tried to get their hands on it through a Freedom of Information request, but they were flat-out denied. The authority claimed the document was “never finalised” and “not publicly available”—a move that FOI experts have slammed as a classic cover-up tactic.
But the sneaky ABC got a leaked copy of the draft anyway, where staff complained about “an overall lack of cultural awareness.” One employee went even further: “I have worked in many different workplaces and environments and never considered the words racist/sexist until I started working here.” Yes, the reef authority is apparently a toxic wasteland—and they aren’t talking about the water quality.
As expected, the heaviest blow came from the allegations of systemic racism, with the most explosive findings centred on the Indigenous Compliance Team. According to the draft, the team felt “disrespected, unsupported and overwhelmed with tasks beyond its responsibilities.” Essentially, any issue brought to the agency by Traditional Owners was automatically dumped on the Indigenous team—no matter if it was actually their job to fix it or not.
They even give examples from actual employees, with one stating: “Because I am Black, I am expected to deal with every time a Black person calls the phone. Black business, it was expected that we use Black money, Black staff.”
Oh, but isn’t that exactly what the activists and HR consultants have been demanding for years? We are constantly told that First Nations people need dedicated, culturally safe spaces and Indigenous-led service delivery. But the second this agency actually sets up that exact structure, the staff end up feeling segregated, tokenised, and treated like a dumping ground for “Black business.” It’s a classic case of “damned if you do, damned if you don’t”.
They highlight a specific incident involving a pair of dugongs caught in netting, noting an 18-hour response time: “The traditional owners were willing to give a statement to anyone; however, were deferred immediately to the Indigenous Compliance Team. This has led to a large backlog of cases within the Indigenous Compliance Team as well as a high level of reputational risk with traditional owners.”
I mean, this is the natural result of dividing everyone up by ethnic background, is it not? When employees are subjected to endless cultural awareness training and conditioned to be hypervigilant about avoiding a misstep, they naturally freeze up. I don’t think they’re trying to be malicious—they’ve just been systematically trained to value political correctness and anti-racism over common-sense urgency.
And finally, the agency offered the ultimate bureaucratic defence, claiming it has “invested consistently in First Nations cultural awareness training for staff,” before dropping the ultimate shutdown: “Allegations [of racism] were investigated exhaustively by an independent external investigator and found to be unsubstantiated.”
So there you go. The government says there is no racism, the employees say there’s tons of racism, and society is absolutely no closer to reconciliation. It’s a perfect loop of modern institutional dysfunction.
Which leaves us with one final nautical question: Has the marine authority drifted off course and run aground, getting completely lost in this sea of diversity, frantically rearranging the deckchairs on a sinking ship in order to hide the submerged threat that we knew all along—that the Great Barrier Reef is actually harbouring systemic racism? I think we all know the answer.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn Has Woke Bureaucracy Paralysed the Reef Authority?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OXhfKCxQMs8/mqdefault.jpg)