Uploaded February 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
A Christian caller named Young Judas calls into "God is FAKE Prove Us Wrong" and argues that God doesn't need consent to impregnate a 14-year-old child — and then doubles down when confronted with his own logic. This is one of the most jaw-dropping calls we've ever taken.
It starts with a simple question: Did God ask Mary for consent in Luke 1? Young Judas immediately pivots to comparing human beings to God's toys — literally saying God asking for consent would be like asking his Legos for permission to play with them. The host walks him through a modern consent framework, showing that Gabriel never asked Mary anything — he declared, "You will conceive and bear a son." Mary's only response? "I am your slave. Let it be done to me." That's not enthusiastic consent. That's acquiescence under an impossible power imbalance.
When the host presents a hypothetical — cornering a 14-year-old in an alley and telling her "you will bear my child" — Young Judas agrees that would be assault for a human. But for God? He gets a pass. The special pleading gets broken down in real time, and the caller is forced to answer the question directly: Can God impregnate children? His answer will leave you stunned.
This episode addresses biblical morality, the problem of divine consent, Mary's age, special pleading as a logical fallacy, and why "God is above human rules" is not a valid moral defense.
🔔 SUBSCRIBE and hit the notification bell so you never miss a call-in debate!
Get your tickets to the NIHB Conference: ge.hopp.to/NIHB-2026
#GodIsFake #BibleMorality #Atheism
Chapters:
00:00 - "God Doesn't Need Your Consent"
02:30 - He Compares Humans to God's LEGOS
05:00 - Secular Morality vs. Divine Command Theory
07:00 - "Heaven Justifies Everything"—Does It?
09:00 - Where Is Mary's Consent in Luke 1?
11:30 - "She Was 14"—Caller Makes Excuses
13:30 - The Alley Hypothetical That Ends It All
16:00 - "Only God Can Impregnate Children"
18:00 - Special Pleading Gets Exposed
20:00 - Why I Hung Up on a Child SA Apologist
Get Jesus From Outerspace Audio Book: amzn.to/3EGj5Vb
Daily Bible Podcast: ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
Subscribe to this channel: ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Merch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download CHRESTUS: ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your "Citation Fucking Needed" Shirt: ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
"got evidence?" shirt: ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
"btw, evolution is a fact" shirt: ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discord Server: ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord
A Christian caller named Young Judas calls into "God is FAKE Prove Us Wrong" and argues that God doesn't need consent to impregnate a 14-year-old child — and then doubles down when confronted with his own logic. This is one of the most jaw-dropping calls we've ever taken.
It starts with a simple question: Did God ask Mary for consent in Luke 1? Young Judas immediately pivots to comparing human beings to God's toys — literally saying God asking for consent would be like asking his Legos for permission to play with them. The host walks him through a modern consent framework, showing that Gabriel never asked Mary anything — he declared, "You will conceive and bear a son." Mary's only response? "I am your slave. Let it be done to me." That's not enthusiastic consent. That's acquiescence under an impossible power imbalance.
When the host presents a hypothetical — cornering a 14-year-old in an alley and telling her "you will bear my child" — Young Judas agrees that would be assault for a human. But for God? He gets a pass. The special pleading gets broken down in real time, and the caller is forced to answer the question directly: Can God impregnate children? His answer will leave you stunned.
This episode addresses biblical morality, the problem of divine consent, Mary's age, special pleading as a logical fallacy, and why "God is above human rules" is not a valid moral defense.
🔔 SUBSCRIBE and hit the notification bell so you never miss a call-in debate!
Get your tickets to the NIHB Conference: ge.hopp.to/NIHB-2026
#GodIsFake #BibleMorality #Atheism
Chapters:
00:00 - "God Doesn't Need Your Consent"
02:30 - He Compares Humans to God's LEGOS
05:00 - Secular Morality vs. Divine Command Theory
07:00 - "Heaven Justifies Everything"—Does It?
