Uploaded January 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
If you live in Victoria—or indeed anywhere in Australia—I’m sure you’ve seen the news coming out of the state over the last week. The ABC made it clear: “Catastrophic fire conditions across Victoria,” “Bushfires ravage Victoria,” and more recently: “Victoria’s bushfires more than five times the size of Singapore.”
Don’t worry, though; Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Premier Jacinta Allan were there on the ground helping out the only way they know how—by taking plenty of photo ops to post on their social media feeds. To be fair, the ABC reported: “Albanese and Allan unveil $19.5 million support package as crews take stock of Victorian fire devastation.”
Of course, I’m not here to joke about the men and women who actually fight the fires. Many of them are unpaid volunteers who risk their lives to protect their state. I’m certainly not here to throw any shade on them.
However, there are a few questions about Victoria’s finances—and their priorities—when it comes to running the state and keeping residents safe.
Last year, the Australian Financial Review reported: “Victoria’s debt is among the worst in the world,” while the ABC reported in November: “Victoria’s auditor-general reports $400 million government budget blowout.” They noted that Victoria recorded an “operating loss of $2.6 billion in 2024–25,” adding to “accumulated losses of $50.6 billion over the last six years.”
The article states that interest payments are set to rise from $6.8 billion this year to $10.6 billion by 2028. Don’t worry, that’s only $29 million per day! Twenty-nine million dollars of taxpayer money every day just floating away into the ether.
If it were a company, it would have filed for bankruptcy years ago. You’d sack the CEO and be selling off the office furniture.
But no—under Premier Allan’s watch, the state continues to borrow and burn through the cash, you know, to “save you money” on your electricity bills.
But while the government burns through your cash—and the state literally burns—the Country Fire Authority is busy headhunting for a new Senior Manager. Thank you to the viewer who sent this in.
Now, the CFA gets most of its funding from the government and is almost entirely reliant on thousands of volunteers who risk their lives for zero pay. So, I know what you’re thinking: “Does this manager help organise the water-bombing aircraft? Do they help maintain the ageing fleet of fire trucks?”
You’d think that would be the priority—especially since The Courier in Ballarat reports that the CFA’s firefighting fleet remains “dangerously” out-of-date.
Not quite.
The full job title is actually: “Senior Manager Culture and Inclusion.” Yes—as the state burns, the CFA seems more interested in making sure their organisation is “inclusive.” They acknowledge they rely on more than 51,000 volunteers—and apparently, “managing” the culture of those unpaid people is worth a salary of up to $167,000 a year. Plus 12% super, of course.
And what do we get for that six-figure taxpayer investment? Well, as with most of these “woke” roles, the goal is to ensure people “feel valued, safe, included, and empowered.”
They boast about their “Diversity and Inclusion Strategy” and their “Gender Equality Action Plan.” Look, as I said, I’m not here to criticise the people fighting the actual fires—but as we can see with almost every organisation attached to the Victorian Government, the rot has seeped in.
The fine print says that “CFA is committed to creating and maintaining a diverse, inclusive, and safe volunteer and work environment.” Their aim is to have a “workforce that reflects the community it serves.”
So, basically: “First Nations people, women, people of all ages, with disabilities and culturally and linguistically diverse people are encouraged to apply.” This is essentially code for: “Anglo-Australian men are not diverse enough.”
The rural men who have been doing this for generations can fight the fires for free, while a minority gets paid top bucks to make sure you’re using the correct inclusive terminology while the bushfire approaches. You better hurry, though; applications close January 18.
Victoria may be struggling to pay off its ever-rising debt; it may be struggling to put out fires with an ageing fleet and a mainly volunteer firefighting army.
But it can still find the funds to pay for the things that really count—diversity consultants to lecture hardworking people who are currently out there saving the state for free.
How about focusing the funding on fighting fires?
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn
If you live in Victoria—or indeed anywhere in Australia—I’m sure you’ve seen the news coming out of the state over the last week. The ABC made it clear: “Catastrophic fire conditions across Victoria,” “Bushfires ravage Victoria,” and more recently: “Victoria’s bushfires more than five times the size of Singapore.”
Don’t worry, though; Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Premier Jacinta Allan were there on the ground helping out the only way they know how—by taking plenty of photo ops to post on their social media feeds. To be fair, the ABC reported: “Albanese and Allan unveil $19.5 million support package as crews take stock of Victorian fire devastation.”
Of course, I’m not here to joke about the men and women who actually fight the fires. Many of them are unpaid volunteers who risk their lives to protect their state. I’m certainly not here to throw any shade on them.
However, there are a few questions about Victoria’s finances—and their priorities—when it comes to running the state and keeping residents safe.
Last year, the Australian Financial Review reported: “Victoria’s debt is among the worst in the world,” while the ABC reported in November: “Victoria’s auditor-general reports $400 million government budget blowout.” They noted that Victoria recorded an “operating loss of $2.6 billion in 2024–25,” adding to “accumulated losses of $50.6 billion over the last six years.”
