Uploaded November 2021 | Updated September 2026, 1 day ago
We’ll be exploring what the discovery of evolution potentially means for religion. Is evolution evidence against theism? If so, why? Is it incompatible with Christianity, as some Christians maintain? What is the conceptual landscape vis-à-vis evolution and theism—as in, what is the range of potential options available to a religious believer when it comes to evolution? We also briefly discuss evolutionary evil as evidence against God’s existence, and argue that the acceptance of evolution does not dissolve all the problems that arise between evolution and theism. Accepting evolution doesn’t mean you’re off the hook.
https://linktr.ee/emersongreen
Transcript (and further links) emersongreenblog.wordpress.com/2021/10/28/god-and-evolution
@waldenpod
Support the Show patreon.com/counter
Music by ichika Nito & Whalers. Used with permission.
Listen to our sister show, Walden Pod here podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/walden-pod/id1474408172
Rate the show on iTunes here podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/counter-apologetics/id1273573417?mt=2
Joe Schmid & Micah Edvenson on Evolutionary Evil youtu.be/I_qD5nWBzwY?t=2923
Joe Schmid & Non-Alchemist on Evolutionary Evil youtube.com/watch?v=lHe9AG8lfzo
/ timestamps /
00:00 Introduction
02:00 The Second Insult to Human Vanity
04:49 The Conceptual Landscape
08:17 Draper's Argument
11:06 Lowder's Argument (Dualism & Evolution)
14:04 Oppy's Argument
16:44 Evolutionary Suffering
25:10 Young Earth Creationism in the U.S.
28:17 Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, and Acceptance
29:33 goodbye
We’ll be exploring what the discovery of evolution potentially means for religion. Is evolution evidence against theism? If so, why? Is it incompatible with Christianity, as some Christians maintain? What is the conceptual landscape vis-à-vis evolution and theism—as in, what is the range of potential options available to a religious believer when it comes to evolution? We also briefly discuss evolutionary evil as evidence against God’s existence, and argue that the acceptance of evolution does not dissolve all the problems that arise between evolution and theism. Accepting evolution doesn’t mean you’re off the hook.
https://linktr.ee/emersongreen
Transcript (and further links) emersongreenblog.wordpress.com/2021/10/28/god-and-evolution
@waldenpod
Support the Show patreon.com/counter
Music by ichika Nito & Whalers. Used with permission.
Listen to our sister show, Walden Pod here podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/walden-pod/id1474408172
Rate the show on iTunes here podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/counter-apologetics/id1273573417?mt=2
Joe Schmid & Micah Edvenson on Evolutionary Evil youtu.be/I_qD5nWBzwY?t=2923
Joe Schmid & Non-Alchemist on Evolutionary Evil youtube.com/watch?v=lHe9AG8lfzo
/ timestamps /
00:00 Introduction
02:00 The Second Insult to Human Vanity
04:49 The Conceptual Landscape
08:17 Draper's Argument
11:06 Lowder's Argument (Dualism & Evolution)
14:04 Oppy's Argument
16:44 Evolutionary Suffering
25:10 Young Earth Creationism in the U.S.
28:17 Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, and Acceptance
29:33 goodbye









![Has Physics Debunked Panpsychism? Answering Sabine Hossenfelder
Theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder recently published a widely-cited critique of panpsychism. Hossenfelder argues that physics has ruled out panpsychism. However, her article is mired in confusion, and one doesn’t need to be a panpsychist to notice.
Read her criticism, Electrons Don’t Think, here: http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/01/electrons-dont-think.html
“Why do the Deniers ignore a long line of distinguished materialist predecessors and ally themselves with Descartes, their sworn enemy, in holding that experience can’t possibly be physical—thereby obliging themselves to endorse the Denial? The answer appears to be that they share with Descartes one very large assumption: that we know enough about the physical to be certain that experience can’t be physical.”
- Galen Strawson
“What a physiologist sees when he examines a brain is in the physiologist, not in the brain he is examining.”
- Bertrand Russell
“[M]aterialism ... is the philosophy of the subject who forgets himself in his calculation.”
- Schopenhauer
Transcript: https://emersongreenblog.wordpress.com/2020/03/30/has-physics-debunked-panpsychism-answering-sabine-hossenfelder/
Listen to Walden Pod: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/walden-pod/id1474408172
Follow on Twitter @waldenpod
Support the podcast at Patreon.com/waldenpod
https://linktr.ee/emersongreen
/ timestamps /
00:00 Introduction
01:47 Hossenfelders critique
04:12 Two interpretations of her critique
09:47 Unfalsifiable or falsified?
11:29 Further points of confusion evident in Hossenfelders critique Has Physics Debunked Panpsychism? Answering Sabine Hossenfelder](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BUIWW_2afBU/mqdefault.jpg)
