Uploaded December 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
I Read the 1971 Paper Creationists Quote—Here's What They Left Out
A young-earth creationist meme claims that a freshly killed seal was carbon-14 dated to 1300 years old—supposedly proving that radiocarbon dating is completely unreliable. But is this actually the gotcha they think it is?
I tracked down the original 1971 Antarctic Journal article they're citing, and what I found is fascinating. Not only did the original researchers already explain why this date was problematic, but this "anomaly" actually taught us something incredible about ocean circulation and the marine reservoir effect.
In this video, I break down exactly how carbon-14 dating works, why Antarctic marine organisms consistently show inflated ages, and how scientists use museum specimens with known death dates to calculate precise correction factors. Far from disproving radiocarbon dating, this example demonstrates how science confronts anomalies and turns them into refined, more accurate methods.
The seal isn't 1300 years old. It's eating food from ancient waters—and that makes all the difference.
CHAPTERS:
0:00 – The Creationist Meme
2:52 – Finding the Original 1971 Article
5:45 – How Carbon-14 Dating Actually Works
8:13 – The Marine Reservoir Effect Explained
13:40 – Why Antarctic Waters Are "Ancient"
17:01 – How Scientists Correct for Reservoir Ages
21:15 – Anomalies Drive Scientific Discovery
24:54 – The Real Problem with This Creationist Argument
#Carbon14Dating #RadiocarbonDating #YoungEarthCreationism #CreationToday #ScienceEducation #MarineReservoirEffect #Antarctica #CritiquingCreationism
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Duff (aka Dr. Duff or The Natural Historian) resources:
About: joelduff.org
Blog: thenaturalhistorian.com
Twitter: twitter.com/NaturalHistoria
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thenaturalhi...
Photography "Portraits of Creation:" beechnutphotography.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Read the 1971 Paper Creationists Quote—Here's What They Left Out
A young-earth creationist meme claims that a freshly killed seal was carbon-14 dated to 1300 years old—supposedly proving that radiocarbon dating is completely unreliable. But is this actually the gotcha they think it is?
I tracked down the original 1971 Antarctic Journal article they're citing, and what I found is fascinating. Not only did the original researchers already explain why this date was problematic, but this "anomaly" actually taught us something incredible about ocean circulation and the marine reservoir effect.
In this video, I break down exactly how carbon-14 dating works, why Antarctic marine organisms consistently show inflated ages, and how scientists use museum specimens with known death dates to calculate precise correction factors. Far from disproving radiocarbon dating, this example demonstrates how science confronts anomalies and turns them into refined, more accurate methods.
The seal isn't 1300 years old. It's eating food from ancient waters—and that makes all the difference.
CHAPTERS:
0:00 – The Creationist Meme
2:52 – Finding the Original 1971 Article
5:45 – How Carbon-14 Dating Actually Works
8:13 – The Marine Reservoir Effect Explained
13:40 – Why Antarctic Waters Are "Ancient"
17:01 – How Scientists Correct for Reservoir Ages
21:15 – Anomalies Drive Scientific Discovery
24:54 – The Real Problem with This Creationist Argument
#Carbon14Dating #RadiocarbonDating #YoungEarthCreationism #CreationToday #ScienceEducation #MarineReservoirEffect #Antarctica #CritiquingCreationism
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Duff (aka Dr. Duff or The Natural Historian) resources:
About: joelduff.org
Blog: thenaturalhistorian.com
Twitter: twitter.com/NaturalHistoria
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thenaturalhi...
Photography "Portraits of Creation:" beechnutphotography.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






![Answers in Genesis vs. Everyone Else: Why Ken Ham Always Wins
When people think of Answers in Genesis (AiG), they often picture Ken Ham, the Creation Museum, or the Ark Encounter. But here’s the question I tackle in this video: just how massive is this organization, financially and structurally? Spoiler alert—it’s not just a ministry; it’s a multi-million-dollar empire that dwarfs every other young-earth creationist group.
I found AiG’s 2022 IRS Form 990 and reveal numbers that might surprise you. We’re talking $77 million in gross receipts, nearly $70 million in total revenue, and a $20 million annual surplus—all while reporting over $121 million in net assets. And remember, this doesn’t even include the Ark Encounter, which operates under a separate nonprofit shell (Crosswater Canyon) but still funnels millions back into AiG. When you add that in, AiG’s reach pushes well over $100 million in yearly revenues and over $200 million in assets in 2022. Combine that with other associated side companies and additions since 2022 it likely has some 300 million in assets today.
I also point out where the money comes from (donations, ticket sales, merchandise, and even management fees from the Ark Encounter) and where it goes—like the $25+ million payroll and Ken Ham’s salary, which, while hefty, is relatively modest compared to CEOs of similar-sized organizations. But it’s not just about salaries—AiG is a family affair, with Ham’s children and in-laws also drawing income.
Finally, I compare AiG’s numbers to Creation Ministries International (CMI) and the Institute for Creation Research (ICR). The contrast is staggering: AiG’s financial muscle means they dominate the YEC landscape. That’s why when Ken Ham speaks, his voice isn’t just loud—it’s amplified by hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of infrastructure.
If you’ve ever wondered why AiG sets the tone for the entire young-earth movement, the answer is simple: money buys influence.
Chapters
[00:00] How Big Is Answers in Genesis?
[01:04] Peeking into the 2022 Form 990
[02:07] Breaking Down Revenue Streams
[03:10] Expenses, Surpluses, and Net Assets
[05:39] The Ark Encounter’s Separate Books
[07:30] Ken Ham’s Paycheck & Family Connections
[21:10] Comparing AiG, CMI, and ICR
[24:27] Why AiG Dominates the YEC World
Joel Duff (aka Dr. Duff or The Natural Historian) resources:
About: https://joelduff.org
Blog: https://thenaturalhistorian.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/NaturalHistoria
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thenaturalhi...
Photography Portraits of Creation: https://www.beechnutphotography.com/ Answers in Genesis vs. Everyone Else: Why Ken Ham Always Wins](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oTBfUOPQ4iw/mqdefault.jpg)



