Uploaded June 2021 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This video is a summary of the way the RBMK reactor in Chernobyl worked, the fatal flaw that caused it to explode as well as short- and long-term consequences and actions taken by the local and federal soviet government in response to the accident. I then give an overview over the most commonly cited de*th toll numbers as well as where they come from before concluding with comparing the dangers of nuclear energy compared to other forms of energy creation.
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999Yt
E-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
The song in the outro was produced by 08 (who gave me no way to credit them), you can listen to the whole remix on my second channel: youtu.be/jZOrMsIOZh0
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
1:19 How an RBMK reactor works
4:46 How an RBMK reactor fails
12:25 Immediate aftermath
20:59 Long term Problems
26:19 Death toll
31:32 Why we care
33:46 Conclusion
Transcript:
On Saturday the 26th of April in 1986 at 01:23 am, an explosion rocked the Vladimir Ilyich Lenin power plant in Pripyat, a few seconds later there was a second larger explosion which among other things destroyed the reactor building and set the roof on fire. This incident caused massive environmental damage and bled the soviet state dry because of the costly measures they had to take to prevent the accident from becoming even worse.
Of course we named this incident after the city which was nearby, Chernobyl. It was the greatest single nuclear accident in history and is the most obvious example of why nuclear power is dangerous, so it is an argument against nuclear power, made by many people. The deaths caused by the accident vary from 31 to 93 thousand.
In this video I will explain how the reactor in Pripyat worked, how it failed, the immediate aftermath, the long-term problems and eventually we will look at the death toll and determine how dangerous nuclear power really is as well as why we talk about this accident so much more than the similar events which happened in western countries.
The Vladimir Lenin power plant was made up of 4 reactors appropriately called reactors one, two, three and four. The reactors in the plant were RBMK reactors which translates to “high-power channel-type reactor”. The special thing about this reactor type was that it had no steel pressure vessels like other reactors.
An RBMK reactor makes electricity by spinning a turbine. For that you need steam. Other power plants make steam by burning coal or oil but in a nuclear power plant you use uranium. Uranium sends out neutrons which then hit another uranium atom and split it into other atoms, this releases heat and more neutrons, keeping the reaction going.
The neutrons themselves move too quickly to actually hit an atom so you slow them down using water and graphite. That water then heats up it goes to drive the turbine. Of course the water is radioactive, since it comes right from the core, so you don’t actually use this water for the turbine but instead you send it through a cooling loop.
That means it cools down and heats a completely separate water loop which then becomes steam and turns the turbine. This way the radioactive water is in a closed loop so it can’t leave the reactor and irradiate things.
The second loop gets it’s cooling water from the nearby pond which is appropriately named cooling pond and once it is steam it is just vented into the atmosphere. The water is not only convenient for moving away the heat but it is also useful because it slows down the speed at which the reaction is happening.
If for some reason the water would turn into steam the reactivity would go way up, so it’s essential that the hot water is moved to the heat exchanger before it becomes steam. In itself the reactor would quickly turn into a nuclear bomb because every split atom releases two or three neutrons which means exponential growth and a lot of energy being released.
To make sure it won’t explode you use control rods which slow down the reaction. In case of an emergency there is a button called AZ-5 which immediately pushes the rods into the core to shut it down. There is one more thing you need to know before we get into the accident. And that is that one of the atoms which is produced when a uranium atom is split is xenon.
And what usually happens is that this xenon is hit by a neutron and burns off. But if you don’t run the reactor on full power then there may not be enough neutrons to burn off the xenon so it would accumulate. The problem with that is that eventually the xenon can be so numerous that it chokes out the reaction by absorbing all neutrons and the reactor power drops to zero.
The RBMK reactor was seen as very safe because it doesn’t use high pressure vessels or enriched uranium. This means that even if there are no control rods in the reactor, and no cooling water, it can not explode.
discord.gg/XgJrrzYysa
This video is a summary of the way the RBMK reactor in Chernobyl worked, the fatal flaw that caused it to explode as well as short- and long-term consequences and actions taken by the local and federal soviet government in response to the accident. I then give an overview over the most commonly cited de*th toll numbers as well as where they come from before concluding with comparing the dangers of nuclear energy compared to other forms of energy creation.
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999Yt
E-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
The song in the outro was produced by 08 (who gave me no way to credit them), you can listen to the whole remix on my second channel: youtu.be/jZOrMsIOZh0
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
1:19 How an RBMK reactor works
4:46 How an RBMK reactor fails
12:25 Immediate aftermath
20:59 Long term Problems
26:19 Death toll
31:32 Why we care
33:46 Conclusion
Transcript:
On Saturday the 26th of April in 1986 at 01:23 am, an explosion rocked the Vladimir Ilyich Lenin power plant in Pripyat, a few seconds later there was a second larger explosion which among other things destroyed the reactor building and set the roof on fire. This incident caused massive environmental damage and bled the soviet state dry because of the costly measures they had to take to prevent the accident from becoming even worse.
Of course we named this incident after the city which was nearby, Chernobyl. It was the greatest single nuclear accident in history and is the most obvious example of why nuclear power is dangerous, so it is an argument against nuclear power, made by many people. The deaths caused by the accident vary from 31 to 93 thousand.
In this video I will explain how the reactor in Pripyat worked, how it failed, the immediate aftermath, the long-term problems and eventually we will look at the death toll and determine how dangerous nuclear power really is as well as why we talk about this accident so much more than the similar events which happened in western countries.