The article states that interest payments are set to rise from $6.8 billion this year to $10.6 billion by 2028. Don’t worry, that’s only $29 million per day! Twenty-nine million dollars of taxpayer money every day just floating away into the ether.
If it were a company, it would have filed for bankruptcy years ago. You’d sack the CEO and be selling off the office furniture.
But no—under Premier Allan’s watch, the state continues to borrow and burn through the cash, you know, to “save you money” on your electricity bills.
But while the government burns through your cash—and the state literally burns—the Country Fire Authority is busy headhunting for a new Senior Manager. Thank you to the viewer who sent this in.
Now, the CFA gets most of its funding from the government and is almost entirely reliant on thousands of volunteers who risk their lives for zero pay. So, I know what you’re thinking: “Does this manager help organise the water-bombing aircraft? Do they help maintain the ageing fleet of fire trucks?”
You’d think that would be the priority—especially since The Courier in Ballarat reports that the CFA’s firefighting fleet remains “dangerously” out-of-date.
Not quite.
The full job title is actually: “Senior Manager Culture and Inclusion.” Yes—as the state burns, the CFA seems more interested in making sure their organisation is “inclusive.” They acknowledge they rely on more than 51,000 volunteers—and apparently, “managing” the culture of those unpaid people is worth a salary of up to $167,000 a year. Plus 12% super, of course.
And what do we get for that six-figure taxpayer investment? Well, as with most of these “woke” roles, the goal is to ensure people “feel valued, safe, included, and empowered.”
They boast about their “Diversity and Inclusion Strategy” and their “Gender Equality Action Plan.” Look, as I said, I’m not here to criticise the people fighting the actual fires—but as we can see with almost every organisation attached to the Victorian Government, the rot has seeped in.
The fine print says that “CFA is committed to creating and maintaining a diverse, inclusive, and safe volunteer and work environment.” Their aim is to have a “workforce that reflects the community it serves.”
So, basically: “First Nations people, women, people of all ages, with disabilities and culturally and linguistically diverse people are encouraged to apply.” This is essentially code for: “Anglo-Australian men are not diverse enough.”
The rural men who have been doing this for generations can fight the fires for free, while a minority gets paid top bucks to make sure you’re using the correct inclusive terminology while the bushfire approaches. You better hurry, though; applications close January 18.
Victoria may be struggling to pay off its ever-rising debt; it may be struggling to put out fires with an ageing fleet and a mainly volunteer firefighting army.
But it can still find the funds to pay for the things that really count—diversity consultants to lecture hardworking people who are currently out there saving the state for free.
How about focusing the funding on fighting fires?
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn







![Grace Tame, Anthony Albanese, and the One-Word Identity Crisis
Former Australian of the Year Grace Tame—honoured for her advocacy for survivors of sexual assault—is now a full-blown activist. Earlier this month, outside Sydney’s Town Hall, she led a crowd in a rather divisive chant at a rally against the visit of Israeli President Isaac Herzog.
She screamed: “From Gadigal to Gaza, globalise the intifada!”
For context, “Gadigal” refers to the original inhabitants of the Sydney region. This little chant of hers tells us two things:
1. She doesn’t want to refer to Sydney using its legal name. It goes without saying that the city of Sydney only exists thanks to European colonisation, so to call the metropolitan entity by any other name doesn’t make any logical sense.
2. Globalising the intifada can only mean one thing: taking a word inextricably linked to suicide bombings and civilian casualties and suggesting it be turned into an international export.
To be fair to Ms Tame, she did defend herself on social media, saying that her words have been “disingenuously distorted” by the media: “I said a phrase that isn’t illegal, whilst addressing a peaceful protest.”
Well, tell that to the Jewish Australian community, many of whom lost friends and family in the First and Second Intifadas in Israel. She notes: “For the record, I’m staunchly anti-violence and anti-racism in every form.”
Well, you should probably avoid words synonymous with a decade of suicide bombings and bus attacks.
Although, she ignored the historical context by playing word games, explaining that ‘intifada’ just literally means ‘shaking off’ in Arabic. Oh okay, so what you meant was: “From Gadigal to Gaza, globalise the shaking off!”
Is she referring to a dance move, or is she trying to ‘shake off’ her own responsibility for leading a chant that calls for a globalised armed uprising?
Despite the way Grace Tame has acted, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is under fire. At the Future Victoria conference earlier this week, he took part in a word association game where he had to give a one-word response to a rapid-fire list of people and news topics.
For example, he referred to Pauline Hanson as “divisive,” former Prince Andrew as a “grub,” and One Nation voters as “frustrated.” When it came to Grace Tame, he said: “Difficult.”
It’s a pretty accurate description, I would suggest. After all, in a previous meeting with the Prime Minister, she wore a profanity-laden shirt.
Well, Ms Tame wasn’t too happy with the description. She reshared a post to her Instagram story, claiming: “‘Difficult’ is the misogynist’s code for a woman who won’t comply. History tends to call her ‘courageous’.”
The BBC later reported: “Australian PM apologises after calling child sex abuse survivor and advocate ‘difficult’.” According to the PM, he wasn’t calling her difficult; he was saying she’s had a “difficult life.”
