Uploaded July 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Proyecto Gerhard Ensemble conducted by José de Eusebio. Ananda Sukarlan as the pianist.
I - 0:00
Rueda's "Cadenza" was completed on October 1997, being commissioned by the Ensemble Intercontemporain. It was premiered in Paris on December 4 of that year, performed by said ensemble conducted by Ed Spanjaard with Dimitri Vassilakis as the pianist. The piece is a kind of short concerto allegro for solo piano and eighteen instruments (seven wind instruments, eight string instruments, two percussion instruments, and a harp).
Different compositional methods were employed to create the piece; from forms with impossible perspectives—the "trompe l'oeil" of the final section, where the presto piano describes a line that, as it opens, creates an illusory harmony—to the classical dialogue between piano and instrumental ensemble, and its strong confrontation. The work, of average, if not brief, length, is nonetheless intense. The entire movement, beginning with a cantabile, follows a trajectory, both from the point of view of microform and macroform, based on a single element composed of three notes. This trajectory passes through moments of greater virtuosity where three-note melodies blend with the various voices while trihedral torrents pour and cascade.
The piece thus opens with this first chord of the ensemble. This same chord generates the intervals which, in successive measures, create the three-note element on which the entire work will be based. The introduction of the ensemble follows a long melodic line from the piano, repeating the element generated earlier. The piano develops it by incorporating the same element into the tripartite base, this time amplified in various simultaneous forms. Then the movement again gives way to the instruments integrated one after the other, further developing the same element in a rhythmic or melodic form. This type of treatment is used practically throughout the work but takes on different nuances and characteristics. To contrast with this element, the piano appears with a new marcato, consisting of sequences of semiquaver chords incorporating the semiquaver notes, and launches the dialogue with the strings in a dizzying ascent. The piano then resumes, multiplying the initial pattern (3 x 3), and reaches the final presto in a brilliant and nervous atmosphere.
Picture: Photograph of three sculptures of "Another Place" (2005) on Crosby Beach, created by British sculptor Antony Gormley.
Source: tinyurl.com/ykex4ppo
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available.
Proyecto Gerhard Ensemble conducted by José de Eusebio. Ananda Sukarlan as the pianist.
I - 0:00
Rueda's "Cadenza" was completed on October 1997, being commissioned by the Ensemble Intercontemporain. It was premiered in Paris on December 4 of that year, performed by said ensemble conducted by Ed Spanjaard with Dimitri Vassilakis as the pianist. The piece is a kind of short concerto allegro for solo piano and eighteen instruments (seven wind instruments, eight string instruments, two percussion instruments, and a harp).
Different compositional methods were employed to create the piece; from forms with impossible perspectives—the "trompe l'oeil" of the final section, where the presto piano describes a line that, as it opens, creates an illusory harmony—to the classical dialogue between piano and instrumental ensemble, and its strong confrontation. The work, of average, if not brief, length, is nonetheless intense. The entire movement, beginning with a cantabile, follows a trajectory, both from the point of view of microform and macroform, based on a single element composed of three notes. This trajectory passes through moments of greater virtuosity where three-note melodies blend with the various voices while trihedral torrents pour and cascade.
The piece thus opens with this first chord of the ensemble. This same chord generates the intervals which, in successive measures, create the three-note element on which the entire work will be based. The introduction of the ensemble follows a long melodic line from the piano, repeating the element generated earlier. The piano develops it by incorporating the same element into the tripartite base, this time amplified in various simultaneous forms. Then the movement again gives way to the instruments integrated one after the other, further developing the same element in a rhythmic or melodic form. This type of treatment is used practically throughout the work but takes on different nuances and characteristics. To contrast with this element, the piano appears with a new marcato, consisting of sequences of semiquaver chords incorporating the semiquaver notes, and launches the dialogue with the strings in a dizzying ascent. The piano then resumes, multiplying the initial pattern (3 x 3), and reaches the final presto in a brilliant and nervous atmosphere.
Picture: Photograph of three sculptures of "Another Place" (2005) on Crosby Beach, created by British sculptor Antony Gormley.
Source: tinyurl.com/ykex4ppo
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available.


![Symphony No.3 - Edmund Rubbra
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Moderato: 0:00
II - Allegro: 9:10
III - Molto adagio ma liberamente: 14:55
IV - Tema con 7 variazioni e una fuga: 24:01
Rubbras Symphony No.3 was composed between 1938-9, its premiere being scheduled to take place at the Proms in London on 23 September 1940, but it was cancelled due to an air raid. It was first performed in Manchester on December 15 of 1940, played by the Hallé Orchestra conducted by Sir Malcolm Sargent, and it was eventually heard at the Proms on August 24 of 1945, conducted by Sir Adrian Boult. The score is dedicated to the critic and scholar Arthur Hutchings, who judged it the finest English work in that form since Elgars Second. Rubbra’s friend Bernard Herrmann was a later champion of the work.
The Symphony is the third of a tetralogy Rubbra wrote in quick succession between 1935-41. He described them as being different facets of one thought, since each was a reaction to the last. The Symphony also reflects the agitated and turbulent times of Britain in the 1930s, also portrayed in William Waltons Symphony No.1 in B-flat minor, Vaughan Williams Symphony No.4 in F minor or Alan Bush Symphony No.1 in C. After the austerity of the first two symphonies, the third is more relaxed and melodic. According to Louis Blois the composers intellect [is] less in competition with his lyrical gift.Andrew Achenbach has commented that the work shows Rubbra at his most lyrically genial, yet the purposeful thrust and riveting concentration of the writing are never in doubt.
The first movement is rather free, only resembling sonata form. It opens with lyrical and cantabile main theme, very Sibelian in shape and presented through antiphonal exchanges between woodwinds and strings. A transition dominated by the brass leads to a solemn and expansive second theme, which is derived from the main one. The ensuing development of the material relies on abundant counterpoint and effective contrasting moods of expression, culminating in an expressive climax. The themes are then recapitulated in a varied manner, reaching the movements biggest climax with the second theme. A slow and contemplative coda ends the moderato with the opening notes of the main theme.
The second movement can be seen as an intermezzo. It begins with an ostinato figure on multiple instruments, which serves as the root of a rhythmic and folkish main theme, also a reference to Beethovens fate motto from the 5th Symphony. A more melodic second theme is also soon introduced and often put in counterpoint with the main one, the interplay between the two is the core dynamic of the entire allegro. An intricate contrapuntal climax is reached, followed by a more expressive central part in which the second theme is put at the forefront. As we return to the opening rhythmic vigour, the music gradually grows in a crescendo towards a contrapuntal and polytonal climax that ends the allegro.
The third movement is also very free, resembling theme and variations. It opens with an expressive and lyrical main theme, presented by strings over horn pedal notes and taking the form of a poignant march. The material is soon contrapuntally developed as a series of fluid and unbroken variations of different moods, dynamics, instrumental colours and rhythm. In this aspect, the movement seems to anticipate the finale. The molto adagio culminates in an expressive polytonal climax of sorrowful tone. A prolonged diminuendo ends the movement with a serene coda.
The fourth movement is structured as a theme and highly contrasting seven variations. It opens with a rather simple and Baroquish main theme on strings, which seems influenced by Rubbras 1938 orchestration of Brahmss Variations and Fugue on a Theme by Handel. The first variation is already much more chromatic and agitated in character, while the second adopts a bleak marching rhythm from which the melody then emerges. In great contrast, the third variation is lively and joyous in tone, supported by bouncing rhythms. In turn, the fourth is lyrical and cantabile, gradually becoming more solemn as if the material is returning to its Baroquis origin. The fifth, also rhythmic, seems to look back to the folkish music heard in the second movement, which leads to a sixth variation almost solely composed of exchanges between brass intruments. The final one is solemn and noble in tone, unfolding with an austere and retrained expression. The movement is capped by a substantial fugue with the theme as the main subject. After a quieter section dominated by woodwinds, the fugue resumes and leads to a solemn coda with which the work ends.
Picture: Palace in Spain (1939) by Dutch painter Carel Willink.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/25j8gslm and https://tinyurl.com/266kg97n
Unfortunately, the score isnt freely available. Symphony No.3 - Edmund Rubbra](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VwnrzPwlQSE/mqdefault.jpg)

![Inclina Domine aurem tuam Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli
La Guilde des Mercenaires Ensemble conducted by Adrien Mabire.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Inclina Domine aurem tuam was published in Volume I of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a collection mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. It is scored for six voices (Cantus, Altus, Quintus, Sextus, Tenor and Bassus), with later arrangements including instrumental accompaniment by trombones and organ. The text is taken from Psalm 68.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
Written in D (Aeolian mode), the music moves with a natural rhetoric that mirrors the prayer’s arc: an urgent plea for God to “incline your ear,” an admission of poverty and need, and a closing affirmation of trust. It opens with a canon between cantus and tenor, before the rest of voices join in an imitative counterpoint, culminating in a unison singing with et exaudi me. This briefly continues with the phrase inops et pauper sum ego, begun by solo sextus, before a trio begins between cantus, altus and quintus. Another trio then takes place between the sextus, tenor and bassus, leading to a contrapuntal passage between the voices. The work then ends with a solemn unison.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: The Penitent Magdalene (c. 1565) by the Italian painter Titian.
Musical analysis written by myself.
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2cofmpx5 Inclina Domine aurem tuam Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/W7HYghdpWZw/mqdefault.jpg)





