Uploaded October 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Malmö Symphony Orchestra Chamber Ensemble conducted by Lev Markiz.
I - Episode I: Meeting. Moderato - Allegretto Scherzando - Meno Mosso - Adagio: 0:00
II - Episode II. Alienation. Moderato: 12:29
III - Episode III. Alert Automation. Allegretto: 16:05
IV - Episode IV. Horror. Agitato: 18:13
V - Episode V. Cobweb. Cadenza - Andante - Maestoso: 22:11
Schnittke's "Labyrinths" was composed in 1971, written at the behest of Russian ballet-master Vladimir Vasiliev, who wished to participate in a Moscow choreography competition. Vasiliev wrote the libretto, came up with the title and designed the choreography, Schnittke having to adapt when composing the music. Unfortunately, due to a lack of rehearsal time, only the first episode of the fifth was performed in Spring 1972, played by the chamber orchestra of the Bolshoi theatre. Afterwards, the ballet company involved broke up and the dancer Alexander Godunov fled to the west.
Soon, Vasiliev too went abroad with his wife and partner Katerina Maximova. Schnittke later mentioned: "He never returned to this choreographical concept and, when I met him recently in New York, he couldn't remember this project at all. But in the last analysis its failure to materialize was not his fault but the fault of the circumstances. Once again the 'corpse of an idea' remained lying in the cellar of oblivion." The ballet music was given several concert performances in Moscow and St. Petersburg, but it wasn't until 1989 when "Labyrinths" finally received a choreographic realization. It took the form of a collage that mixed ballet and pantomime, alongside Schnittke's second ballet "Der gelbe Klang" (1973-4), originally after poetic libretto material by Vasili Kandinsky.
The music to the ballet itself is strangely similar in its mixture of the simplistic and dauntingly sophisticated, the naive and the learned, and the funny and scary; indeed, while the score is not one of Schnittke's better known works, "Labyrinths" does provide a veritable maze of figures, moods, and techniques which would become archetypes in Schnittke's later output. The first movement's carnivalesque haunted house of timbres founds itself on the Schnittke "continuo" group, a pearly amalgam of keyboard instruments (piano, celesta, harpsichord) and percussion instruments (marimba, vibraphone, bells, glockenspiel) which blend into a sonic hall of mirrors. So effective in the score's long and disquietingly atmospheric first movement, these sounds would undergo greater invention in Schnittke's Second and Fourth Symphonies (1979, 1984), and indeed provide the conceptual spine for his last great ballet, 1987's "Peer Gynt".
The middle three movements are all inventions and developments of a single mood or process. They are for the most part rapid and scherzo-like accumulations, both on the sonic level (layers of sounds accrue, dynamic and timbral screens grow from transparencies into great blocks), and on level of anxiety -- the rhetorical inversion here happens with deft seamlessness, as the playful flies fast into the terrifying. In the finale, Schnittke realizes he's onto something, and creates a 15-minute last movement whose monolithic progression simply builds upon this unadorned, reverberant sound-world; the climax, resounding rich major thirds, recalls the work's opening gesture, and does so with marvellous equivocality — is this joy? Stricken terror? Again, the rhetoric loopiness maintains a poker-face.
Picture: "The Thinker" (1991) by Russian painter Mikhail Zvyagin.
Sources: tinyurl.com/22979wee and tinyurl.com/24jp6oy8
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available.
Malmö Symphony Orchestra Chamber Ensemble conducted by Lev Markiz.
I - Episode I: Meeting. Moderato - Allegretto Scherzando - Meno Mosso - Adagio: 0:00
II - Episode II. Alienation. Moderato: 12:29
III - Episode III. Alert Automation. Allegretto: 16:05
IV - Episode IV. Horror. Agitato: 18:13
V - Episode V. Cobweb. Cadenza - Andante - Maestoso: 22:11
Schnittke's "Labyrinths" was composed in 1971, written at the behest of Russian ballet-master Vladimir Vasiliev, who wished to participate in a Moscow choreography competition. Vasiliev wrote the libretto, came up with the title and designed the choreography, Schnittke having to adapt when composing the music. Unfortunately, due to a lack of rehearsal time, only the first episode of the fifth was performed in Spring 1972, played by the chamber orchestra of the Bolshoi theatre. Afterwards, the ballet company involved broke up and the dancer Alexander Godunov fled to the west.
Soon, Vasiliev too went abroad with his wife and partner Katerina Maximova. Schnittke later mentioned: "He never returned to this choreographical concept and, when I met him recently in New York, he couldn't remember this project at all. But in the last analysis its failure to materialize was not his fault but the fault of the circumstances. Once again the 'corpse of an idea' remained lying in the cellar of oblivion." The ballet music was given several concert performances in Moscow and St. Petersburg, but it wasn't until 1989 when "Labyrinths" finally received a choreographic realization. It took the form of a collage that mixed ballet and pantomime, alongside Schnittke's second ballet "Der gelbe Klang" (1973-4), originally after poetic libretto material by Vasili Kandinsky.
The music to the ballet itself is strangely similar in its mixture of the simplistic and dauntingly sophisticated, the naive and the learned, and the funny and scary; indeed, while the score is not one of Schnittke's better known works, "Labyrinths" does provide a veritable maze of figures, moods, and techniques which would become archetypes in Schnittke's later output. The first movement's carnivalesque haunted house of timbres founds itself on the Schnittke "continuo" group, a pearly amalgam of keyboard instruments (piano, celesta, harpsichord) and percussion instruments (marimba, vibraphone, bells, glockenspiel) which blend into a sonic hall of mirrors. So effective in the score's long and disquietingly atmospheric first movement, these sounds would undergo greater invention in Schnittke's Second and Fourth Symphonies (1979, 1984), and indeed provide the conceptual spine for his last great ballet, 1987's "Peer Gynt".
The middle three movements are all inventions and developments of a single mood or process. They are for the most part rapid and scherzo-like accumulations, both on the sonic level (layers of sounds accrue, dynamic and timbral screens grow from transparencies into great blocks), and on level of anxiety -- the rhetorical inversion here happens with deft seamlessness, as the playful flies fast into the terrifying. In the finale, Schnittke realizes he's onto something, and creates a 15-minute last movement whose monolithic progression simply builds upon this unadorned, reverberant sound-world; the climax, resounding rich major thirds, recalls the work's opening gesture, and does so with marvellous equivocality — is this joy? Stricken terror? Again, the rhetoric loopiness maintains a poker-face.
Picture: "The Thinker" (1991) by Russian painter Mikhail Zvyagin.
Sources: tinyurl.com/22979wee and tinyurl.com/24jp6oy8
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available.

![Symphony No.16 (Revised Version) - Alan Pettersson
Saarbrücken Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Alun Francis. John-Edward Kelly as the soloist.
I - Frenetico (0:00) - Cantabile espressivo (7:52) - [III] (12:15) - [IV] (17:41)
Petterssons Symphony No.16 was composed between May and August 1979, being commissioned by saxophonist Frederick Hemke. It was the last piece he completed before his death by cancer in June 1980. Hemke had heard Petterssons Seventh Symphony and requested the composer a piece featuring the saxophone. Instead of receiving a reply, the composer sent the completed score. Pettersson thus created a unique work in his entire production: a symphony for saxophone and orchestra. It was posthumously premiered on February 24 of 1983, performed by the Stockholm Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Yriy Ahronovitch, with Hemke as the soloist.
The composer originally referred to the work as a Saxophone Concerto, something prevented him from regarding it as either a true concerto or symphony. That the term concerto was not completely suitable may have been owing to the fact that the soloist doesnt have the traditional virtuosic passages where they can show off, interspersed with a number of orchestral interludes. When Hemke saw the work he noticed how the saxophone part did not fully exploit the instrument in Petterssons own terms. With the permission of the publishers, he prepared his own edition which is recorded here. The Lindberg recording features the original scoring, and for the listener it may be interesting to compare both.
The Sixteenth Symphony is short by the standards of Pettersson’s symphonies, with a duration of around 25 minutes – similar to that of Nos 10 and 11. Like the Fourth Symphony, the Sixteenth employs a musical language that encompasses wide stylistic differences. The opening itself is wild and intense (the score is marked frenetico) and the free-tonal language in the introduction contrasts with the Romantic, occasionally jazz-scented style in the slow, calm section that begins a little later in the symphony. After this calm passage, the symphony is once again marked by a frenetic atmosphere in a free-tonal idiom. Tonal points of reference – around which the listener can orient himself – are present, but are few and far between. The music is characterized by tension – a tension that is resolved in the symphony’s simple, tonal and peaceful ending.
Picture: Green Ballet (1960) by the Danish artist Asger Jorn.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/254sok2g and https://tinyurl.com/2bduohem
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available. Symphony No.16 (Revised Version) - Alan Pettersson](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/T3hv80JJFo8/mqdefault.jpg)




![Symphony No.6 in E-flat minor - Sergei Prokofiev
Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra conducted by Kirill Karabits.
I - Allegro moderato - Moderato - Allegro moderato, come prima - Andante molto - Allegro (un poco più animato che il tempo I) - Poco meno - Moderato - Andante molto - Allegro moderato - Andante: 0:00
II - Largo - Meno mosso: 13:46
III - Vivace - Andante tenero - Vivace, come prima: 26:54
Prokofievs Symphony No.6 was begun in the Summer of 1945 (alongside with the fifth), being completed on February 1947. It was premiered in Leningrad on October 11 of 1947, performed by the Leningrad Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Yevgeny Mravinsky. The piece was a great success, being warmly received by critics and being positively compared with Shostakovichs Symphony No.8. Prokofiev initially wanted to dedicated the work to the memory of Beethoven, by October 1947 he claimed that the work reflected the destruction of the recently concluded Great Patriotic War.
Unfortunately for Prokofiev, the success was short-lived. As the patriotic fervour of the war waned, tight governmental control of the arts returned with an iron fist. Four months later in 1948, a devastating and fierce anti-formalist campaign was launched against some of then most prominent soviet composers like Shostakovich, Prokofiev, Kachaturian or Myaskovsky. The work was called abnormal, repellent and pathological, generally considered as a failure, and the same critics that had praised the sixth then denounced the work as formalist. Prokofievs career never truly recovered from such campaign; many of his works were banned and the new compositions, written to appease soviet authorities failed to relaunch his career. By August 1948, Prokofiev was in severe financial straits, his personal debt amounting to 180,000 rubles.
Prokofievs health was also on the decline; on January 1945 he had suffered a concussion after fainting in his apartment due to untreated chronic hypertension. He didnt fully recovered from the accident, and following medical advice, he substantially had to restrict his composing activity.The last eight years of his life were those of an invalid, and he suffered almost constant headaches. The doctors could only suggest rest: he was to avoid all excitement, there was to be no reading, chess, alcohol or cigarettes and above all no composition: an impossible order, since he protested that he couldn’t help composing in his head.
Only after Prokofievs death in 1953, during the De-Stalinization, the Sixth was rehabilitated in the Soviet Union. Thereafter the work made its way relatively slowly, and it was not until the 1980s that performances occurred with some frequency. In the free West the symphony had a mixed reception, with critics praising its depth and expressivity while others criticised its austerity and structure. As time went on, the piece was reevaluated and now it is generally considere as the symphonic masterpiece of Prokofiev, even if its popularity is lesser that the first and fifth symphonies.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with grim E-flat minor brass calls, followed by a lyrical and expressive main theme introduced by muted violins and violas, which lugubriously unfolds with a deep melancholic tone with no sense of heroics. Follows a more cantabile and hopeful second theme introduced by oboe, which offers contrast and rises in a short-lived climax. A brief reminiscence of the main theme leads to the development, which opens with a menacing marching ostinato figure on bassoon and piano. This turns into an increasingly dissonant grotesque funereal march, culminating in a bitter climax. After a diminuendo the material is recapitulated, which the marching ostinato from the development returning as well. Only at the very end of the allegro moderato, in the slow and reflective coda, the key moves towards a more optimistic E-flat major.
