Coherentism vs Foundationalism Epistemology Debate James Fodor vs David Pallman @JamesFodor
Coherentism vs Foundationalism Epistemology Debate James Fodor vs David Pallman  @JamesFodor
Uploaded November 2021 | Updated September 2026, 16 hours ago
David Pallman and I discuss our respective views on epistemology. Epistemology is the branch of philosophy which examines the basis for knowledge and methods of acquiring knowledge. In this conversation, David defends a version of internalist foundationalism, while James defends a version of weak coherentism.

Originally recorded August 2021.

Link to original video:
youtube.com/watch?v=AzK-8-zWvlU
Coherentism vs Foundationalism Epistemology Debate James Fodor vs David PallmanCar Chat 5: Counter-Apologetics, the Incarnation, and AtonementThe Urgent Case for Jesus - A Discussion with the Greg SheridanIs Psychophysical Harmony a good argument for Theism?Is Materialism Destroying America? A Materialist RespondsA Skeptical Analysis of the 1917 Marian Apparitions and Miracle of the SunActual Reasons to be an Atheist - Responding to Capturing Christianity (again!)Heres what Craig will say about the Kalam Documentary...Responding to Inspiring Philosophy about Digital Physics and GodThe Case Against Theism - Refuting the Resurrection ArgumentInspiring Philosophy Still Misrepresents ScienceCameron asked about miracle claims. I answered.
James Fodor |

Coherentism vs Foundationalism Epistemology Debate James Fodor vs David Pallman

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER