Uploaded December 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
The colonial explorers Robert O’Hara Burke and William John Wills—the renowned Burke and Wills—set out from Melbourne in August 1860 with great public fanfare to cross the Australian continent from south to north. At that time, most of the inland of Australia had not been explored by European settlers.
Almost six months later, they successfully made it to their destination in the Gulf of Carpentaria, but the return journey was plagued by delays and monsoon rains eventually leading to their deaths in around June 1861. Although the expedition had a tragic ending, it certainly was not a waste. It helped complete the picture of inland Australia and proved that there was no inland sea. Furthermore, each of the rescue parties sent from different parts of the continent added in some way to the understanding of inland Australia.
In 1865, a statue was erected in Burke and Wills’ honour on the intersection of Collins and Russell Streets in Melbourne, making it Melbourne’s first, and therefore oldest piece of public art. In 2017, the statue was removed from its location in City Square, at the corner of Swanston and Collins Streets, and put into storage to allow for the construction of the Metro Tunnel Project’s Town Hall Station.
And now that Town Hall Station is complete as of 30 November, do you think the Burke and Wills statue, Melbourne’s oldest public art, will be put back in City Square? Don’t be daft! This is woke Melbourne! We don’t celebrate nasty colonialists who achieved greatness! We like to airbrush history and put First Nations at the forefront.
The Australian reported: “‘Cancellation’ of Burke and Wills statue sparks furore.” They wrote that the decision to remove the historic monument was due to “concerns over a First Nations and colonial clash.” Instead of being returned to the spot where it has resided for more than 150 years, the monument is now slated for transfer to the Royal Society of Victoria, which has yet to decide what it will do with it.
Former Premier of Victoria, Jeff Kennett, was dismayed by the decision. He said, “It’s not only absurd, it’s wrong and it’s a reflection that sadly this government is not respectful of our history. It was fundamentally wrong to cancel the memory of Burke and Wills, the monument to them having been one of the most significant in Australia and located at the heart of the city.”
Victorian MP, Shadow Minister for Arts David Davis echoed the sentiment, saying, “Our British and European heritage is a part of the state’s history that can’t be airbrushed out or willed away by a politically correct focus by Labor.”
Melbourne Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece said the Royal Society of Victoria would be a “fitting home” for the monument, and added that “Burke and Wills were heroes of Melbourne in the 1860s.” Read into that how you will.
Now that Aboriginal Victorians have recently signed a so-called treaty, it’s understood that local Indigenous groups will be consulted about what happens next. One of the options is a First Nations sculpture depicting the role of the Yandruwandha people of South Australia who helped save John King, the only one of the four core explorers to survive the expedition.
Pulling down a statue doesn’t change a single page of history. History cannot be erased. Burke and Wills are part of our history whether certain people like it or not. You can’t fix the past by hiding evidence. The story of Australia deserves to be recognised, and it belongs to all of us.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn
The colonial explorers Robert O’Hara Burke and William John Wills—the renowned Burke and Wills—set out from Melbourne in August 1860 with great public fanfare to cross the Australian continent from south to north. At that time, most of the inland of Australia had not been explored by European settlers.
Almost six months later, they successfully made it to their destination in the Gulf of Carpentaria, but the return journey was plagued by delays and monsoon rains eventually leading to their deaths in around June 1861. Although the expedition had a tragic ending, it certainly was not a waste. It helped complete the picture of inland Australia and proved that there was no inland sea. Furthermore, each of the rescue parties sent from different parts of the continent added in some way to the understanding of inland Australia.
In 1865, a statue was erected in Burke and Wills’ honour on the intersection of Collins and Russell Streets in Melbourne, making it Melbourne’s first, and therefore oldest piece of public art. In 2017, the statue was removed from its location in City Square, at the corner of Swanston and Collins Streets, and put into storage to allow for the construction of the Metro Tunnel Project’s Town Hall Station.
And now that Town Hall Station is complete as of 30 November, do you think the Burke and Wills statue, Melbourne’s oldest public art, will be put back in City Square? Don’t be daft! This is woke Melbourne! We don’t celebrate nasty colonialists who achieved greatness! We like to airbrush history and put First Nations at the forefront.
The Australian reported: “‘Cancellation’ of Burke and Wills statue sparks furore.” They wrote that the decision to remove the historic monument was due to “concerns over a First Nations and colonial clash.” Instead of being returned to the spot where it has resided for more than 150 years, the monument is now slated for transfer to the Royal Society of Victoria, which has yet to decide what it will do with it.
Former Premier of Victoria, Jeff Kennett, was dismayed by the decision. He said, “It’s not only absurd, it’s wrong and it’s a reflection that sadly this government is not respectful of our history. It was fundamentally wrong to cancel the memory of Burke and Wills, the monument to them having been one of the most significant in Australia and located at the heart of the city.”
Victorian MP, Shadow Minister for Arts David Davis echoed the sentiment, saying, “Our British and European heritage is a part of the state’s history that can’t be airbrushed out or willed away by a politically correct focus by Labor.”
