Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
In this video, I’m addressing a situation that has crossed a serious line. What started as disagreement over theology, preaching, public criticism, and my coverage of Pastor Amere Mays has now escalated into rhetoric that I believe needs to be discussed openly and carefully.
Original video: youtube.com/live/ShlDF_i_ItY?si=jN8ssQVsS5y3HW4r
For those who have followed All Things Theology, you already know that my content regularly examines public sermons, teachings, statements, church practices, financial appeals, and the conduct of public ministry leaders. I criticize what is said publicly, compare doctrine with Scripture, and give my opinion about whether certain teachings and behaviors are biblical. People are free to disagree with me, challenge me, respond to me, debate me, or criticize my content. That comes with doing public commentary.
But disagreement is one thing. Talking as though a theological dispute should become a physical confrontation—or using language that can reasonably be understood as threatening serious violence—is something completely different.
In this video, I’m going through the statements surrounding Amere Mays and explaining why I believe this situation deserves attention. I will show the relevant clips and context so viewers can hear what was actually said rather than relying on rumors, edited social-media summaries, or secondhand interpretations.
To be clear, the title reflects my interpretation and concern about the statements being discussed. Viewers should watch the full context and reach their own conclusions about what was meant, whether the language constituted a threat, and how seriously it should be taken. I am not claiming knowledge of anyone’s private intentions beyond what can reasonably be evaluated from the statements and conduct that are publicly available.
My position is simple: if you believe I am wrong about Brian Carn, prosperity preaching, false prophecy, questionable doctrine, church leadership, or anything else I discuss, then answer the argument. Open the Bible. Show the context. Correct the theology. Challenge the evidence. Come on a livestream and have the conversation.
Threatening rhetoric does not refute a theological argument.
Trying to intimidate a critic does not prove a preacher is biblically sound.
And turning a disagreement over public ministry into something personal or physical only distracts from the original issue.
This is especially important when pastors and Christian leaders are involved. Scripture gives extremely serious qualifications for those who claim spiritual leadership. A pastor is supposed to demonstrate self-control, sober-mindedness, respectable conduct, and an ability to handle conflict in a manner consistent with Christian character. That does not mean pastors can never become angry or defend themselves from false accusations. It does mean that intimidation, threats, and violent rhetoric should never become substitutes for biblical argumentation.
I also want to make something else clear: this video is not a call for anyone watching to harass Amere Mays, contact his family, threaten him, confront him physically, disrupt his church, or engage in retaliation of any kind. Do not do that. The purpose of this discussion is commentary, documentation, accountability, and theological critique.
Throughout this video we will examine what was said, what led up to the controversy, how my previous criticism connects to the situation, and whether the response was appropriate for someone functioning in Christian ministry.
But Christianity does not require us to suspend discernment.
Acts 17 praises the Bereans for examining teaching against Scripture. First John tells believers to test the spirits. Paul repeatedly warns the church about false teachers. Biblical Christianity is not afraid of examination.
That is why I’m covering this situation.
This episode is bigger than one argument between two people. It raises questions about accountability, pastoral character, celebrity preacher culture, theological criticism, intimidation, and how Christians should respond when disagreements become personal.
Let’s discuss it.
#AllThingsTheology #AmereMays #PastorAmereMays
Software I use (Ecamm) Sign up with this link: ecamm.com/mac/ecammlive/?fp_ref=christopher23
AFFILIATES
Amazon: amazon.com/shop/allthingstheology
Covenant Eyes: covenanteyes.sjv.io/zNYmqG
Join this channel to get access to perks:
youtube.com/channel/UCrLO95wGXUW0fY00Rss4aGw/join
Website: kdubtru.com
Music: open.spotify.com/artist/1TohVbZFbpZsW5yubbhYm3
Subscribe & click 🛎 for notifications of premieres and live
streams!
Follow me on social media:
Twitter.com/kdubtru
Facebook.com/allthingstheology
instagram.com/kdub.tru
SUPPORT:
Patreon.com/kdubtru
Listen on podcast: https://anchor.fm/allthingstheology
Email for interviews or booking:
allthingstheology@gmail.com
In this video, I’m addressing a situation that has crossed a serious line. What started as disagreement over theology, preaching, public criticism, and my coverage of Pastor Amere Mays has now escalated into rhetoric that I believe needs to be discussed openly and carefully.
Original video: youtube.com/live/ShlDF_i_ItY?si=jN8ssQVsS5y3HW4r
For those who have followed All Things Theology, you already know that my content regularly examines public sermons, teachings, statements, church practices, financial appeals, and the conduct of public ministry leaders. I criticize what is said publicly, compare doctrine with Scripture, and give my opinion about whether certain teachings and behaviors are biblical. People are free to disagree with me, challenge me, respond to me, debate me, or criticize my content. That comes with doing public commentary.
But disagreement is one thing. Talking as though a theological dispute should become a physical confrontation—or using language that can reasonably be understood as threatening serious violence—is something completely different.
In this video, I’m going through the statements surrounding Amere Mays and explaining why I believe this situation deserves attention. I will show the relevant clips and context so viewers can hear what was actually said rather than relying on rumors, edited social-media summaries, or secondhand interpretations.
To be clear, the title reflects my interpretation and concern about the statements being discussed. Viewers should watch the full context and reach their own conclusions about what was meant, whether the language constituted a threat, and how seriously it should be taken. I am not claiming knowledge of anyone’s private intentions beyond what can reasonably be evaluated from the statements and conduct that are publicly available.
My position is simple: if you believe I am wrong about Brian Carn, prosperity preaching, false prophecy, questionable doctrine, church leadership, or anything else I discuss, then answer the argument. Open the Bible. Show the context. Correct the theology. Challenge the evidence. Come on a livestream and have the conversation.
Threatening rhetoric does not refute a theological argument.
Trying to intimidate a critic does not prove a preacher is biblically sound.
And turning a disagreement over public ministry into something personal or physical only distracts from the original issue.
This is especially important when pastors and Christian leaders are involved. Scripture gives extremely serious qualifications for those who claim spiritual leadership. A pastor is supposed to demonstrate self-control, sober-mindedness, respectable conduct, and an ability to handle conflict in a manner consistent with Christian character. That does not mean pastors can never become angry or defend themselves from false accusations. It does mean that intimidation, threats, and violent rhetoric should never become substitutes for biblical argumentation.
I also want to make something else clear: this video is not a call for anyone watching to harass Amere Mays, contact his family, threaten him, confront him physically, disrupt his church, or engage in retaliation of any kind. Do not do that. The purpose of this discussion is commentary, documentation, accountability, and theological critique.
Throughout this video we will examine what was said, what led up to the controversy, how my previous criticism connects to the situation, and whether the response was appropriate for someone functioning in Christian ministry.
But Christianity does not require us to suspend discernment.
Acts 17 praises the Bereans for examining teaching against Scripture. First John tells believers to test the spirits. Paul repeatedly warns the church about false teachers. Biblical Christianity is not afraid of examination.
That is why I’m covering this situation.
This episode is bigger than one argument between two people. It raises questions about accountability, pastoral character, celebrity preacher culture, theological criticism, intimidation, and how Christians should respond when disagreements become personal.
Let’s discuss it.
#AllThingsTheology #AmereMays #PastorAmereMays
Software I use (Ecamm) Sign up with this link: ecamm.com/mac/ecammlive/?fp_ref=christopher23
AFFILIATES
Amazon: amazon.com/shop/allthingstheology
Covenant Eyes: covenanteyes.sjv.io/zNYmqG
Join this channel to get access to perks:
youtube.com/channel/UCrLO95wGXUW0fY00Rss4aGw/join
Website: kdubtru.com
Music: open.spotify.com/artist/1TohVbZFbpZsW5yubbhYm3
Subscribe & click 🛎 for notifications of premieres and live
streams!
Follow me on social media:
Twitter.com/kdubtru
Facebook.com/allthingstheology
instagram.com/kdub.tru
SUPPORT:
Patreon.com/kdubtru
Listen on podcast: https://anchor.fm/allthingstheology
Email for interviews or booking:
allthingstheology@gmail.com
