Educating NephilimFree - Part 7 @NoToPseudoscience
Educating NephilimFree - Part 7  @NoToPseudoscience
Uploaded November 2008 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY.

I'm citing "Fair Use" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.
aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdf
Also "Fair Dealing" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a
opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4
Censorship is NOT a valid argument.

Apologies for the quality of the video. A replacement will follow after the series is complete.

This is the part 7 of a series that will debunk NephilimFree's attack against two UC Berkeley Post-Grad students who themselves debunk Creationist Pseudoscience.

NephilimFree sees fit to be insulting, condescending and hypocritical in his childish attack on them and he still defends this steaming pile of evidence-free doctrine-laden theological-pornographic miracle-saturated bullshit of his, as can be seen on the comments on BereanBeacon's hosting of the video in its entirety, and so I have chosen to put this BS to rest, and once and for all show NephilimFree to be the vile disgusting hypocritical lying Creationist that he truly is.
Educating NephilimFree - Part 7Critical Analysis of What The Bleep Do We Know Part 6Talking Points: The UK is not a free speech country because topless women were arrested!On the subject of trollsNowhere to sit, with a broken cruise control...Creationist Name and Shame Series - smokeysportTalking Points: The Social ContractStandard Oil and Predatory PricingTalking Points: Another frivolous collectionTalking Points: Is killing/stealing/kidnap unethical?Socialist Alarm Clock - Extended VersionRE: Nazra7 vs FSAthe1st (and Atheism?) 2/3
No To Pseudoscience |

Educating NephilimFree - Part 7

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER