Uploaded September 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Mainz Philharmonic State Orchestra conducted by Hermann Bäumer.
I - Allegro moderato (𝅗𝅥 = 69) - A tempo ma un poco più sostenuto - Animato - Tempo I - Vivo ed appassionato - Tempo I - A tempo ma un poco più sostenuto - Animato - Molto tranquillo: 0:00
II - Larghetto (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 72) - Andante (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Tempo I - Andante - Tempo I: 15:24
III - Scherzo. Vivace (𝅗𝅥. = 100) - Trio. Meno mosso. Marschmässig (𝅘𝅥. = 63) - Da capo scherzo - Coda. Più mosso: 25:09
IV - Finale. Allegro moderato assai (𝅗𝅥 = 66) - Con fuoco ed animato - Tranquillo - Con fuoco - Sehr breit und ruhig, wie zu anfang - Con fuoco ed animato - Tranquillo - Animato - Molto allegro e sempre stringendo al fine: 32:51
Gernsheim's Symphony No.1 was composed on 1874, being premiered in Rotterdam on February 25 of 1875, during the composer’s tenure there as Music Director of the city’s Philharmonic Society. The piece was a great success, and it was soon played in Cologne, Leipzig, and Munich, among other places. The symphony is actually not Gernsheim’s first; an earlier effort in E-flat major was composed in 1857 during his stay in Paris, but this work remains unknown to this day. The piece was very well received, Max Bruch considered it a work that "ranks without question among the best that has been written in this genre in our time."
Gernsheim was a conservative composer and a friend of Johannes Brahms, to whom he is frequently compared. They met on 1862 and both shared their disregard for program music and lack of interest in opera. Gernsheim had learned much from Brahms, especially in his manner of working out thematic content and, to a lesser extent, in his manner of orchestration. However, his music also successfully melds together echoes of Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Spohr, Schubert and (of course) Brahms into a convincing style of his own. His first symphony, completed a year before Brahms's First saw the light of day, winningly melds the dramatic urgency of Beethoven, the melodic fluency of Mendelssohn, and the romantic ardour and harmonic richness of Schumann.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a dramatic and expressive main theme in G minor, introduced in piano by strings before rising in a fortissimo climax on full orchestra. The horn then introduces the lyrical and cantabile second theme in B-flat major, followed by the rest of woodwinds supported by strings. After an animato climax and a return to tranquillity, this entire exposition is then repeated, an archaic element unusual for the times. One can hear the influence of Beethoven in works such as the Coriolan Overture. The development focuses on the main theme, culminating in a rushing and passionate climax. The materials are then recapitulated, with the notable deviation of the second theme being in G major. The music returns to G minor for the coda, beginning in pianissisimo before reaching a thunderous fortissisimo peak, before the movement ends with a powerful restatement of the main theme.
The second movement is also written in sonata form, with some slight differences. It opens with a lyrical and nostalgic main theme in B-flat major, presented by horns, bassoons and clarinets. It is expressively taken by strings and rest of woodwinds. Then a calm and lyrical second theme in G-flat major, introduced by strings before woods join in as well, unfolded in a flowing counterpoint. The ensuing development is centred around the main theme, beginning in B-flat major and soon offering dramatic contrast with a G minor modulation, before returning to B-flat major. The recapitulation is inverted, beginning with the second theme before the main one both in the home key. A calm pianissimo chord then ends the larghetto.
The third movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a vigorously rhythmic main theme in E-flat major, introduced in pianissimo by strings before passing in forte to full orchestra. The first part of the scherzo is repeated before a bold C minor modulation. The head of the theme is restated, followed by a brief departure to A-flat major before returning to E-flat major. The trio section introduces a more melodic second theme in C major, taking the form of a march presented by clarinets and bassoons over pizzicati strings. After the music reaches a forte climax, the scherzo is repeated in its entirety. The movement ends with a brilliant coda.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: "Self-Portrait with Cupid and Death" (1875) by the German painter Hans Thoma.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/29gqa7pq and
To check the score: tinyurl.com/yp7jshj5
Mainz Philharmonic State Orchestra conducted by Hermann Bäumer.
I - Allegro moderato (𝅗𝅥 = 69) - A tempo ma un poco più sostenuto - Animato - Tempo I - Vivo ed appassionato - Tempo I - A tempo ma un poco più sostenuto - Animato - Molto tranquillo: 0:00
II - Larghetto (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 72) - Andante (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Tempo I - Andante - Tempo I: 15:24
III - Scherzo. Vivace (𝅗𝅥. = 100) - Trio. Meno mosso. Marschmässig (𝅘𝅥. = 63) - Da capo scherzo - Coda. Più mosso: 25:09
IV - Finale. Allegro moderato assai (𝅗𝅥 = 66) - Con fuoco ed animato - Tranquillo - Con fuoco - Sehr breit und ruhig, wie zu anfang - Con fuoco ed animato - Tranquillo - Animato - Molto allegro e sempre stringendo al fine: 32:51
Gernsheim's Symphony No.1 was composed on 1874, being premiered in Rotterdam on February 25 of 1875, during the composer’s tenure there as Music Director of the city’s Philharmonic Society. The piece was a great success, and it was soon played in Cologne, Leipzig, and Munich, among other places. The symphony is actually not Gernsheim’s first; an earlier effort in E-flat major was composed in 1857 during his stay in Paris, but this work remains unknown to this day. The piece was very well received, Max Bruch considered it a work that "ranks without question among the best that has been written in this genre in our time."
Gernsheim was a conservative composer and a friend of Johannes Brahms, to whom he is frequently compared. They met on 1862 and both shared their disregard for program music and lack of interest in opera. Gernsheim had learned much from Brahms, especially in his manner of working out thematic content and, to a lesser extent, in his manner of orchestration. However, his music also successfully melds together echoes of Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Spohr, Schubert and (of course) Brahms into a convincing style of his own. His first symphony, completed a year before Brahms's First saw the light of day, winningly melds the dramatic urgency of Beethoven, the melodic fluency of Mendelssohn, and the romantic ardour and harmonic richness of Schumann.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a dramatic and expressive main theme in G minor, introduced in piano by strings before rising in a fortissimo climax on full orchestra. The horn then introduces the lyrical and cantabile second theme in B-flat major, followed by the rest of woodwinds supported by strings. After an animato climax and a return to tranquillity, this entire exposition is then repeated, an archaic element unusual for the times. One can hear the influence of Beethoven in works such as the Coriolan Overture. The development focuses on the main theme, culminating in a rushing and passionate climax. The materials are then recapitulated, with the notable deviation of the second theme being in G major. The music returns to G minor for the coda, beginning in pianissisimo before reaching a thunderous fortissisimo peak, before the movement ends with a powerful restatement of the main theme.
The second movement is also written in sonata form, with some slight differences. It opens with a lyrical and nostalgic main theme in B-flat major, presented by horns, bassoons and clarinets. It is expressively taken by strings and rest of woodwinds. Then a calm and lyrical second theme in G-flat major, introduced by strings before woods join in as well, unfolded in a flowing counterpoint. The ensuing development is centred around the main theme, beginning in B-flat major and soon offering dramatic contrast with a G minor modulation, before returning to B-flat major. The recapitulation is inverted, beginning with the second theme before the main one both in the home key. A calm pianissimo chord then ends the larghetto.
The third movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a vigorously rhythmic main theme in E-flat major, introduced in pianissimo by strings before passing in forte to full orchestra. The first part of the scherzo is repeated before a bold C minor modulation. The head of the theme is restated, followed by a brief departure to A-flat major before returning to E-flat major. The trio section introduces a more melodic second theme in C major, taking the form of a march presented by clarinets and bassoons over pizzicati strings. After the music reaches a forte climax, the scherzo is repeated in its entirety. The movement ends with a brilliant coda.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: "Self-Portrait with Cupid and Death" (1875) by the German painter Hans Thoma.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/29gqa7pq and
To check the score: tinyurl.com/yp7jshj5









![Symphony No.16 (Revised Version) - Alan Pettersson
Saarbrücken Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Alun Francis. John-Edward Kelly as the soloist.
I - Frenetico (0:00) - Cantabile espressivo (7:52) - [III] (12:15) - [IV] (17:41)
Petterssons Symphony No.16 was composed between May and August 1979, being commissioned by saxophonist Frederick Hemke. It was the last piece he completed before his death by cancer in June 1980. Hemke had heard Petterssons Seventh Symphony and requested the composer a piece featuring the saxophone. Instead of receiving a reply, the composer sent the completed score. Pettersson thus created a unique work in his entire production: a symphony for saxophone and orchestra. It was posthumously premiered on February 24 of 1983, performed by the Stockholm Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Yriy Ahronovitch, with Hemke as the soloist.
The composer originally referred to the work as a Saxophone Concerto, something prevented him from regarding it as either a true concerto or symphony. That the term concerto was not completely suitable may have been owing to the fact that the soloist doesnt have the traditional virtuosic passages where they can show off, interspersed with a number of orchestral interludes. When Hemke saw the work he noticed how the saxophone part did not fully exploit the instrument in Petterssons own terms. With the permission of the publishers, he prepared his own edition which is recorded here. The Lindberg recording features the original scoring, and for the listener it may be interesting to compare both.
The Sixteenth Symphony is short by the standards of Pettersson’s symphonies, with a duration of around 25 minutes – similar to that of Nos 10 and 11. Like the Fourth Symphony, the Sixteenth employs a musical language that encompasses wide stylistic differences. The opening itself is wild and intense (the score is marked frenetico) and the free-tonal language in the introduction contrasts with the Romantic, occasionally jazz-scented style in the slow, calm section that begins a little later in the symphony. After this calm passage, the symphony is once again marked by a frenetic atmosphere in a free-tonal idiom. Tonal points of reference – around which the listener can orient himself – are present, but are few and far between. The music is characterized by tension – a tension that is resolved in the symphony’s simple, tonal and peaceful ending.
Picture: Green Ballet (1960) by the Danish artist Asger Jorn.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/254sok2g and https://tinyurl.com/2bduohem
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available. Symphony No.16 (Revised Version) - Alan Pettersson](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/T3hv80JJFo8/mqdefault.jpg)
