Philosophy of Biology - Refutation of Vitalism and Teleology @dewinthemorning
Philosophy of Biology - Refutation of Vitalism and Teleology  @dewinthemorning
Uploaded February 2015 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
For biology to be recognized as separate science of the living world, certain erroneous principles had to be refuted - and those were vitalism and teleology. Here I talk mainly about vitalism. In the following video there will be more about teleology.

If you read "What Makes Biology Unique" by Ernst Mayr and "Chance and Necessity" by Jacques Monod, it will be worth it .
Philosophy of Biology - Refutation of Vitalism and TeleologyWhere Does Logic Come From and Philosophy of BiologyWL Craigs Non-Answer to My Version of Euthyphros Dilemma - Eurythros Dillema :)Is an All-Knowing Superintelligence Possible? - Part 1 (The World Is Built on Probability)Why I Think AtheistTowards Evolutionary Psychology (Dawkins and the Selfish Gene) - Part XIIEFILISM??? Get Out Of Town!WL Craigs Great BlunderScientism (?) - the Biggest Fallacy of the Anti-rational Memes of Theists, Inmendham, and othersBreaking News! - WL Craig Drops the Teleological Argument!Reproduction versus Caring - Dawkins snd the Selfish Gene - Part VIPortrait of Dishonesty (William Lane Craig) 1/2 - Mirror from Biker Man (with my voice-over)
dewinthemorning |

Philosophy of Biology - Refutation of Vitalism and Teleology

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER