Uploaded July 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Symphonieorchester Concierto München conducted by Carlos Domínguez Nieto.
I - 0:00
Rueda's "Viaje Imaginario" (Imaginary Journey) was completed on January 1998, while Rueda was composer-in-residence with the Spanish National Youth Orchestra (JONDE). It bears the subtitle "Francisco Guerrero in memoriam", being dedicated to the memory of his mentor and teacher, who died on October 1997. This fact links the work, according to the author, to the motet Delicta Juventutis, which Pierre de la Rue wrote in the 15th century on the death of Philip the Fair, in which the author uses descending gestures to evoke sadness.
The composer explained the inspiration behind the piece: "I remember we were staying in an old spa hotel in Cestona, in the Basque Country, and that the orchestra had the entire place to itself. The main lounge and the huge rooms reminded me of the legendary hotel in Kubrik’s The Shining. The long evenings I spent composing and the night-time walks I took in the mountains and by the river left an indelible mark on the character of this work. I was inspired by the unconditional support of so many young musician friends and of my publisher, Llorenc Caballero, but chiefly by memories of my teacher Francisco Guerrero, who had died three months earlier."
By developing the extremes of registers and, above all, by combining the sounds of different instruments, Rueda here creates indeterminate sounds, similar in a way to the world of electroacoustics. At the beginning, an exploration of opposing registers brings us the sensation of space; this is then gradually filled as he superimposes chords that fluctuate in an enveloping, ecstatic sound. A trumpet call drags us out of this gentle flow to take us into a plastic world of reflecting light and shade. In the end, the chords fade away to leave the cellos’ last note hanging in nothingness. "Viaje imaginario" is, to a certain extent, structurally similar to Ives’ "The Unanswered Question" and Lutosławski’s "Interlude". It also has, as one might expect, a marked funereal tone.
Picture: "The Entire City" (1935-6) by Germain painter Max Ernst.
Sources: tinyurl.com/ywpadtel and tinyurl.com/yofu5que
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available.
Symphonieorchester Concierto München conducted by Carlos Domínguez Nieto.
I - 0:00
Rueda's "Viaje Imaginario" (Imaginary Journey) was completed on January 1998, while Rueda was composer-in-residence with the Spanish National Youth Orchestra (JONDE). It bears the subtitle "Francisco Guerrero in memoriam", being dedicated to the memory of his mentor and teacher, who died on October 1997. This fact links the work, according to the author, to the motet Delicta Juventutis, which Pierre de la Rue wrote in the 15th century on the death of Philip the Fair, in which the author uses descending gestures to evoke sadness.
The composer explained the inspiration behind the piece: "I remember we were staying in an old spa hotel in Cestona, in the Basque Country, and that the orchestra had the entire place to itself. The main lounge and the huge rooms reminded me of the legendary hotel in Kubrik’s The Shining. The long evenings I spent composing and the night-time walks I took in the mountains and by the river left an indelible mark on the character of this work. I was inspired by the unconditional support of so many young musician friends and of my publisher, Llorenc Caballero, but chiefly by memories of my teacher Francisco Guerrero, who had died three months earlier."
By developing the extremes of registers and, above all, by combining the sounds of different instruments, Rueda here creates indeterminate sounds, similar in a way to the world of electroacoustics. At the beginning, an exploration of opposing registers brings us the sensation of space; this is then gradually filled as he superimposes chords that fluctuate in an enveloping, ecstatic sound. A trumpet call drags us out of this gentle flow to take us into a plastic world of reflecting light and shade. In the end, the chords fade away to leave the cellos’ last note hanging in nothingness. "Viaje imaginario" is, to a certain extent, structurally similar to Ives’ "The Unanswered Question" and Lutosławski’s "Interlude". It also has, as one might expect, a marked funereal tone.
Picture: "The Entire City" (1935-6) by Germain painter Max Ernst.
Sources: tinyurl.com/ywpadtel and tinyurl.com/yofu5que
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available.


![Symphony No.6 in E-flat minor - Sergei Prokofiev
Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra conducted by Kirill Karabits.
I - Allegro moderato - Moderato - Allegro moderato, come prima - Andante molto - Allegro (un poco più animato che il tempo I) - Poco meno - Moderato - Andante molto - Allegro moderato - Andante: 0:00
II - Largo - Meno mosso: 13:46
III - Vivace - Andante tenero - Vivace, come prima: 26:54
Prokofievs Symphony No.6 was begun in the Summer of 1945 (alongside with the fifth), being completed on February 1947. It was premiered in Leningrad on October 11 of 1947, performed by the Leningrad Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Yevgeny Mravinsky. The piece was a great success, being warmly received by critics and being positively compared with Shostakovichs Symphony No.8. Prokofiev initially wanted to dedicated the work to the memory of Beethoven, by October 1947 he claimed that the work reflected the destruction of the recently concluded Great Patriotic War.
