Uploaded November 2015 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
- Composer: Sergei Vasilievich Rachmaninoff (1 April 1873 -- 28 March 1943)
- Orchestra: Philharmonia Orchestra
- Conductor: Ettore Gracis
- Soloist: Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli
- Year of recording: 1957
Piano Concerto No. 4 in G minor, Op. 40, written in 1926.
00:00 - I. Allegro vivace (Alla breve)
09:35 - II. Largo - attacca subito
15:36 - III. Allegro vivace
When Rachmaninov came to America in the wake of the Bolshevik Revolution, he had little beside his family and his talent. Confronted with the need to make money quickly, he eschewed composition and conducting and went on long concert tours as a pianist. It was not until 1926 that he felt secure enough to take a break and start writing again. His first post-exile work, the Fourth Piano Concerto, was premiered in 1927 with the composer as soloist and Leopold Stokowski conducting the Philadelphia Orchestra. Its public and critical reception was chilly at best. Though Rachmaninov later revised it and rewrote the third movement, the Fourth Concerto has never really gained a foothold in the repertory. It could be that the tone is cooler and more remote than we expect from Rachmaninov -- this is, after all, the work of an exile picking up a lost thread -- or that the structure in the outer movements is harder to grasp. Or maybe it's just that its melodies aren't as memorable, because of a (sub)conscious effort to conform to the popular modernism music style of the time. However, in the hands of an inspired virtuoso like Michelangeli here, the concerto will yield its melancholy secrets.
- The opening Allegro vivace (Alla breve) gets off to a dramatic start with an ascending crescendo from the orchestra and a grand chordal theme from the soloist that searches for a while before finding its home key. This theme and a restless, lyric second subject are developed in rhapsodic manner, reaching a great, extended climax before the movement's abrupt close.
- The main theme of the wistful and nostalgic Largo is in fact memorable, restlessly restated in a series of different keys. It crashes directly in...
- the Allegro vivace finale, which in its whirlwind virtuosity and rhythmic instability recalls the finale of the First Concerto, albeit through the prism of regretful hindsight. Near the end the climactic material of the first movement returns, ushering in a brilliant coda expressing a hard-won optimism.
Michelangeli was usually very reluctant to make records, because of his self-imposed high standards. Here however he felt that his playing was worthy of a recording. It actually went so well, that when Michelangeli played the whole work straight through at the first take, he got up and refused to even contemplate a retake.
- Composer: Sergei Vasilievich Rachmaninoff (1 April 1873 -- 28 March 1943)
- Orchestra: Philharmonia Orchestra
- Conductor: Ettore Gracis
- Soloist: Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli
- Year of recording: 1957
Piano Concerto No. 4 in G minor, Op. 40, written in 1926.
00:00 - I. Allegro vivace (Alla breve)
09:35 - II. Largo - attacca subito
15:36 - III. Allegro vivace
When Rachmaninov came to America in the wake of the Bolshevik Revolution, he had little beside his family and his talent. Confronted with the need to make money quickly, he eschewed composition and conducting and went on long concert tours as a pianist. It was not until 1926 that he felt secure enough to take a break and start writing again. His first post-exile work, the Fourth Piano Concerto, was premiered in 1927 with the composer as soloist and Leopold Stokowski conducting the Philadelphia Orchestra. Its public and critical reception was chilly at best. Though Rachmaninov later revised it and rewrote the third movement, the Fourth Concerto has never really gained a foothold in the repertory. It could be that the tone is cooler and more remote than we expect from Rachmaninov -- this is, after all, the work of an exile picking up a lost thread -- or that the structure in the outer movements is harder to grasp. Or maybe it's just that its melodies aren't as memorable, because of a (sub)conscious effort to conform to the popular modernism music style of the time. However, in the hands of an inspired virtuoso like Michelangeli here, the concerto will yield its melancholy secrets.
- The opening Allegro vivace (Alla breve) gets off to a dramatic start with an ascending crescendo from the orchestra and a grand chordal theme from the soloist that searches for a while before finding its home key. This theme and a restless, lyric second subject are developed in rhapsodic manner, reaching a great, extended climax before the movement's abrupt close.
