Uploaded November 2015 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
- Composer: Joseph-Maurice Ravel (7 March 1875 -- 28 December 1937)
- Orchestra: Orchestre Symphonique de Montréal
- Choir: Montreal Symphony Orchestra Chorus
- Conductor: Charles Dutoit
- Soloist: Timothy Hutchins (flute)
- Year of recording: 1980
Daphnis et Chloé, ballet for orchestra, written in 1909-1912.
Part I (Une prairie а la lisiére d'un bois sacré)
00:00 - 01. Introduction et Danse religieuse
10:20 - 02. Danse générale
11:51 - 03. Danse grotesque de Dorcon
13:46 - 04. Danse légère et gracieuse de Daphnis
18:11 - 05. Danse de Lycéion
23:10 - 06. Danse lente et mystérieuse des Nymphes (Nocturne)
Part II (Camp des pirates)
29:08 - 07. Introduction
29:22 - 08. Danse guerrière
33:45 - 09. Danse suppliante de Chloé
Part III (Paysage du première 1er tableau, а la fin de la nuit)
39:33 - 10. Lever du jour
45:06 - 11. Pantomime (Les amours de Pan et Syrinx)
52:39 - 12. Danse générale (Bacchanale)
Many consider Daphnis et Chloé, a symphonie choréographique in three scenes, to be Maurice Ravel's greatest work. The label may not really be a fair one; there were so many different Maurice Ravels throughout his life, each with a different set of musical goals, each exploring different musical worlds, that it is not right to assign the label of life masterpiece to the top work of any one of those periods, over the top works of all the others, just because it happens to be longer, more ambitious, and easier to access. But Daphnis et Chloé is certainly one of the most colorfully, intricately, and in a very immediate, almost physical sense, beautifully scored works ever written; if one were to assign pre-eminent status to any of Ravel's works solely on the basis of orchestration, this ballet would, without a doubt, be the one selected for the honor. There may be no more skillfully orchestrated work in all the twentieth century repertoire (Stravinsky's work included) and whole shelves of orchestration textbooks could be eliminated without loss by simply replacing them with an astute examination of this score.
Daphnis et Chloé was composed between 1909 and 1912, after a commission by Diaghilev and the Ballets Russes, and is a setting of a scenario adapted by Mikhail Fokine from the Greek work of the same name by Longus. It was premiered on 8 June 1912. The performance was not well prepared, and few people took note of Ravel's piece. Two orchestral suites derived from the score, however, did make a splash when Ravel brought them out just a short time after (especially the Suite No. 2, which is probably still Ravel's most often-played work).
Ravel was always far more interested in reproducing traditional musical forms and structures than he was in achieving the kind of sonic soundscapes that get rather callously lumped together as impressionist music; Daphnis et Chloé is, section-by-section, built along firmly classical lines (Ravel was extremely proud of the fact). Even the famous sunrise music at the opening of the third scene, with its scintillating thirty-second notes strewn about the orchestra and bright chirrups from the flute and piccolo flute and ecstatic, rising melody, has nothing in it that might be called progressive or even especially innovative in a technical sense, though certainly nothing written before it sounds even remotely like it. This was the essence of Ravel's genius: the ability to take the old and make it somehow sound completely new and different. Whether Daphnis et Chloé is Ravel's greatest achievement may be an irrelevant question: from the very first call of the backstage choir, distant and brought forth from an ancient world of shepherds and nymphs, to the rhythmic revelry of the final dance, it is proof on paper of Ravel's astounding capacity to fuse diverse elements into an astonishing new whole.
- Composer: Joseph-Maurice Ravel (7 March 1875 -- 28 December 1937)
- Orchestra: Orchestre Symphonique de Montréal
- Choir: Montreal Symphony Orchestra Chorus
- Conductor: Charles Dutoit
- Soloist: Timothy Hutchins (flute)
- Year of recording: 1980
Daphnis et Chloé, ballet for orchestra, written in 1909-1912.
Part I (Une prairie а la lisiére d'un bois sacré)
00:00 - 01. Introduction et Danse religieuse
10:20 - 02. Danse générale
11:51 - 03. Danse grotesque de Dorcon
13:46 - 04. Danse légère et gracieuse de Daphnis
18:11 - 05. Danse de Lycéion
23:10 - 06. Danse lente et mystérieuse des Nymphes (Nocturne)
Part II (Camp des pirates)
29:08 - 07. Introduction
29:22 - 08. Danse guerrière
33:45 - 09. Danse suppliante de Chloé
Part III (Paysage du première 1er tableau, а la fin de la nuit)
39:33 - 10. Lever du jour
45:06 - 11. Pantomime (Les amours de Pan et Syrinx)
52:39 - 12. Danse générale (Bacchanale)
Many consider Daphnis et Chloé, a symphonie choréographique in three scenes, to be Maurice Ravel's greatest work. The label may not really be a fair one; there were so many different Maurice Ravels throughout his life, each with a different set of musical goals, each exploring different musical worlds, that it is not right to assign the label of life masterpiece to the top work of any one of those periods, over the top works of all the others, just because it happens to be longer, more ambitious, and easier to access. But Daphnis et Chloé is certainly one of the most colorfully, intricately, and in a very immediate, almost physical sense, beautifully scored works ever written; if one were to assign pre-eminent status to any of Ravel's works solely on the basis of orchestration, this ballet would, without a doubt, be the one selected for the honor. There may be no more skillfully orchestrated work in all the twentieth century repertoire (Stravinsky's work included) and whole shelves of orchestration textbooks could be eliminated without loss by simply replacing them with an astute examination of this score.
