Uploaded July 2022 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
The real reason corsets were torture has nothing to do with the corsets . . . and everything to do with the reason we keep including corset lacing torture scenes in period dramas!
Historical drama movies and TV shows so often use corset torture as a trope, and show elaborately and dramatically filmed scenes of women being laced tightly and painfully. These scenes are almost never historically accurate : The corsets and stays are wrong such as in Titanic, and tightlacing is often not possible in the types of corsets shown, such as in Bridgerton. These scenes give us some of our worst corset myths, and are part of the reason so many people ask "were corsets torture?". It's time we saw these corset myths debunked, because they're not the biggest problem about how period dramas portray the effects of corsets and what wearing a corset is like.
What really annoys me about how historical dramas portray Victorian corset history is how much it says about our modern views of Victorian corsetry. These scenes are used as lazy writing, to throw in the audience's face how different Edwardian fashion or other historical costume was, and to let us feel superior to historical people. Furthermore, shows and movies make these scenes really explicit, and characterize the "pain" of wearing a Victorian corset as the attractive thing! In this regard, the Victorians had a much better outlook on things than we do today. The shock value of seeing a character in pain while wearing an Edwardian corset, or hearing that an actress was in pain while filming in her corset, is used as marketing for shows. Instead of objecting to these myths about Victorian fashion history and how productions often mistreat actors, we fall for it and make a fuss over historical accuracy in fashion history every time.
Join my Patreon for behind-the-scenes updates, pattern diagrams, research lists, monthly video chats, and more! patreon.com/snappydragonstudios
Or, you can buy me some Ko-Fi : ko-fi.com/snappydragon
Follow me on IG for more stitchy business : @missSnappyDragon
For business inquiries, send an e-mail to : SnappyDragon at TBHonestSocial dot Com
I do not take personal costume/sewing or research commissions.
Want to send me letters? Send mail to PO Box 3884, Berkeley CA, 94703! Letters and cards only please 💚
The real reason corsets were torture has nothing to do with the corsets . . . and everything to do with the reason we keep including corset lacing torture scenes in period dramas!
Historical drama movies and TV shows so often use corset torture as a trope, and show elaborately and dramatically filmed scenes of women being laced tightly and painfully. These scenes are almost never historically accurate : The corsets and stays are wrong such as in Titanic, and tightlacing is often not possible in the types of corsets shown, such as in Bridgerton. These scenes give us some of our worst corset myths, and are part of the reason so many people ask "were corsets torture?". It's time we saw these corset myths debunked, because they're not the biggest problem about how period dramas portray the effects of corsets and what wearing a corset is like.
What really annoys me about how historical dramas portray Victorian corset history is how much it says about our modern views of Victorian corsetry. These scenes are used as lazy writing, to throw in the audience's face how different Edwardian fashion or other historical costume was, and to let us feel superior to historical people. Furthermore, shows and movies make these scenes really explicit, and characterize the "pain" of wearing a Victorian corset as the attractive thing! In this regard, the Victorians had a much better outlook on things than we do today. The shock value of seeing a character in pain while wearing an Edwardian corset, or hearing that an actress was in pain while filming in her corset, is used as marketing for shows. Instead of objecting to these myths about Victorian fashion history and how productions often mistreat actors, we fall for it and make a fuss over historical accuracy in fashion history every time.
Join my Patreon for behind-the-scenes updates, pattern diagrams, research lists, monthly video chats, and more! patreon.com/snappydragonstudios
Or, you can buy me some Ko-Fi : ko-fi.com/snappydragon
Follow me on IG for more stitchy business : @missSnappyDragon
For business inquiries, send an e-mail to : SnappyDragon at TBHonestSocial dot Com
I do not take personal costume/sewing or research commissions.
Want to send me letters? Send mail to PO Box 3884, Berkeley CA, 94703! Letters and cards only please 💚






![Historical Costume vs Catcalling : Feminist fashion trends men hated
Fashion Trends Men Hate isnt a new thing. Nor is street harassment or catcalling. Hoopskirts, hat pins, and more of these feminist historical fashion trends helped fight unwanted advances and catcalls by maintaining personal space, keeping men at a distance, symbolizing womens power, and even LITERALLY STABBING men who grabbed women on the street. Lets chat about the fashion history and gender politics behind Elizabethan puffy sleeves, 18th century hoopskirts, Victorian crinolines and bustles, huge Regency bonnets and Edwardian hats, and the Hatpin Peril that led to bans all over the world! But most importantly, in the era of #MeToo and Times Up, what this dive into the feminism of historical dress will show us that sexual harassment has NEVER been about what the victim was wearing.
Men have been writing about womens fashion for centuries, and youd be surprised how many 18th century and Victorian magazines have articles that read like a modern list of fashion trends men hate. This goes back to the early 18th century with the resurgence of hoopskirts, and continued into the 20th century with the Hatpin Peril— a supposed epidemic of mashers (Edwardian slang for creeps) stabbed with hatpins for bothering women out in public. Inspired by a quote in The Cut Of Womens Clothes by Nora Waugh, and a tumblr post about how no one actually thought bustles were fake butts, I combed through dozens of ancient magazines and newspapers to figure out why men of the past couldnt handle Women Wearing Clothes. Dress history tells us a fascinating story about how historical dresses prevented men grabbing arms, kept unwanted male advances at a distance, and in a pinch defended against violence. They also empowered women! From Queen Elizabeth I dazzling her courtiers in huge dresses, to 18th century women flirting on purpose with their hoopskirts, Victorian working-class women breaking down class barriers with fashionable clothes, and Edwardian women going places on their own, safe in the knowledge they carried concealed weapons, fashion and feminism have always worked together in some ways.
#MashersBeware #HatpinPeril
Join my Patreon for behind-the-scenes updates, pattern diagrams, research lists, monthly video chats, and more! https://www.patreon.com/snappydragonstudios
Or, you can buy me some Ko-Fi : https://ko-fi.com/snappydragon
Follow me on IG for more stitchy business : @missSnappyDragon
For business inquiries, send an e-mail to : SnappyDragonStitches at Gmail dot Com
I do not take personal costume/sewing or research commissions.
Want to send me letters? Send mail to PO Box 3884, Berkeley CA, 94703! Letters and cards only please 💚
0:00 Why not to catcall historical costumers
0:28 What fashion has to do with harassment
2:01 Gendered terms
2:55 Giant Elizabethan sleeves
4:56 18th century hoopskirts
8:02 Satirical Regency bonnets
10:05 : Victorian bustles and crinolines
12:40 The Hatpin Peril
15:47 The Point
Works Sighted (a highly informal bibliography)
Gilded Age Garbage Fires post that started it all : https://marzipanandminutiae.tumblr.com/post/175188840617/its-hilarious-to-me-when-people-call-historical
The Cut of Womens Clothes by Nora Waugh
Internet Archive copy of Fynes Morysons Itinerary : https://archive.org/stream/fynesmorysons04moryuoft/fynesmorysons04moryuoft_djvu.txt
the Cecil Papers, including Jones Bill for the Q[ueens] Gown. : https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-cecil-papers/vol14/pp31-49
Kimberly Chrismans paper Unhoop the Fair Sex: The Campaign Against the Hoop Petticoat in Eighteenth-Century England. : https://www.jstor.org/stable/30053852?seq=1
Project Gutenberg copy of The Tatler containing the Trial Of The Hooped Petticoat : https://www.gutenberg.org/files/31645/31645-h/31645-h.htm
Project Gutenberg copy of The Spectator, no. 127 contains a letter about hooped petticoats : https://www.gutenberg.org/files/12030/12030-h/SV1/Spectator1.html
Hathi Trust copy of the London Magazine from January 1741, containing one Mr. Stonecastles letter on page 84 : https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015021277838&view=1up&seq=84&q1=petticoat
Crinoline for domestic use cartoon from the Hathi Trust Digital Library and the University of Michigan : https://victorianweb.org/periodicals/punch/clothing/12.html
Archive.org copy of Routledges Manual of Etiquette : https://archive.org/stream/routledgesmanual12426gut/12426.txt
The New York Evening World article about Leoti Blaker : https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030193/1903-05-27/ed-1/seq-3/
The San Francisco Call article about a hatpin and a train robbery : https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85066387/1898-01-11/ed-1/seq-6/
Vomit emoji by Twitter/Twemoji, lisenced under Creative Commons : https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
Music from EpidemicSound. Historical Costume vs Catcalling : Feminist fashion trends men hated](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fSPa402MRPc/mqdefault.jpg)



