LPBF Stable vs. Unstable Melt Pool | FLOW-3D AM @flow3d
LPBF Stable vs. Unstable Melt Pool | FLOW-3D AM  @flow3d
Uploaded April 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Process instabilities in laser powder bed fusion can lead to defects such as balling that compromise part quality and mechanical performance. This FLOW-3D AM simulation compares stable and unstable IN718 LPBF print conditions by increasing laser scan speed while holding power constant at 1150W, illustrating how parameter changes drive melt pool instability. CFD modeling helps engineers identify process windows that maintain stable melt pool behavior and avoid defect formation. Learn more at flow3d.com/products/flow3d-am
LPBF Stable vs. Unstable Melt Pool | FLOW-3D AMOverhang Multilayer LPBF Sequence | FLOW-3D AMPlunging Jet - Air Entrainment & Dissolved Oxygen | FLOW-3D HYDROLaser Cutting Steel Sheet | FLOW-3D WELDCulvert Outlet Erosion | FLOW-3D HYDROMelt pool Modeling for Additive Manufacturing Webinar | FLOW-3D AMButterfly Valve with Cavitation | FLOW-3D HYDROSand Cast the v8 Engine Block Cylinders Up or Down? | FLOW-3D CASTCustomers success: Improving Casting System with FLOW-3D CAST Part ILabyrinth Weir Design at the Dog River Reservoir | FLOW-3D HYDROFlooded Roadway | FLOW-3D HYDROCylindrical Weld Comparison | FLOW-3D WELD
FLOW-3D |

LPBF Stable vs. Unstable Melt Pool | FLOW-3D AM

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER