Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Performed by the Rodin Quartett.
I - Allegretto (đť…ź. = 80) - Allegro assai : 0:00
II - Menuetto. Allegretto (đť…ź = 126): 11:23
III - Andante (đť… = 152): 15:25
IV - Rondo. Allegro vivace (đť…ź = 88) - Allegro assai (đť…ź = 160): 23:33
Lachner's String Quartet No.3 was composed in 1843 right after the previous one. Unfortunately we don't know when and by whom it was premiered. Although largely forgotten nowadays, Lachner was a key composer in the transition between the late classical and romantic styles. He was a close friend of Franz Schubert, which became the greatest influence in Lachner's style. This results in a mixture of elements from the Viennese classical school with the romantic expression of Beethoven.
Lachner's cycle of seven string quartets (one unpublished and unrecorded) is a perfect example of this. They were much admired and often performed during his lifetime. Mendelssohn was fascinated by them and Schumann called Lachner the most talented composer in southern Germany. Writing twenty years later, Tchaikovsky noted that Lachner had to be placed near the pinnacle of fine composers. These quartets are sure to be appealing to both amateur and professional musicians, and would certainly be enjoyed by general audiences and connoisseurs alike.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a melodic and noble main theme in E-flat major, followed by a rhythmic and agitated second theme in B-flat minor. The influence of Schubert is clearly perceptible in the shape of the themes. The music reaches a dramatic climax with a duo between the two violins in their upper registers. The exposition is then repeated, also an element commonly found in classical works. The ensuing development is heavily contrapuntal and passionate in nature, employing sudden expressive modulations, dynamic contrast and rhythmic variance to transform the material. A melancholic transition leads to the recapitulation of the themes, followed by a contrapuntal passage. A resolute coda then ends the allegretto.
The second movement is a minuet in ternary form. The minuet, another call to the classical era, was growing out of fashion and largely replaced by the scherzo. It opens with an elegant and graceful main theme in E-flat major, consisting of two parts that are repeated. The trio section contains a quicker and rhythmic second theme that is also in E-flat major, divided in two parts that are repeated. The minuet is then repeated da capo, ending the allegretto with a gradual fadeout coda.
The third movement is written in sonata form. It begins with a lyrical and cantabile main theme in A-flat major, presented by first violin. Then a stormy and passionate second theme in F minor is introduced, reaching a dramatic climax. Follows a contrapuntal development of the material, reaching an expressive climax with a series of modulations to G-sharp minor, A minor, C major, A minor again and then back to A-flat major. The return to the home key launches a varied recapitulation of the material, reaching another climax. A reflective coda ends the andante.
The fourth movement is structured as a sonata-rondo. It opens with a rhythmic and lively main theme in E-flat major, presented by first violin over tremolo pedal notes. A more melodic second theme serves as a contrasting episode, emplying canonic and contrapuntal writing. Then a repeat starts from the beginning, before the main theme becoes the subject of a development that transforms the material in a similar fashion as in the first movement, reaching a dramatic climax. A subdued transition leads to the recapitulation of the main theme, followed by a second development episode. The second theme follows, with an accelerando leading to a lively coda ends the quartet with high spirits.
Picture: "The ruins of Eldena in the Giant Mountains" (1830-4) by the German painter Caspar David Friedrich.
Musical analysis written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/2yfngazo
To check the score: tinyurl.com/29vualhl
Performed by the Rodin Quartett.
I - Allegretto (đť…ź. = 80) - Allegro assai : 0:00
II - Menuetto. Allegretto (đť…ź = 126): 11:23
III - Andante (đť… = 152): 15:25
IV - Rondo. Allegro vivace (đť…ź = 88) - Allegro assai (đť…ź = 160): 23:33
Lachner's String Quartet No.3 was composed in 1843 right after the previous one. Unfortunately we don't know when and by whom it was premiered. Although largely forgotten nowadays, Lachner was a key composer in the transition between the late classical and romantic styles. He was a close friend of Franz Schubert, which became the greatest influence in Lachner's style. This results in a mixture of elements from the Viennese classical school with the romantic expression of Beethoven.