Daphnis et Chloé was composed between 1909 and 1912, after a commission by Diaghilev and the Ballets Russes, and is a setting of a scenario adapted by Mikhail Fokine from the Greek work of the same name by Longus. It was premiered on 8 June 1912. The performance was not well prepared, and few people took note of Ravel's piece. Two orchestral suites derived from the score, however, did make a splash when Ravel brought them out just a short time after (especially the Suite No. 2, which is probably still Ravel's most often-played work).
Ravel was always far more interested in reproducing traditional musical forms and structures than he was in achieving the kind of sonic soundscapes that get rather callously lumped together as impressionist music; Daphnis et Chloé is, section-by-section, built along firmly classical lines (Ravel was extremely proud of the fact). Even the famous sunrise music at the opening of the third scene, with its scintillating thirty-second notes strewn about the orchestra and bright chirrups from the flute and piccolo flute and ecstatic, rising melody, has nothing in it that might be called progressive or even especially innovative in a technical sense, though certainly nothing written before it sounds even remotely like it. This was the essence of Ravel's genius: the ability to take the old and make it somehow sound completely new and different. Whether Daphnis et Chloé is Ravel's greatest achievement may be an irrelevant question: from the very first call of the backstage choir, distant and brought forth from an ancient world of shepherds and nymphs, to the rhythmic revelry of the final dance, it is proof on paper of Ravel's astounding capacity to fuse diverse elements into an astonishing new whole.








![Max Reger - Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 101
- Composer: Johann Baptist Joseph Maximilian Reger (19 March 1873 11 May 1916)
- Orchestra: Tampere Philharmonic Orchestra
- Conductor: Hannu Lintu
- Soloist: Benjamin Schmid
- Year of recording: 2012
Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 101, written between 1907-1908.
00:00 - I. Allegro moderato - quasi Andante - a tempo
27:12 - II. Largo con gran espressione - a tempo
40:07 - III. Allegro moderato (ma con spirito)
Regers Violin Concerto in A major is one of his most extensive works. He wrote it during his first winter in Leipzig in 1907-1908. The concerto was written for, and dedicated to French violinist Henri Marteau, who premiered it under Arthur Nikisch in Leipzig on 15 October 1908.
Reger himself held the work in high esteem, and while working on it wrote to a friend with glowing self-confidence: “The Violin Concerto continues to grow. [...] I believe the instrumentation is really good, for I tried to keep it as translucent as possible so that the soloist will not be covered. I know this sounds arrogant, but I believe that this Violin Concerto will follow in the footsteps of those of Beethoven and Brahms. We [meaning the German cultural sphere] have so far not had any real violin concertos besides those two.” The Violin Concerto indeed “continued to grow” and eventually attained gargantuan proportions, with a performing time of almost one hour. When violinist Carl Flesch later proposed making certain cuts to the work, Reger dismissed the idea immediately: “No, that is impossible. I have thought about this great deal, but the work is and shall remain a monster.”
It is indicative that Reger referred to Beethoven and Brahms in the letter cited above. The Violin Concertos of these two idols of his are models of the ‘symphonic concerto’ genre, as opposed to the less substantial virtuoso concerto vehicle favoured by numerous 19th-century composers. Reger never wrote a symphony, but it is generally agreed that in his Violin Concerto he came very close, so much so that his early biographer Max Hehemann (1916) described it as “thoroughly symphonic, like a symphony that just happens to have a concertante violin part”. The symphonic nature of the work is due partly to its proportions and partly to the melodic violin part dovetailing smoothly with its overall musical shape. On the other hand, the symphonic aspects should not be over-emphasised, because for the soloist this is a highly demanding concerto, not just in terms of simple endurance but also because of its technical requirements. Yet these technical demands arise so organically from the musical material that accusations of writing a virtuoso concerto simply would not stick.
Enormous as it is, Reger’s Violin Concerto is divided into the traditional three movements:
- The extensive first movement opens pastorally, with the woodwind introducing the main subject. The violin joins in after a certain amount of noodling. The second subject, when it is introduced in turn, is also first presented by the orchestra and then by the violin. The music in the movement is lyrical and melodic but attains monumental proportions, and although the mood is overflowingly Romantic and the development section escalates to grandiose and contrapuntally complex culminations, this is more about intensifying and condensing the single underlying mood than about dramatic contrasts and conflicts in the tradition of Romantic concertos. Towards the end of the movement, in its conventional place, there is a solo cadenza where the virtuoso element is more overtly displayed.
- Reger stressed the importance of the melodic element in the solo violin part, and this is particularly apparent in the central movement. It opens in a tranquil mood and traces soaring arcs while growing to an incandescent intensity, only to subside again towards the end.
- The final introduces a more mobile and energetic element with a dance-like feel, balanced by the idyllic and lyrical second subject. Reger described the concluding movement in colourful and perhaps surprisingly incisive terms: “[It is] like a photograph of the Devil’s grandmother when she was still young and raised hell at courtly balls. It will be a good and bold movement that will infuriate the
degenerate intellectuals!”
The concerto is dedicated: Henri Marteau zugeeignet. Max Reger - Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 101](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v-DhYo1CX2E/mqdefault.jpg)

