Uploaded May 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Helsinki Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Leif Segerstam.
I - Adagio - Un pochettino meno adagio - Poco a poco affrettando il tempo I - Vivacissimo - Adagio - Allegro molto moderato - Allegro moderato - Vivace - Presto - Poco a poco rallentando al adagio - Largamente - Affettuoso - Tempo I: 0:00
Sibelius' Symphony No.7 was composed between 1918-24, while he was revising the fifth and working on the sixth. It was originally conceived as a three-movement piece, but following the integrative current observed in his last works, he condensed it in a single movement. It was premiered on March 24 of 1924, performed by the Stockholm Concert Society conducted by the composer. It was presented under the title of "Fantasia Sinfonica", before being finally labelled as his seventh symphony.
The piece was modestly received initially, but with the time it has grown to be appreciated by critics and public alike, now being firmly anchored into the classical repertoire. It was one of Sibelius' final masterpieces. Many composers found in Sibelius' structural innovations a blank canvas to infuse new life into the genre of the symphony; one-movement symphonies by Dmitri Shostakovich, Einar Englund, Roy Harris, Havergal Brian, Roberto Gerhard, to just name a few, are indebted to Sibelius one way or another.
The symphony can be divided into five sections; an adagio, a scherzo, a rondo and a return to the opening adagio. It begins with timpani blows, followed by a rising C major scale on strings, bringing with it tinges of both the doom-laden and the ecstatic. A key motif is also announced quietly on the flute and repeated on the clarinet. Violas and cellos then present a lyrical main theme in form of a chorale, which grows more expressive and noble, culminating in an expansive climax. A majestic trombone theme will reappear through the work as a unifying element, labelled "Aino" in sketches, after the composer's wife. The tempo gradually increases in a long sequential passage exploring several tonalities, leading us to the scherzo section.
The scherzo-like section begins almost seamlessly, evolving subtly out of the Adagio's closing material. Soon the tempo is ratcheted up to vivacissimo, with fast staccato chords traded between the strings and woodwind. The music turns stormy in mood with ominous ascending and descending scales on the strings, while the "Aino" theme is heard again in the brass. The rondo section begins with a pastoral, Apollonian dance, which can without warning break out with Dionysian fury and passion. The rhythmic figure from the vivacissimo returns, spitting and flaring, leading us on to the vivace section, a brief recapitulation of the vivacissimo Scherzo. The "Aino" theme majestically reappears, leading us to the recapitulation of the opening adagio. Echoes of the previous themes and motives dominate the final coda, ending with a hymn-like C major chord.
Picture: "Summer Evening on Skagen's Southern Beach" (1893) by the Danish painter Peder Severin Krøyer.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/ytynzwus
Score: tinyurl.com/yux63pu3
Helsinki Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Leif Segerstam.
I - Adagio - Un pochettino meno adagio - Poco a poco affrettando il tempo I - Vivacissimo - Adagio - Allegro molto moderato - Allegro moderato - Vivace - Presto - Poco a poco rallentando al adagio - Largamente - Affettuoso - Tempo I: 0:00
Sibelius' Symphony No.7 was composed between 1918-24, while he was revising the fifth and working on the sixth. It was originally conceived as a three-movement piece, but following the integrative current observed in his last works, he condensed it in a single movement. It was premiered on March 24 of 1924, performed by the Stockholm Concert Society conducted by the composer. It was presented under the title of "Fantasia Sinfonica", before being finally labelled as his seventh symphony.
The piece was modestly received initially, but with the time it has grown to be appreciated by critics and public alike, now being firmly anchored into the classical repertoire. It was one of Sibelius' final masterpieces. Many composers found in Sibelius' structural innovations a blank canvas to infuse new life into the genre of the symphony; one-movement symphonies by Dmitri Shostakovich, Einar Englund, Roy Harris, Havergal Brian, Roberto Gerhard, to just name a few, are indebted to Sibelius one way or another.