09:00 - Where Is Mary's Consent in Luke 1?
11:30 - "She Was 14"—Caller Makes Excuses
13:30 - The Alley Hypothetical That Ends It All
16:00 - "Only God Can Impregnate Children"
18:00 - Special Pleading Gets Exposed
20:00 - Why I Hung Up on a Child SA Apologist
Get Jesus From Outerspace Audio Book: amzn.to/3EGj5Vb
Daily Bible Podcast: ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
Subscribe to this channel: ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Merch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download CHRESTUS: ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your "Citation Fucking Needed" Shirt: ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
"got evidence?" shirt: ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
"btw, evolution is a fact" shirt: ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discord Server: ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord



![Jesus Last Words: Inspiring Philosophys Fix Just Backfired 🤯
Jesus last words contradiction — can Inspiring Philosophys fix actually survive it? Matthew and Mark, Luke, and John each give Jesus a different last line on the cross.
Michael Jones (Inspiring Philosophy) says its not a contradiction — but his own defense backfires into a worse problem: either the gospels report what Jesus said and when, or they dont.
Get your Nanocon Tickets: https://ge.hopp.to/NaNoCon2026Tickets
In this response, Inspiring Philosophy (Michael Jones) argues the four different last words of Jesus arent a contradiction because the gospel authors transplanted sayings to the moment before he died. We break down why that defense backfires — and what it does to gospel reliability. We cover gospel contradictions, eisegesis vs exegesis, the Gospel of Lukes orderly account, hagiography vs biography, Mike Liconas transplanting claim, and the criteria of authenticity.
• The four different last words — Matthew/Mark (My God, why have you forsaken me?), Luke (Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit), John (I thirst / It is finished).
• Eisegesis vs exegesis — reading your conclusion INTO the text vs drawing it OUT of it.
• Lukes own orderly account (Luke 1) — why orderly means sequential, and how that sinks the transplant defense.
• Hagiography vs biography — why a text written to venerate Jesus isnt doing history.
• Mike Liconas transplant a saying to a later time claim — and the dilemma it opens.
• The criteria of authenticity — and why the methods for sorting real sayings from invented ones dont hold up.
The trap: if each author moved Jesus words to the moment right before he died, then the gospels are misreporting what he said and when — or theyre accurate and these are flat contradictions. Which one is it?
⏱️ CHAPTERS (timestamps are from the CURRENT cut — RE-TIME against the final edit; a cold-open splice is planned that shifts everything)
00:00 Driven by vibes — the line that sinks the fix
00:33 Four gospels, four different last words
01:11 Eisegesis vs exegesis
02:05 Lukes orderly account problem
02:40 How ancient biographers handled contradictions
03:24 Liconas transplant a saying defense
04:44 Hagiography isnt history
05:27 The trap: misreporting, or contradictions?