Lachner's cycle of seven string quartets (one unpublished and unrecorded) is a perfect example of this. They were much admired and often performed during his lifetime. Mendelssohn was fascinated by them and Schumann called Lachner the most talented composer in southern Germany. Writing twenty years later, Tchaikovsky noted that Lachner had to be placed near the pinnacle of fine composers. These quartets are sure to be appealing to both amateur and professional musicians, and would certainly be enjoyed by general audiences and connoisseurs alike.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a melodic and noble main theme in E-flat major, followed by a rhythmic and agitated second theme in B-flat minor. The influence of Schubert is clearly perceptible in the shape of the themes. The music reaches a dramatic climax with a duo between the two violins in their upper registers. The exposition is then repeated, also an element commonly found in classical works. The ensuing development is heavily contrapuntal and passionate in nature, employing sudden expressive modulations, dynamic contrast and rhythmic variance to transform the material. A melancholic transition leads to the recapitulation of the themes, followed by a contrapuntal passage. A resolute coda then ends the allegretto.
The second movement is a minuet in ternary form. The minuet, another call to the classical era, was growing out of fashion and largely replaced by the scherzo. It opens with an elegant and graceful main theme in E-flat major, consisting of two parts that are repeated. The trio section contains a quicker and rhythmic second theme that is also in E-flat major, divided in two parts that are repeated. The minuet is then repeated da capo, ending the allegretto with a gradual fadeout coda.
The third movement is written in sonata form. It begins with a lyrical and cantabile main theme in A-flat major, presented by first violin. Then a stormy and passionate second theme in F minor is introduced, reaching a dramatic climax. Follows a contrapuntal development of the material, reaching an expressive climax with a series of modulations to G-sharp minor, A minor, C major, A minor again and then back to A-flat major. The return to the home key launches a varied recapitulation of the material, reaching another climax. A reflective coda ends the andante.
The fourth movement is structured as a sonata-rondo. It opens with a rhythmic and lively main theme in E-flat major, presented by first violin over tremolo pedal notes. A more melodic second theme serves as a contrasting episode, emplying canonic and contrapuntal writing. Then a repeat starts from the beginning, before the main theme becoes the subject of a development that transforms the material in a similar fashion as in the first movement, reaching a dramatic climax. A subdued transition leads to the recapitulation of the main theme, followed by a second development episode. The second theme follows, with an accelerando leading to a lively coda ends the quartet with high spirits.
Picture: "The ruins of Eldena in the Giant Mountains" (1830-4) by the German painter Caspar David Friedrich.
Musical analysis written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/2yfngazo
To check the score: tinyurl.com/29vualhl


![Symphony No.16 (Revised Version) - Alan Pettersson
SaarbrĂĽcken Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Alun Francis. John-Edward Kelly as the soloist.
I - Frenetico (0:00) - Cantabile espressivo (7:52) - [III] (12:15) - [IV] (17:41)
Petterssons Symphony No.16 was composed between May and August 1979, being commissioned by saxophonist Frederick Hemke. It was the last piece he completed before his death by cancer in June 1980. Hemke had heard Petterssons Seventh Symphony and requested the composer a piece featuring the saxophone. Instead of receiving a reply, the composer sent the completed score. Pettersson thus created a unique work in his entire production: a symphony for saxophone and orchestra. It was posthumously premiered on February 24 of 1983, performed by the Stockholm Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Yriy Ahronovitch, with Hemke as the soloist.
The composer originally referred to the work as a Saxophone Concerto, something prevented him from regarding it as either a true concerto or symphony. That the term concerto was not completely suitable may have been owing to the fact that the soloist doesnt have the traditional virtuosic passages where they can show off, interspersed with a number of orchestral interludes. When Hemke saw the work he noticed how the saxophone part did not fully exploit the instrument in Petterssons own terms. With the permission of the publishers, he prepared his own edition which is recorded here. The Lindberg recording features the original scoring, and for the listener it may be interesting to compare both.
The Sixteenth Symphony is short by the standards of Pettersson’s symphonies, with a duration of around 25 minutes – similar to that of Nos 10 and 11. Like the Fourth Symphony, the Sixteenth employs a musical language that encompasses wide stylistic differences. The opening itself is wild and intense (the score is marked frenetico) and the free-tonal language in the introduction contrasts with the Romantic, occasionally jazz-scented style in the slow, calm section that begins a little later in the symphony. After this calm passage, the symphony is once again marked by a frenetic atmosphere in a free-tonal idiom. Tonal points of reference – around which the listener can orient himself – are present, but are few and far between. The music is characterized by tension – a tension that is resolved in the symphony’s simple, tonal and peaceful ending.
Picture: Green Ballet (1960) by the Danish artist Asger Jorn.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/254sok2g and https://tinyurl.com/2bduohem
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available. Symphony No.16 (Revised Version) - Alan Pettersson](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/T3hv80JJFo8/mqdefault.jpg)




![Symphony No.6 in E-flat minor - Sergei Prokofiev
Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra conducted by Kirill Karabits.
I - Allegro moderato - Moderato - Allegro moderato, come prima - Andante molto - Allegro (un poco piĂą animato che il tempo I) - Poco meno - Moderato - Andante molto - Allegro moderato - Andante: 0:00
II - Largo - Meno mosso: 13:46
III - Vivace - Andante tenero - Vivace, come prima: 26:54
Prokofievs Symphony No.6 was begun in the Summer of 1945 (alongside with the fifth), being completed on February 1947. It was premiered in Leningrad on October 11 of 1947, performed by the Leningrad Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Yevgeny Mravinsky. The piece was a great success, being warmly received by critics and being positively compared with Shostakovichs Symphony No.8. Prokofiev initially wanted to dedicated the work to the memory of Beethoven, by October 1947 he claimed that the work reflected the destruction of the recently concluded Great Patriotic War.
Unfortunately for Prokofiev, the success was short-lived. As the patriotic fervour of the war waned, tight governmental control of the arts returned with an iron fist. Four months later in 1948, a devastating and fierce anti-formalist campaign was launched against some of then most prominent soviet composers like Shostakovich, Prokofiev, Kachaturian or Myaskovsky. The work was called abnormal, repellent and pathological, generally considered as a failure, and the same critics that had praised the sixth then denounced the work as formalist. Prokofievs career never truly recovered from such campaign; many of his works were banned and the new compositions, written to appease soviet authorities failed to relaunch his career. By August 1948, Prokofiev was in severe financial straits, his personal debt amounting to 180,000 rubles.
Prokofievs health was also on the decline; on January 1945 he had suffered a concussion after fainting in his apartment due to untreated chronic hypertension. He didnt fully recovered from the accident, and following medical advice, he substantially had to restrict his composing activity.The last eight years of his life were those of an invalid, and he suffered almost constant headaches. The doctors could only suggest rest: he was to avoid all excitement, there was to be no reading, chess, alcohol or cigarettes and above all no composition: an impossible order, since he protested that he couldn’t help composing in his head.
Only after Prokofievs death in 1953, during the De-Stalinization, the Sixth was rehabilitated in the Soviet Union. Thereafter the work made its way relatively slowly, and it was not until the 1980s that performances occurred with some frequency. In the free West the symphony had a mixed reception, with critics praising its depth and expressivity while others criticised its austerity and structure. As time went on, the piece was reevaluated and now it is generally considere as the symphonic masterpiece of Prokofiev, even if its popularity is lesser that the first and fifth symphonies.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with grim E-flat minor brass calls, followed by a lyrical and expressive main theme introduced by muted violins and violas, which lugubriously unfolds with a deep melancholic tone with no sense of heroics. Follows a more cantabile and hopeful second theme introduced by oboe, which offers contrast and rises in a short-lived climax. A brief reminiscence of the main theme leads to the development, which opens with a menacing marching ostinato figure on bassoon and piano. This turns into an increasingly dissonant grotesque funereal march, culminating in a bitter climax. After a diminuendo the material is recapitulated, which the marching ostinato from the development returning as well. Only at the very end of the allegro moderato, in the slow and reflective coda, the key moves towards a more optimistic E-flat major.
The second movement is written in ternary form. It opens with a tragic and tortuous main theme on full orchestra, fully exposed by violins and trumpets in the key of A-flat major. After an expressive climax, a transition leads to the lyrical second theme introduced by cellos, before the material is contrapuntally combined. The central part of the movement is a harsh climax of barely contained violence, with marching rhythms underneath. An inverted recapitulation then begins with the second theme on four horns, then joined by strings and woods. Upper strings then build towards a climactic restatement of the first theme heard across the orchestra, which culminates in a return of the shrill exchanges heard at the opening. From here the music subsides into a tranquil coda, in which elements of both themes are gently laid to rest.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Farewell (1967) by the Russian painter Geliy Korzhev.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2dpgtbod and https://tinyurl.com/2dqtthzv
To check the score: https://tinyurl Symphony No.6 in E-flat minor - Sergei Prokofiev](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/U_5AtTg-gTk/mqdefault.jpg)