The symphony can be divided into five sections; an adagio, a scherzo, a rondo and a return to the opening adagio. It begins with timpani blows, followed by a rising C major scale on strings, bringing with it tinges of both the doom-laden and the ecstatic. A key motif is also announced quietly on the flute and repeated on the clarinet. Violas and cellos then present a lyrical main theme in form of a chorale, which grows more expressive and noble, culminating in an expansive climax. A majestic trombone theme will reappear through the work as a unifying element, labelled "Aino" in sketches, after the composer's wife. The tempo gradually increases in a long sequential passage exploring several tonalities, leading us to the scherzo section.
The scherzo-like section begins almost seamlessly, evolving subtly out of the Adagio's closing material. Soon the tempo is ratcheted up to vivacissimo, with fast staccato chords traded between the strings and woodwind. The music turns stormy in mood with ominous ascending and descending scales on the strings, while the "Aino" theme is heard again in the brass. The rondo section begins with a pastoral, Apollonian dance, which can without warning break out with Dionysian fury and passion. The rhythmic figure from the vivacissimo returns, spitting and flaring, leading us on to the vivace section, a brief recapitulation of the vivacissimo Scherzo. The "Aino" theme majestically reappears, leading us to the recapitulation of the opening adagio. Echoes of the previous themes and motives dominate the final coda, ending with a hymn-like C major chord.
Picture: "Summer Evening on Skagen's Southern Beach" (1893) by the Danish painter Peder Severin Krøyer.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/ytynzwus
Score: tinyurl.com/yux63pu3





![Symphony No.16 (Revised Version) - Alan Pettersson
Saarbrücken Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Alun Francis. John-Edward Kelly as the soloist.
I - Frenetico (0:00) - Cantabile espressivo (7:52) - [III] (12:15) - [IV] (17:41)
Petterssons Symphony No.16 was composed between May and August 1979, being commissioned by saxophonist Frederick Hemke. It was the last piece he completed before his death by cancer in June 1980. Hemke had heard Petterssons Seventh Symphony and requested the composer a piece featuring the saxophone. Instead of receiving a reply, the composer sent the completed score. Pettersson thus created a unique work in his entire production: a symphony for saxophone and orchestra. It was posthumously premiered on February 24 of 1983, performed by the Stockholm Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Yriy Ahronovitch, with Hemke as the soloist.
The composer originally referred to the work as a Saxophone Concerto, something prevented him from regarding it as either a true concerto or symphony. That the term concerto was not completely suitable may have been owing to the fact that the soloist doesnt have the traditional virtuosic passages where they can show off, interspersed with a number of orchestral interludes. When Hemke saw the work he noticed how the saxophone part did not fully exploit the instrument in Petterssons own terms. With the permission of the publishers, he prepared his own edition which is recorded here. The Lindberg recording features the original scoring, and for the listener it may be interesting to compare both.
The Sixteenth Symphony is short by the standards of Pettersson’s symphonies, with a duration of around 25 minutes – similar to that of Nos 10 and 11. Like the Fourth Symphony, the Sixteenth employs a musical language that encompasses wide stylistic differences. The opening itself is wild and intense (the score is marked frenetico) and the free-tonal language in the introduction contrasts with the Romantic, occasionally jazz-scented style in the slow, calm section that begins a little later in the symphony. After this calm passage, the symphony is once again marked by a frenetic atmosphere in a free-tonal idiom. Tonal points of reference – around which the listener can orient himself – are present, but are few and far between. The music is characterized by tension – a tension that is resolved in the symphony’s simple, tonal and peaceful ending.
Picture: Green Ballet (1960) by the Danish artist Asger Jorn.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/254sok2g and https://tinyurl.com/2bduohem
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available. Symphony No.16 (Revised Version) - Alan Pettersson](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/T3hv80JJFo8/mqdefault.jpg)




![Symphony No.6 in E-flat minor - Sergei Prokofiev
Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra conducted by Kirill Karabits.
