Clarifying my stance on Fakesagan @themaskedanalyst
Clarifying my stance on Fakesagan  @themaskedanalyst
Uploaded May 2007 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
A couple of days ago I made some videos in which I proposed that the copyright laws should be changed so that others can repost our videos after we have removed them.

youtube.com/watch?v=ckxdxIrdXyY


I argued that the importance of keeping a historical record should outweigh our control over our videos once we have made them public.

Fakesagan makes an impassioned case in this video against my point of view.

youtube.com/watch?v=E_pJOI9xYio

Pay close attention between 7:30 and 9:00 into the video.

People may have also gotten the wrong idea that I consider fakesagan a scoundral. I want to correct that situation since I do think highly of him, despite our disagreements.



-------------------------------------------------
A great big hat tip to J6a6so6n! I said in this video that ""I find as a general rule most of the time it works that you shouldn't attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence or negligence in your opponent". I knew I had heard something like this many years ago, but I didn't know where it was from. J6a6so6n sent me a pm pointing out that this is known as "Hanlon's Razor". The statement was originally formulated as "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

Robert J. Hanlon was the author of this sage advice and it first appeared in 1980 in Murphy's Law book two: More reasons why things go wrong!" by Arthur Bloch. For more information about this see:

statusq.org/archives/2001/11/26

statusq.org/archives/2001/12/04

Thanks, J6a6so6n!
Clarifying my stance on FakesaganJudelicious, Parymich and the Right to Speak AnonymouslyHow VenomFangX Can Shut Up Those Who Criticize His Fundraising on YoutubeHelping Irish282 Clear His NameRedskulled is leaving and why I am breaking the truceWhy YouTube Should Not Censor ProfanityVideo 3 Pt 1 Why the DMCA is UnconstitutionalTheRedskull falsely accuses me of releasing personal infoDiscussing §512 (f) of the DMCA: Pt. 1 OPG v. DieboldDont Scuttle The Settlement Between Thunderf00t and VFXJohn McCain hit by the DMCA!!!!!No Gnooze is bad news Or 100,000 Subscribers or Bust!
themaskedanalyst |

Clarifying my stance on Fakesagan

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER