Uploaded July 2008 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
This is a video response to two videos by Gimmeabreakman (Victor)
GregSolomon, master of the polite F-bomb. By Gimmeabreakman (Victor)
youtube.com/watch?v=9-d4cimDAfA
GregSolomon & His LOLsuit! By Gimmeabreakman (Victor)
youtube.com/watch?v=JAMmqHQjDbQ
My previous videos on this topic start here:
youtube.com/watch?v=qIoZ4J8eO24
Renetto's "Tube It" video:
youtube.com/watch?v=80yQ4RUP-Mw
Renetto made a video a couple of days after his "Tube It" video explaining how he made his video.
How to build a song with "GarageBand"
youtube.com/watch?v=iSIyXUE5h-k
This is the video by Greg Solomon that myrealitybytes watched and attached her "Renetto's toy" video. After watching this video, she SHOULD have known that Greg would probably use her video to bash renetto for plagiarism.
"My Song For Renetto"
youtube.com/watch?v=bii1kz13c8U
"renetto's toy" by myrealitybytes
youtube.com/watch?v=rke953hXAVw
Here is the video that myrealitybytes DMCAd. It is now titled "Renetto Accused of Plagiarism", but I THINK it was titled "A Lady Accuses Renetto of Plagiarism" at one point.
livevideo.com/video/ADE073F68B40445CB4B14DE6974CC177/renneto-accused-of-plagiarism.aspx
Greg Solomon Is A Bully by myrealitybytes
youtube.com/watch?v=gyGwrOYNteM
Note the comments on this video:
RDJim (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply | Spam
Greg may not have had permission to use the video but that does not clear you of culpability. Why would you submit that video response to Greg Solomon of all people if you didn't mean to harm Rennetto? You wanted attention did you not? Well seems you got it. Enjoy.
MyRealityBytes (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply
The truth is I had only seen maybe 2 of Solomon's videos. I saw his song video and thought it was kind of funny. So, I had this "renetto's toy' video and I tried to post it a response to Solomon's video. I did not "egg" Solomon into doing anything. If You watch this video again and pause it where I show the email Solomon sent me. Read it carefully. I thought he meant what he said. He was going to "cite" (mention) me and my video. He never said he was going to use my video.
MyRealityBytes (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply
He never asked for my permission. AND I thought he knew my video was a joke. (I mean, I even sent it to renetto himself.) EVERYONE knows that loop is royalty free. Apparently, Solomon didn't. He then portrays me as some idiot who actually is accusing reneto of "plagarizing" a child's toy! {Plagarism is a serious offense). I woke up Sunday morning with my email full of hate mail and this how I discovered what Solomon had done with my video.
MyRealityBytes (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply
I asked him very nicely to take it down, that he had not been given permission to use any part my video. He immediately turned vicious (see above comments - I left them all there as proof. Whereas, Solomon removed all my comments, blocked me, removed all my friends comments and blocked them.) - He would have no part of removing that video. So ...
This is a video response to two videos by Gimmeabreakman (Victor)
GregSolomon, master of the polite F-bomb. By Gimmeabreakman (Victor)
youtube.com/watch?v=9-d4cimDAfA
GregSolomon & His LOLsuit! By Gimmeabreakman (Victor)
youtube.com/watch?v=JAMmqHQjDbQ
My previous videos on this topic start here:
youtube.com/watch?v=qIoZ4J8eO24
Renetto's "Tube It" video:
youtube.com/watch?v=80yQ4RUP-Mw
Renetto made a video a couple of days after his "Tube It" video explaining how he made his video.
How to build a song with "GarageBand"
youtube.com/watch?v=iSIyXUE5h-k
This is the video by Greg Solomon that myrealitybytes watched and attached her "Renetto's toy" video. After watching this video, she SHOULD have known that Greg would probably use her video to bash renetto for plagiarism.
"My Song For Renetto"
youtube.com/watch?v=bii1kz13c8U
"renetto's toy" by myrealitybytes
youtube.com/watch?v=rke953hXAVw
Here is the video that myrealitybytes DMCAd. It is now titled "Renetto Accused of Plagiarism", but I THINK it was titled "A Lady Accuses Renetto of Plagiarism" at one point.
livevideo.com/video/ADE073F68B40445CB4B14DE6974CC177/renneto-accused-of-plagiarism.aspx
Greg Solomon Is A Bully by myrealitybytes
youtube.com/watch?v=gyGwrOYNteM
Note the comments on this video:
RDJim (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply | Spam
Greg may not have had permission to use the video but that does not clear you of culpability. Why would you submit that video response to Greg Solomon of all people if you didn't mean to harm Rennetto? You wanted attention did you not? Well seems you got it. Enjoy.
MyRealityBytes (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply
The truth is I had only seen maybe 2 of Solomon's videos. I saw his song video and thought it was kind of funny. So, I had this "renetto's toy' video and I tried to post it a response to Solomon's video. I did not "egg" Solomon into doing anything. If You watch this video again and pause it where I show the email Solomon sent me. Read it carefully. I thought he meant what he said. He was going to "cite" (mention) me and my video. He never said he was going to use my video.
MyRealityBytes (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply
He never asked for my permission. AND I thought he knew my video was a joke. (I mean, I even sent it to renetto himself.) EVERYONE knows that loop is royalty free. Apparently, Solomon didn't. He then portrays me as some idiot who actually is accusing reneto of "plagarizing" a child's toy! {Plagarism is a serious offense). I woke up Sunday morning with my email full of hate mail and this how I discovered what Solomon had done with my video.
MyRealityBytes (1 day ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply
I asked him very nicely to take it down, that he had not been given permission to use any part my video. He immediately turned vicious (see above comments - I left them all there as proof. Whereas, Solomon removed all my comments, blocked me, removed all my friends comments and blocked them.) - He would have no part of removing that video. So ...



![Onisions Fair Use Analysis Is Full of Bologna
Onision DMCAd idiotech and antibu86s videos.
Here is a copy of the video by antibu86 that Onision DMCAd:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGkrZW3WWO0
Look at the comments posted on this video by Onision and CatCommunication:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isrcfjyHLS8
Onisions Fair Use Analysis:
1)Antibu took the heart of the video:
2)He downloaded the video illegally
3)Affordable permission was available for using the work.
4)Numerous copies were made.
Onision allegedly also claimed that since he took down the video which antibu copied from, it is no longer published and that makes Antibus usage infringing.
Question: If a woman gives birth to an ugly baby, can she unborn him by shoving him back up her birth canal?
CatCommunication made the following point—which Onisien agreed with:
Onision is a partner and makes money off his videos. Antibu86s posted portions of Onisiens video on his channel. People could watch Antibus video instead of Onisiens. Therefore, Onisien would be deprived of money.
The Four Factor Fair Use Test can be seen here:
http://www.themaskedanalyst.com/Fair%20Use.htm
From Campbell v. Acuff Rose:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1292.ZO.html
The more transformative the new work, the less will be the significance of other factors, like commercialism, that may weigh against a finding of fair use.
Note: citations have been omitted from the following passage from Campbell v. Acuff Rose:
when, on the contrary, the second use is transformative, market substitution is at least less certain, and market harm may not be so readily inferred. Indeed, as to parody pure and simple, it is more likely that the new work will not affect the market for the original in a way cognizable under this factor, that is, by acting as a substitute for it (supersed[ing] [its] objects). . . . This is so because the parody and the original usually serve different market functions. . .
We do not, of course, suggest that a parody may not harm the market at all, but when a lethal parody, like a scathing theater review, kills demand for the original, it does not produce a harm cognizable under the Copyright Act. Because parody may quite legitimately aim at garroting the original, destroying it commercially as well as artistically, . . . the role of the courts is to distinguish between [b]iting criticism [that merely] suppresses demand [and] copyright infringement[, which] usurps it.
The Purpose of Copyright Law is to provide an environment that is conducive to the creation of new works. It does this in two ways:
1)It gives creators limited control over their works so that they can profit from them.
2)It gives creators the ability to create new works by building on the works of others. This is what Fair Use is all about.
Note that the purpose of copyright law is not to give the creator control over his work. Giving the creator limited control over his works is but a means to the ends of creating an environment where new works will be produced. See my website for more details.
http://www.themaskedanalyst.com/The%20Purpose%20of%20Copyright%20Law.htm Onisions Fair Use Analysis Is Full of Bologna](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iC8YQTSmpT4/mqdefault.jpg)






