Uploaded October 2019 | Updated September 2026, 1 day ago
Peter Helland attempts to show that the American Experiment beginning in 1776 aimed at destroying Kings and anybody who claimed they had a divine right to rule. Americans argued that the people should choose the King (i.e. the government they want) and thus they are the ones in charge. This idea eventually leads to the overthrow of all authority and subordination. What it means for the family is that the father can not claim that God gave him authority to command his household in Christ's name. He can get away with it only until his wife objects and takes him to court if necessary to stop his "tyrannical" rule. At best the husband and wife must be in mutual submission with nobody in charge but actually ending with the women getting the upper hand in most cases.
To prove that the Father has no real authority in American democracy to rule his own home Peter reads from the books of Ezra and Nehemiah where both prophets get extremely angry at the Israelite fathers for allowing their daughters and sons to marry "strange wives and husbands." Just like God commanded them to put away their strange gods he commands the husbands to put away their strange wives and the children born to them. The idea is the children will imitate their ungodly mothers and simply become pagans. The sons and daughters have been marrying the wrong person in America because the fathers do not insist on overseeing their children"s marriages. This has resulted in a 50% divorce rate and families falling apart.
The background screen contains a picture of Rosie the Riveter, the cultural icon from World War II that was used to socially engineer the women to come out of their homes and work in the factories. This greatly helped create the new liberated woman of the post war era. Also in the background is a photo from the sitcom in the 50's called "The Honeymooners." This sitcom helped pave the way in portraying husbands as incompetent and the wives as superior in competence.
Peter Helland attempts to show that the American Experiment beginning in 1776 aimed at destroying Kings and anybody who claimed they had a divine right to rule. Americans argued that the people should choose the King (i.e. the government they want) and thus they are the ones in charge. This idea eventually leads to the overthrow of all authority and subordination. What it means for the family is that the father can not claim that God gave him authority to command his household in Christ's name. He can get away with it only until his wife objects and takes him to court if necessary to stop his "tyrannical" rule. At best the husband and wife must be in mutual submission with nobody in charge but actually ending with the women getting the upper hand in most cases.
To prove that the Father has no real authority in American democracy to rule his own home Peter reads from the books of Ezra and Nehemiah where both prophets get extremely angry at the Israelite fathers for allowing their daughters and sons to marry "strange wives and husbands." Just like God commanded them to put away their strange gods he commands the husbands to put away their strange wives and the children born to them. The idea is the children will imitate their ungodly mothers and simply become pagans. The sons and daughters have been marrying the wrong person in America because the fathers do not insist on overseeing their children"s marriages. This has resulted in a 50% divorce rate and families falling apart.
The background screen contains a picture of Rosie the Riveter, the cultural icon from World War II that was used to socially engineer the women to come out of their homes and work in the factories. This greatly helped create the new liberated woman of the post war era. Also in the background is a photo from the sitcom in the 50's called "The Honeymooners." This sitcom helped pave the way in portraying husbands as incompetent and the wives as superior in competence.










![CCM: Dr. E. Michael Jones reviews mayor Pete Buttigiegs book: Shortest Way Home
(Photo is “Pete” kissing “husband” outside “church”)
Dr. Jones writes on the first page of his review: As with virtually every other claim in this book, the facts stubbornly resist the paradigm Mayor Pete brings to bear to interpret them. And on the last page he writes: Hasnt the city of South Bend become a hostage to your homosexual narcissistic fantasy of becoming Americas first gay president? Dr. Jones concludes his 22 page review: .....that the first victim of the regimen of sexual liberation as political control which he [Mayor Pete] perpetrated on South Bend was the man he sees in the mirror.
It does seem obvious to those wanting to see that there are two grooming scenarios going on at the same time. Mayor Pete has been preparing his perfect resume for his run for President for a long time. He must have aimed purposely to be Valedictorian of St. Joseph high school situated right across the street from Notre Dame University. Apparently this is a Catholic school where you can be number one while still being amoral even to the point of being a homosexual. Pete then added to his resume by going to Harvard and Oxford. He became a Rhodes Scholar, an Afghanistan war veteran, the mayor of South Bend and most importantly coming out as gay and publicly marrying his husband while mayor. But his career path to becoming President gives the impression that he and others have been carefully calculating all the right moves to fit the type of person that the second grooming scenario is formulating. Our schools, our media and our overall culture has been socially engineering Americans to admire the resume that Buttigieg and others have made. The problem is that by accepting Buttigiegs gayness as a good thing Americans are risking overthrowing 20 centuries of Western Christianity and going back to some form of paganism. CCM: Dr. E. Michael Jones reviews mayor Pete Buttigiegs book: Shortest Way Home](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Yc4EzB38NjE/mqdefault.jpg)