Uploaded November 2021 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This video is an alternative history scenario that tries to display my answer to the question "How would the world have changed if the soviet revolution of 1917 spread?".
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Second channel: youtube.com/channel/UCtXcyUuCaUMY2GGU_8iM1hg
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999Yt
E-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
The song in the outro was produced by 08 (who gave me no way to credit them), you can listen to the whole remix on my second channel: youtu.be/jZOrMsIOZh0
Chris who made the viki figures: deviantart.com/chrisy-da
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
1:20 Why would it spread at all?
6:30 The conditions of Russia
11:05 The revolution moves from Russia
18:58 The revolution inspires the workers of the world
29:07Conclusion
5 person discord invite. Hit the bell to catch it under the next video. And please only use it if you willbe active on the server, otherwise leave it for others: discord.gg/EBfxDDg2Gu
Transcript:
Hello everybody. You read the title, this is another alternative history video and it’s about what would have happened if the soviet revolution of 1917 had spread. Most historians agree that Lenin’s revolution in the Russian empire likely influenced the rest of the century.
It completely changed the lives of anyone in eastern euope, it scared the people of germany and Italy into supporting fascist parties to protect themselves against what they saw as a Marxist plot to destroy them, somehow which lead to world war twp and of course the entire rest of the 20th century was just the cold war and the USSR was an important part of that.
The first world war really was the seminal catastrophe of the 20th century. So what would happen if you changed a major part of the world war? What if the Russian revolution went differently? What if it spread and more countries became socialist like the USSR? That is what this video is about.
Also check out the little viki figures a friend of mine called Chris made, is this a copyright violation? Probably but I will use it. Link to Chris’s DeviantArt in the description.
The obvious question to ask about the scenario is: Why? Why would the revolution spread at all? And what do I mean by that? Well, this goes all the way back to Karl Marx. You see, marx thought that the more developed and industrialised a society is the more the workers will realize they are taken advantage of and eventually they will organise and overthrow the capitalist state to establish socialism.
Using this logic the first country to have a revolution would be the one with the largest factory worker population because the more workers there are the more they can unionise and rebel. And of course after the revolution takes place the other workers of the nearby countries would realise that they are oppressed and that a better worker run society is possible and they would overthrow their state until all workers of all places are free.
The reason Karl Marx believed in this form of revolution was because during his time there were many popular uprisings against the ruling classes. Most famously of course the French revolution which started in France and inspired other revolutions all across Europe. It’s the same story for the revolutions of 1848 which spread from one country to the next.
So, to Karl marx and all of his contemporaries that seemed like the obvious path towards revolution. A worker’s uprising creating a better state and becoming a role model for all other workers who then overthrow their own capitalists. Of course, they were also worried about things that may split the working class like racism.
Matter of fact some people around Karl Marx’s life time believed that there could be a revolution in an industrialised country but that the non-socialist countries would gang up on it and destroy the worker’s revolution. This was not very far fetched. After all after the French revolution removed all the nobles from power all countries in Europe started a coalition war to destroy the evolution.
This video is an alternative history scenario that tries to display my answer to the question "How would the world have changed if the soviet revolution of 1917 spread?".
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Second channel: youtube.com/channel/UCtXcyUuCaUMY2GGU_8iM1hg
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999Yt
E-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
The song in the outro was produced by 08 (who gave me no way to credit them), you can listen to the whole remix on my second channel: youtu.be/jZOrMsIOZh0
Chris who made the viki figures: deviantart.com/chrisy-da
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
1:20 Why would it spread at all?
6:30 The conditions of Russia
11:05 The revolution moves from Russia
18:58 The revolution inspires the workers of the world
29:07Conclusion
5 person discord invite. Hit the bell to catch it under the next video. And please only use it if you willbe active on the server, otherwise leave it for others: discord.gg/EBfxDDg2Gu
Transcript:
Hello everybody. You read the title, this is another alternative history video and it’s about what would have happened if the soviet revolution of 1917 had spread. Most historians agree that Lenin’s revolution in the Russian empire likely influenced the rest of the century.
It completely changed the lives of anyone in eastern euope, it scared the people of germany and Italy into supporting fascist parties to protect themselves against what they saw as a Marxist plot to destroy them, somehow which lead to world war twp and of course the entire rest of the 20th century was just the cold war and the USSR was an important part of that.
The first world war really was the seminal catastrophe of the 20th century. So what would happen if you changed a major part of the world war? What if the Russian revolution went differently? What if it spread and more countries became socialist like the USSR? That is what this video is about.
Also check out the little viki figures a friend of mine called Chris made, is this a copyright violation? Probably but I will use it. Link to Chris’s DeviantArt in the description.