05:56 The criteria are just vibes
🔗 RELATED — keep going down the rabbit hole
▶️ FULL PLAYLIST — Gospel Contradictions & Bible Reliability: [playlist URL — TBD; create + seed with this video]
▶️ The Gospels ARE NOT Historically Reliable...At All — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSehmpSOSK4
▶️ The Gospel Of Luke Is NOT Historically Reliable — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtPNmJ8sQKk
▶️ Comparing The Gospels To Other Historical Biographies — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v zZ09Qh42y4
▶️ Who Wrote The Gospels? ft. Mike Licona & Gary Habermas — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgiJdNBXIYo
▶️ The Gospels REALLY Are Anonymous ft. Bart Ehrman — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm9KF8OG6no
▶️ Embarrassment Criteria DESTROYED by Its Own Logic 🤯 — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHGsqgeZXp4
📚 SOURCES MENTIONED: Mike Licona (ancient-biography transplanting claim) · the Gospel of Luke 1:1-4 orderly account · Arrian on Alexander the Great (reconciling contradictory sources) · Bart Ehrman
Follow me everywhere:
🐦 Threads: https://ge.hopp.to/GEOnThreads
📘 Facebook: https://ge.hopp.to/GEFacebook
💬 Discord: http://bit.ly/JoinGodlessDiscord
🎞️ Main Channel: https://ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Get Jesus From Outerspace Audio Book: https://amzn.to/3EGj5Vb
Daily Bible Podcast: https://ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
Subscribe to this channel: https://ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: https://ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Available Deals
Get the Tariff shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/DefineTariffTShirt
I didnt vote for President Musk Shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/DidntVoteForPresidentMuskEitherShirt
Merch
Download CHRESTUS: https://ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your Citation Fucking Needed Shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
got evidence? shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
btw, evolution is a fact shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
Discord Server: https://ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord
#GodIsFake #BibleContradictions #CounterApologetics Jesus Last Words: Inspiring Philosophys Fix Just Backfired 🤯](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mmegqXjs1eM/mqdefault.jpg)






![Christian Man Uses Rape Apologetics—Gets DESTROYED Over Consent 🤯
Christian caller Colgate Dre defends biblical marriage authority using Ephesians 5 and 1 Corinthians 7—but gets absolutely demolished when pressed on consent, bodily autonomy, and the drop a $10 bill scenario. This intense debate covers Old Testament law, womens submission in Christian marriage, and whether the Bible endorses marital grape. Watch as atheists systematically dismantle his arguments while another guest, Lathe, weighs in with a womans perspective on these disturbing takes.
In this conversation, we tackle:
✅ Does Jesus affirm Old Testament laws? (Matthew 5:17-19)
✅ Women as property in the Ten Commandments
✅ Ephesians 5:22-25 and wifely submission
✅ 1 Corinthians 7:4-5 and bodily autonomy
✅ What genuine consent means in marriage
✅ The 69 nos and 1 yes = yes problem
✅ Why marriage doesnt give blanket consent
✅ Objective vs subjective Christian morality
This is a masterclass in consent education, biblical criticism, and why Christian morals may do more harm than good regarding womens rights and relationship dynamics.
🔴 SUBSCRIBE for more atheist debates and Christian caller takedowns!
💬 COMMENT: Whats the most problematic Christian marriage teaching youve heard?
👍 LIKE if you believe consent is non-negotiable in ANY relationship!
🎙️ Want to join the conversation? [Link to call-in info]
📱 Follow on social media: [Your links]
🔗 Related Videos: [Playlist link]
#AtheistDebate #ChristianApologetics #ConsentMatters
Get Jesus From Outerspace Audio Book: https://amzn.to/3EGj5Vb
Daily Bible Podcast: https://ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
Chapters
0:00 - Christian Morals Debate: Setting the Stage
2:52 - Jesus Affirms Old Testament Law—Immutability of God
4:41 - Ten Commandments: Women as Property?
6:54 - 1 Corinthians 7: The Bodily Autonomy Debate Begins
9:02 - Does the Bible Endorse Marital Grape?
13:05 - Eisegesis Defense Falls Apart
17:02 - The Infamous Drop a $10 Bill Scenario
20:07 - Breaking Down the Problematic Take
23:07 - Lathes Perspective: A Woman Responds
26:06 - Marriage ≠ Blanket Consent
27:29 - The James Bond 69 Nos Problem
30:25 - Objective Morality Claim Gets Challenged
Subscribe to this channel: https://ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: https://ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Available Deals
Get the Tariff shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/DefineTariffTShirt
I didnt vote for President Musk Shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/DidntVoteForPresidentMuskEitherShirt
Merch
Download CHRESTUS: https://ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your Citation Fucking Needed Shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
got evidence? shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
btw, evolution is a fact shirt: https://ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
Discord Server: https://ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord Christian Man Uses Rape Apologetics—Gets DESTROYED Over Consent 🤯](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oRBpmeyI9cc/mqdefault.jpg)