Uploaded April 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Body Cam Video of Entitled Woman Acts Like Brat To Police After Causing Traffic Accident On September 12, 2024, law enforcement responded to the area of US Highway 1 and Sebastian Boulevard East in reference to a traffic crash. Upon arrival, the defendant was observed seated inside a BMW involved in the incident. An officer remained on scene while another completed the traffic crash investigation.
It was determined that the defendant had been operating the BMW and made an illegal left turn, entering the eastbound lanes while traveling west. Multiple signs in the area prohibit such maneuvers, including “Do Not Enter” and “No U-Turn” signage. The crash was severe enough that both vehicles required towing. The BMW emitted a strong odor of an adult beverage.
Several officers observed that the defendant was swaying, moved slowly and deliberately, had difficulty following instructions, and struggled to remain still. A strong odor of an adult beverage was also detected on the defendant’s breath during conversation. After the crash investigation concluded, the defendant repeatedly declined EMS assistance. Due to the suspicion of impairment, officers began a DUI investigation.
The defendant was observed standing between the cab and driver door of the BMW, leaning against the window and speaking on a cell phone. When asked to hang up the phone and walk away from the scene, the defendant refused, stating it was a parent on the line. Despite multiple lawful commands from officers, the defendant continued to refuse and then attempted to walk away from the scene.
The defendant was placed in handcuffs and transported for medical clearance prior to jail transport. A strong odor of an adult beverage was noted inside the patrol vehicle following transport. A search of the defendant’s purse, which was located in the vehicle, revealed two alcoholic seltzers—one destroyed, possibly from the crash, and another with visible condensation. A cup containing an unknown adult beverage was also found inside the vehicle.
While en route to and inside the hospital, the defendant exhibited rapid mood swings, ranging from being loud and verbally abusive to crying. The defendant reported nausea and dry heaved but declined to sit or comply with several officer instructions. After being read Miranda rights, the defendant stated they did not understand and did not want to hear them. The defendant refused further medical treatment.
At one point in the hospital, the defendant requested a nurse be present, stating they felt “exposed,” and made a vague accusation toward an officer regarding the handling of their clothing. A supervisor was called, and after a conversation about the consequences of filing a false report, the defendant stated they simply didn’t like the officer.
After being medically cleared, the defendant was transported to the county jail. At the jail, the defendant again interrupted during the Miranda warning, claimed not to understand it, and remained argumentative. When asked if they would participate in field sobriety exercises, the defendant would not provide a clear answer but ultimately agreed after being advised of the Taylor Warning.
During the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test, the defendant stated they wore contact lenses. Officers observed lack of smooth pursuit and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation, but the test was not completed due to the defendant becoming irate.
For the Walk and Turn test, the defendant removed their sandals and repeatedly began the task without instruction, starting with the wrong foot and failing to maintain the correct starting position. Despite multiple explanations and demonstrations, the task was not completed to standard. The defendant also claimed to have a broken foot.
When asked about the One-Leg Stand exercise, the defendant initially refused to answer but later agreed. The defendant attempted the task but modified the instructions, failed to count properly beyond “14,” and stopped without resuming.
When asked to provide a breath sample, the defendant refused. After being read implied consent by a corrections deputy, the defendant continued to refuse.
Based on the totality of the circumstances, officers concluded the defendant was under the influence of an adult beverage to the extent that normal faculties were impaired. The defendant was charged with Driving Under the Influence with Property Damage and Resisting Arrest Without Violence.
Attached to the report are the arrest affidavit, witness statements, and DUI citation. Medical paperwork was retained by jail medical staff.
Body Cam Video of Entitled Woman Acts Like Brat To Police After Causing Traffic Accident On September 12, 2024, law enforcement responded to the area of US Highway 1 and Sebastian Boulevard East in reference to a traffic crash. Upon arrival, the defendant was observed seated inside a BMW involved in the incident. An officer remained on scene while another completed the traffic crash investigation.
It was determined that the defendant had been operating the BMW and made an illegal left turn, entering the eastbound lanes while traveling west. Multiple signs in the area prohibit such maneuvers, including “Do Not Enter” and “No U-Turn” signage. The crash was severe enough that both vehicles required towing. The BMW emitted a strong odor of an adult beverage.
Several officers observed that the defendant was swaying, moved slowly and deliberately, had difficulty following instructions, and struggled to remain still. A strong odor of an adult beverage was also detected on the defendant’s breath during conversation. After the crash investigation concluded, the defendant repeatedly declined EMS assistance. Due to the suspicion of impairment, officers began a DUI investigation.
The defendant was observed standing between the cab and driver door of the BMW, leaning against the window and speaking on a cell phone. When asked to hang up the phone and walk away from the scene, the defendant refused, stating it was a parent on the line. Despite multiple lawful commands from officers, the defendant continued to refuse and then attempted to walk away from the scene.
The defendant was placed in handcuffs and transported for medical clearance prior to jail transport. A strong odor of an adult beverage was noted inside the patrol vehicle following transport. A search of the defendant’s purse, which was located in the vehicle, revealed two alcoholic seltzers—one destroyed, possibly from the crash, and another with visible condensation. A cup containing an unknown adult beverage was also found inside the vehicle.
While en route to and inside the hospital, the defendant exhibited rapid mood swings, ranging from being loud and verbally abusive to crying. The defendant reported nausea and dry heaved but declined to sit or comply with several officer instructions. After being read Miranda rights, the defendant stated they did not understand and did not want to hear them. The defendant refused further medical treatment.
At one point in the hospital, the defendant requested a nurse be present, stating they felt “exposed,” and made a vague accusation toward an officer regarding the handling of their clothing. A supervisor was called, and after a conversation about the consequences of filing a false report, the defendant stated they simply didn’t like the officer.
After being medically cleared, the defendant was transported to the county jail. At the jail, the defendant again interrupted during the Miranda warning, claimed not to understand it, and remained argumentative. When asked if they would participate in field sobriety exercises, the defendant would not provide a clear answer but ultimately agreed after being advised of the Taylor Warning.
During the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test, the defendant stated they wore contact lenses. Officers observed lack of smooth pursuit and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation, but the test was not completed due to the defendant becoming irate.
For the Walk and Turn test, the defendant removed their sandals and repeatedly began the task without instruction, starting with the wrong foot and failing to maintain the correct starting position. Despite multiple explanations and demonstrations, the task was not completed to standard. The defendant also claimed to have a broken foot.
When asked about the One-Leg Stand exercise, the defendant initially refused to answer but later agreed. The defendant attempted the task but modified the instructions, failed to count properly beyond “14,” and stopped without resuming.
When asked to provide a breath sample, the defendant refused. After being read implied consent by a corrections deputy, the defendant continued to refuse.
Based on the totality of the circumstances, officers concluded the defendant was under the influence of an adult beverage to the extent that normal faculties were impaired. The defendant was charged with Driving Under the Influence with Property Damage and Resisting Arrest Without Violence.
Attached to the report are the arrest affidavit, witness statements, and DUI citation. Medical paperwork was retained by jail medical staff.
