Creationist Name & Shame Series - shonasplace revisited (1/4) @NoToPseudoscience
Creationist Name & Shame Series - shonasplace revisited (1/4)  @NoToPseudoscience
Uploaded April 2009 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY.

I'm citing "Fair Use" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.
aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdf
Also "Fair Dealing" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a
opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4
Censorship is NOT a valid argument.

This is a follow-up video in relation to my last CNS Episode. I have expanded my original name and shame and I have explained why I am revisiting this Creationist in this part.

This video covers the exploits of one shonasplace, who seems to think that she can clothe intolerance and bigotry in the form of "peace and love" with the Bible. She makes statements on one hand about everyone being equal, and then makes sweeping statements against people in interracial relationships. Such intolerance and bigotry is vile and disgusting and must be pointed out.

This is Part 1 of 4. The remaining parts will be added as and when they have been completed.
Creationist Name & Shame Series - shonasplace revisited (1/4)NephilimFree rebuttal - Italian Wall Lizards (Mirror)Educating NephilimFree - Part 7Critical Analysis of What The Bleep Do We Know Part 6Talking Points: The UK is not a free speech country because topless women were arrested!On the subject of trollsNowhere to sit, with a broken cruise control...Creationist Name and Shame Series - smokeysportTalking Points: The Social ContractStandard Oil and Predatory PricingTalking Points: Another frivolous collectionTalking Points: Is killing/stealing/kidnap unethical?
No To Pseudoscience |

Creationist Name & Shame Series - shonasplace revisited (1/4)

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER