Uploaded April 2009 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
This is the second in a series of videos on YouTubes Terms of Service. This series is primarily in response to the YourTubeAdvocates (Number 20) videos.
youtube.com/watch?v=51f_1l20hXs
youtube.com/watch?v=GBab6u-VdYg
My videos on TOS may also help explain why people were quick to jump on YouTube for the suspension of James Randi. Mr. Randi gently chastised some of us for getting on YouTubes case, and this series of videos gives a partial explanation of why many are unwilling to give YouTube the benefit of the doubt.
youtube.com/watch?v=zngwTpkogeE
Part of that suspicion stems from past actions of YouTube, and part of it comes from their lack of communication with us about these matters. They make it very difficult for the average YouTuber to communicate with them if their video has been wrongfully removed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the community guidelines:
youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
we do not permit hate speech (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status and sexual orientation/gender .
If you click on the link for Community Guideline tips you get further clarification:
"Hate speech" refers to content that promotes hatred against members of a protected group. For instance, racist or sexist content may be considered hate speech. Sometimes there is a fine line between what is and what is not considered hate speech. For instance, it is generally okay to criticize a nation, but not okay to make insulting generalizations about people of a particular nationality.
What is a religion: Is Scientology a religion? Many observers have concluded that Scientology is a cult or a bait and switch scheme that lures unsuspecting suckers in with promises of helping them achieve success and mastery while hiding the fact that their philosophy is based on a rather bizarre belief about the evil Galactic Lord Xenu. They dont reveal this core belief to recruits until they have been exposed to years of brainwashing and spent thousands of dollars on Scientology courses.
What is to safeguard the accounts of Scientologys critics?
How about those who say that those who follow of Islam worship a religion whose prophet is a pedophile. Should they be protected?
This is the second in a series of videos on YouTubes Terms of Service. This series is primarily in response to the YourTubeAdvocates (Number 20) videos.
youtube.com/watch?v=51f_1l20hXs
youtube.com/watch?v=GBab6u-VdYg
My videos on TOS may also help explain why people were quick to jump on YouTube for the suspension of James Randi. Mr. Randi gently chastised some of us for getting on YouTubes case, and this series of videos gives a partial explanation of why many are unwilling to give YouTube the benefit of the doubt.
youtube.com/watch?v=zngwTpkogeE
Part of that suspicion stems from past actions of YouTube, and part of it comes from their lack of communication with us about these matters. They make it very difficult for the average YouTuber to communicate with them if their video has been wrongfully removed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the community guidelines:
youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
we do not permit hate speech (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status and sexual orientation/gender .
If you click on the link for Community Guideline tips you get further clarification:
"Hate speech" refers to content that promotes hatred against members of a protected group. For instance, racist or sexist content may be considered hate speech. Sometimes there is a fine line between what is and what is not considered hate speech. For instance, it is generally okay to criticize a nation, but not okay to make insulting generalizations about people of a particular nationality.
What is a religion: Is Scientology a religion? Many observers have concluded that Scientology is a cult or a bait and switch scheme that lures unsuspecting suckers in with promises of helping them achieve success and mastery while hiding the fact that their philosophy is based on a rather bizarre belief about the evil Galactic Lord Xenu. They dont reveal this core belief to recruits until they have been exposed to years of brainwashing and spent thousands of dollars on Scientology courses.
What is to safeguard the accounts of Scientologys critics?
How about those who say that those who follow of Islam worship a religion whose prophet is a pedophile. Should they be protected?
![Onisions Fair Use Analysis Is Full of Bologna
Onision DMCAd idiotech and antibu86s videos.
Here is a copy of the video by antibu86 that Onision DMCAd:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGkrZW3WWO0
Look at the comments posted on this video by Onision and CatCommunication:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isrcfjyHLS8
Onisions Fair Use Analysis:
1)Antibu took the heart of the video:
2)He downloaded the video illegally
3)Affordable permission was available for using the work.
4)Numerous copies were made.
Onision allegedly also claimed that since he took down the video which antibu copied from, it is no longer published and that makes Antibus usage infringing.
Question: If a woman gives birth to an ugly baby, can she unborn him by shoving him back up her birth canal?
CatCommunication made the following point—which Onisien agreed with:
Onision is a partner and makes money off his videos. Antibu86s posted portions of Onisiens video on his channel. People could watch Antibus video instead of Onisiens. Therefore, Onisien would be deprived of money.
The Four Factor Fair Use Test can be seen here:
http://www.themaskedanalyst.com/Fair%20Use.htm
From Campbell v. Acuff Rose:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1292.ZO.html
The more transformative the new work, the less will be the significance of other factors, like commercialism, that may weigh against a finding of fair use.
Note: citations have been omitted from the following passage from Campbell v. Acuff Rose:
when, on the contrary, the second use is transformative, market substitution is at least less certain, and market harm may not be so readily inferred. Indeed, as to parody pure and simple, it is more likely that the new work will not affect the market for the original in a way cognizable under this factor, that is, by acting as a substitute for it (supersed[ing] [its] objects). . . . This is so because the parody and the original usually serve different market functions. . .
We do not, of course, suggest that a parody may not harm the market at all, but when a lethal parody, like a scathing theater review, kills demand for the original, it does not produce a harm cognizable under the Copyright Act. Because parody may quite legitimately aim at garroting the original, destroying it commercially as well as artistically, . . . the role of the courts is to distinguish between [b]iting criticism [that merely] suppresses demand [and] copyright infringement[, which] usurps it.
The Purpose of Copyright Law is to provide an environment that is conducive to the creation of new works. It does this in two ways:
1)It gives creators limited control over their works so that they can profit from them.
2)It gives creators the ability to create new works by building on the works of others. This is what Fair Use is all about.
Note that the purpose of copyright law is not to give the creator control over his work. Giving the creator limited control over his works is but a means to the ends of creating an environment where new works will be produced. See my website for more details.
http://www.themaskedanalyst.com/The%20Purpose%20of%20Copyright%20Law.htm Onisions Fair Use Analysis Is Full of Bologna](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iC8YQTSmpT4/mqdefault.jpg)








![How VenomFangX Can Shut Up Those Who Criticize His Fundraising on Youtube
My video is inspired by VenomFangXs video in which he donated $500 to charity and told atheists to shut up and stop criticizing him until after THEY make videos donating to charity.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maW5mtLivbI
Note at 1:55 159 he states Im hoping this video will silence you and your accusations.
Note at 5:26 he states If you want to bring accusations against me, then by all means—donate more than me. Otherwise, keep your mouth shut.
In the following video, VenomFangX says that he will give anything he makes over $500/month to the SickKids Hospital. Watch from 8:30 9:13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZY-S2oMywU#t=8m30s
VIDEOS EXPOSING VFX
Dprjones video was probably the first to document VFXs charity bait-and-switch. Did YouTube reward him for exposing someone who was using their site to commit fraud? Of course not. They slapped him on the hand and removed his video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG0V6pZJkVg
LordHathors videos exposing what appears to be very questionable (possibly even criminal) activity by VenomFangX on PayPal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L5agvxVwbw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xw2MtKdj2I
TerraRisings videos exposing VFXs behavior:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oawMNBprpFE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_cbn73VWKE
Terrarising questioned how sincere VFX was in his sympathy for children with deformities. He pointed out the following video in which VenomFangX says amputees dont deserve their arms and God has no moral obligation to heal them. Watch 2:52 3:52
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp-eqMT5vqw#t=2m52s
Does God have a moral obligation to heal someone who has sinned against him? Absolutely not. So, why doesnt God heal amputees? Cause. They dont deserve their arms. We deserve to die. Thats what the Bible teaches.
VFX Admitted he deliberately and repeatedly lied about the DMCA he sent against thunderf00t
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_MYyc-PtH4#t=1m59s
And here, VFX notes that someone who lies is a liar:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp-eqMT5vqw#t=3m52s
Have you ever told a lie? That makes you a liar.
So, VFX says that he has lied repeatedly, and anyone who tells a lie is a liar.
Drug Cartels build churches in impoverished Mexican villages to win over the local population:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/mexico/20080405-1123-mexico-drugs-.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/archive/godfathercocaine.html
ROBERTO ESCOBAR, Escobars Brother:
[through interpreter] They call him El Patron, the boss, because in Colombia, people who own a company are called Patrones. And the poor people began to call him El Patron because he would bring two or three trucks to the poor barrios and hed distribute food to people who didnt have any.
NARRATOR:
Escobars image as a modern Robin Hood was born in the slums that surround Medellin. There is a place here known as Barrio Pablo Escobar. They still say masses for Escobars soul in the church which he built here. Music from the steeple drifts over 200 homes which Escobar built for the poor. People here prefer to forget Escobars violent reputation.
RACHEL EHRENFELD, Author, Evil Money:
He built a soccer field and he sponsored a soccer team. He did a lot in order to help the poor. And he hired the local people in order to do construction, to run businesses for him, to teach in the local schools, which he built. He did a lot of good - much, much more than the local government - than the Colombian government did. How VenomFangX Can Shut Up Those Who Criticize His Fundraising on Youtube](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mgXNtmLyVhg/mqdefault.jpg)
