Uploaded August 2022 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Karen Brimm. (2021). "Interpreters Collaborating in K-12 Education." In ADVANCES IN EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETING, edited by Elizabeth A. Winston and Stephen B. Fitzmaurice, 266-284. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
https://gupress.gallaudet.edu/Books/A/Advances-in-Educational-Interpreting
This video may not be repurposed or incorporated into other works in any way without the express written consent of the signer and the chapter author.
+++++++
Hello, my name is Karen Brimm. This chapter is called “Interpreters Collaborating in K-12, Education. Educational interpreters do not work alone; they often work with other educational professionals, which will abbreviate as OEP’s, that group tends to include mainstream classroom teachers, special education teachers, teachers of the Deaf, and speech-language pathologists. This chapter reviews research from Caldwell-Langer from 2004, and her research collected feedback from interpreters working in educational environments who often struggled to collaborate with other people in that environment. My more recent research includes the perspective of OEP’s as well.
Relating to this chapter, collaboration will be defined specifically as a process that is continual and involves the shared goals of attempting to successfully provide access to education and socialization for deaf students. This chapter includes from the interpreter perspective on their role, and also the educational professional perspective as to what the interpreter role is; discusses communication break downs and examines how they happen and how to repair it. This research also looks at the control of bodies and spaces and how people share that environment in a professional way. This recent research attempts to identify patterns of practice for interpreters. In order to do that first, an online survey was distributed in the U.S. survey, which included interpreters and OEP’s. 79 interpreters and 41 OEPs participated and their responses were analyzed. And then that group was asked if any of them wanted to volunteer to sit down for interviews, which were conducted online and recorded through Zoom. Out of that volunteer group, one person from each job description was selected randomly. They answered various questions, and those answers were analyzed. It was recognized that yes, collaboration is in fact happening, but it may not be happening every day because people tend to forget that collaboration must include a shared and common goal. People must set aside specific time to be able to discuss issues and collaborate with each other, to support each other and share knowledge and expertise. Also, they must have a way to build relationships with each other and they must have mutual respect. Remember, educational interpreters do not work alone. They work with other people who are all trying to provide their knowledge and expertise; interpreters provide linguistic expertise and cultural mediation, and teachers provide expertise in academics and a background in instruction and curriculum. Together, that group of people can successfully provide access to education and socialization for the deaf student.
Karen Brimm. (2021). "Interpreters Collaborating in K-12 Education." In ADVANCES IN EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETING, edited by Elizabeth A. Winston and Stephen B. Fitzmaurice, 266-284. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
https://gupress.gallaudet.edu/Books/A/Advances-in-Educational-Interpreting
This video may not be repurposed or incorporated into other works in any way without the express written consent of the signer and the chapter author.
+++++++
Hello, my name is Karen Brimm. This chapter is called “Interpreters Collaborating in K-12, Education. Educational interpreters do not work alone; they often work with other educational professionals, which will abbreviate as OEP’s, that group tends to include mainstream classroom teachers, special education teachers, teachers of the Deaf, and speech-language pathologists. This chapter reviews research from Caldwell-Langer from 2004, and her research collected feedback from interpreters working in educational environments who often struggled to collaborate with other people in that environment. My more recent research includes the perspective of OEP’s as well.
Relating to this chapter, collaboration will be defined specifically as a process that is continual and involves the shared goals of attempting to successfully provide access to education and socialization for deaf students. This chapter includes from the interpreter perspective on their role, and also the educational professional perspective as to what the interpreter role is; discusses communication break downs and examines how they happen and how to repair it. This research also looks at the control of bodies and spaces and how people share that environment in a professional way. This recent research attempts to identify patterns of practice for interpreters. In order to do that first, an online survey was distributed in the U.S. survey, which included interpreters and OEP’s. 79 interpreters and 41 OEPs participated and their responses were analyzed. And then that group was asked if any of them wanted to volunteer to sit down for interviews, which were conducted online and recorded through Zoom. Out of that volunteer group, one person from each job description was selected randomly. They answered various questions, and those answers were analyzed. It was recognized that yes, collaboration is in fact happening, but it may not be happening every day because people tend to forget that collaboration must include a shared and common goal. People must set aside specific time to be able to discuss issues and collaborate with each other, to support each other and share knowledge and expertise. Also, they must have a way to build relationships with each other and they must have mutual respect. Remember, educational interpreters do not work alone. They work with other people who are all trying to provide their knowledge and expertise; interpreters provide linguistic expertise and cultural mediation, and teachers provide expertise in academics and a background in instruction and curriculum. Together, that group of people can successfully provide access to education and socialization for the deaf student.







![Ch 5. Substance Use Disorders Among Deaf Offenders
Guthmann, D., & Kolvitz, M. (2021). Substance use disorders among deaf offenders. In D. Guthmann, G. I. Lomas, D. Goff Paris, & G. A. Martin (Eds.), DEAF PEOPLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (pp. 82-114). Gallaudet University Press.
https://gupress.gallaudet.edu/Books/D/Deaf-People-in-the-Criminal-Justice-System
This video may not be repurposed or incorporated into other works in any way without the express written consent of the signer and the chapter author.
Transcript:
Chapter 5, Substance Use Disorders Among Deaf Offenders
Dr. Guthmann and Dr. Kolvitz
Dr. Debra Guthmann is one of the editors of this publication and coauthored this chapter with Dr. Marcia Kolvitz. Dr. Guthmann has worked within the Deaf community for over 40 years in educational (secondary and postsecondary), medical, and social service settings. Dr. Guthmann was the founding director of the Minnesota Substance Use Disorder Program for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Individuals which opened in 1989 and was one of the first inpatient treatment programs for DHH Individuals in the country. Dr. Guthmann is currently the lead consultant for a federal grant with Wright State University focusing on the validation of mental health, substance abuse, and career-related screening tools in American Sign Language. Dr. Kolvitz is a consultant who focuses on issues related to education, vocational rehabilitation, and transition services. She has over 40 years of experience addressing education and access issues for students who are deaf and hard of hearing in K-12 programs and postsecondary educational settings. Dr. Guthmann and Dr. Kolvitz are both past presidents of ADARA.
In Chapter 5, Substance Use Disorders Among Deaf Offenders, Dr. Guthmann and Dr. Kolvitz discuss the intersection of substance use, mental health, and criminal behavior among deaf people. They address the presence of co-occurring disorders related to deaf offenders who have substance abuse issues. Throughout the chapter, the experiences of two deaf men are included to give the reader insight into the life experiences of deaf offenders with substance use and mental health issues.
Guthmann and Kolvitz begin the chapter by discussing the prevalence of substance use and criminal activity within the hearing community. Unfortunately, there has been little research to date about the prevalence among inmates who are deaf. The authors include an overview of some of the literature that has been published focusing on substance use and criminal activity within the deaf community. This literature review also includes the discussion of several small prison studies involving deaf inmates, a recently completed prevalence study regarding substance use with deaf individuals, information about barriers, and a follow-up study that was completed by those who had gone through treatment. The chapter highlights the need for more research in these areas.
Dr. Guthmann and Dr. Kolvitz discuss how deaf offenders face a number of barriers to communication and other kinds of access throughout the criminal justice system. They highlight the need for providing effective communication access–whether through ASL interpreters, videophones, video relay services, printed materials, visual notifications, or TTYs to assist deaf individuals to better understand the judicial process as well as the rules and procedures that typically occur in correctional facilities.
The authors also discuss the gaps in state and federal prisons that exist between available addiction treatment, inmate participation, and the need for such services. Guthmann and Kolvitz share anecdotal stories from deaf inmates who are in facilities where they are housed with other deaf inmates, and examples from those who may be the only deaf individual in their facility. They discuss how deaf inmates may be unable to access prison programming such as substance use treatment and 12-Step Programs and that without an interpreter or other support services, these individuals may be released much later than if that access was provided. Further exacerbating the problem is that currently, there are no evidence-based treatment programs specifically designed for deaf individuals, whether incarcerated or not. The lack of accessible options for deaf individuals who may be required to participate in treatment as terms of their release is problematic since few if any programs are available in most communities.
Another area that the chapter covers are those deaf individuals who may have a mental illness, learning disabilities, attention deficit disorder, or cognitive disabilities, and how this has been linked to increased rates of substance abuse within the general population. The authors discuss the importance of conducting assessments and providing accurate diagnoses to identify and better understand hidden disabilities among deaf individuals, including those who are incarcerated.
[Please see the comments for the remainder of the transcript.] Ch 5. Substance Use Disorders Among Deaf Offenders](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BAH2JIJ6IFM/mqdefault.jpg)