He insisted: “If there was any misinterpretation, then I certainly apologise. She has had a difficult life and that was what I was referring to.”
But he still couldn’t ignore the fallout from her earlier chant. He pivoted: “Now there are other issues, such as the language that Grace Tame used, that I disagree with… That’s why it’s impossible to describe people in one word.”
Ms Tame, however, was not buying the walk-back. As The Guardian noted, she told the Prime Minister to “spare me the condescension, old man,” even accusing him of “quoting Scott [Morrison]” to dismiss her.
Anyway, do you buy Albo’s apology? Do you agree Grace Tame’s had a difficult life? Or is she just playing silly word games?
“The PM called me difficult. I called for a global intifada.”
Either way, whether it’s “shaking off” or “difficult,” one word is never quite enough to hide the reality of what’s actually being said.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn Grace Tame, Anthony Albanese, and the One-Word Identity Crisis](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/O1ZuM0PpEOc/mqdefault.jpg)
![Has Woke Bureaucracy Paralysed the Reef Authority?
This is the Great Barrier Reef—the world’s largest coral reef ecosystem, stretching over 2,300 km along Australia’s northeastern coast. You wouldn’t exactly think “racism” would be a word associated with managing a natural wonder.
Bzzt! Wrong. The ABC has plastered an article all over their website this morning exposing a buried, taxpayer-funded review into the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, under the blunt headline: “‘Systemic racism’ tip of the iceberg in buried reef authority review.”
It seems like if you look hard enough, you can find racism anywhere these days.
Here’s the actual article, focusing heavily on “Systemic Racism.” Now, you’d think with the ABC’s ongoing love affair with climate change, that would be their main focus when covering the Reef. But no—in modern woke Australia, racism is apparently the most catastrophic threat the natural world has ever faced.
Basically, an independent review was conducted into the taxpayer-funded Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, noting that it “cares for an area bigger than New Zealand and home to 70 traditional owner groups.” One massive ecosystem, split across dozens of tribal groups. Good luck getting seventy different committees to agree on anything, let alone marine management.
This taxpayer-funded review was commissioned back in 2022, but a decision was made to never finalise it, effectively burying the findings. The ABC tried to get their hands on it through a Freedom of Information request, but they were flat-out denied. The authority claimed the document was “never finalised” and “not publicly available”—a move that FOI experts have slammed as a classic cover-up tactic.
But the sneaky ABC got a leaked copy of the draft anyway, where staff complained about “an overall lack of cultural awareness.” One employee went even further: “I have worked in many different workplaces and environments and never considered the words racist/sexist until I started working here.” Yes, the reef authority is apparently a toxic wasteland—and they aren’t talking about the water quality.
As expected, the heaviest blow came from the allegations of systemic racism, with the most explosive findings centred on the Indigenous Compliance Team. According to the draft, the team felt “disrespected, unsupported and overwhelmed with tasks beyond its responsibilities.” Essentially, any issue brought to the agency by Traditional Owners was automatically dumped on the Indigenous team—no matter if it was actually their job to fix it or not.
They even give examples from actual employees, with one stating: “Because I am Black, I am expected to deal with every time a Black person calls the phone. Black business, it was expected that we use Black money, Black staff.”
Oh, but isn’t that exactly what the activists and HR consultants have been demanding for years? We are constantly told that First Nations people need dedicated, culturally safe spaces and Indigenous-led service delivery. But the second this agency actually sets up that exact structure, the staff end up feeling segregated, tokenised, and treated like a dumping ground for “Black business.” It’s a classic case of “damned if you do, damned if you don’t”.
They highlight a specific incident involving a pair of dugongs caught in netting, noting an 18-hour response time: “The traditional owners were willing to give a statement to anyone; however, were deferred immediately to the Indigenous Compliance Team. This has led to a large backlog of cases within the Indigenous Compliance Team as well as a high level of reputational risk with traditional owners.”
I mean, this is the natural result of dividing everyone up by ethnic background, is it not? When employees are subjected to endless cultural awareness training and conditioned to be hypervigilant about avoiding a misstep, they naturally freeze up. I don’t think they’re trying to be malicious—they’ve just been systematically trained to value political correctness and anti-racism over common-sense urgency.
And finally, the agency offered the ultimate bureaucratic defence, claiming it has “invested consistently in First Nations cultural awareness training for staff,” before dropping the ultimate shutdown: “Allegations [of racism] were investigated exhaustively by an independent external investigator and found to be unsubstantiated.”
So there you go. The government says there is no racism, the employees say there’s tons of racism, and society is absolutely no closer to reconciliation. It’s a perfect loop of modern institutional dysfunction.
Which leaves us with one final nautical question: Has the marine authority drifted off course and run aground, getting completely lost in this sea of diversity, frantically rearranging the deckchairs on a sinking ship in order to hide the submerged threat that we knew all along—that the Great Barrier Reef is actually harbouring systemic racism? I think we all know the answer.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn Has Woke Bureaucracy Paralysed the Reef Authority?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OXhfKCxQMs8/mqdefault.jpg)

