@AirCrashDaily
  @AirCrashDaily
Air Crash Daily | Aeroperรบ Flight 603 CVR Recording (Clearer Version) @AirCrashDaily | Uploaded December 2023 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
Follow us on Instagram: instagram.com/aircrashdaily/?hl=en

Source: newsroom.ap.org/editorial-photos-videos/detail?itemid=386924bd6214f3a5a1fb5364871de057&mediatype=video

Full Version: youtu.be/-pWaY4wra3w?si=mi1Ehy7N0WG9bWk1

Accident Description: instagram.com/p/CjNl-XOP1Zs/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

๐—”๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜‚ ๐—™๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ ๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฏ was a scheduled international passenger flight from Miami to Santiago with intermediate stops in Quito and Lima. The flight was being operated by a Boeing 757-200 (Reg. N52AW) on ๐—ข๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐Ÿฎ, ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต๐Ÿฒ.

The plane took off from Lima's runway 15 at 00:42 local time for the last leg to Santiago. 5 minutes after takeoff the crew reported problems with their instruments and stated they wanted to return to the airport. During the initial climb, the airspeed and altitude indications were too low. In calm winds, the windshear warning suddenly sounded. The plane climbed to FL130, before a return to Lima was initiated. While returning, the captain's airspeed indications were too high, causing an overspeed warning. At the same time, the co-pilot's airspeed indications were too low, triggering the stick shaker.

The plane kept descending and impacted the water with the left wing and no. 1 engine at a 10ยฐ angle, at a speed of 260 knots. The crew attempted to climb and the plane pulled up to about 200 feet before crashing inverted 22 seconds later. The captain's airspeed indicated 450 knots and altitude 9,500 feet. Investigation results showed that the plane's three static ports on the left side were obstructed by duct tape. The tape had been applied before washing and polishing of the plane prior to the accident flight.

๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€:

ERROR OF THE MAINTENANCE STAFF INCLUDING THE CREW

It can be deduced from the investigation carried out that the maintenance staff did not remove the protective adhesive tape from the static ports. This tape was not detected during the various phases of the aircraft's release to the line mechanic, its transfer to the passenger boarding apron and, lastly, the inspection by the crew responsible for the flight (the walk-around or pre-flight check), which was carried out by the pilot-in-command, [name], according to the mechanic responsible for the aircraft on the day of the accident.

๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€:

b.1) PERSONAL ERROR OF THE CREW

The pilot-in-command, Mr [name], made a personal error by not complying with the procedure for GPWS alarms and not noticing the readings of the radio altimeters in order to discard everything which he believed to be fictitious.

b.2) PERSONAL ERROR INCLUDING THE CREW

The co-pilot, Mr DAVID FERNรNDEZ REVOREDO, made a personal error by not being more insistent, assertive and convincing in alerting the pilot-in-command much more emphatically to the ground proximity alarms.
Aeroperรบ Flight 603 CVR Recording (Clearer Version)Colgan Air Flight 3407 NTSB AnimationEl Al Flight 1862 Police & Fire Brigade Radio RecordingEastern Air Lines Flight 66 ATC Recording1979 Indian Airlines Hindustan Aerospace Ltd. HAL-748 (VT-DXJ) Crash Aftermath FootageAero Transporti Italiani (ATI) Flight 392 Aftermath FootageSabena Flight 548 Aftermath FootageConviasa Flight 2350 CVR RecordingAir Rhodesia Flight 827 Aftermath FootageNorthwest Airlines Flight 255 NTSB AnimationChina Airlines Flight 006 ATC RecordingKorean Air Lines Flight 007 CVR Recording

Aeroperรบ Flight 603 CVR Recording (Clearer Version) @AirCrashDaily

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER