Critical Analysis of What The Bleep Do We Know Part 6 @NoToPseudoscience
Critical Analysis of What The Bleep Do We Know Part 6  @NoToPseudoscience
Uploaded May 2012 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Update: Comment approval now removed. You are free to comment as you wish. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:

I'm citing "Fair Use" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.
aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdf

Also "Fair Dealing" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a
opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4

Censorship is NOT a valid argument.

This is the sixth part of my critical analysis of "What The Bleep Do We Know?! Down The Rabbit Hole". Having laid the groundwork for Part 5 in recent months, it has allowed me to have Part 6 prepared for upload within 24 hours of the previous video, so I decided to post it now.

Links that are not provided in the video itself will be added in due course.

Information on cold fusion is provided here, via Wikipedia. Be sure to follow up the provided sources to verify the information:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion
Critical Analysis of What The Bleep Do We Know Part 6Talking Points: The UK is not a free speech country because topless women were arrested!On the subject of trollsNowhere to sit, with a broken cruise control...Creationist Name and Shame Series - smokeysportTalking Points: The Social ContractStandard Oil and Predatory PricingTalking Points: Another frivolous collectionTalking Points: Is killing/stealing/kidnap unethical?Socialist Alarm Clock - Extended VersionRE: Nazra7 vs FSAthe1st (and Atheism?) 2/3Onision sinks even lower still...
No To Pseudoscience |

Critical Analysis of "What The Bleep Do We Know" Part 6

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER