Uploaded May 2007 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
A couple of days ago I made some videos in which I proposed that the copyright laws should be changed so that others can repost our videos after we have removed them.
youtube.com/watch?v=ckxdxIrdXyY
I argued that the importance of keeping a historical record should outweigh our control over our videos once we have made them public.
Fakesagan makes an impassioned case in this video against my point of view.
youtube.com/watch?v=E_pJOI9xYio
Pay close attention between 7:30 and 9:00 into the video.
People may have also gotten the wrong idea that I consider fakesagan a scoundral. I want to correct that situation since I do think highly of him, despite our disagreements.
-------------------------------------------------
A great big hat tip to J6a6so6n! I said in this video that ""I find as a general rule most of the time it works that you shouldn't attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence or negligence in your opponent". I knew I had heard something like this many years ago, but I didn't know where it was from. J6a6so6n sent me a pm pointing out that this is known as "Hanlon's Razor". The statement was originally formulated as "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
Robert J. Hanlon was the author of this sage advice and it first appeared in 1980 in Murphy's Law book two: More reasons why things go wrong!" by Arthur Bloch. For more information about this see:
statusq.org/archives/2001/11/26
statusq.org/archives/2001/12/04
Thanks, J6a6so6n!
A couple of days ago I made some videos in which I proposed that the copyright laws should be changed so that others can repost our videos after we have removed them.
youtube.com/watch?v=ckxdxIrdXyY
I argued that the importance of keeping a historical record should outweigh our control over our videos once we have made them public.
Fakesagan makes an impassioned case in this video against my point of view.
youtube.com/watch?v=E_pJOI9xYio
Pay close attention between 7:30 and 9:00 into the video.
People may have also gotten the wrong idea that I consider fakesagan a scoundral. I want to correct that situation since I do think highly of him, despite our disagreements.
-------------------------------------------------
A great big hat tip to J6a6so6n! I said in this video that ""I find as a general rule most of the time it works that you shouldn't attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence or negligence in your opponent". I knew I had heard something like this many years ago, but I didn't know where it was from. J6a6so6n sent me a pm pointing out that this is known as "Hanlon's Razor". The statement was originally formulated as "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
Robert J. Hanlon was the author of this sage advice and it first appeared in 1980 in Murphy's Law book two: More reasons why things go wrong!" by Arthur Bloch. For more information about this see:
statusq.org/archives/2001/11/26
statusq.org/archives/2001/12/04
Thanks, J6a6so6n!

![How VenomFangX Can Shut Up Those Who Criticize His Fundraising on Youtube
My video is inspired by VenomFangXs video in which he donated $500 to charity and told atheists to shut up and stop criticizing him until after THEY make videos donating to charity.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maW5mtLivbI
Note at 1:55 159 he states Im hoping this video will silence you and your accusations.
Note at 5:26 he states If you want to bring accusations against me, then by all means—donate more than me. Otherwise, keep your mouth shut.
In the following video, VenomFangX says that he will give anything he makes over $500/month to the SickKids Hospital. Watch from 8:30 9:13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZY-S2oMywU#t=8m30s
VIDEOS EXPOSING VFX
Dprjones video was probably the first to document VFXs charity bait-and-switch. Did YouTube reward him for exposing someone who was using their site to commit fraud? Of course not. They slapped him on the hand and removed his video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG0V6pZJkVg
LordHathors videos exposing what appears to be very questionable (possibly even criminal) activity by VenomFangX on PayPal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L5agvxVwbw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xw2MtKdj2I
TerraRisings videos exposing VFXs behavior:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oawMNBprpFE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_cbn73VWKE
Terrarising questioned how sincere VFX was in his sympathy for children with deformities. He pointed out the following video in which VenomFangX says amputees dont deserve their arms and God has no moral obligation to heal them. Watch 2:52 3:52
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp-eqMT5vqw#t=2m52s
Does God have a moral obligation to heal someone who has sinned against him? Absolutely not. So, why doesnt God heal amputees? Cause. They dont deserve their arms. We deserve to die. Thats what the Bible teaches.
VFX Admitted he deliberately and repeatedly lied about the DMCA he sent against thunderf00t
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_MYyc-PtH4#t=1m59s
And here, VFX notes that someone who lies is a liar:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp-eqMT5vqw#t=3m52s
Have you ever told a lie? That makes you a liar.
So, VFX says that he has lied repeatedly, and anyone who tells a lie is a liar.
Drug Cartels build churches in impoverished Mexican villages to win over the local population:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/mexico/20080405-1123-mexico-drugs-.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/archive/godfathercocaine.html
ROBERTO ESCOBAR, Escobars Brother:
[through interpreter] They call him El Patron, the boss, because in Colombia, people who own a company are called Patrones. And the poor people began to call him El Patron because he would bring two or three trucks to the poor barrios and hed distribute food to people who didnt have any.
NARRATOR:
Escobars image as a modern Robin Hood was born in the slums that surround Medellin. There is a place here known as Barrio Pablo Escobar. They still say masses for Escobars soul in the church which he built here. Music from the steeple drifts over 200 homes which Escobar built for the poor. People here prefer to forget Escobars violent reputation.
RACHEL EHRENFELD, Author, Evil Money:
He built a soccer field and he sponsored a soccer team. He did a lot in order to help the poor. And he hired the local people in order to do construction, to run businesses for him, to teach in the local schools, which he built. He did a lot of good - much, much more than the local government - than the Colombian government did. How VenomFangX Can Shut Up Those Who Criticize His Fundraising on Youtube](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mgXNtmLyVhg/mqdefault.jpg)