The Vladimir Lenin power plant was made up of 4 reactors appropriately called reactors one, two, three and four. The reactors in the plant were RBMK reactors which translates to “high-power channel-type reactor”. The special thing about this reactor type was that it had no steel pressure vessels like other reactors.
An RBMK reactor makes electricity by spinning a turbine. For that you need steam. Other power plants make steam by burning coal or oil but in a nuclear power plant you use uranium. Uranium sends out neutrons which then hit another uranium atom and split it into other atoms, this releases heat and more neutrons, keeping the reaction going.
The neutrons themselves move too quickly to actually hit an atom so you slow them down using water and graphite. That water then heats up it goes to drive the turbine. Of course the water is radioactive, since it comes right from the core, so you don’t actually use this water for the turbine but instead you send it through a cooling loop.
That means it cools down and heats a completely separate water loop which then becomes steam and turns the turbine. This way the radioactive water is in a closed loop so it can’t leave the reactor and irradiate things.
The second loop gets it’s cooling water from the nearby pond which is appropriately named cooling pond and once it is steam it is just vented into the atmosphere. The water is not only convenient for moving away the heat but it is also useful because it slows down the speed at which the reaction is happening.
If for some reason the water would turn into steam the reactivity would go way up, so it’s essential that the hot water is moved to the heat exchanger before it becomes steam. In itself the reactor would quickly turn into a nuclear bomb because every split atom releases two or three neutrons which means exponential growth and a lot of energy being released.
To make sure it won’t explode you use control rods which slow down the reaction. In case of an emergency there is a button called AZ-5 which immediately pushes the rods into the core to shut it down. There is one more thing you need to know before we get into the accident. And that is that one of the atoms which is produced when a uranium atom is split is xenon.
And what usually happens is that this xenon is hit by a neutron and burns off. But if you don’t run the reactor on full power then there may not be enough neutrons to burn off the xenon so it would accumulate. The problem with that is that eventually the xenon can be so numerous that it chokes out the reaction by absorbing all neutrons and the reactor power drops to zero.
The RBMK reactor was seen as very safe because it doesn’t use high pressure vessels or enriched uranium. This means that even if there are no control rods in the reactor, and no cooling water, it can not explode.
discord.gg/XgJrrzYysa










![Watching basic economics lessons for socialists (And having a laugh at them)
This video is a collection of Basic economics lessons made by right wing people in order to educate leftists/liberals. I take a look at them and point out the problems with literally everything they say. Please note that this is not a comprehensive debunking but rather an attempt to have fun with the faulty arguments they use.
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999Yt
E-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
Sources:
US income inequality: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_inequality_in_the_United_States
US inflation rates: https://www.statista.com/statistics/191077/inflation-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/
Videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yn_ZuL1xz34
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sosOJp5r-EE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIOgvG0oBXM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZfrRSgyAjc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ketK2yGNKpA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ps4LF_NeqTQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14K_86OtB1A
transcript:
Hello everybody, are you tired of ancaps, libertarians and neofascists telling you that you don’t understand basic economics? Have you been wondering what they mean by that? Well fear no longer for I have complied 7 very helpful videos by libertarians and conservatives which totally weren’t just the top result of what youtube returned when I typed “socialists don’t understand basic economics”.
So strap yourselves in, we are gonna learn some stuff today.
Here is this video called “Leftists Don’t Understand Basic Economics“. It’s a video of this very sympathetic looking man watching a video where someone mentions the fact that inequality has been growing and then he says that they have been [Creating 25 Million jobs] since the 80s and that [most of our poor people live better than most people who live in the 3rd world] he also says that “Middle class” is a Marxist term which is a whole new level of wrong but let’s ignore that.
Basic economic lesson one: Inequality isn’t growing, don’t you see the new jobs? Silly socialists are saying inequality is getting worse even though the economy is growing. What? You googled it and it turns out unemployment can be low AND inequality can be high at the same time? Are you saying that there can be more than two things existing at the same time and that the facts show that I am wrong? Aaaaaaahhh Let’s quickly move on before the viewers realize I am talking crap.
The next one is made by Libertarian Views Scotty M, as you can tell he is definitely open to changing his ideology when new facts come along and most definitely isn’t going to hold onto his worldview forever because he built his personality around it. Nothing screams open mind like putting your ideology into your username.
His video is a response to a socialist’s video and he goes over the basics like [our place on this earth is scarce natural resources. As resources don’t last forever. They are not infinite. Resources are finite] so basically there isn’t infinite stuff and we need to somehow manage who get’s stuff and who doesn’t. Then he says that [people who support socialism don’t understand these fundamental basic things]
So, basic economics lesson two: There aren’t infinite resources you silly socialist, there just isn’t enough food for everyone, we need hold onto the free market and let 8 million starve each year. We just don’t have food. Earth only produces food for 10 Billion people, how can we provide for 7.5 Billion with that? Wait a second. I’ve just had an epiphany: 10 is more than 7.5 but wait then why is there such starvation. Could it possibly be that the free market is not efficient enough to provide for everyone and that it only works in some nations in some situations and is unfit as a global economic system? If only someone had made a 12 minute and 52 second video explaining exactly how poverty and starvation happen in such a resource rich world which overproduces products like that. If that was true we might all be a bit smarter.
Scotty then says that the only way products can be allocated is via the free market because [if you do not support a money based system. If you support a money less system, How the hell are you to know the information of what to produce more of how much to produce, you know where to allocate the scarce natural resources. The reason why I say that is because you have no way of knowing that information without the information of prices]. Watching basic economics lessons for socialists (And having a laugh at them)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SlnlmKB5_2Q/mqdefault.jpg)