The second movement is written in ternary form. It opens with a tragic and tortuous main theme on full orchestra, fully exposed by violins and trumpets in the key of A-flat major. After an expressive climax, a transition leads to the lyrical second theme introduced by cellos, before the material is contrapuntally combined. The central part of the movement is a harsh climax of barely contained violence, with marching rhythms underneath. An inverted recapitulation then begins with the second theme on four horns, then joined by strings and woods. Upper strings then build towards a climactic restatement of the first theme heard across the orchestra, which culminates in a return of the shrill exchanges heard at the opening. From here the music subsides into a tranquil coda, in which elements of both themes are gently laid to rest.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Farewell (1967) by the Russian painter Geliy Korzhev.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2dpgtbod and https://tinyurl.com/2dqtthzv
To check the score: https://tinyurl Symphony No.6 in E-flat minor - Sergei Prokofiev](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/U_5AtTg-gTk/mqdefault.jpg)



![Symphony No.3 - Edmund Rubbra
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Moderato: 0:00
II - Allegro: 9:10
III - Molto adagio ma liberamente: 14:55
IV - Tema con 7 variazioni e una fuga: 24:01
Rubbras Symphony No.3 was composed between 1938-9, its premiere being scheduled to take place at the Proms in London on 23 September 1940, but it was cancelled due to an air raid. It was first performed in Manchester on December 15 of 1940, played by the Hallé Orchestra conducted by Sir Malcolm Sargent, and it was eventually heard at the Proms on August 24 of 1945, conducted by Sir Adrian Boult. The score is dedicated to the critic and scholar Arthur Hutchings, who judged it the finest English work in that form since Elgars Second. Rubbra’s friend Bernard Herrmann was a later champion of the work.
The Symphony is the third of a tetralogy Rubbra wrote in quick succession between 1935-41. He described them as being different facets of one thought, since each was a reaction to the last. The Symphony also reflects the agitated and turbulent times of Britain in the 1930s, also portrayed in William Waltons Symphony No.1 in B-flat minor, Vaughan Williams Symphony No.4 in F minor or Alan Bush Symphony No.1 in C. After the austerity of the first two symphonies, the third is more relaxed and melodic. According to Louis Blois the composers intellect [is] less in competition with his lyrical gift.Andrew Achenbach has commented that the work shows Rubbra at his most lyrically genial, yet the purposeful thrust and riveting concentration of the writing are never in doubt.
The first movement is rather free, only resembling sonata form. It opens with lyrical and cantabile main theme, very Sibelian in shape and presented through antiphonal exchanges between woodwinds and strings. A transition dominated by the brass leads to a solemn and expansive second theme, which is derived from the main one. The ensuing development of the material relies on abundant counterpoint and effective contrasting moods of expression, culminating in an expressive climax. The themes are then recapitulated in a varied manner, reaching the movements biggest climax with the second theme. A slow and contemplative coda ends the moderato with the opening notes of the main theme.
The second movement can be seen as an intermezzo. It begins with an ostinato figure on multiple instruments, which serves as the root of a rhythmic and folkish main theme, also a reference to Beethovens fate motto from the 5th Symphony. A more melodic second theme is also soon introduced and often put in counterpoint with the main one, the interplay between the two is the core dynamic of the entire allegro. An intricate contrapuntal climax is reached, followed by a more expressive central part in which the second theme is put at the forefront. As we return to the opening rhythmic vigour, the music gradually grows in a crescendo towards a contrapuntal and polytonal climax that ends the allegro.
The third movement is also very free, resembling theme and variations. It opens with an expressive and lyrical main theme, presented by strings over horn pedal notes and taking the form of a poignant march. The material is soon contrapuntally developed as a series of fluid and unbroken variations of different moods, dynamics, instrumental colours and rhythm. In this aspect, the movement seems to anticipate the finale. The molto adagio culminates in an expressive polytonal climax of sorrowful tone. A prolonged diminuendo ends the movement with a serene coda.
The fourth movement is structured as a theme and highly contrasting seven variations. It opens with a rather simple and Baroquish main theme on strings, which seems influenced by Rubbras 1938 orchestration of Brahmss Variations and Fugue on a Theme by Handel. The first variation is already much more chromatic and agitated in character, while the second adopts a bleak marching rhythm from which the melody then emerges. In great contrast, the third variation is lively and joyous in tone, supported by bouncing rhythms. In turn, the fourth is lyrical and cantabile, gradually becoming more solemn as if the material is returning to its Baroquis origin. The fifth, also rhythmic, seems to look back to the folkish music heard in the second movement, which leads to a sixth variation almost solely composed of exchanges between brass intruments. The final one is solemn and noble in tone, unfolding with an austere and retrained expression. The movement is capped by a substantial fugue with the theme as the main subject. After a quieter section dominated by woodwinds, the fugue resumes and leads to a solemn coda with which the work ends.
Picture: Palace in Spain (1939) by Dutch painter Carel Willink.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/25j8gslm and https://tinyurl.com/266kg97n
Unfortunately, the score isnt freely available. Symphony No.3 - Edmund Rubbra](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VwnrzPwlQSE/mqdefault.jpg)