![Why YouTube Should Not Censor Profanity
YouTube recently announced a policy to algorithmically demote videos containing profanity so that they wont appear on the Most Viewed and Most Discussed list. Here is their blog entry announcing the new policy
http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=AEX3_7h40mk
Both VioletKitty411 and Jezuzfreek777 have applauded this policy. My video takes the opposite view.
YouTube needs Censorship by jezuzfreek777
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaVFuIcPf-A
The Freedom of Speech by VioletKitty411
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FejxrvGqz-E
Rozeboosjes video in which he points out that Youtubes policy sends the wrong message to children:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79CWlB_p5Bs
An article about the Hurricane that hit Burma and the murderous thug regime that lords it over the people:
http://www.slate.com/id/2191196/
Millions still suffer in Burma due to blocked aid 1 month on
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2o3TYaWIHuE
[Channel 4 News] Efforts to get aid past Burma junta
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Km4MbSlA1dE
(Fuck Burmese Junta)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6adIBWNek4
An average guy tells the Burmese Junta that they are really fucking up by refusing aid to their country to help their people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Giw6u1QoZ-k Why YouTube Should Not Censor Profanity](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oBbIAL948t4/mqdefault.jpg)



![Dont Scuttle The Settlement Between Thunderf00t and VFX
This video is a response to Kurtilein3s video: [DRAMA] thunderf00t versus venomfangx
For those who are not familiar with the Thunderf00t/VenmFangX drama—a VERY quick synopsis:
VenomFangX filed a ton of DMCAs against critics who used clips of his videos without his permission. He claims that he didnt actually file the DMCAs. Instead, he says, he authorized a friend to do it. This claim is questionable, but even if it is true he is still not off the hook. His friend acted as his agent, so he is almost certainly still legally liable.
Thunderf00t threatened to complain to Youtube about VFXs false DMCAs in order to get VFXs account suspended. He also threatened a lawsuit against VFX. He had a ton of evidence that VFX had broken the law, and it would have been a slam dunk win, in my opinion. He told VFX that he would refrain from filing suit and complaining to Youtube provided that VFX close his account and stay off of Youtbe for a year. He gave VFX until Sept. 22 to make his decision. If he did not close his account by the morning of Sept. 23, he would tell his lawyer to file his lawsuit against VFX.
VFX responded at first by accusing Thunderf00t of blackmail. This accusation, IMO, was baseless since Thunderf00t had every right to offer an out of court settlement after having been the victim of VFXs DMCA abuse.
However, VFX changed his tune as the deadline approached with this apology video.
Settlement Agreement & Apology by VenomFangX
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L83CQE2d_Bs
Thunderf00t received a lot of flack by people who think he let VFX off the hook too easily. He put out this video explaining why he did not go through with the lawsuit.
Did I let him off the hook? by Thunderf00t
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6f9QD4Pn-M
kurtilein3 is now trying to scuttle the agreement between VenomFangX and Thunderf00t. Scuttling that agreement would be a bad move, IMO. It is also premature to make a decision about whether VFX was let off the hook until we hear all the terms of the settlement.
My website:
http://www.themaskedanalyst.com/
My page on Scientology, featuring Kurtilein3s video:
http://www.themaskedanalyst.com/Sceintology%20and%20the%20DMCA.htm
My page on Michael Crook—his apology video is Must Watch material:
http://www.themaskedanalyst.com/Michael%20Crook.htm
Rozeboosje made a valuable contribution to the debate:
The Apology
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VJ1xob7iQU
I hope Thunderf00t will include Rozeboosjes suggestions in the final settlement. Dont Scuttle The Settlement Between Thunderf00t and VFX](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pRdSdLlzbhc/mqdefault.jpg)

