Uploaded December 2015 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
- Composer: Alexander Nikolayevich Scriabin (6 January 1872 -- 27 April 1915)
- Orchestra: Berlin Radio Symphony Orchestra
- Conductor: Vladimir Ashkenazy
- Year of recording: 1991
Sculpture: detail of "Ecstasy of Saint Teresa" (Giovanni Lorenzo Bernini 1647-1652)
Le Poème de l'extase {Poem of Ecstasy}, Op. 54, written in 1905-1908.
During the decade immediately preceding the First World War, the European musical scene was developing at an astonishing pace. Schoenberg moved from the massive, two-hour-long Gurrelieder, with its epic Romantic text and equally lush score, to the concise and stringent Piano Pieces, Op. 11 in a matter of just eight years, while by 1913 Stravinsky was ready to unveil his Rite of Spring. Although Scriabin stayed apart from these developments, his extraordinary innovations during the first decade of the century are at the very heart of this musical realignment. Although generally regarded as a composer for the piano, Scriabin is the author of five large-scale orchestral works (all composed between about 1900 and 1910) that showcase his revolutionary artistic genius in much the same way that the piano sonatas do.
In Le poème de l'extase of 1908, the journey towards atonality and thematic fragmentation is by no means complete (the real musical goal would not be reached until the final few sonatas), but enough of the composer's increasingly complex mystical and theosophical views saturate the score to bring to it a density and complexity of expression denied to the three symphonies that precede it. It is a work that stands with great pride beside the massive German orchestral works of the period, both a mesmerizing portrait of those troubled years and, at the same time, a uniquely intimate picture of an artist's fascinating mind.
The Poem was originally to take the shape of a fourth symphony, but Scriabin decided to cast it instead as a 20-minute orchestral poem based on his own Poem of Ecstasy, a 369-line poem celebrating and glorifying his own creative powers (which would, according to his vision of reality, play a crucial role in the approaching transformation of the world). The orchestra is large -- twice the classical contingent of winds and brass are required -- and, unlike Mahler or Schoenberg, who used even greater forces than this, by no means sparingly used.
Although Scriabin's orchestral experience was limited, he was one of the early twentieth century's masters of orchestration, and throughout the Poem of Ecstasy his orchestral writing is brilliant. Themes are used to delineate mental and emotional states (in this way the late orchestral works are quite unlike the late piano works, which employ an almost exclusively textural and harmonic narrative structure). At the opening, the flute gesture searches longingly, the clarinet dreams, and the trumpet foretells a still-distant victory. An equestrian stride commences, only to be abruptly halted to make room for an ardent violin solo. As the many levels of expression unfold the music is highly chromatic, but not particularly dissonant. A glorious climax draws the music to an appropriately ecstatic finish in C major -- a key that had, for Scriabin, a cleansing and focusing quality.
Modest Altschuler, who helped Scriabin revise the score in Switzerland in 1907, and who conducted the premiere with the Russian Symphony Society of New York on 10 December 1908, reported that Scriabin's implied program (which does not appear in the score) is based on three main ideas: his soul in the orgy of love, the realization of a fantastical dream, and the glory of his own art.
Henry Miller made a reference to this symphony in Nexus, the third volume of The Rosy Crucifixion:
"That Poème de l'extase? Put it on loud. His music sounds like I think - sometimes. Has that far-off cosmic itch. Divinely fouled up. All fire and air. The first time I heard it I played it over and over. (...) It was like a bath of ice, cocaine and rainbows. For weeks I went about in a trance. Something had happened to me. (...) Every time a thought seized me a little door would open inside my chest, and there, in this comfy little nest sat a bird, the sweetest, gentlest bird imaginable. 'Think it out!' he would chirp. 'Think it out to the end!' And I would, by God. Never any effort involved. Like an étude gliding off a glacier."
- Composer: Alexander Nikolayevich Scriabin (6 January 1872 -- 27 April 1915)
- Orchestra: Berlin Radio Symphony Orchestra
- Conductor: Vladimir Ashkenazy
- Year of recording: 1991
Sculpture: detail of "Ecstasy of Saint Teresa" (Giovanni Lorenzo Bernini 1647-1652)
Le Poème de l'extase {Poem of Ecstasy}, Op. 54, written in 1905-1908.
During the decade immediately preceding the First World War, the European musical scene was developing at an astonishing pace. Schoenberg moved from the massive, two-hour-long Gurrelieder, with its epic Romantic text and equally lush score, to the concise and stringent Piano Pieces, Op. 11 in a matter of just eight years, while by 1913 Stravinsky was ready to unveil his Rite of Spring. Although Scriabin stayed apart from these developments, his extraordinary innovations during the first decade of the century are at the very heart of this musical realignment. Although generally regarded as a composer for the piano, Scriabin is the author of five large-scale orchestral works (all composed between about 1900 and 1910) that showcase his revolutionary artistic genius in much the same way that the piano sonatas do.
In Le poème de l'extase of 1908, the journey towards atonality and thematic fragmentation is by no means complete (the real musical goal would not be reached until the final few sonatas), but enough of the composer's increasingly complex mystical and theosophical views saturate the score to bring to it a density and complexity of expression denied to the three symphonies that precede it. It is a work that stands with great pride beside the massive German orchestral works of the period, both a mesmerizing portrait of those troubled years and, at the same time, a uniquely intimate picture of an artist's fascinating mind.
The Poem was originally to take the shape of a fourth symphony, but Scriabin decided to cast it instead as a 20-minute orchestral poem based on his own Poem of Ecstasy, a 369-line poem celebrating and glorifying his own creative powers (which would, according to his vision of reality, play a crucial role in the approaching transformation of the world). The orchestra is large -- twice the classical contingent of winds and brass are required -- and, unlike Mahler or Schoenberg, who used even greater forces than this, by no means sparingly used.
Although Scriabin's orchestral experience was limited, he was one of the early twentieth century's masters of orchestration, and throughout the Poem of Ecstasy his orchestral writing is brilliant. Themes are used to delineate mental and emotional states (in this way the late orchestral works are quite unlike the late piano works, which employ an almost exclusively textural and harmonic narrative structure). At the opening, the flute gesture searches longingly, the clarinet dreams, and the trumpet foretells a still-distant victory. An equestrian stride commences, only to be abruptly halted to make room for an ardent violin solo. As the many levels of expression unfold the music is highly chromatic, but not particularly dissonant. A glorious climax draws the music to an appropriately ecstatic finish in C major -- a key that had, for Scriabin, a cleansing and focusing quality.
Modest Altschuler, who helped Scriabin revise the score in Switzerland in 1907, and who conducted the premiere with the Russian Symphony Society of New York on 10 December 1908, reported that Scriabin's implied program (which does not appear in the score) is based on three main ideas: his soul in the orgy of love, the realization of a fantastical dream, and the glory of his own art.
Henry Miller made a reference to this symphony in Nexus, the third volume of The Rosy Crucifixion:
"That Poème de l'extase? Put it on loud. His music sounds like I think - sometimes. Has that far-off cosmic itch. Divinely fouled up. All fire and air. The first time I heard it I played it over and over. (...) It was like a bath of ice, cocaine and rainbows. For weeks I went about in a trance. Something had happened to me. (...) Every time a thought seized me a little door would open inside my chest, and there, in this comfy little nest sat a bird, the sweetest, gentlest bird imaginable. 'Think it out!' he would chirp. 'Think it out to the end!' And I would, by God. Never any effort involved. Like an étude gliding off a glacier."





![Max Reger - Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 101
- Composer: Johann Baptist Joseph Maximilian Reger (19 March 1873 11 May 1916)
- Orchestra: Tampere Philharmonic Orchestra
- Conductor: Hannu Lintu
- Soloist: Benjamin Schmid
- Year of recording: 2012
Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 101, written between 1907-1908.
00:00 - I. Allegro moderato - quasi Andante - a tempo
27:12 - II. Largo con gran espressione - a tempo
40:07 - III. Allegro moderato (ma con spirito)
Regers Violin Concerto in A major is one of his most extensive works. He wrote it during his first winter in Leipzig in 1907-1908. The concerto was written for, and dedicated to French violinist Henri Marteau, who premiered it under Arthur Nikisch in Leipzig on 15 October 1908.
Reger himself held the work in high esteem, and while working on it wrote to a friend with glowing self-confidence: “The Violin Concerto continues to grow. [...] I believe the instrumentation is really good, for I tried to keep it as translucent as possible so that the soloist will not be covered. I know this sounds arrogant, but I believe that this Violin Concerto will follow in the footsteps of those of Beethoven and Brahms. We [meaning the German cultural sphere] have so far not had any real violin concertos besides those two.” The Violin Concerto indeed “continued to grow” and eventually attained gargantuan proportions, with a performing time of almost one hour. When violinist Carl Flesch later proposed making certain cuts to the work, Reger dismissed the idea immediately: “No, that is impossible. I have thought about this great deal, but the work is and shall remain a monster.”
It is indicative that Reger referred to Beethoven and Brahms in the letter cited above. The Violin Concertos of these two idols of his are models of the ‘symphonic concerto’ genre, as opposed to the less substantial virtuoso concerto vehicle favoured by numerous 19th-century composers. Reger never wrote a symphony, but it is generally agreed that in his Violin Concerto he came very close, so much so that his early biographer Max Hehemann (1916) described it as “thoroughly symphonic, like a symphony that just happens to have a concertante violin part”. The symphonic nature of the work is due partly to its proportions and partly to the melodic violin part dovetailing smoothly with its overall musical shape. On the other hand, the symphonic aspects should not be over-emphasised, because for the soloist this is a highly demanding concerto, not just in terms of simple endurance but also because of its technical requirements. Yet these technical demands arise so organically from the musical material that accusations of writing a virtuoso concerto simply would not stick.
Enormous as it is, Reger’s Violin Concerto is divided into the traditional three movements:
- The extensive first movement opens pastorally, with the woodwind introducing the main subject. The violin joins in after a certain amount of noodling. The second subject, when it is introduced in turn, is also first presented by the orchestra and then by the violin. The music in the movement is lyrical and melodic but attains monumental proportions, and although the mood is overflowingly Romantic and the development section escalates to grandiose and contrapuntally complex culminations, this is more about intensifying and condensing the single underlying mood than about dramatic contrasts and conflicts in the tradition of Romantic concertos. Towards the end of the movement, in its conventional place, there is a solo cadenza where the virtuoso element is more overtly displayed.
- Reger stressed the importance of the melodic element in the solo violin part, and this is particularly apparent in the central movement. It opens in a tranquil mood and traces soaring arcs while growing to an incandescent intensity, only to subside again towards the end.
- The final introduces a more mobile and energetic element with a dance-like feel, balanced by the idyllic and lyrical second subject. Reger described the concluding movement in colourful and perhaps surprisingly incisive terms: “[It is] like a photograph of the Devil’s grandmother when she was still young and raised hell at courtly balls. It will be a good and bold movement that will infuriate the
degenerate intellectuals!”
The concerto is dedicated: Henri Marteau zugeeignet. Max Reger - Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 101](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v-DhYo1CX2E/mqdefault.jpg)




![Sergei Prokofiev - Flourish, Mighty Land
- Composer: Sergei Sergeyevich Prokofiev (23 April 1891 5 March 1953)
- Orchestra: Russian State Symphony Orchestra
- Choir: Russian State Symphony Capella
- Conductor: Valeri Polyansky
- Year of recording: 2003
Translation of text on the poster: to raise our happiness and peace!
Flourish, Mighty [Home]land, cantata for chorus & orchestra, Op. 114, written in 1947.
This composition was written in celebration of the 30th anniversary of the October 1917 Russian Revolution. Soviet composers were routinely expected to satisfy the demands of state occasions, and Prokofiev did so several times. but hardly with enthusiasm. Flourish, Mighty Homeland lasts less than ten minutes in performance and is a relatively modest work, especially when compared with the composers Cantata for the 20th Anniversary of the October Revolution (1936 - 1937), a massive work requiring five hundred performers and containing veiled satire. Finished during Stalins first reign of terror, Prokofiev wisely withdrew it and the work was never heard in his lifetime. In this Op. 114 choral piece he deliberately kept the music simple, refusing to give it the grandiosity Soviet arts commissars wanted.
Using a text by Evgeni Dolmatovsky, Prokofiev opens the work with a charming march played on the trumpet. The mixed chorus then enters to introduce a rather solemn but attractive theme a cappella. For the remainder of the work the chorus dominates the proceedings, with the orchestra relegated to an accompanimental role and brief musical commentary between choral passages, although it does reprise the opening march at the close. This is a charming but minor effort whose greatest strengths are its contrasting, memorable themes and subdued character. Sergei Prokofiev - Flourish, Mighty Land](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vvmmQ8qbhP8/mqdefault.jpg)