Melbourne Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece said the Royal Society of Victoria would be a “fitting home” for the monument, and added that “Burke and Wills were heroes of Melbourne in the 1860s.” Read into that how you will.
Now that Aboriginal Victorians have recently signed a so-called treaty, it’s understood that local Indigenous groups will be consulted about what happens next. One of the options is a First Nations sculpture depicting the role of the Yandruwandha people of South Australia who helped save John King, the only one of the four core explorers to survive the expedition.
Pulling down a statue doesn’t change a single page of history. History cannot be erased. Burke and Wills are part of our history whether certain people like it or not. You can’t fix the past by hiding evidence. The story of Australia deserves to be recognised, and it belongs to all of us.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn





![The ABC’s Hilarious Defence of Anthony Albanese
We all know that politicians belong to one of the most trustworthy professions in Australia. I mean, how could you possibly lie when you’re constantly under the public spotlight? It doesn’t even seem humanly possible.
So, it comes as a bit of a surprise that One Nation has launched a campaign targeting Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called “Fire the Liar”—which, in just two weeks, has managed to rake in over $4.8 million. They claim the PM has lied about everything from immigration levels and ISIS brides to electricity prices and… falling off a stage.
Now, to be fair to Albo, he didn’t fall off the stage. He was simply sitting down and having a rest in an incredibly awkward, floor-dwelling position. Hey, don’t judge—it’s exhausting work being on the campaign trail.
Thankfully, The Guardian was on standby to publish an entire piece explaining the nuanced differences between “falling, stumbling, and stepping off,” just to ensure you plebeians didn’t get the wrong idea.
But leaving aside that hard-hitting piece of investigative journalism, One Nation’s campaign is well underway. The real question is: did the PM honestly lie? (Excuse the oxymoron). Well, you might be surprised to learn that the ABC says: technically, no, he didn’t.
Here’s the article in question: “‘Broken promise’ or not, Anthony Albanese’s tax decision has helped One Nation.” First of all, a quick shout-out and thank you to the viewer who sent this one in. Now, to be entirely fair, this piece was originally published on The Conversation by Michelle Grattan—but nonetheless, the ABC happily chose to run it on their own platform.
The tax changes Michelle Grattan is referring to are, of course, the ones regarding negative gearing and capital gains. Now, what exactly did Albanese say about this before the election? Well, to give you just one example, during a press conference on the campaign trail last year, a journalist asked him directly: “Can you rule out any changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax settings if re-elected?” To which he snapped: “Yes. How hard is it? For the 50th time.”
Now, you would think that flatly ruling it out fifty times in his own words—only to turn around and introduce those exact changes anyway—would be definitive proof that he lied, right?
Well, not according to this ABC article.
Naturally, the article kicks off by focusing on the ABC’s perennial favourite villain, Pauline Hanson, and her “Fire the Liar” campaign. They immediately pivot to casting doubt on the fundraising numbers, noting: “By evening, it claimed to have raised more than $1 million, rising fast. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese cast doubt on the numbers.”
Because, of course, if there’s anyone whose judgement we should trust on the absolute, unvarnished truth… it’s the guy who just flat-out broke a major election promise. Good to see he’s keeping an eye on everyone else’s integrity.
The article features plenty of creative terms to describe Albanese’s bending of the truth. For instance, it refers to the “budget’s broken promises” before pointedly asking: “Does breaking your word in politics matter?”
It goes on to say: “But by changing the tax arrangements in the budget, he was certainly breaking his word, breaching faith with voters. It doesn’t help that when tackled about this, the prime minister pushed back by endlessly repeating the phrase, ‘We changed our position’.”
Yes, you’ve probably heard that exact phrase about a hundred times by now. Because apparently, in modern political speak, “we changed our position” is the new elegant euphemism for “we completely lied to your face.”
Speaking of lying, does the article actually mention the “L” word? Yes, it does! Buried in the text, they drop this incredible piece of semantic acrobatics:
“We can’t assume Albanese ‘lied’ in the campaign. To lie is, in a dictionary definition, ‘to say […] something that is not true in order to deceive someone’. We don’t know (beyond reasonable doubt) whether, when Albanese before the election flatly ruled out changing negative gearing and capital gains tax, he was saying one thing and intending (if conditions suited) to do another.”
Ah, well, it’s all settled then! If we can’t prove in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt that he was actively plotting to deceive us at the exact moment he said it, then it wasn’t a lie.
Perhaps that kind of elite dictionary-defending flies down at the ABC, but I reckon if you asked most Aussies down at the local pub, they’d call absolute BS on that explanation.
So, what is it? “Fire the person who may have technically changed his position and broken his word”? Or is it “Fire the Liar”?
I’ll let you decide.
MUSIC
Allégro by Emmit Fenn The ABC’s Hilarious Defence of Anthony Albanese](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XtiOY-SNfuc/mqdefault.jpg)




