Uploaded September 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Paul wrote first. The Gospels came decades later. So why does the Gospel Jesus keep saying things that read like Paul's letters — sometimes on the same topics, in the same order, resolving the same disputes in Paul's churches?
Richard Carrier joins me to work through the connections between Paul's epistles and the Jesus of the Gospels: where the parallels are, how tight they are, and which direction the borrowing runs. If Mark built his Jesus partly out of Paul, that reverses the usual assumption that Paul is echoing sayings he inherited from a historical teacher.
Some of what we get into:
- Food laws — Romans 14:14, 20 ("nothing is unclean in itself") and Mark 7:19 ("thus he declared all foods clean")
- Divorce — 1 Corinthians 7:10-11, where Paul cites a command "from the Lord," and Mark 10:11-12
- The Last Supper — 1 Corinthians 11:23-26, Paul's version "received from the Lord," and Mark 14:22-25
- Taxes and Caesar — Romans 13:1-7 and Mark 12:13-17
- Resurrection bodies — 1 Corinthians 15:35-50 and Mark 12:18-27
- Love fulfilling the law — Romans 13:8-10, Galatians 5:14, and Mark 12:28-34
- "Abba, Father" — Romans 8:15, Galatians 4:6, and Mark 14:36
- Faith that moves mountains — 1 Corinthians 13:2 and Mark 11:23
- The laborer's wages — 1 Corinthians 9:14, quoted as scripture at 1 Timothy 5:18, appearing as a saying of Jesus at Luke 10:7
- Peter, James and John as "pillars" in Galatians 2:9 and Mark's inner circle
- What Paul says his information source actually was (Galatians 1:11-12) and why that matters
Plus the obvious objection: parallels run both ways, so what distinguishes Mark using Paul from Paul echoing Jesus? We take that seriously rather than waving it off.
Carrier's summary of the case: "the sayings and teachings of Jesus in Mark were adapted from what began as the teachings of Paul... the sequence of causation appears to have gone the other way." (The Obsolete Paradigm of the "Historical Jesus")
CHAPTERS
00:00 Intro
FURTHER READING
Richard Carrier, "Mark's Use of Paul's Epistles" — richardcarrier.info/archives/15934
Richard Carrier, On the Historicity of Jesus (Sheffield Phoenix, 2014), ch. 10
Richard Carrier, The Obsolete Paradigm of the "Historical Jesus" (2025)
Tom Dykstra, Mark: Canonizer of Paul (OCABS, 2012)
Thomas Nelligan, The Quest for Mark's Sources: An Exploration of the Case for Mark's Use of First Corinthians (Pickwick, 2015)
David Oliver Smith, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and Paul: The Influence of the Epistles on the Synoptic Gospels (Resource, 2011)
Eve-Marie Becker et al., eds., Mark and Paul: For and Against Pauline Influence on Mark (De Gruyter, 2014)
Richard Carrier's blog: richardcarrier.info
#RichardCarrier #ApostlePaul #BiblicalScholarship #HistoricalJesus #NewTestament
Want to stand up and use your voice like this? Check out Streamyard!
streamyard.com/pal/d/5461246688624640
Paul wrote first. The Gospels came decades later. So why does the Gospel Jesus keep saying things that read like Paul's letters — sometimes on the same topics, in the same order, resolving the same disputes in Paul's churches?
Richard Carrier joins me to work through the connections between Paul's epistles and the Jesus of the Gospels: where the parallels are, how tight they are, and which direction the borrowing runs. If Mark built his Jesus partly out of Paul, that reverses the usual assumption that Paul is echoing sayings he inherited from a historical teacher.
Some of what we get into:
- Food laws — Romans 14:14, 20 ("nothing is unclean in itself") and Mark 7:19 ("thus he declared all foods clean")
- Divorce — 1 Corinthians 7:10-11, where Paul cites a command "from the Lord," and Mark 10:11-12
- The Last Supper — 1 Corinthians 11:23-26, Paul's version "received from the Lord," and Mark 14:22-25
- Taxes and Caesar — Romans 13:1-7 and Mark 12:13-17
- Resurrection bodies — 1 Corinthians 15:35-50 and Mark 12:18-27
- Love fulfilling the law — Romans 13:8-10, Galatians 5:14, and Mark 12:28-34
- "Abba, Father" — Romans 8:15, Galatians 4:6, and Mark 14:36
- Faith that moves mountains — 1 Corinthians 13:2 and Mark 11:23
- The laborer's wages — 1 Corinthians 9:14, quoted as scripture at 1 Timothy 5:18, appearing as a saying of Jesus at Luke 10:7
- Peter, James and John as "pillars" in Galatians 2:9 and Mark's inner circle
- What Paul says his information source actually was (Galatians 1:11-12) and why that matters
Plus the obvious objection: parallels run both ways, so what distinguishes Mark using Paul from Paul echoing Jesus? We take that seriously rather than waving it off.