- The main theme of the wistful and nostalgic Largo is in fact memorable, restlessly restated in a series of different keys. It crashes directly in...
- the Allegro vivace finale, which in its whirlwind virtuosity and rhythmic instability recalls the finale of the First Concerto, albeit through the prism of regretful hindsight. Near the end the climactic material of the first movement returns, ushering in a brilliant coda expressing a hard-won optimism.
Michelangeli was usually very reluctant to make records, because of his self-imposed high standards. Here however he felt that his playing was worthy of a recording. It actually went so well, that when Michelangeli played the whole work straight through at the first take, he got up and refused to even contemplate a retake.




![Max Reger - Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 101
- Composer: Johann Baptist Joseph Maximilian Reger (19 March 1873 11 May 1916)
- Orchestra: Tampere Philharmonic Orchestra
- Conductor: Hannu Lintu
- Soloist: Benjamin Schmid
- Year of recording: 2012
Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 101, written between 1907-1908.
00:00 - I. Allegro moderato - quasi Andante - a tempo
27:12 - II. Largo con gran espressione - a tempo
40:07 - III. Allegro moderato (ma con spirito)
Regers Violin Concerto in A major is one of his most extensive works. He wrote it during his first winter in Leipzig in 1907-1908. The concerto was written for, and dedicated to French violinist Henri Marteau, who premiered it under Arthur Nikisch in Leipzig on 15 October 1908.
Reger himself held the work in high esteem, and while working on it wrote to a friend with glowing self-confidence: “The Violin Concerto continues to grow. [...] I believe the instrumentation is really good, for I tried to keep it as translucent as possible so that the soloist will not be covered. I know this sounds arrogant, but I believe that this Violin Concerto will follow in the footsteps of those of Beethoven and Brahms. We [meaning the German cultural sphere] have so far not had any real violin concertos besides those two.” The Violin Concerto indeed “continued to grow” and eventually attained gargantuan proportions, with a performing time of almost one hour. When violinist Carl Flesch later proposed making certain cuts to the work, Reger dismissed the idea immediately: “No, that is impossible. I have thought about this great deal, but the work is and shall remain a monster.”
It is indicative that Reger referred to Beethoven and Brahms in the letter cited above. The Violin Concertos of these two idols of his are models of the ‘symphonic concerto’ genre, as opposed to the less substantial virtuoso concerto vehicle favoured by numerous 19th-century composers. Reger never wrote a symphony, but it is generally agreed that in his Violin Concerto he came very close, so much so that his early biographer Max Hehemann (1916) described it as “thoroughly symphonic, like a symphony that just happens to have a concertante violin part”. The symphonic nature of the work is due partly to its proportions and partly to the melodic violin part dovetailing smoothly with its overall musical shape. On the other hand, the symphonic aspects should not be over-emphasised, because for the soloist this is a highly demanding concerto, not just in terms of simple endurance but also because of its technical requirements. Yet these technical demands arise so organically from the musical material that accusations of writing a virtuoso concerto simply would not stick.
Enormous as it is, Reger’s Violin Concerto is divided into the traditional three movements:
- The extensive first movement opens pastorally, with the woodwind introducing the main subject. The violin joins in after a certain amount of noodling. The second subject, when it is introduced in turn, is also first presented by the orchestra and then by the violin. The music in the movement is lyrical and melodic but attains monumental proportions, and although the mood is overflowingly Romantic and the development section escalates to grandiose and contrapuntally complex culminations, this is more about intensifying and condensing the single underlying mood than about dramatic contrasts and conflicts in the tradition of Romantic concertos. Towards the end of the movement, in its conventional place, there is a solo cadenza where the virtuoso element is more overtly displayed.
- Reger stressed the importance of the melodic element in the solo violin part, and this is particularly apparent in the central movement. It opens in a tranquil mood and traces soaring arcs while growing to an incandescent intensity, only to subside again towards the end.
