Uploaded September 2024 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Find out more at https://gupress.gallaudet.edu/internationalperspectives
"The Winds of Change: Canadian Sign Language Interpreter Education Programs" | Chapter summary in International Sign
Chapter authors: Debra Russell, Jeanette Nicholson, and Nigel Howard
From “International Perspectives on Sign Language Translator and Interpreter Education”
Edited by Jemina Napier, Stacey Webb, and Robert Adam
Published by Gallaudet University Press
**This video may not be repurposed or incorporated into other works in any way without the express written consent of the signer and the chapter authors.**
Visual description: Nigel Howard is 181 cm tall with a slim build, short dark hair, and hazel eyes. He is standing against a blue background and is wearing a long-sleeved black shirt.
Transcript:
This chapter explores the historical and current landscape of sign language interpreter education programs in Canada. Contextually, Canada is the second largest country in the world by land area, with a population of nearly 39 million. The majority of its residents are concentrated in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec. As a bilingual country of English and French, Canada has a long history of employing interpreters to deliver services in both official languages. As of 2019, the Government of Canada through the passing of Bill C-81, known as the Accessible Canada Act, recognized American Sign Language (ASL), le langue des signes Quebecoise (LSQ), and Indigenous Sign Languages (ISLs) as the sign languages used by deaf Canadians.
This chapter traces the professionalization of sign language interpreters in Canada, starting with the earliest documented interpreter, Anne Byrne, in the late 1800s, and describes the evolution from intermittent training to formal post-secondary programs lasting two (Diploma) to four years (Bachelor of Honors Degree) in length.
This chapter also highlights the early development of deaf interpreters in Canada, noting that deaf interpreters, including a deaf woman from 1977, earned the "Reverse Skills Certificate" from the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (RID). Deaf interpreters acted as the middlemen of communication.
Historically, interpreters in Canada who were seeking educational support set up AVLIC, the Association of Visual Language Interpreters of Canada. The name was later changed to CASLI, the Canadian Association of Sign Language Interpreters. CASLI had a vital role in monitoring the education program and ensuring the upkeep of interpreters’ ethics.
Over time, the Canadian interpreting landscape evolved to include Video Relay Services (VRS). Interpreters originally only provided service to deaf Americans. When the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission mandated the creation of the Canada Video Relay Service to service deaf Canadian consumers, VRS centers were established in some Canadian cities. Employing Canadian interpreters was an attempt to provide the most linguistically and culturally appropriate service, as interpreters in the United States were not familiar with the Canadian sign language variations, or the political and geographical context that frames many of the calls to Canadian service providers. Canadian interpreters working in VRS settings were also preferred by deaf Canadians due to their reported higher quality of interpreting skills compared to interpreters in the United States, who were noted for employing a more literal interpreting style.
A positive and unique feature of the Canadian implementation of VRS is the hiring of deaf managers for the VRS centers who are also deaf interpreters and have experience working as interpreter educators. With the unfolding of time, there has been a significant increase in deaf interpreters creating new business opportunities in translation work, as well as interpreters working and undertaking professional development opportunities to work within specialized settings such as medical, legal, and mental health.
One significant finding amongst deaf Canadians is their predilection for deaf interpreters to interpret for televised broadcasts such as the news, emergency announcements, and political briefings (for example, the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic) as the provision of deaf interpreters can provide the most linguistically accessible interpretation for ASL and LSQ users.
Although the chapter concludes with several recommendations that could lead interpreter education in new directions, diversity within current interpreter education is critical. Canada embraces deaf individuals from diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds, necessitating that cohorts in postsecondary programs reflect the evolving diversity of the deaf community.
Find out more at https://gupress.gallaudet.edu/internationalperspectives
"The Winds of Change: Canadian Sign Language Interpreter Education Programs" | Chapter summary in International Sign
Chapter authors: Debra Russell, Jeanette Nicholson, and Nigel Howard
From “International Perspectives on Sign Language Translator and Interpreter Education”
Edited by Jemina Napier, Stacey Webb, and Robert Adam
Published by Gallaudet University Press
**This video may not be repurposed or incorporated into other works in any way without the express written consent of the signer and the chapter authors.**
Visual description: Nigel Howard is 181 cm tall with a slim build, short dark hair, and hazel eyes. He is standing against a blue background and is wearing a long-sleeved black shirt.
Transcript:
This chapter explores the historical and current landscape of sign language interpreter education programs in Canada. Contextually, Canada is the second largest country in the world by land area, with a population of nearly 39 million. The majority of its residents are concentrated in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec. As a bilingual country of English and French, Canada has a long history of employing interpreters to deliver services in both official languages. As of 2019, the Government of Canada through the passing of Bill C-81, known as the Accessible Canada Act, recognized American Sign Language (ASL), le langue des signes Quebecoise (LSQ), and Indigenous Sign Languages (ISLs) as the sign languages used by deaf Canadians.
This chapter traces the professionalization of sign language interpreters in Canada, starting with the earliest documented interpreter, Anne Byrne, in the late 1800s, and describes the evolution from intermittent training to formal post-secondary programs lasting two (Diploma) to four years (Bachelor of Honors Degree) in length.
This chapter also highlights the early development of deaf interpreters in Canada, noting that deaf interpreters, including a deaf woman from 1977, earned the "Reverse Skills Certificate" from the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (RID). Deaf interpreters acted as the middlemen of communication.
Historically, interpreters in Canada who were seeking educational support set up AVLIC, the Association of Visual Language Interpreters of Canada. The name was later changed to CASLI, the Canadian Association of Sign Language Interpreters. CASLI had a vital role in monitoring the education program and ensuring the upkeep of interpreters’ ethics.
Over time, the Canadian interpreting landscape evolved to include Video Relay Services (VRS). Interpreters originally only provided service to deaf Americans. When the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission mandated the creation of the Canada Video Relay Service to service deaf Canadian consumers, VRS centers were established in some Canadian cities. Employing Canadian interpreters was an attempt to provide the most linguistically and culturally appropriate service, as interpreters in the United States were not familiar with the Canadian sign language variations, or the political and geographical context that frames many of the calls to Canadian service providers. Canadian interpreters working in VRS settings were also preferred by deaf Canadians due to their reported higher quality of interpreting skills compared to interpreters in the United States, who were noted for employing a more literal interpreting style.
A positive and unique feature of the Canadian implementation of VRS is the hiring of deaf managers for the VRS centers who are also deaf interpreters and have experience working as interpreter educators. With the unfolding of time, there has been a significant increase in deaf interpreters creating new business opportunities in translation work, as well as interpreters working and undertaking professional development opportunities to work within specialized settings such as medical, legal, and mental health.
One significant finding amongst deaf Canadians is their predilection for deaf interpreters to interpret for televised broadcasts such as the news, emergency announcements, and political briefings (for example, the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic) as the provision of deaf interpreters can provide the most linguistically accessible interpretation for ASL and LSQ users.
Although the chapter concludes with several recommendations that could lead interpreter education in new directions, diversity within current interpreter education is critical. Canada embraces deaf individuals from diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds, necessitating that cohorts in postsecondary programs reflect the evolving diversity of the deaf community.





![Ch 1. Demographics and Etiology in Deafness
Goff Paris, D., Kessler, E. B., & Martin, G. A. (2021). Demographics and etiology in deafness: Sociocultural elements of relevance to the criminal justice system. In D. Guthmann, G. I. Lomas, D. Goff Paris, & G. A. Martin (Eds.), DEAF PEOPLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (pp. 1-21). Gallaudet University Press. https://gupress.gallaudet.edu/Books/D/Deaf-People-in-the-Criminal-Justice-System
This video may not be repurposed or incorporated into other works in any way without the express written consent of the signer and the chapter author.
Dr. Damara Goff Paris is one of the editors of this publication and co-authored this chapter with Dr. E. Basil Kessler, and Dr. Gabriel A. “Tony” Martin. Dr. Paris is currently an Associate Professor in Counselor Education for Emporia State University, is the president of ADARA, and holds licensure in professional counseling and rehabilitation counseling. She has worked with victims of crime, and individuals with co-occurring disorders who have gone through the criminal justice system.
Dr. E. Basil Kessler is an Assistant Professor in counselor education at Emporia State University. He holds licensure as a professional counselor and is a Certified Rehabilitation Counselor (CRC). He began his professional life as a case manager working with members of the Deaf community and as a certified interpreter. He served for 10 years on the Kansas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing serving in three capacities: interpreter representative, mental health representative and Ex-Officio for the Kansas Department of Education.
Dr. Gabriel A. Tony Martin was a Department Chair for over 20 years at Lamar Universitys Deaf Education and Deaf Studies program. He also served as an interpreter for the SE Texas DHH community and a consultant on court cases involving deaf individuals. Dr. Martin unexpectedly passed away during the writing of this chapter. We honor his work by keeping his name as a co-author.
In Chapter 1, Demographics and Etiology, Dr. Paris, Dr. Kessler, and Dr. Martin take the reader through an understanding of the deaf community that moves from the medical model to the cultural model. They note that the etiology of a hearing loss (which includes information about the types and causes of hearing loss) is not as important as the often-overlooked dimensions of the socio-linguistic and cultural elements of being deaf. They remind the reader that there are many dimensions in multiple minority membership.
The authors trace a history of public policy that was intended to help federal agencies better understand how those medical conditions that caused hearing loss impacted individuals and society medically, socially, and economically. As much as Paris, Kessler, and Martin understand the obligation the government has to address medical conditions that affect the populous, they also illustrate that much more and different information must be obtained and analyzed in order to understand the multiple realities that exist among deaf people. For example, a child who is born deaf and who has deaf parents often has a completely different upbringing, linguistically, culturally, and educationally, than a deaf child whose parents are hearing. Military personnel who experience combat-related traumatic brain injuries with secondary hearing loss have communication needs that differ, significantly, from those who have Ménières disease.
The authors share that inmates with one disability make up 32% of the federal prison population and 40% of the jail population. Youth with disabilities are disproportionately represented in correctional facilities and 6.5% of inmates in federal prisons and jails are deaf or have a severe hearing loss. The reader is provided with two cases involving deaf adults denied access to sign language interpreters and whose police interactions and legal cases were exacerbated by lack of communication access.
[Please see the comments for the remainder of the transcript.] Ch 1. Demographics and Etiology in Deafness](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VEBEILNr_OY/mqdefault.jpg)