Unfortunately for Prokofiev, the success was short-lived. As the patriotic fervour of the war waned, tight governmental control of the arts returned with an iron fist. Four months later in 1948, a devastating and fierce anti-formalist campaign was launched against some of then most prominent soviet composers like Shostakovich, Prokofiev, Kachaturian or Myaskovsky. The work was called abnormal, repellent and pathological, generally considered as a failure, and the same critics that had praised the sixth then denounced the work as formalist. Prokofievs career never truly recovered from such campaign; many of his works were banned and the new compositions, written to appease soviet authorities failed to relaunch his career. By August 1948, Prokofiev was in severe financial straits, his personal debt amounting to 180,000 rubles.
Prokofievs health was also on the decline; on January 1945 he had suffered a concussion after fainting in his apartment due to untreated chronic hypertension. He didnt fully recovered from the accident, and following medical advice, he substantially had to restrict his composing activity.The last eight years of his life were those of an invalid, and he suffered almost constant headaches. The doctors could only suggest rest: he was to avoid all excitement, there was to be no reading, chess, alcohol or cigarettes and above all no composition: an impossible order, since he protested that he couldn’t help composing in his head.
Only after Prokofievs death in 1953, during the De-Stalinization, the Sixth was rehabilitated in the Soviet Union. Thereafter the work made its way relatively slowly, and it was not until the 1980s that performances occurred with some frequency. In the free West the symphony had a mixed reception, with critics praising its depth and expressivity while others criticised its austerity and structure. As time went on, the piece was reevaluated and now it is generally considere as the symphonic masterpiece of Prokofiev, even if its popularity is lesser that the first and fifth symphonies.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with grim E-flat minor brass calls, followed by a lyrical and expressive main theme introduced by muted violins and violas, which lugubriously unfolds with a deep melancholic tone with no sense of heroics. Follows a more cantabile and hopeful second theme introduced by oboe, which offers contrast and rises in a short-lived climax. A brief reminiscence of the main theme leads to the development, which opens with a menacing marching ostinato figure on bassoon and piano. This turns into an increasingly dissonant grotesque funereal march, culminating in a bitter climax. After a diminuendo the material is recapitulated, which the marching ostinato from the development returning as well. Only at the very end of the allegro moderato, in the slow and reflective coda, the key moves towards a more optimistic E-flat major.
The second movement is written in ternary form. It opens with a tragic and tortuous main theme on full orchestra, fully exposed by violins and trumpets in the key of A-flat major. After an expressive climax, a transition leads to the lyrical second theme introduced by cellos, before the material is contrapuntally combined. The central part of the movement is a harsh climax of barely contained violence, with marching rhythms underneath. An inverted recapitulation then begins with the second theme on four horns, then joined by strings and woods. Upper strings then build towards a climactic restatement of the first theme heard across the orchestra, which culminates in a return of the shrill exchanges heard at the opening. From here the music subsides into a tranquil coda, in which elements of both themes are gently laid to rest.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Farewell (1967) by the Russian painter Geliy Korzhev.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2dpgtbod and https://tinyurl.com/2dqtthzv
To check the score: https://tinyurl Symphony No.6 in E-flat minor - Sergei Prokofiev](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/U_5AtTg-gTk/mqdefault.jpg)



![Symphony No.3 - Edmund Rubbra
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Moderato: 0:00
II - Allegro: 9:10
III - Molto adagio ma liberamente: 14:55
IV - Tema con 7 variazioni e una fuga: 24:01
Rubbras Symphony No.3 was composed between 1938-9, its premiere being scheduled to take place at the Proms in London on 23 September 1940, but it was cancelled due to an air raid. It was first performed in Manchester on December 15 of 1940, played by the Hallé Orchestra conducted by Sir Malcolm Sargent, and it was eventually heard at the Proms on August 24 of 1945, conducted by Sir Adrian Boult. The score is dedicated to the critic and scholar Arthur Hutchings, who judged it the finest English work in that form since Elgars Second. Rubbra’s friend Bernard Herrmann was a later champion of the work.
The Symphony is the third of a tetralogy Rubbra wrote in quick succession between 1935-41. He described them as being different facets of one thought, since each was a reaction to the last. The Symphony also reflects the agitated and turbulent times of Britain in the 1930s, also portrayed in William Waltons Symphony No.1 in B-flat minor, Vaughan Williams Symphony No.4 in F minor or Alan Bush Symphony No.1 in C. After the austerity of the first two symphonies, the third is more relaxed and melodic. According to Louis Blois the composers intellect [is] less in competition with his lyrical gift.Andrew Achenbach has commented that the work shows Rubbra at his most lyrically genial, yet the purposeful thrust and riveting concentration of the writing are never in doubt.
The first movement is rather free, only resembling sonata form. It opens with lyrical and cantabile main theme, very Sibelian in shape and presented through antiphonal exchanges between woodwinds and strings. A transition dominated by the brass leads to a solemn and expansive second theme, which is derived from the main one. The ensuing development of the material relies on abundant counterpoint and effective contrasting moods of expression, culminating in an expressive climax. The themes are then recapitulated in a varied manner, reaching the movements biggest climax with the second theme. A slow and contemplative coda ends the moderato with the opening notes of the main theme.
The second movement can be seen as an intermezzo. It begins with an ostinato figure on multiple instruments, which serves as the root of a rhythmic and folkish main theme, also a reference to Beethovens fate motto from the 5th Symphony. A more melodic second theme is also soon introduced and often put in counterpoint with the main one, the interplay between the two is the core dynamic of the entire allegro. An intricate contrapuntal climax is reached, followed by a more expressive central part in which the second theme is put at the forefront. As we return to the opening rhythmic vigour, the music gradually grows in a crescendo towards a contrapuntal and polytonal climax that ends the allegro.
The third movement is also very free, resembling theme and variations. It opens with an expressive and lyrical main theme, presented by strings over horn pedal notes and taking the form of a poignant march. The material is soon contrapuntally developed as a series of fluid and unbroken variations of different moods, dynamics, instrumental colours and rhythm. In this aspect, the movement seems to anticipate the finale. The molto adagio culminates in an expressive polytonal climax of sorrowful tone. A prolonged diminuendo ends the movement with a serene coda.
The fourth movement is structured as a theme and highly contrasting seven variations. It opens with a rather simple and Baroquish main theme on strings, which seems influenced by Rubbras 1938 orchestration of Brahmss Variations and Fugue on a Theme by Handel. The first variation is already much more chromatic and agitated in character, while the second adopts a bleak marching rhythm from which the melody then emerges. In great contrast, the third variation is lively and joyous in tone, supported by bouncing rhythms. In turn, the fourth is lyrical and cantabile, gradually becoming more solemn as if the material is returning to its Baroquis origin. The fifth, also rhythmic, seems to look back to the folkish music heard in the second movement, which leads to a sixth variation almost solely composed of exchanges between brass intruments. The final one is solemn and noble in tone, unfolding with an austere and retrained expression. The movement is capped by a substantial fugue with the theme as the main subject. After a quieter section dominated by woodwinds, the fugue resumes and leads to a solemn coda with which the work ends.
Picture: Palace in Spain (1939) by Dutch painter Carel Willink.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/25j8gslm and https://tinyurl.com/266kg97n
Unfortunately, the score isnt freely available. Symphony No.3 - Edmund Rubbra](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VwnrzPwlQSE/mqdefault.jpg)

![Inclina Domine aurem tuam Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli
La Guilde des Mercenaires Ensemble conducted by Adrien Mabire.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Inclina Domine aurem tuam was published in Volume I of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a collection mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. It is scored for six voices (Cantus, Altus, Quintus, Sextus, Tenor and Bassus), with later arrangements including instrumental accompaniment by trombones and organ. The text is taken from Psalm 68.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
Written in D (Aeolian mode), the music moves with a natural rhetoric that mirrors the prayer’s arc: an urgent plea for God to “incline your ear,” an admission of poverty and need, and a closing affirmation of trust. It opens with a canon between cantus and tenor, before the rest of voices join in an imitative counterpoint, culminating in a unison singing with et exaudi me. This briefly continues with the phrase inops et pauper sum ego, begun by solo sextus, before a trio begins between cantus, altus and quintus. Another trio then takes place between the sextus, tenor and bassus, leading to a contrapuntal passage between the voices. The work then ends with a solemn unison.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: The Penitent Magdalene (c. 1565) by the Italian painter Titian.
Musical analysis written by myself.
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2cofmpx5 Inclina Domine aurem tuam Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/W7HYghdpWZw/mqdefault.jpg)