Carrier's summary of the case: "the sayings and teachings of Jesus in Mark were adapted from what began as the teachings of Paul... the sequence of causation appears to have gone the other way." (The Obsolete Paradigm of the "Historical Jesus")
CHAPTERS
00:00 Intro
FURTHER READING
Richard Carrier, "Mark's Use of Paul's Epistles" — richardcarrier.info/archives/15934
Richard Carrier, On the Historicity of Jesus (Sheffield Phoenix, 2014), ch. 10
Richard Carrier, The Obsolete Paradigm of the "Historical Jesus" (2025)
Tom Dykstra, Mark: Canonizer of Paul (OCABS, 2012)
Thomas Nelligan, The Quest for Mark's Sources: An Exploration of the Case for Mark's Use of First Corinthians (Pickwick, 2015)
David Oliver Smith, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and Paul: The Influence of the Epistles on the Synoptic Gospels (Resource, 2011)
Eve-Marie Becker et al., eds., Mark and Paul: For and Against Pauline Influence on Mark (De Gruyter, 2014)
Richard Carrier's blog: richardcarrier.info
#RichardCarrier #ApostlePaul #BiblicalScholarship #HistoricalJesus #NewTestament
Want to stand up and use your voice like this? Check out Streamyard!
streamyard.com/pal/d/5461246688624640



![Christian Man Uses Rape Apologetics—Gets DESTROYED Over Consent 🤯
Christian caller Colgate Dre defends biblical marriage authority using Ephesians 5 and 1 Corinthians 7—but gets absolutely demolished when pressed on consent, bodily autonomy, and the drop a $10 bill scenario. This intense debate covers Old Testament law, womens submission in Christian marriage, and whether the Bible endorses marital grape. Watch as atheists systematically dismantle his arguments while another guest, Lathe, weighs in with a womans perspective on these disturbing takes.
In this conversation, we tackle:
✅ Does Jesus affirm Old Testament laws? (Matthew 5:17-19)
✅ Women as property in the Ten Commandments
✅ Ephesians 5:22-25 and wifely submission
✅ 1 Corinthians 7:4-5 and bodily autonomy
✅ What genuine consent means in marriage
✅ The 69 nos and 1 yes = yes problem
✅ Why marriage doesnt give blanket consent
✅ Objective vs subjective Christian morality
This is a masterclass in consent education, biblical criticism, and why Christian morals may do more harm than good regarding womens rights and relationship dynamics.
🔴 SUBSCRIBE for more atheist debates and Christian caller takedowns!
💬 COMMENT: Whats the most problematic Christian marriage teaching youve heard?
👍 LIKE if you believe consent is non-negotiable in ANY relationship!
🎙️ Want to join the conversation? [Link to call-in info]
📱 Follow on social media: [Your links]
🔗 Related Videos: [Playlist link]
#AtheistDebate #ChristianApologetics #ConsentMatters
Get Jesus From Outerspace Audio Book: https://amzn.to/3EGj5Vb
Daily Bible Podcast: https://ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
Chapters
0:00 - Christian Morals Debate: Setting the Stage
2:52 - Jesus Affirms Old Testament Law—Immutability of God
4:41 - Ten Commandments: Women as Property?
6:54 - 1 Corinthians 7: The Bodily Autonomy Debate Begins
9:02 - Does the Bible Endorse Marital Grape?
13:05 - Eisegesis Defense Falls Apart
17:02 - The Infamous Drop a $10 Bill Scenario
20:07 - Breaking Down the Problematic Take
23:07 - Lathes Perspective: A Woman Responds
26:06 - Marriage ≠ Blanket Consent
27:29 - The James Bond 69 Nos Problem
30:25 - Objective Morality Claim Gets Challenged
Subscribe to this channel: https://ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: https://ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Available Deals
Get the Tariff shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/DefineTariffTShirt
I didnt vote for President Musk Shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/DidntVoteForPresidentMuskEitherShirt
Merch
Download CHRESTUS: https://ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your Citation Fucking Needed Shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
got evidence? shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
btw, evolution is a fact shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
Discord Server: https://ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord Christian Man Uses Rape Apologetics—Gets DESTROYED Over Consent 🤯](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oRBpmeyI9cc/mqdefault.jpg)