I - Allegro moderato - Moderato - Allegro moderato, come prima - Andante molto - Allegro (un poco più animato che il tempo I) - Poco meno - Moderato - Andante molto - Allegro moderato - Andante: 0:00
II - Largo - Meno mosso: 13:46
III - Vivace - Andante tenero - Vivace, come prima: 26:54
Prokofievs Symphony No.6 was begun in the Summer of 1945 (alongside with the fifth), being completed on February 1947. It was premiered in Leningrad on October 11 of 1947, performed by the Leningrad Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Yevgeny Mravinsky. The piece was a great success, being warmly received by critics and being positively compared with Shostakovichs Symphony No.8. Prokofiev initially wanted to dedicated the work to the memory of Beethoven, by October 1947 he claimed that the work reflected the destruction of the recently concluded Great Patriotic War.
Unfortunately for Prokofiev, the success was short-lived. As the patriotic fervour of the war waned, tight governmental control of the arts returned with an iron fist. Four months later in 1948, a devastating and fierce anti-formalist campaign was launched against some of then most prominent soviet composers like Shostakovich, Prokofiev, Kachaturian or Myaskovsky. The work was called abnormal, repellent and pathological, generally considered as a failure, and the same critics that had praised the sixth then denounced the work as formalist. Prokofievs career never truly recovered from such campaign; many of his works were banned and the new compositions, written to appease soviet authorities failed to relaunch his career. By August 1948, Prokofiev was in severe financial straits, his personal debt amounting to 180,000 rubles.
Prokofievs health was also on the decline; on January 1945 he had suffered a concussion after fainting in his apartment due to untreated chronic hypertension. He didnt fully recovered from the accident, and following medical advice, he substantially had to restrict his composing activity.The last eight years of his life were those of an invalid, and he suffered almost constant headaches. The doctors could only suggest rest: he was to avoid all excitement, there was to be no reading, chess, alcohol or cigarettes and above all no composition: an impossible order, since he protested that he couldn’t help composing in his head.
Only after Prokofievs death in 1953, during the De-Stalinization, the Sixth was rehabilitated in the Soviet Union. Thereafter the work made its way relatively slowly, and it was not until the 1980s that performances occurred with some frequency. In the free West the symphony had a mixed reception, with critics praising its depth and expressivity while others criticised its austerity and structure. As time went on, the piece was reevaluated and now it is generally considere as the symphonic masterpiece of Prokofiev, even if its popularity is lesser that the first and fifth symphonies.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with grim E-flat minor brass calls, followed by a lyrical and expressive main theme introduced by muted violins and violas, which lugubriously unfolds with a deep melancholic tone with no sense of heroics. Follows a more cantabile and hopeful second theme introduced by oboe, which offers contrast and rises in a short-lived climax. A brief reminiscence of the main theme leads to the development, which opens with a menacing marching ostinato figure on bassoon and piano. This turns into an increasingly dissonant grotesque funereal march, culminating in a bitter climax. After a diminuendo the material is recapitulated, which the marching ostinato from the development returning as well. Only at the very end of the allegro moderato, in the slow and reflective coda, the key moves towards a more optimistic E-flat major.
The second movement is written in ternary form. It opens with a tragic and tortuous main theme on full orchestra, fully exposed by violins and trumpets in the key of A-flat major. After an expressive climax, a transition leads to the lyrical second theme introduced by cellos, before the material is contrapuntally combined. The central part of the movement is a harsh climax of barely contained violence, with marching rhythms underneath. An inverted recapitulation then begins with the second theme on four horns, then joined by strings and woods. Upper strings then build towards a climactic restatement of the first theme heard across the orchestra, which culminates in a return of the shrill exchanges heard at the opening. From here the music subsides into a tranquil coda, in which elements of both themes are gently laid to rest.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Farewell (1967) by the Russian painter Geliy Korzhev.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2dpgtbod and https://tinyurl.com/2dqtthzv
To check the score: https://tinyurl Symphony No.6 in E-flat minor - Sergei Prokofiev](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/U_5AtTg-gTk/mqdefault.jpg)