- The final introduces a more mobile and energetic element with a dance-like feel, balanced by the idyllic and lyrical second subject. Reger described the concluding movement in colourful and perhaps surprisingly incisive terms: “[It is] like a photograph of the Devil’s grandmother when she was still young and raised hell at courtly balls. It will be a good and bold movement that will infuriate the
degenerate intellectuals!”
The concerto is dedicated: Henri Marteau zugeeignet. Max Reger - Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 101](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v-DhYo1CX2E/mqdefault.jpg)




![Sergei Prokofiev - Flourish, Mighty Land
- Composer: Sergei Sergeyevich Prokofiev (23 April 1891 5 March 1953)
- Orchestra: Russian State Symphony Orchestra
- Choir: Russian State Symphony Capella
- Conductor: Valeri Polyansky
- Year of recording: 2003
Translation of text on the poster: to raise our happiness and peace!
Flourish, Mighty [Home]land, cantata for chorus & orchestra, Op. 114, written in 1947.
This composition was written in celebration of the 30th anniversary of the October 1917 Russian Revolution. Soviet composers were routinely expected to satisfy the demands of state occasions, and Prokofiev did so several times. but hardly with enthusiasm. Flourish, Mighty Homeland lasts less than ten minutes in performance and is a relatively modest work, especially when compared with the composers Cantata for the 20th Anniversary of the October Revolution (1936 - 1937), a massive work requiring five hundred performers and containing veiled satire. Finished during Stalins first reign of terror, Prokofiev wisely withdrew it and the work was never heard in his lifetime. In this Op. 114 choral piece he deliberately kept the music simple, refusing to give it the grandiosity Soviet arts commissars wanted.
Using a text by Evgeni Dolmatovsky, Prokofiev opens the work with a charming march played on the trumpet. The mixed chorus then enters to introduce a rather solemn but attractive theme a cappella. For the remainder of the work the chorus dominates the proceedings, with the orchestra relegated to an accompanimental role and brief musical commentary between choral passages, although it does reprise the opening march at the close. This is a charming but minor effort whose greatest strengths are its contrasting, memorable themes and subdued character. Sergei Prokofiev - Flourish, Mighty Land](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vvmmQ8qbhP8/mqdefault.jpg)
![Dirk Schäfer - Piano Quintet Op. 5
- Composer: Dirk Schäfer (25 November 1873 16 February 1931)
- Performers: Jacob Bogaart (piano) & Orpheus String Quartet
- Year of recording: 1992
Quintet for 2 violins, viola, cello & piano, Op. 5, written in 1901.
00:00 - I. Allegro non troppo e molto maestoso
15:29 - II. Adagio patetico
24:29 - III. Allegro vivo e scherzando
30:42 - IV. Finale - allegro non troppo e molto maestoso
The piano quintet by Dutch composer-pianist Schäfer, with its startling opening and virtuoso treatment of the instruments, has much in common with the quintets of Schumann and Brahms [both uploaded on this channel]. The town-musician-like character of the first movement and the pizzicato passages in the scherzando call Dvoraks 2nd piano quintet to mind. With the sweeping melody in the adagio, Schäfer engraves his personal mark on the memory. Although his style may be somewhat eclectic, Schäfers music has a clarity and lightness that sets it apart, distinguishing it particularly from the weightier Brahms style.
The quintet was premiered in 1904 at a music festival in Frankfurt, but despite the wildly enthusiastic reception it met with on this occasion, three-quarters of a century were to pass before it was to be performed with any regularity.
Schäfer wrote two years before his death: All of my works seem to be almost entirely neglected. As far as the clavier compositions are concerned, the performance of these is left entirely to myself; but I dislike making propaganda for my creations. I much prefer this done through the WORK itself, rather than by me.
The Piano Quintet is dedicated to: Herrn Dr. Baron van Zuylen van Nijevelt. Dirk Schäfer - Piano Quintet Op. 5](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/w9egj5tO5e4/mqdefault.jpg)