The obvious question to ask about the scenario is: Why? Why would the revolution spread at all? And what do I mean by that? Well, this goes all the way back to Karl Marx. You see, marx thought that the more developed and industrialised a society is the more the workers will realize they are taken advantage of and eventually they will organise and overthrow the capitalist state to establish socialism.
Using this logic the first country to have a revolution would be the one with the largest factory worker population because the more workers there are the more they can unionise and rebel. And of course after the revolution takes place the other workers of the nearby countries would realise that they are oppressed and that a better worker run society is possible and they would overthrow their state until all workers of all places are free.
The reason Karl Marx believed in this form of revolution was because during his time there were many popular uprisings against the ruling classes. Most famously of course the French revolution which started in France and inspired other revolutions all across Europe. It’s the same story for the revolutions of 1848 which spread from one country to the next.
So, to Karl marx and all of his contemporaries that seemed like the obvious path towards revolution. A worker’s uprising creating a better state and becoming a role model for all other workers who then overthrow their own capitalists. Of course, they were also worried about things that may split the working class like racism.
Matter of fact some people around Karl Marx’s life time believed that there could be a revolution in an industrialised country but that the non-socialist countries would gang up on it and destroy the worker’s revolution. This was not very far fetched. After all after the French revolution removed all the nobles from power all countries in Europe started a coalition war to destroy the evolution.





![Watching basic economics lessons for socialists (And having a laugh at them)
This video is a collection of Basic economics lessons made by right wing people in order to educate leftists/liberals. I take a look at them and point out the problems with literally everything they say. Please note that this is not a comprehensive debunking but rather an attempt to have fun with the faulty arguments they use.
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999Yt
E-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
Sources:
US income inequality: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_inequality_in_the_United_States
US inflation rates: https://www.statista.com/statistics/191077/inflation-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/
Videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yn_ZuL1xz34
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sosOJp5r-EE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIOgvG0oBXM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZfrRSgyAjc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ketK2yGNKpA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ps4LF_NeqTQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14K_86OtB1A
transcript:
Hello everybody, are you tired of ancaps, libertarians and neofascists telling you that you don’t understand basic economics? Have you been wondering what they mean by that? Well fear no longer for I have complied 7 very helpful videos by libertarians and conservatives which totally weren’t just the top result of what youtube returned when I typed “socialists don’t understand basic economics”.
So strap yourselves in, we are gonna learn some stuff today.
Here is this video called “Leftists Don’t Understand Basic Economics“. It’s a video of this very sympathetic looking man watching a video where someone mentions the fact that inequality has been growing and then he says that they have been [Creating 25 Million jobs] since the 80s and that [most of our poor people live better than most people who live in the 3rd world] he also says that “Middle class” is a Marxist term which is a whole new level of wrong but let’s ignore that.
Basic economic lesson one: Inequality isn’t growing, don’t you see the new jobs? Silly socialists are saying inequality is getting worse even though the economy is growing. What? You googled it and it turns out unemployment can be low AND inequality can be high at the same time? Are you saying that there can be more than two things existing at the same time and that the facts show that I am wrong? Aaaaaaahhh Let’s quickly move on before the viewers realize I am talking crap.
The next one is made by Libertarian Views Scotty M, as you can tell he is definitely open to changing his ideology when new facts come along and most definitely isn’t going to hold onto his worldview forever because he built his personality around it. Nothing screams open mind like putting your ideology into your username.
His video is a response to a socialist’s video and he goes over the basics like [our place on this earth is scarce natural resources. As resources don’t last forever. They are not infinite. Resources are finite] so basically there isn’t infinite stuff and we need to somehow manage who get’s stuff and who doesn’t. Then he says that [people who support socialism don’t understand these fundamental basic things]
So, basic economics lesson two: There aren’t infinite resources you silly socialist, there just isn’t enough food for everyone, we need hold onto the free market and let 8 million starve each year. We just don’t have food. Earth only produces food for 10 Billion people, how can we provide for 7.5 Billion with that? Wait a second. I’ve just had an epiphany: 10 is more than 7.5 but wait then why is there such starvation. Could it possibly be that the free market is not efficient enough to provide for everyone and that it only works in some nations in some situations and is unfit as a global economic system? If only someone had made a 12 minute and 52 second video explaining exactly how poverty and starvation happen in such a resource rich world which overproduces products like that. If that was true we might all be a bit smarter.
Scotty then says that the only way products can be allocated is via the free market because [if you do not support a money based system. If you support a money less system, How the hell are you to know the information of what to produce more of how much to produce, you know where to allocate the scarce natural resources. The reason why I say that is because you have no way of knowing that information without the information of prices]. Watching basic economics lessons for socialists (And having a laugh at them)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SlnlmKB5_2Q/mqdefault.jpg)




